PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B P Whitaker

Publications and source records attributed to B P Whitaker.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Immunohistochemical analysis of clear cell carcinoma of the gynecologic tract.

Clear cell carcinoma of the gynecologic tract has been defined in terms of its clinical and histologic features; however, its immunophenotypic profile has not been fully characterized. Seventeen cases of primary clear cell carcinoma from various sites within the female genital tract (11 ovary, 5 uterus, 1 vagina) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. These tumors were assessed for the expression of cytokeratin 7 (CK7), cytokeratin 20 (CK20), low and high molecular weight cytokeratin, (CAM5.2 and 34 beta E12, respectively), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Leu-M1, vimentin, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), bcl-2, p53, HER-2/neu, and CA-125. The characteristic immunoprofile for all sites was positivity for CK7, CAM5.2, 34 beta E12, CEA, Leu-M1, vimentin, bcl-2, p53, and CA-125; variably positivity for ER and HER-2/neu; and negativity for CK20 and PR. For comparison, two cases of urologic clear cell carcinoma (1 bladder, 1 urethra) were also studied, and their profile was found to be similar to the gynecologic cases. Aside from minor differences, clear cell carcinoma appears to have the same immunophenotype regardless of whether it originates in the endometrium, ovary, or genitourinary tract. Much of its profile is similar to other gynecologic adenocarcinomas, but some of the markers studied may be useful in the differential diagnosis of this tumor.

Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell↗

DNA ploidy studies of benign and malignant tumours: comparison of flow cytometry and image analysis techniques using two types of cytological specimen.

DNA ploidy studies were carried out on Feulgen stained smears and cytocentrifuge preparations from 35 malignant tumours and four benign neoplasms using the CAS image analyser. The smears were prepared from scrapings from fresh tumour tissue whereas the cytocentrifuge preparations were prepared from single nuclear suspensions from paraffin-embedded cell blocks from the same tumour. Histograms obtained by image analysis of the tumour scrapes were compared with those obtained on the cytocentrifuge preparations. Concordant results were obtained in four benign tumours (100%) and 32 malignant tumours (91%). The results obtained by image analysis were also compared with results obtained by flow cytometry of the tumour tissue. Discordant results were obtained for three malignant tumours. Possible reasons for the discrepancy include sampling error, tumour heterogeneity and selective loss of cell populations during processing.

Base Sequence↗