Characterization and regulation of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Breast Neoplasms↗
Biomedical subjects
B S Katzenellenbogen
Publications and source records attributed to B S Katzenellenbogen.
Examination of the DNA-binding ability of estrogen receptor in whole cells: implications for hormone-independent transactivation and the actions of antiestrogens.
We describe an assay employing the competitive binding of estrogen receptor (ER) with basal transcription factors on a constitutive promoter (cytomegalovirus-hormone response element[s]-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase [CMV-(HRE)n-CAT, containing a hormone response element(s) between the TATA box and the start site of transcription]) to examine the DNA-binding ability of the human ER in whole cells. We used this promoter interference assay to examine the DNA binding of ER in cell lines containing high and low levels of endogenous ER, as well as in CHO cells expressing wild-type and mutant ERs from cotransfected expression vectors. The ER is capable of binding to the promoter interference constructs in the absence of added ligand, and estrogen (estradiol) or antiestrogen (trans-hydroxytamoxifen or ICI 164,384) enhances or stabilizes this interaction. The binding of unoccupied ER to reporter gene activation plasmids results in ligand-independent transactivation, presumably due to the TAF-1 function of the receptor. DNA binding of ER in the absence of ligand is observed in cells containing endogenous ER, or expressed ER, and occurs in cells with high or low receptor contents. Although estrogen- and antiestrogen-occupied ER complexes bind to DNA and reduce the template promoter activity, the extent of suppression achieved by ICI-bound ERs is consistently less than that achieved with the other ligands, presumably caused by the fact that ICI rapidly reduces the level of ER in most of the cells examined. However, the ICI-ER complexes that remain are in sufficient quantity to bind to gene activation reporter constructs, and in these cells, ICI still behaves as a pure antagonist of gene transcription and does not activate reporter genes. Hence, obstruction of ER DNA binding or reduction of ER in target cells may contribute to, but cannot fully explain, the pure antagonist character of the antiestrogen ICI 164,384. In addition, DNA binding by the ER alone is clearly not sufficient for ensuring full activation of transcription and argues for an intermediate in the receptor activation of promoters.
Animals↗
Identification of two cysteines closely positioned in the ligand-binding pocket of the human estrogen receptor: roles in ligand binding and transcriptional activation.
We have previously identified cysteine 530 in the human estrogen receptor (ER) as the major site of attachment for covalently binding affinity ligands and have shown that when this cysteine is mutated to alanine (C530A mutant), the affinity ligand [tamoxifen aziridine (TAZ)] can still bind covalently to the ER, presumably by interaction with a different cysteine(s) in the hormone-binding domain (HBD). Using site-directed mutagenesis, we have determined the alternative ligand attachment site and the functional importance of the cysteines (residues 381, 417, 447, and 530) in the HBD of the ER to the hormone-binding and transcriptional responses to estrogens and antiestrogens. Cysteine 530 plus one or more of these other cysteines were mutated to alanines. Analysis of these mutant ERs expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells provides strong evidence that cysteine 381 is the residue that is preferentially covalently labeled by TAZ in the C530A mutant. Hence, portions of the HBD that are far apart in the linear receptor sequence, namely regions near C381 and C530, are probably closely positioned in the ligand-binding pocket, with the cysteine thiols being 1.1 nm or less apart. The affinity of estradiol binding to receptors was reduced only 2- and 5-fold, respectively, in the double and quadruple Cys to Ala mutants, and estradiol was an effective stimulator of transcription from an estrogen-responsive reporter gene [(ERE)2-TATA-CAT].(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Base Sequence↗
Structural requirements for high affinity ligand binding by estrogen receptors: a comparative analysis of truncated and full length estrogen receptors expressed in bacteria, yeast, and mammalian cells.
