PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Pitt

Publications and source records attributed to B Pitt.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

The physician's role in minimizing prehospital delay in patients at high risk for acute myocardial infarction: recommendations from the National Heart Attack Alert Program. Working Group on Educational Strategies To Prevent Prehospital Delay in Patients at High Risk for Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Physicians and other health care professionals play an important role in reducing the delay to treatment in patients who have an evolving acute myocardial infarction. A multidisciplinary working group has been convened by the National Heart Attack Alert Program (which is coordinated by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health) to address this concern. The working group's recommendations target specific groups of patients: those who are known to have coronary heart disease, atherosclerotic disease of the aorta or peripheral arteries, or cerebrovascular disease. The risk for acute myocardial infarction or death in such patients is five to seven times greater than that in the general population. The working group recommends that these high-risk patients be clearly informed about symptoms that they might have during a coronary occlusion, steps that they should take, the importance of contacting emergency medical services, the need to report to an appropriate facility quickly, treatment options that are available if they present early, and rewards of early treatment in terms of improved quality of life. These instructions should be reviewed frequently and reinforced with appropriate written material, and patients should be encouraged to have a plan and to rehearse it periodically. Because of the important role of the bystander in increasing or decreasing delay to treatment, family members and significant others should be included in all instruction. Finally, physicians' offices and clinics should devise systems to quickly assess patients who telephone or present with symptoms of a possible acute myocardial infarction.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1997

Randomised trial of losartan versus captopril in patients over 65 with heart failure (Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly Study, ELITE)

BACKGROUND: To determine whether specific angiotensin II receptor blockade with losartan offers safety and efficacy advantages in the treatment of heart failure over angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibition with captopril, the ELITE study compared losartan with captopril in older heart-failure patients. METHODS: We randomly assigned 722 ACE inhibitor naive patients (aged 65 years or more) with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV heart failure and ejection fractions of 40% or less to double-blind losartan (n = 352) titrated to 50 mg once daily or captopril (n = 370) titrated to 50 mg three times daily, for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the tolerability measure of a persisting increase in serum creatinine of 26.5 mumol/L or more (> or = 0.3 mg/dL) on therapy; the secondary endpoint was the composite of death and/or hospital admission for heart failure; and other efficacy measures were total mortality, admission for heart failure, NYHA class, and admission for myocardial infarction or unstable angina. FINDINGS: The frequency of persisting increases in serum creatinine was the same in both groups (10.5%). Fewer losartan patients discontinued therapy for adverse experiences (12.2% vs 20.8% for captopril, p = 0.002). No losartan-treated patients discontinued due to cough compared with 14 in the captopril group. Death and/or hospital admission for heart failure was recorded in 9.4% of the losartan and 13.2% of the captopril patients (risk reduction 32% [95% CI -4% to + 55%], p = 0.075). This risk reduction was primarily due to a decrease in all-cause mortality (4.8% vs 8.7%; risk reduction 46% [95% CI 5-69%], p = 0.035). Admissions with heart failure were the same in both groups (5.7%), as was improvement in NYHA functional class from baseline. Admission to hospital for any reason was less frequent with losartan than with captopril treatment (22.2% vs 29.7%). INTERPRETATION: In this study of elderly heart-failure patients, treatment with losartan was associated with an unexpected lower mortality than that found with captopril. Although there was no difference in renal dysfunction, losartan was generally better tolerated than captopril and fewer patients discontinued losartan therapy. A further trial, evaluating the effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in a larger number of patients with heart failure, is in progress.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

The potential use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with hyperlipidemia.

New evidence suggests an interaction between hyperlipidemia, activation of the renin-angiotensin system, and atherosclerotic disease. In patients with atherosclerosis and hyperlipidemia, coronary endothelial dysfunction is usually diffuse and affects vasomotor tone, platelet activity, thrombosis, fibrinolysis, and regulation of inflammatory cells. Angiotensin II, an important oxidant, alters the binding of low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol to its receptors and increases endothelial uptake of LDL. Endothelial dysfunction is worsened by the suppression of nitric oxide production and/or release via angiotensin II-associated degradation of bradykinin and oxygen free radical production, resulting in inadequate vasorelaxation. Therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors appears to eliminate these untoward effects and may ameliorate the tendency for myocardial infarction associated with elevated plasma levels of angiotensin II. Although the role of ACE inhibitors in the prevention and/or treatment of coronary artery disease in patients without left ventricular dysfunction remains to be established, the capacity of ACE inhibition to correct endothelial dysfunction offers promise. The ability of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors to improve endothelial function, prevent the progression of coronary atherosclerosis, reduce the incidence of ischemic events, and improve survival is well known. Potentially, ACE inhibitors may have an additive or synergistic effect on the development of atherosclerosis and the clinical consequences of this disease when used in combination therapy with lipid-lowering strategies.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed1997

