PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Michot

Publications and source records attributed to B Michot.

36 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Structure of the 5'-external transcribed spacer of the human ribosomal RNA gene.

We report the complete nucleotide sequence of the 3627 bp long 5'-external transcribed spacer (ETS) of a human ribosomal RNA gene. This sequence exhibits only very limited homologies with its mouse counterpart, the only other mammalian specimen analyzed so far. It has very peculiar compositional characteristics, with a highly biased base content (very rich in G + C, very poor in A) and also some very strong dinucleotide preferences. Interestingly, these specific features are shared by the mouse sequence, despite the extensive sequence divergence, and also apply to the other transcribed spacers of mammals indicating that a common and strong structural constraint is exerted on all these regions of the ribosomal gene. An outstanding secondary structure can be formed within the human ETS RNA, which could have a significant role in preribosome assembly.

Animals↗

Mouse U3-RNA-processed pseudogenes are nonrandomly integrated into genomic DNA. Implications for the process of retrogene formation.

We have characterized three mouse U3-RNA-processed pseudogenes. Together with previous analyses of mouse functional genes and of rat genes and pseudogenes, these data provide some insights into the processes of U3 retrogene formation during the evolution of rodents. All the mouse retrogenes correspond to a full-length U3B-coding sequence with a 3'-poly(A) tail and are precisely flanked by a pair of direct repeats, in agreement with formation through an RNA intermediate followed by insertion at staggered nicks in the genome. All the rodents U3 retrogenes identified so far are produced from a U3B-RNA form, with two of them (one for each rodent) formed from a 3'-elongated U3-RNA precursor, pointing to the particular susceptibility of RNA precursors forms to serve as templates for retrogene formation. Rodent full-length U3 retrogenes are not inserted randomly in the genome but are systematically found in a context of simple sequences, prone to slipped-strand mispairings and likely to favour the appearance of single-stranded DNA. Moreover their flanking repeats share not only the same size (15 bp) but also common sequence features (which extend to vicinal upstream nucleotides) suggesting that common mechanisms, specific to this class of retrogenes, have been involved in their formation. For the first time, a model accounting for the generation of full-length cDNA copies from nonpolyadenylated RNA templates is proposed. Rodent U3 retrogenes appear to be of rather recent origin (posterior to the mouse/rat divergence) and some of them could have undergone subsequent genetic exchanges with the functional genes.

Animals↗

Dinoflagellates in evolution. A molecular phylogenetic analysis of large subunit ribosomal RNA.

The sequence of the large subunit ribosomal RNA (LsuRNA) gene of the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum micans has been determined. The inferred rRNA sequence [3408 nucleotides (nt)] is presented in its most probable secondary structure based on compensatory mutations, energy, and conservation criteria. No introns have been found but a hidden break is present in the second variable domain, 690 nt from the 5' end, as judged by agarose gel electrophoresis and primer extension experiments. Prorocentrum micans LsuRNA length and G+C content are close to those of ciliates and yeast. The conserved portions of the molecule (1900 nt) have been aligned with corresponding sequences from various eukaryotes, including five protista, one metaphyta, and three metazoa. An extensive phylogenetic study was performed, comparing two phenetic methods (neighbor joining on difference matrix, and Fitch and Margoliash on Knuc values matrix) and one cladistic (parsimony). The three methods led to similar tree topologies, except for the emergence of yeast that groups with ciliates and dinoflagellates when phenetic methods are used, but emerges later in the most parsimonious tree. This discrepancy was checked by statistical analyses on reduced trees (limited to four species) inferred using parsimony and evolutionary parsimony methods. The data support the phenetic tree topologies and a close relationship between dinoflagellates, ciliates, and yeast.

Animals↗

Evolution of large subunit rRNA structure. The 3' terminal domain contains elements of secondary structure specific to major phylogenetic groups.