In order to better understand the structural requirements for effective high affinity binding of estrogens and antiestrogens by the human estrogen receptor (ER), a comparative study was undertaken in which we examined: 1) native ER from the MCF-7 ER-positive human breast cancer cell line; 2) full length ER expressed in yeast; 3) the ER hormone binding domain (amino acid residues 302-595) expressed in yeast; 4) a bacterially expressed protein A fusion product encoding a truncated ER (amino acid residues 240-595); and 5) a synthetic peptide encompassing amino acids 510-551 of the ER. The binding parameters studied included affinity, kinetics, structural specificity for ligands, and stability. Full length ER expressed in yeast was very similar to the MCF-7 ER in its affinity [dissociation constant (Kd), 0.35 +/- 0.05 nM], dissociation rate (t1/2, 3-4 h at 25 C), and structural specificity for both reversible and covalently attaching affinity ligands. While the truncated ER expressed in yeast was similar to MCF-7 ER in its specificity of ligand binding, it showed a slightly reduced affinity for estradiol (Kd, 1.00 +/- 0.17 nM). The bacterially expressed ER also had a lower affinity for estradiol (Kd, 1.49 +/- 0.16 nM), which may be due in part to an increase in the dissociation rate (t1/2, 0.5 h at 25 C). The attachment of covalent affinity ligands and structural specificity for a variety of reversible ligands was comparable in the bacterially expressed ER to that observed for the receptors expressed in MCF-7 cells and yeast.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Aziridines↗
Differential DNA-binding abilities of estrogen receptor occupied with two classes of antiestrogens: studies using human estrogen receptor overexpressed in mammalian cells.
We have developed a transient transfection system using the Cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter to express the human estrogen receptor (ER) at very high levels in COS-1 cells and have used it to study the interaction of agonist and antagonist receptor complexes with estrogen response element (ERE) DNA. ER can be expressed to levels of 20-40 pmol/mg or 0.2-0.3% of total soluble protein and all of the soluble receptor is capable of binding hormone. The ER binds estradiol with high affinity (Kd 0.2 nM), and is indistinguishable from native ER in that the receptor is capable of recognizing its cognate DNA response element with high affinity, and of transactivating a transgene in an estradiol-dependent manner. Gel mobility shift assays reveal interesting ligand-dependent differences in the binding of receptor complexes to ERE DNA. Receptors occupied by estradiol or the type I antiestrogen transhydroxytamoxifen bind to DNA response elements when exposed to the ligand in vitro or in vivo. Likewise, receptors exposed to the type II antiestrogen ICI 164,384 in vitro bind to ERE DNA. However, when receptor exposure to ICI 164,384 is carried out in vivo, the ER-ICI 164,384 complexes do not bind to ERE DNA, or do so only weakly. This effect is not reversed by subsequent incubation with estradiol in vitro, but is rapidly reversible by in vivo estradiol exposure of intact COS-1 cells. This suggests there may be some cellular process involved in the mechanism of antagonism by the pure antiestrogen ICI 164,384, which is not observed in cell-free extracts.
Base Sequence↗
Antiestrogen resistance: mechanisms by which breast cancer cells undermine the effectiveness of endocrine therapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Breast Neoplasms↗
Mutagenesis of cysteines in the hormone binding domain of the human estrogen receptor. Alterations in binding and transcriptional activation by covalently and reversibly attaching ligands.