Medical care costs and quality of life after randomization to coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery. Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery in patients with multivessel coronary disease have shown no significant differences in overall rates of death and myocardial infarction. We compared quality of life, employment, and medical care costs during five years of follow-up among patients treated with angioplasty or bypass surgery. METHODS: A total of 934 of the 1829 patients enrolled in the randomized Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation participated in this study. Detailed data on quality of life were collected annually, and economic data were collected quarterly. RESULTS: During the first three years of follow-up, functional-status scores on the Duke Activity Status Index, which measures the ability to perform common activities of daily living, improved more in patients assigned to surgery than in those assigned to angioplasty (P<0.05). Other measures of quality of life improved equally in both groups throughout the follow-up period. Patients in the angioplasty group returned to work five weeks sooner than did patients in the surgery group (P<0.001). The initial mean cost of angioplasty was 65 percent that of surgery ($21,113 vs. $32,347, P<0.001), but after five years the total medical cost of angioplasty was 95 percent that of surgery ($56,225 vs. $58,889), a difference of $2,664 (P = 0.047). The five-year cost of angioplasty was significantly lower than that of surgery among patients with two-vessel disease ($52,930 vs. $58,498, P<0.05), but not among patients with three-vessel disease ($60,918 vs. $59,430). After five years of follow-up, surgery had an overall cost-effectiveness ratio of $26,117 per year of life added, but unacceptable ratios of $100,000 or more per year of life added could not be excluded (P=0.13). Surgery appeared particularly cost effective in treating diabetic patients because of their significantly improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multivessel coronary disease, coronary-artery bypass surgery is associated with a better quality of life for three years than coronary angioplasty, after the initial morbidity caused by the procedure. Coronary angioplasty has a lower five-year cost than bypass surgery only in patients with two-vessel coronary disease.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1997

Diversity of calcium antagonists.

Calcium antagonists (CAs) are widely used in the management of hypertension and chronic stable angina pectoris. Currently available CAs fall into three distinct structural classes--the dihydropyridines, the benzothiazepines, and the phenylalkylamines. The diversity of these agents, even among drugs within a structural group, is apparent in their pharmacology, physiologic effects, and therapeutic uses. Traditional CAs produce their effects through blockade of the L-type calcium channel. Recently, a new CA has been developed. Mibefradil, the first member of a new class of CAs, is a tetralol derivative. It is characterized by its selective blockade of T-type calcium channels. It differs from existing CAs and may offer important therapeutic advantages.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed1997

ACE inhibitors in heart failure: prospects and limitations.

ACE inhibitors have been shown to be effective in reducing the morbidity and mortality of patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, but their application to clinical practice in this situation is still limited. In part, the failure to prescribe an ACE inhibitor to a patient with left ventricular systolic dysfunction is due to perceptions regarding their side effects, such as cough and renal dysfunction. Relatively few patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and a serum creatinine > or = 2 mg/dl receive an ACE inhibitor in clinical practice. In this situation one should consider an agent such as fosinopril, which is metabolized by the liver as well as secreted by the kidney. In patients with moderate renal dysfunction, fosinopril has been well tolerated without an increase in serum creatinine. In patients who develop cough due to an ACE inhibitor, consideration should be given to an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocking agent, such as losartan. The relative safety and efficacy of an ACE inhibitor compared with an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocking agent is being explored in a prospective randomized trial (Evaluation of Losartan In The Elderly [ELITE]), as well as the safety and pharmacological effectiveness of adding an angiotensin II receptor antagonist to an ACE inhibitor (Randomized Angiotensin receptor antagonists-ACE-inhibitor Study [RAAS]). There may also be a role for the combination of an aldosterone receptor antagonists and an ACE inhibitor in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Once an ACE inhibitor is administered to a patient with left ventricular systolic dysfunction it should be continued indefinitely. ACE inhibitors may be of value not only in preventing the progression of heart failure but also in reversing endothelial dysfunction and preventing the development of atherosclerosis and its consequences, such as myocardial infarction.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1997

Quinapril prevents hypertension and enhanced vascular reactivity in nitroarginine-treated rats.