Refined secondary structure models supported by phylogenetic evidence have been derived for the 3' terminal domain of large subunit rRNA (the region that exists as a separate 4.5 S molecular entity in chloroplast ribosomes) through a comparative analysis of all the pro- and eukaryotic sequences at present available. While several universally conserved features of secondary structure are found, a few diversified structural elements are also detected which are specific to one of the primary kingdoms, eubacteria, archaebacteria, or eukaryotes. Remarkably, some appear to be selectively preserved during the evolution of the primary kindgom, suggesting they represent functionally important structures. Thus, although the role of this 3' terminal domain in ribosomal function still remains unknown, its mode of sequence variation clearly points to a significant diversification of its function among the primary kindgoms.

Animals↗

Sequence and secondary structure of the 5' external transcribed spacer of mouse pre-rRNA.

We report the sequence of the 4006-nucleotide 5' external transcribed spacer (5'ETS) of the mouse ribosomal primary transcript. These data complete the sequence of the 13.4-kb mouse rRNA gene, thus providing a mammalian rRNA gene structure, in addition to yeast and Xenopus. The mouse 5'ETS displays a highly biased base content (very high in GC and particularly low in A), closely similar to the other transcribed spacers of the mouse ribosomal gene. This region seems to have accumulated sequence variation relatively rapidly during vertebrate evolution, with the possible insertion in rodents of sequences structurally similar to retroposons. About half the length of the mouse 5'ETS can fold into a giant and highly stable secondary structure, which is probably evolutionarily conserved in mammals and which could play an important role in the higher-order organization of mammalian pre-ribosomes.

Animals↗

Comparisons of large subunit rRNAs reveal some eukaryote-specific elements of secondary structure.

All large rRNAs possess a common core of secondary structure. However, large variations in the size of the molecule have arisen during evolution, which are accommodated over a dozen rapidly evolving domains. Most of the enlargement of the eukaryotic molecules (as compared to prokaryotes) is in fact restricted over only two of these divergent domains, which are dramatically expanded in vertebrates. We have derived secondary structure models for these two domains through a systematic comparison of all the pro- and eukaryotic sequences published so far. Within each of these domains, a subset of secondary structure elements which are specific to eukaryotes is detected. Archaebacterial-specific secondary structures can also be identified which appear to be maintained through a strong selective constraint. The relative preservation of such group-specific structures raises the issue of their potential involvement in some diversification of ribosomal functions among the three fundamental phylogenetic groups, eubacteria, archaebacteria and eukaryotes. We also show that eukaryotic ribosomal RNAs are subjected, over their entire length, to a unique type of compositional constraint which may largely differ among the major eukaryotic taxa.

Animals↗

Secondary structure of mouse 28S rRNA and general model for the folding of the large rRNA in eukaryotes.

We present a secondary structure model for the entire sequence of mouse 28S rRNA (1) which is based on an extensive comparative analysis of the available eukaryotic sequences, i.e. yeast (2, 3), Physarum polycephalum (4), Xenopus laevis (5) and rat (6). It has been derived with close reference to the models previously proposed for yeast 26S rRNA (2) and for prokaryotic 23S rRNA (7-9). Examination of the recently published eukaryotic sequences confirms that all pro- and eukaryotic large rRNAs share a largely conserved secondary structure core, as already apparent from the previous analysis of yeast 26S rRNA (2). These new comparative data confirm most features of the yeast model (2). They also provide the basis for a few modifications and for new proposals which extend the boundaries of the common structural core (now representing about 85% of E. coli 23S rRNA length) and bring new insights for tracing the structural evolution, in higher eukaryotes, of the domains which have no prokaryotic equivalent and are inserted at specific locations within the common structural core of the large subunit rRNA.

Animals↗

The complete nucleotide sequence of mouse 28S rRNA gene. Implications for the process of size increase of the large subunit rRNA in higher eukaryotes.

We have determined the complete nucleotide sequence (4712 nucleotides) of the mouse 28S rRNA gene. Comparison with all other homologs indicates that the potential for major variations in size during the evolution has been restricted to a unique set of a few sites within a largely conserved secondary structure core. The D (divergent) domains, responsible for the large increase in size of the molecule from procaryotes to higher eukaryotes, represent half the mouse 28S rRNA length. They show a clear potential to form self-contained secondary structures. Their high GC content in vertebrates is correlated with the folding of very long stable stems. Their comparison with the two other vertebrates, xenopus and rat, reveals an history of repeated insertions and deletions. During the evolution of vertebrates, insertion or deletion of new sequence tracts preferentially takes place in the subareas of D domains where the more recently fixed insertions/deletions were located in the ancestor sequence. These D domains appear closely related to the transcribed spacers of rRNA precursor but a sizable fraction displays a much slower rate of sequence variation.

