Which spatial behavior are we talking about?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗
Biomedical subjects
B Poucet
Publications and source records attributed to B Poucet.
Cognitive and noncognitive processes involved in selective object exploration: comparison between young adult and old rats.
The age effects on locomotor activity, object-oriented exploration, habituation, and response to a spatial change were studied in young adult and old rats using an object exploration test. In this test the spatial response was evaluated by the renewal of exploration of a familiar object after its repositioning. The specificity of the spatial response was determined by comparison with control animals not submitted to a spatial change. Male Wistar rats 6 and 24 months old were used. Results showed a significant decrement in locomotor activity, object exploration, and spatial reactivity in old rats. The habituation curve and the reactivity to a new object were preserved. Detail analyses suggest that the spatial deficit of old rats is due to an incapacity to detect the spatial change and not to their poor locomotor or exploratory activity. These results corroborate those obtained in spatial orientation tasks and support the idea that the lack of spatial response observed in old animals is more related to cognitive impairments than to other factors such as sensory, motor, or motivational differences.
Aging↗
Object exploration and reactions to spatial and nonspatial changes in hooded rats following damage to parietal cortex or hippocampal formation.
Hooded rats with bilateral lesions of the anterior part of the hippocampal formation (HIP), anterior region of the posterior parietal cortex (APC), or posterior region of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) were compared with controls for their exploration of 5 objects in an open field, habituation of locomotion and object investigation, and response to spatial and nonspatial change. First, all groups displayed habituation of both locomotor and exploratory activity. Second, controls selectively reexplored displaced objects, and APC-lesioned rats reexplored all objects, whereas PPC- and HIP-lesioned rats failed to react to the spatial change. Third, a novel object induced reexploration in all groups. The results are consistent with the roles of the HIP and PPC in spatial information processing. Moreover, the APC and PPC are involved in attentional effortful processing and visuospatial information processing necessary for spatial representation, respectively.
Animals↗
Effects of short-lasting inactivations of the ventral hippocampus and medial septum on long-term and short-term acquisition of spatial information in rats.
This study was aimed at testing the effects of a reversible inactivation of the hippocampal formation on long-term and short-term acquisition of spatial information. Rats chronically equipped with either bilateral cannulae into the ventral hippocampus or a single cannula into the medial septum had to locate, in a circular platform with 18 holes on the periphery, the unique hole leading to a hidden shelter in order to avoid bright light. In Expt. 1, following 16 days of training (1 trial/day, 24 h ITI) without physical intervention, the location of the correct hole was changed on both Days 17 and 23, and the rats were either sham-injected or injected with lidocaine. Both hippocampally and septally lidocaine-injected rats relearned the new location at a rate similar to corresponding sham-injected animals. In Expt. 2, a massed-trial version of the task was used, in which the rats had to learn a new hole location on each daily session (3 trials, ITI = 1 min). Animals were sham-injected or lidocaine-injected on alternate sessions. While sham-injected rats improved in orientational accuracy over successive trials, both hippocampally and septally lidocaine-injected rats failed to display any between-trial improvement. The impairment displayed by lidocaine-injected rats when their hippocampus was inactivated confirms the role of the hippocampus in short-term spatial memory (Expt. 2). In contrast, short-lasting inactivation of the hippocampus did not prevent long-term spatial learning (Expt. 1). These results suggest that the hippocampus could process information 'off-line' in the delay between temporally discontiguous learning trials, and show that short-term and long-term spatial learning rely on distinct neurobiological mechanisms.
Animals↗
The effects of reversible inactivations of the hippocampus on exploratory activity and spatial memory.