Long-term inhibition of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) by substituted arginine analogues has previously been shown to induce systemic hypertension in several animal species; however, the precise mechanisms for the elevated blood pressure remain unclear. We hypothesized that a portion of the hypertensive response to arginine analogues was due to direct inhibition of endothelial NOS and resultant functional alterations in the vasculature that contribute to elevated systemic resistance. Adult Sprague-Dawley rats were treated for 2 weeks with an arginine analogue, N omega Nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA), alone or in combination with the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor quinapril. Next, thoracic aortas were removed, cut into rings and suspended in isolated tissue baths for measurement of contractile force in response to vasoactive drugs. Our results showed that oral L-NNA treatment significantly elevated systolic blood pressure in rats that was completely prevented by quinapril. Furthermore, L-NNA treatment increased endothelium-dependent and -independent contractility and attenuated endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the thoracic aorta. These functional alterations were also attenuated by quinapril treatment. Therefore, long-term L-NNA-induced hypertension in rats is associated with enhanced vascular reactivity due both to direct inhibition of endothelial NOS and to stimulation of the renin-angiotensin system.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed1997

'Do not resuscitate': How? why? and when?

OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to discover who had 'Do Not Resuscitate' (DNR) status, why, how, when and by whom these decisions were made. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: The medical and nursing notes of all inpatients (139) (age range 16-100 years) in an inner city district general hospital on a single day were examined to determine the resuscitation status, age, sex, and diagnosis of each patient. RESULT: A decision not to resuscitate had been taken in 28 (20%) of the cases. 'Do Not Resuscitate' (DNR) patients were significantly older and more likely to suffer from malignant and cardiorespiratory disease. Patients with dementia and other psychiatric disorders were not significantly more often labelled DNR. Evidence of consultation for these decisions was lacking and the recording erratic. CONCLUSIONS: (1) There is a great need to devise and implement comprehensive guidelines. (2) There is need for appropriate and comprehensive documentation outlining the reasons why and how the decision was taken, who was consulted and review date. (3) This is an important area for audit.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Rationale, background, and design of the randomized angiotensin receptor antagonist--angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor study (RAAS).

The randomized angiotensin receptor antagonist--angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)--Inhibitor Study (RAAS) was designed to test the hypothesis that the addition of an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocking agent, losartan 50 mg/day, to an ACE-inhibitor, enalapril 10 mg twice a day (group 1), will be more effective than standard-dose enalapril 10 mg twice a day (group 2) or high-dose enalapril alone 20 mg twice a day (group 3), in blocking the activation of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The addition of an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocking agent to an ACE inhibitor would theoretically block ACE as well as non-ACE-dependent angiotensin II formation while maintaining the potential beneficial effect of ACE inhibitor-induced bradykinin formation. One hundred twenty patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and moderate to severe heart failure despite treatment with an ACE inhibitor will be randomized to 1 of the 3 groups and followed for 6 weeks, with an optional long-term week extension to determine the safety and tolerability of the combination of losaratan and enalapril, its effectiveness in preventing rest and exercise-induced neurohumoral activation (plasma norepinephrine, N-terminal proatrial natriuretic factor, angiotensin II, and aldosterone), as well as quality of life and exercise performance (6-minute walk test).

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed1996

Baseline clinical and angiographic data in the Quinapril Ischemic Event (QUIET) Trial.

The QUinapril Ischemic Event Trial (QUIET) is the first prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the long-term antiatherosclerotic effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. Normotensive, nonhyperlipidemic subjects (1,750) with normal left ventricular systolic function were randomly assigned to treatment or placebo at percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). The primary end point is time to first cardiac ischemic event. Baseline clinical characteristics are (mean +/- SD): age 58 +/- 9 years; blood pressure 123 +/- 15/74 +/- 10 mm Hg; low density lipoprotein cholesterol 124 +/- 27 mg/dL; high density lipoprotein cholesterol 37 +/- 10 mg/dL; and triglycerides 167 +/- 91 mg/dL. In addition, 81% are men; 22% are current smokers; 49% give a history of myocardial infarction. Baseline angiographic characteristics are (mean +/- SD): left ventricular ejection fraction 59% +/- 11%; per patient diameter stenosis (excluding the PTCA segment) 49% +/- 31%; 8.9 +/- 3.5 analyzable segments per patient (excluding the PTCA segment), 3.8 +/- 2.3 of which have visible stenosis. Including the PTCA segment, 52% have single vessel disease and 48% have multivessel disease. Baseline angiographic data for non-PTCA segments will be correlated with cardiac ischemic events which occur after 6 months. Up to 500 subjects will undergo follow-up angiography with quantitative coronary angiographic analysis (QCA) of baseline and follow-up films. The primary QCA end point will be per-patient categorical designation as progressor or nonprogressor based on the presence or absence of > or = 400 microns narrowing in > or = 1 vessels that did not undergo PTCA.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Cost-effectiveness of pravastatin in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease.