We have carried out experiments to determine the role of the cysteines in the hormone-binding domain (HBD) of the human estrogen receptor (ER) in receptor function. In each mutant receptor, 1 of the 4 cysteines in the HBD (cysteines 381, 417, 447, and 530) was changed by in vitro mutagenesis of the ER cDNA (containing Gly400) from cysteine to alanine; Cys530 was also mutated to a serine. The mutant and wild-type receptor cDNAs were expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells using an expression vector containing the Rous sarcoma virus promoter. The mutant and wild-type receptors were assayed for hormone binding and for their ability to activate estrogen-responsive reporter plasmids. All ER mutants bound estradiol (E2) with affinity similar to wild-type ER, displaying a Kd between 0.3 and 0.8 nM (wild-type ER Kd = 0.45 +/- 0.10 nM). All were capable of covalent labeling by the affinity ligands ketononestrol aziridine, an estrogen agonist, and tamoxifen aziridine, an antagonist. Since in previous work we identified Cys530 as the site of covalent attachment of these ligands (Harlow, K.W., Smith, D.N., Katzenellenbogen, J.A., Greene, G.L., and Katzenellenbogen, B.S. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 17476-17485) it appears that an alternate residue(s) can be labeled in the absence of a cysteine at position 530; studies with methyl methanethiosulfonate, a cysteine-specific reagent, suggest that this residue is probably another cysteine in the HBD. The C381A, C417A, C530A and C530S ERs showed E2-stimulated transcriptional activation profiles similar to wild-type ER whereas the dose response for E2 for the C447A mutant was shifted to the right, requiring 50 x higher E2 concentrations to achieve half-maximal response. Tamoxifen aziridine inhibited E2-stimulated transcription, and ketononestrol aziridine stimulated transcription by wild-type, C530A, and C530S ER, but the effectiveness of these covalently attaching ligands was altered in the C530A and C530S mutants. Thus, these two mutant receptors are altered in their transactivation response to agonist and antagonist affinity labeling ligands but are unaltered in their response to reversibly binding estrogens and antiestrogens. In addition, we show that a mutant ER (C447A) can have an affinity for E2 similar to that of wild-type ER but differs in its ability to activate transcription in response to E2, indicating a decoupling of the hormone binding and transcriptional activation functions in this receptor.
Animals↗
Efficient and selective photoaffinity labeling of the estrogen receptor using two nonsteroidal ligands that embody aryl azide or tetrafluoroaryl azide photoreactive functions.
3-(4-Azido-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzoyl)-6-hydroxy-2-(4- hydroxyphenyl)benzo[b]thiophene 1 (tetrafluoroaryl azide, TFAA) and its protio analogue 3-(4-azidobenzoyl)-6- hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)benzo[b]thiophene 2 (protioaryl azide, PAA), photoaffinity labeling (PAL) reagents for the estrogen receptor (ER), have been prepared in high specific activity tritium-labeled form (19 Ci/mmol) and shown to undergo selective and efficient photocovalent attachment to ER from rat uterus. Both azides 1 and 2 demonstrate high binding affinity for ER as determined by both a competitive binding assay (relative binding affinities: estradiol = 100; TFAA = 9.3; PAA = 66) and a direct binding assay (Kd: estradiol = 0.24 nM; TFAA = 2.64 nM; PAA = 0.37 nM). When unlabeled TFAA and PAA are irradiated at greater than 315 nm, they demonstrate site-specific photoinactivation of ER that reaches 43% and 55%, respectively, by 30 min. Specific photocovalent attachment to ER can be effected by irradiation of the tritium-labeled azides; the covalent attachment efficiency is good (1 = 20-30%, 2 = ca. 25%) and the selectivity of ER labeling is high. Characterization of the photolabeled proteins by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis shows specific labeling of a major component at Mr 60,000 and a minor species at Mr 46,000, the same two species that are labeled by [3H]tamoxifen aziridine, a well-characterized affinity label for ER. The ER-specific antibodies H222Sp gamma and D547Sp gamma show a clean precipitation of only these two species. In the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line, PAA is a full estrogen agonist in terms of stimulation of cell proliferation and induction of progesterone receptor. These two azides provide the first system in which the photocovalent attachment efficiency of an aryl azide can be compared to its tetrafluorosubstituted aryl azide analogue in a complex biological receptor system. Azides 1 and 2 are the most efficient and selective PAL reagents prepared to date for ER, and they should be useful in further studies of the hormone-binding domain of this protein.
Affinity Labels↗
Progesterone receptor regulation in uterine cells: stimulation by estrogen, cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate, and insulin-like growth factor I and suppression by antiestrogens and protein kinase inhibitors.