Animals↗

Complete nucleotide sequence of mouse 18 S rRNA gene: comparison with other available homologs.

We present the complete sequence of mouse 18 S rRNA. As indicated by comparison with yeast, Xenopus and rat, the conservation of eukaryotic 18 S rRNA sequences is extensive. However, this conservation is far from being uniform along the molecule: most of the base changes and the size differences between species are concentrated at specific locations. Two distinct classes of divergent traces can be detected which differ markedly in their rates of nucleotide substitution during evolution, and should prove valuable in additional comparative analyses, both for eukaryotic taxonomy and for rRNA higher order organization. Mouse and rat 18 S rRNA sequences differ by only 14 point changes over the 1869 nucleotides of the molecule.

Animals↗

Improved methods for structure probing in large RNAs: a rapid 'heterologous' sequencing approach is coupled to the direct mapping of nuclease accessible sites. Application to the 5' terminal domain of eukaryotic 28S rRNA.

We have developed a combined approach for probing native structures in large RNAs. In the first method, after digestion with a structure specific nuclease, accessible sites are mapped at sequence resolution along the entire RNA molecule which is used as a template for the reverse transcriptase elongation of a 5' end labelled selected primer (coding strand of a small restriction fragment of the cloned gene). This method circumvents any prior end-labelling of RNA, a technique with major limitations for large RNAs. In the second approach, a rapid "heterologous" sequencing can be easily applied to definite domains of an RNA molecule in a variety of species (or individuals), without additional DNA cloning nor end-labelling of RNA. By taking advantage of the presence of evolutionary conserved tracts within an RNA sequence, it allows a rapid analysis of RNA folding patterns in terms of phylogenetic comparisons : when located within such a conserved tract, selected restriction fragments from a cloned gene can be used as heterologous primers for sequencing the upstream divergent region in RNAs of other species by currently available technology, i.e. reverse transcriptase elongation in the presence of chain terminator dideoxynucleotides.

Animals↗

Primary sequence of the 5'-terminal region of mouse 18 S rRNA and adjacent spacer. Implications for rRNA processing.

Among the stepwise cleavage reactions involved in the processing of rRNA precursors in mammalian cells, an early event corresponds to the removal of the so-called 'external transcribed regions' which are located upstream 18 S rRNA sequence within the primary transcript. We have determined the primary sequence of the domain of mouse pre-rRNA which encompasses this early processing site and analyzed its structural features with reference to the other eukaryotic homologs available. The potential involvement of secondary structure features of rRNA precursors in the recognition process for cleavage is discussed.

Animals↗

Structure of mouse rRNA precursors. Complete sequence and potential folding of the spacer regions between 18S and 28S rRNA.

We have determined the complete nucleotide sequence of the regions of mouse ribosomal RNA transcription unit which separate mature rRNA genes. These internal transcribed spacers (ITS) are excised from rRNA precursor during ribosome biosynthesis. ITS 1, between 18S and 5.8S rRNA genes, is 999 nucleotides long. ITS 2, between 5.8S and 28S rRNA genes, is 1089 nucleotides long. Both spacers are very rich in G + C, 70 and 74% respectively. Mouse sequences have been compared with the other available eukaryotes: while no homology is apparent with yeast or xenopus, mouse and rat ITS sequences have been largely conserved, with homologous segments interspersed with highly divergent tracts. Homology with rat is much more extensive for ITS 1 than for ITS 2. Tentative secondary structure models are proposed for the folding of these regions within rRNA precursor; they are closely related in mouse and rat.

Animals↗

Recognition signals for mouse pre-rRNA processing. A potential role for U3 nucleolar RNA.