This study analyzed the cost-effectiveness of pravastatin in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD). The projected risk model in 445 male patients with established CAD and moderately elevated serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol used results data from 2 placebo-controlled plaque regression trials: Pravastatin Limitation of Atherosclerosis in the Coronary Arteries and Pravastatin, Lipids, and Atherosclerosis in the Carotids. Framingham Heart Study data were used to project the risk of mortality 10 years after myocardial infarction (MI) for incremental male patients in the placebo group who had MI. A Markov process was used to estimate life-years saved, and decision analysis was used to estimate cost. Depending on the patient-risk profile, the midrange estimated cost per life-year saved with pravastatin in secondary prevention of CAD varied from $7,124 to $12,665, which is favorable compared with other widely accepted medical interventions.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed1996

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with quinapril improves endothelial vasomotor dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease. The TREND (Trial on Reversing ENdothelial Dysfunction) Study.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may exert some of their benefits in the therapy of hypertension, congestive heart failure, and acute myocardial infarction by their improvement of endothelial dysfunction. TREND (Trial on Reversing ENdothelial Dysfunction) investigated whether quinapril might improve endothelial dysfunction in normotensive patients with coronary artery disease and no heart failure, cardiomyopathy, or major lipid abnormalities so that confounding variables that affect endothelial dysfunction could be minimized. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design, we measured the effects of quinapril (40 mg daily) on coronary artery diameter responses to acetylcholine using quantitative coronary angiography. The primary response variable was the net change in the acetylcholine-provoked constriction of target segments between the baseline (prerandomization) and 6-month follow-up angiograms. The constrictive responses to acetylcholine were comparable in the placebo (n = 54) and quinapril (n = 51) groups at baseline. After 6 months, only the quinapril group showed significant net improvement in response to incremental concentrations of acetylcholine (4.5 +/- 3.0% [mean +/- SEM] versus -0.1 +/- 2.8% at 10(-6) mol/L and 12.1 +/- 3.0% versus -0.8 +/- 2.9% at 10(-4) mol/L, quinapril versus placebo, respectively; overall P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: TREND shows that ACE inhibition with quinapril improved endothelial dysfunction in patients who were normotensive and who did not have severe hyperlipidemia or evidence of heart failure. These benefits of ACE inhibition are likely due to attenuation of the contractile effects and superoxide-generating effects of angiotensin II and to enhancement of endothelial cell release of nitric oxide secondary to diminished breakdown of bradykinin.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed1996

Effect of d-sotalol on mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after recent and remote myocardial infarction. The SWORD Investigators. Survival With Oral d-Sotalol.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction is associated with an increased risk of death. Other studies have suggested that a potassium-channel blocker might reduce this risk with minimal adverse effects. We investigated whether d-sotalol, a pure potassium-channel blocker with no clinically significant beta-blocking activity, could reduce all-cause mortality in these high-risk patients. METHODS: Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less and either a recent (6-42 days) myocardial infarction or symptomatic heart failure with a remote (> 42 days) myocardial infarction were randomly assigned d-sotalol (100 mg increased to 200 mg twice daily, if tolerated) or matching placebo twice daily. FINDINGS: After 3121 of the planned 6400 patients had been recruited, the trial was stopped. Among 1549 patients assigned d-sotalol, there were 78 deaths (5.0%) compared with 48 deaths (3.1%) among the 1572 patients assigned placebo (relative risk 1.65 [95% CI 1.15-2.36], p = 0.006). Presumed arrhythmic deaths (relative risk 1.77 [1.15-2.74], p = 0.008) accounted for the increased mortality. The effect was greater in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 31-40% than in those with lower ( <or= 30%) ejection fractions (relative risk 4.0 vs 1.2, p = 0.007). INTERPRETATION: Among the 1549 patients evaluated, administration of d-sotalol was associated with increased mortality, which was presumed primarily to be due to arrhythmias. The prophylactic use of a specific potassium-channel blocker does not reduce mortality, and may be associated with increased mortality in high-risk patients after myocardial infarction.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

Diabetes mellitus, a predictor of morbidity and mortality in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Trials and Registry.

Diabetes is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure, patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction (defined as an ejection fraction of 35% or less), and in a broader registry population with less stringent entry criteria. Although the SOLVD Trials made a major clinical contribution by proving the value of enalapril, diabetes remains a significant predictor of outcome even after adjusting for treatment with enalapril.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