PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B McNeney

Publications and source records attributed to B McNeney.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

D6S265*15 marks a DRB1*15, DQB1*0602 haplotype associated with attenuated protection from type 1 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The HLA class II DQB1*0602 allele confers strong dominant protection against type 1 diabetes but protection is not absolute. The aim of this study was to identify markers within the HLA region that differentiate DQB1*0602 haplotypes and show different associations with disease risk. METHODS: We defined alleles at eight microsatellite markers spanning the HLA region in a case-control cohort from Sweden. RESULTS: We found that allele 15 at marker D6S265 (109 kb centromeric of HLA-A) was over-represented among patients carrying DRB1*15, DQB1*0602. A detailed haplotype analysis showed that DRB1*15, DQB1*0602 haplotypes carrying D6S265*15 have a ten-fold higher odds ratio (OR) than those carrying other alleles and thus confer reduced protection [OR D6S265*15=0.186 (95% CI 0.074, 0.472) vs OR D6S265*15-=0.017 (95% CI 0.005, 0.062), p<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Our data support the existence of a locus that modifies the protective effect associated with DQB1*0602. Typing for allele D6S265*15 can identify a less protective DQB1*0602 haplotype, thereby allowing a more accurate prediction of type 1 diabetes risk.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Patient-oriented outcomes from low back surgery: a community-based study.

STUDY DESIGN: This study used a prospective cohort design. OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with favorable self-reported patient outcomes 1 year after elective surgery for degenerative back problems. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Many previous studies addressing the results of low back surgery have been conducted in academic institutions or by single surgeons. As part of a quality improvement effort, surgeons in private practice led a community-based outcomes management project in Washington State. METHODS: Patients ages 18 and older with the following diagnoses were eligible for the study: degenerative changes, herniated disc, instability, and spinal stenosis. Nine orthopedists and neurosurgeons enrolled a total of 281 patients. Participants were asked to complete baseline and 1-year follow-up surveys. Data concerning diagnoses, clinical signs, and operative procedures were provided by the surgeons. The researchers examined sociodemographic characteristics, self-reported symptoms before surgery, preoperative clinical signs, diagnoses, and operative procedures associated with three primary outcomes: better functioning, improved quality of life, and overall treatment satisfaction. RESULTS: Follow-up surveys were completed by 236 (84%) of the enrolled patients. Approximately two thirds of the study participants reported much better functioning (65%), a great quality of life improvement (64%), and a very positive perspective about their treatment outcome (68%). The following variables were associated with worse patient outcomes: older age, previous low back surgery, workers' compensation coverage, and consultation with an attorney before surgery. Patients undergoing a fusion procedure were more likely to report good outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' experience indicates that community-based outcomes data collection efforts are feasible and can be incorporated into usual clinical practice. The study results indicate that compensation payments and litigation are two important predictors of poor outcomes after low back surgery in community practice. Because of small numbers, varied diagnoses, and possible selection bias, the findings with respect to fusion should be interpreted cautiously.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

5-year reoperation rates after different types of lumbar spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Population-based cohort study of Washington State patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions in 1988. OBJECTIVES: To compare complications and reoperation rates during the 5-year period after surgery between patients who have undergone lumbar spine fusion surgery and those who have undergone laminectomy or discectomy alone. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal fusion is associated with wider surgical exposure, more extensive dissection, and longer operative times than lumbar surgery without fusion, and previous studies have shown higher complication rates and hospital charges associated with these more complex procedures. In elderly patients, spinal fusion operations were associated with higher mortality rates than laminectomy or discectomy alone, and reoperation rates were not lower. In the current study, reoperations, mortality, and complications following lumbar spine surgery were examined for the general population. METHODS: A statewide hospital discharge database was used to identify all Washington patients who underwent spine surgery in 1988 and to determine the rate of reoperation during the subsequent 5 years. Administrative records also were used to identify complications, mortality, and hospital charges associated with the operations. Unadjusted complication and reoperation rates for the groups were compared using chi-square statistics. Adjusted rates were compared using logistic regression and proportional hazards (Cox) regression after controlling for age, gender, prior spine surgery, diagnosis, comorbidity, type of surgery, and coverage by Workers' Compensation. RESULTS: Of 6376 patients who underwent lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions in Washington in 1988, 1041 (16%) had operations involving spine fusion. Diagnoses of degenerative disc disease or possible instability were more frequent among patients undergoing fusion surgery, whereas herniated discs were more frequent among those undergoing discectomy or laminectomy alone. Complications were recorded in 18% of fusion patients and 7% of nonfusion patients (P < 0.01), but mortality rates did not differ. Unadjusted reoperation rates over the 5-year period were greater for patients who underwent fusion than for patients who underwent nonfusion surgery (18% vs. 15%, respectively), but after adjustment for baseline characteristics, fusion patients had only a slightly greater (and nonsignificant) risk of reoperation (relative risk 1.1, confidence interval .9-1.3). CONCLUSION: As in previous studies, complications in the current study occurred more frequently among patients who underwent lumbar spine fusion than among those who underwent laminectomy or discectomy alone. Reoperations were at least as frequent after fusion, but the authors could not assess treatment efficacy in terms of pain relief or improved function. Although the characteristics of patients undergoing fusion differed from those undergoing a laminectomy or discectomy alone, there appeared to be sufficient overlap in the clinical populations to warrant closer scrutiny of the safety, efficacy, and indications for spinal fusions, preferably in randomized trials.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Hospitalizations for back and neck problems: a comparison between the Province of Ontario and Washington State.

OBJECTIVE: To examine back and neck hospitalizations in the Province of Ontario and Washington State. Because of their different organization and financing, there has been considerable interest in comparing healthcare systems in Canada and the United States. Features of healthcare systems might be expected to result in greater variations in care for elective than urgent conditions. DATA SOURCE: Automated hospital discharge databases. STUDY DESIGN: Previously developed algorithms were used to identify surgical and nonsurgical hospitalizations for back and neck problems in the administrative databases. We compared overall rates of hospitalization and lengths of hospital stay in Ontario and Washington as well as small area variations within the province and state. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Surgical back and neck hospitalizations were three times as common in Washington, but medical hospitalizations were twice as common in Ontario. Provincial lengths of stay were longer for both surgical and nonsurgical hospitalizations. Admission rates varied substantially and significantly among small areas in both Washington and Ontario. Variations in hospital length of stay were greater in Ontario, particularly for nonsurgical back and neck hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: The two jurisdictions had very different patterns of hospital utilization for one of the most common health problems seen by physicians. Our results suggest that the global controls on hospital budgets and access to technology in Ontario were associated with lower rates of surgery, higher rates of hospital-based medical care, and longer lengths of stay. They also indicate that the utilization review process in Washington was associated with lower small area variation rates for medical back care.

Adult↗