In order to identify signals for rRNA processing in eukaryotes, mouse pre-rRNA sequence features around four cleavage sites have been analyzed. No consensus sequence can be recognized when the four boundary regions are examined. Unlike mature rRNA termini, distal sequences of precursor-specific domains cannot participate in stable duplex with adjacent regions. The extensive divergence of precursor-specific sequences during evolution also applies to nucleotides adjacent to cleavage sites, with a significant exception for a conserved segment immediately downstream 5.8S rRNA. A specific role is proposed for U3 nucleolar RNA in the conversion of 32S pre-rRNA into mature 28S rRNA, through base-pairing with precursor-specific sequences at the boundaries of excised domains.

Animals↗

Sequence and secondary structure of mouse 28S rRNA 5'terminal domain. Organisation of the 5.8S-28S rRNA complex.

We present the sequence of the 5' terminal 585 nucleotides of mouse 28S rRNA as inferred from the DNA sequence of a cloned gene fragment. The comparison of mouse 28S rRNA sequence with its yeast homolog, the only known complete sequence of eukaryotic nucleus-encoded large rRNA (see ref. 1, 2) reveals the strong conservation of two large stretches which are interspersed with completely divergent sequences. These two blocks of homology span the two segments which have been recently proposed to participate directly in the 5.8S-large rRNA complex in yeast (see ref. 1) through base-pairing with both termini of 5.8S rRNA. The validity of the proposed structural model for 5.8S-28S rRNA complex in eukaryotes is strongly supported by comparative analysis of mouse and yeast sequences: despite a number of mutations in 28S and 5.8S rRNA sequences in interacting regions, the secondary structure that can be proposed for mouse complex is perfectly identical with yeast's, with all the 41 base-pairings between the two molecules maintained through 11 pairs of compensatory base changes. The other regions of the mouse 28S rRNA 5'terminal domain, which have extensively diverged in primary sequence, can nevertheless be folded in a secondary structure pattern highly reminiscent of their yeast' homolog. A minor revision is proposed for mouse 5.8S rRNA sequence.

Animals↗

Immunosuppression by a mouse tumor resembles antigenic competition.

The intraperitoneal injection of gamma-radiated, UV-radiated, or unradiated P-815 tumor cells into syngeneic or allogeneic mice suppressed the immune response to a subsequent intraperitoneal injection of sheep erythrocytes in a manner similar to the suppression caused by the injection of manner similar to the suppression caused by the injection of horse erythrocytes and termed antigenic competition. In both cases, the greatest suppression occurred when the sheep erythrocytes were injected at the same site (intraperitoneal) as the tumor or antigen several days after the tumor or antigen and in a dose of 10(8) erythrocytes or less.

Animals↗

Novel intron-encoded small nucleolar RNAs with long sequence complementarities to mature rRNAs involved in ribosome biogenesis.

Recently, several new snoRNAs encoded in introns of genes coding for ribosomal, ribosome-associated, or nucleolar proteins have been discovered. We are presently studying four of these intronic snoRNAs. Three of them, U20, U21, and U24, are closely related to each other on a structural basis. They are included in genes encoding nucleolin and ribosomal proteins L5 and L7a, respectively, in warm-blooded vertebrates. These three metabolically stable snoRNAs interact with nucleolar protein fibrillarin. In addition, they display common features that make them strikingly related to snoRNA U14. U14 contains two tracts of complementarity to 18S rRNA, which are required for the production of 18S rRNA. U20 displays a 21 nucleotide (nt) long complementarity to 18S rRNA. U21 contains a 13 nt complementarity to an invariant sequence in eukaryotic 28S rRNA. U24 has two separate 12 nt long complementarities to a highly conserved tract of 28S rRNA. Phylogenetic evidences support the fundamental importance of the pairings of these three snoRNAs to pre-rRNA, which could be involved in a control of pre-rRNA folding during preribosome assembly. By transfection of mouse cells, we have also analyzed the processing of U20 and found that the -cis acting signals for its processing from intronic RNA are restricted to the mature snoRNA sequence. Finally, we have documented changes of host genes for these three intronic snoRNAs during the evolution of eukaryotes.

Animals↗