This study was aimed at testing the effects of a reversible inactivation of the ventral hippocampus on behavior in response to a change, following a period of habituation with a hippocampus that functions normally. A new dishabituation paradigm was used, which allowed the testing of visuospatial memory. A salient stimulus was placed under the glass floor of the apparatus during initial exploration and was removed during the test session. The time spent above the zone where the stimulus was initially located indicated the rats' reaction to the change. Unlike the control rats who reacted to the removal of the salient stimulus by reexploring its previous location, lidocaine-injected subjects did not display any similar searching behavior. Experiment 2 examined the hypothesis that landmarks located under the floor could help hippocampus-inactivated animals to accurately react to the change. Two objects were located either close to the stimulus or some distance away from it. Even when the objects were closely associated to the stimulus, the same failure to react to the removal of the stimulus was found in lidocaine-injected rats. However, these animals displayed a higher activity level measured by the time spent on a "neutral" zone. This behavioral pattern suggests a specific localization deficit. The method of reversible inactivation appears to be a promising approach to the study of the time course of memory process with short-term experimental paradigms such as those used in the present study.
Animals↗
Role of the medial and lateral septum in a variable goal spatial problem solving task.
Rats with lesions to the medial (MS) or lateral septal (LS) nuclei were compared to normal controls (CNT) in the acquisition of a spatial working memory task. In this task, animals were first allowed to explore the unbaited three-table apparatus before being fed on one of the two possible goal tables. Animals were then tested on their ability to return to the table where they just had been fed. Only rats with medial septal damage were clearly impaired on this problem, an impairment that dissipated over days. In contrast, the performance of LS rats was not significantly different from controls. During the second phase of the experiment, the same animals received either atropine sulphate (50 mg/kg, IP), atropine methylnitrate (50 mg/kg, IP), or an equivalent volume of saline. Atropine sulphate produced a sharp decrease in performance by all subjects. Meanwhile, atropine methylnitrate produced a mild temporary deficit only in LS rats. Overall, these results confirm that the medial septum plays a crucial role in the acquisition of problem solving. In addition, these results also suggest that the lateral septum may play a possible role in some form of spatial behavior easily disrupted by atropine methylnitrate.
Animals↗
A further characterization of the spatial problem-solving deficit induced by lesions of the medial frontal cortex in the rat.
Two experiments were conducted to investigate the basis of the spatial impairment displayed by rats with lesions to the medial frontal cortex, using a three-table Y-shaped apparatus. In both experiments, animals were first given an exploratory experience of the maze, followed by a short feeding experience on one of the tables, and were then required to return to the location where they had just been fed. In Expt. 1, a spatial working memory procedure was used in which the location of the goal table was varied from day to day. When compared to normal animals frontal rats showed a marked impairment, despite the addition of (a) distinctive visual cues on the tables and their associated runways, or (b) a conspicuous visual pattern placed directly above the goal. Expt. 2 used a spatial learning procedure, in which the spatial location of the goal table remained constant over days. However, the whole apparatus was daily rotated so that animals could not learn to associate the goal table with specific cues located behind it. This procedure did not prevent frontal animals from learning the consistent location of the food by using the spatial relationships of the environment. These results, together with previous ones, suggest that frontal animals suffer from a specific (though not restricted to the domain of spatial information) working memory deficit, and their spatial reference memory is not impaired.
Animals↗
Septum and medial frontal cortex contribution to spatial problem-solving.
An attempt was made to contrast the effects of lesions to the medial frontal cortex and septum in two spatial tasks. In the fixed-goal (FG) task, the food was located on the same table throughout testing, and the start table was randomly varied from day to day. In the variable-goal (VG) task, the start table remained constant but the food was randomly distributed on one or the other of the two remaining tables. In both tasks, normal animals performed better than frontal and septal rats whose performance, however, improved over days in the FG, but not in the VG, task. In both tasks, significant improvement within days was found in medial frontal animals, but not in septal animals. Additional analyses revealed that septal animals had a general pattern of disrupted exploration and a tendency to use a response strategy (i.e. to repeat the same response both within and between days) which decreased over days in the FG task. In contrast, medial frontal animals did not demonstrate disrupted exploration nor any response tendency. It is concluded that both septal and medial frontal cortical damage produce a common spatial working memory impairment. However, there is some evidence to suggest that this common memory impairment could result from disruption of distinct mechanisms in septal and frontal animals. It is proposed that medial frontal lesions could affect some specific mechanism related either to attentional processes or to the ability to anticipate future events, whereas septal damage would interfere with the building of comprehensive and flexible spatial memories.