Primary uterine cell cultures were used to study multifactor regulation of progesterone receptor (PR) and the signal transduction pathways which may serve to mediate that regulation. Increases in intracellular cAMP, brought about by treatment with cholera toxin plus isobutyl methyl xanthine or by addition of 8-bromo-cAMP, result in 6- to 7-fold increases in the intracellular content of PR as monitored by [3H]R5020 binding and by Western immunoblot using anti-PR antibodies. In these primary cultures of uterine cells isolated from 19-day-old immature rats, 8-bromo-cAMP evokes significant increases in PR by 8 h with maximal increases by 24 h. This time course and magnitude of PR stimulation are similar to those evoked by maximally effective concentrations of estradiol (3 x 10(-9) M) or IGF-I (20 ng/ml). Dose-response studies reveal that 10(-6) to 10(-4) M concentrations of 8-bromo-cAMP (8-Br-cAMP) elicit a maximal response. In contrast, 8-bromo-cGMP over a wide concentration range was unable to elevate cellular PR levels. Under these culture conditions, cell proliferation was not altered by treatment with any of these agents. Although estrogen, cAMP, and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) may act via different pathways to increase PR, the effects evoked by maximally effective concentrations of these agents are not additive implying involvement of a common component. The increases in PR evoked by estradiol, cAMP, or IGF-I are markedly suppressed by treatment with antiestrogen (ICI 164,384) or the cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinase inhibitor H8 or the protein kinase A inhibitor PKI, indicating the involvement of the estrogen receptor and phosphorylation pathways in PR regulation by these three agents. The present studies identify cAMP, as well as estrogen and IGF-I, as important regulators of the level of PR in uterine cells and suggest that multiple factors, including those affecting intracellular cAMP levels, might influence responsiveness to progestins via regulation of the intracellular PR content.
1-Methyl-3-isobutylxanthine↗
Differential regulation of gene expression by estrogen in estrogen growth-independent and -dependent MCF-7 human breast cancer cell sublines.
We have examined the ability of estradiol (E2) to regulate the expression of three mRNAs [for pS2, progesterone receptor (PR), and estrogen receptor (ER)], known to be under E2 regulation in the parental E2 growth-responsive MCF-7 cells, in an E2 growth-independent MCF-7 K3), previously isolated from the parental estrogen-dependent MCF-7 K1 human breast cancer cells after long term growth in vitro in the absence of estrogen, acquired estrogen-independent growth in vitro as well as the ability to form tumors in nude mice in vivo without estrogen. We find that the content of pS2 mRNA and the transcription rate of the pS2 gene, while being markedly increased by E2 in MCF-7 K1 cells, are no longer stimulated by E2 in this subline, although protein kinase activators tremendously increase (greater than 10-fold) pS2 mRNA in both K1 and K3 cells. In fact, basal pS2 mRNA levels are elevated 2.8 +/- 0.4-fold in MCF-7 K3 cells, and E2 evokes a concentration-dependent suppression of the pS2 mRNA level. In contrast, PR mRNA in the K3 subline, as in the parental K1 cells, is still up-regulated by E2, and ER mRAN content and the ER mRNA transcription rate are still down-regulated by E2 and show normal E2 dose-response relationships, implying that the ER in this subline is functional. These results demonstrate that the progression to estrogen-independent growth in K3 cells is accompanied by a change in the regulation of some estrogen-induced genes by estrogen. While PR and ER retain normal patterns of regulation by E2, the pS2 gene in the estrogen growth-independent K3 subline is differentially affected and is no longer stimulated by E2. Our data suggest that this altered regulation of the pS2 gene is probably not caused by a defect of the ER or ER regulation in this subline.
1-Methyl-3-isobutylxanthine↗
Hormonal modulation of HER-2/neu protooncogene messenger ribonucleic acid and p185 protein expression in human breast cancer cell lines.
