How to critically evaluate an anesthesia practice: lessons from the American Society of Anesthesiologists.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to B McPeek.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A modified critical-incident analysis technique was used in a retrospective examination of the characteristics of human error and equipment failure in anesthetic practice. The objective was to uncover patterns of frequently occurring incidents that are in need of careful prospective investigation. Forty-seven interviews were conducted with staff and resident anesthesiologists at one urban teaching institution, and descriptions of 359 preventable incidents were obtained. Twenty-three categories of details from these descriptions were subjected to computer-aided analysis for trends and patterns. Most of the preventable incidents involved human error (82 per cent), with breathing-circuit disconnections, inadvertent changes in gas flow, and drug-syringe errors being frequent problems. Overt equipment failures constituted only 14 per cent of the total number of preventable incidents, but equipment design was indictable in many categories of human error, as were inadequate experience and insufficient familiarity with equipment or with the specific surgical procedure. Other factors frequently associated with incidents were inadequate communication among personnel, haste or lack of precaution, and distraction. Results from multi-hospital studies based on the methodology developed could be used for more objective determination of priorities and planning of specific investments for decreasing the risk associated with anesthesia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Two indices of postoperative morbidity, Nursing Assessment Index and Observed Treatment Index, are described and evaluated in this study of 4,182 consecutive anesthetics. The use of these indices in studies of the quality and effectiveness of surgical and anesthetic care should increase the economy and precision with which the causes of unsatisfactory outcome are identified. Specific illustrations of the relationship of the preanesthetic status of patients to their postoperative morbidity as measured by these indices and mortality rates are given. In addition these two indices of morbidity measured on the seventh postoperative day are shown to be strongly co-related with subsequent in-hospital deaths. Thus, of the 100 patients with a Nursing Assessment Index worse than 3, 19 percent died; only 0.4 percent of the 550 patients who had no morbidity as measured by this index died. Although they ultimately survive, about an equal number of patients become seriously ill as die follow operations.