Animals↗
Spatial behaviour of normal and septal rats on alternate route maze problems.
The behaviour of normal rats and rats with lesions of the septum was compared on a variety of alternate route variations of the three-table problems. In all variations of the task, septal rats were impaired on test trial performance when they displayed stereotypic body turn responses and demonstrated a strong preference for the most direct route between tables both during exploration and testing in all conditions. Normal rats displayed a similar route choice tendency in the simplest situations but shifted route choice behaviour in the most complex configuration, when they chose the inner, but longer, path. The use of the inner path may have allowed delayed-choice, single-point reference orientation, or reduction in the number of available alternatives. It is concluded that normal rats form a cognitive representation that allows them to identify environmental factors likely to facilitate solution, whereas septal rats rely on "taxon"-type strategies that can combine guidances and orientational responses.
Animals↗
Scopolamine impairs response-to-change based on distal cues in the rat.
The effect of a scopolamine injection (1 mg/kg, IP) on response-to-change behavior was investigated in two experiments. After exploration of a T-maze with one arm black and the other white (Trial 1), rats were tested with both arms either black or white (Trial 2). Experiment 1 revealed that the opportunity to make body turns into the arms did not help scopolamine-injected rats to locate the changed arm after visual exploration of the arms during Trial 1. Saline-injected animals chose the changed arm. In Experiment 2, rats were allowed to move freely into the arms during Trial 1. During Trial 2, they were tested either from the same start as that used during Trial 1 or from a different start 180 degrees from the original start. While scopolamine-injected animals reacted appropriately to the change when tested from the same start, they were impaired when tested from the opposite start. In both conditions, saline-injected animals chose the changed arm. These results, together with others, support the notion that the cholinergic system plays a crucial role in the processing of distal information.
Animals↗
Object exploration, habituation, and response to a spatial change in rats following septal or medial frontal cortical damage.
Normal rats and rats sustaining septal or medial frontal cortex lesions were compared in experiments dealing with object exploration, habituation, and reaction to novelty (measured by renewed exploration following a spatial change). Normal rats exhibited high levels of initial exploratory activity which decreased over time. Following a spatial change, they reinvestigated both the displaced object and the nondisplaced ones. Frontal animals were similar to normal subjects with respect to their initial exploratory level and habituation pattern. However, frontal rats reexplored only the displaced object and completely neglected the nondisplaced ones. In contrast, the behavioral pattern displayed by septal rats was markedly different from that of normal and frontal animals. Septal rats had lower levels of initial exploratory activity, did not habituate over time, and failed to react to either displaced or nondisplaced objects. These results show that although the septo-hippocampal complex and the medial frontal cortex may share some common function in spatially organized behaviors, both structures have unique roles. Some hypotheses about the possible basic processes subtended by the septal area or the medial frontal cortex are briefly mentioned and discussed.
Animals↗
Spatial problem solving in a dual runway task by normal and septal rats.
The addition of a dual runway configuration did not disrupt the successful performance of normal animals, nor did it improve the deficit of septal rats on the Maier three-table spatial integration task. Both groups of animals displayed a preference for the outside runway configuration during exploration. During testing, however, septal animals retained this preference, whereas normal subjects attempted solution by using the inside runway configuration. This fact, in addition to the apparent lack of a habituation pattern during exploration, suggests that septal animals do not acquire a spatial representation of the test situation. It is suggested that the inability of septal rats in spatial situations is due to an inability to form rather than an inability to use spatial maps.
Animals↗
Spatial behaviour of cats in cue-controlled environments.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