Recent work has suggested that overexpression of the HER-2/neu protooncogene may play a role in the aggressive clinical behavior of some breast tumors. Since hormones are also known to change the proliferation rate and invasiveness of these cells, we have studied the effect of sex steroid hormones and antihormones on levels of the HER-2/neu mRNA and protein in human breast cancer cell lines using complementary DNA and antibody probes. In MCF-7 cells, which contain high levels of estrogen receptor and an estradiol (E2)-inducible progesterone receptor (PR), 1 nM E2 caused a rapid drop in HER-2/neu mRNA (4.8 kilobases), to 40% of control values by 6 h, and a more gradual decrease in HER-2/neu protein, to 50% by 24 h. HER-2/neu protein and mRNA levels remained reduced throughout 1 week of E2 treatment. The effect of E2 was dose dependent, with the maximal effect seen with concentrations of 10(-10) M E2 and above, and antiestrogen partly reversed the E2-induced decrease in HER-2/neu expression. These characteristics suggest that the observed modulation of HER-2/neu is an estrogen receptor-mediated process. In contrast, progestins did not change HER-2/neu mRNA or protein levels in E2-primed MCF-7 cells that contain high levels of PR; in T47D cells, which contain low levels of ER and high levels of PR, addition of E2 or the progestin R5020 or the antiprogestin RU38,486 had no significant effect on HER-2/neu mRNA or protein levels over 6 days of treatment. These results indicate that estrogen but not progestin modulates HER-2/neu protooncogene expression in these breast cancer cell lines and suggest that aggressiveness associated with high levels of HER-2/neu mRNA and protein may be uncoupled from estrogen-stimulated proliferation in these cells.
Breast Neoplasms↗
Multihormonal regulation of the progesterone receptor in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells: interrelationships among insulin/insulin-like growth factor-I, serum, and estrogen.
Estrogen (E) is well known to be an important stimulator of progesterone receptor (PR) synthesis in target cells. We have observed that E stimulation of PR in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells (as monitored by progestin binding or Western blotting with anti-PR antibodies) increases as a function of serum concentration in the cell culture medium; PR stimulation by E is greatest in high serum medium (5% or 10% charcoal dextran-treated calf serum) and is not observed when cells are in medium containing serum concentrations below 1%, although estrogen receptor levels are well maintained. This suggests that some serum factor(s) may be essential for E to be able to stimulate PR. To better understand such factors, we have grown cells in serum-free medium and in serum-free medium supplemented with insulin (6.25 micrograms/ml) [corrected], transferrin (6.25 micrograms/ml), selenium (6.25 ng/ml), albumin (1.25 mg/ml) [corrected], and linoleic acid (5.35 micrograms/ml; ITS+). Unexpectedly, we found that addition of ITS+ (without E) increases PR levels in these cells, especially in the absence of serum and under low serum conditions where E stimulation of PR is poor. Analyses of the individual components in ITS+ reveal that insulin is the major active component. Dose-response studies indicate that high superphysiological (greater than 1 microgram/ml) concentrations of insulin are required. In contrast, low physiological levels of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I; 10 or 40 ng/ml) are active, suggesting mediation by the IGF type I receptor system. At all serum concentrations (0-10%), the effects of ITS+ and E in increasing PR are synergistic. The fact that anti-E are able to suppress the insulin/IGF-I stimulation as well as the E stimulation of PR suggests that the anti-E can actively interfere with the action of the growth factor as well as the action of E. These results indicate that regulation of PR is multifactor and raise the possibility that PR may be regulated in vivo by both E and growth factors such as IGF-I that are known to be increased in these breast cancer cells by E.
Blood↗
Cross-linking of estrogen receptor to chromatin in intact MCF-7 human breast cancer cells: optimization and effect of ligand.
To investigate the effect of ligand (be it hormone, antihormone, or no hormone) on the interaction between estrogen receptor (ER) and chromatin, we have used formaldehyde as a cross-linking agent in intact MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. After a 1- to 2-h hormone treatment, the cells are exposed for 8 min to formaldehyde, which is added directly to their culture medium to minimize environmental perturbation. Nuclei are prepared from formaldehyde-treated cells and their contents are fractionated on CsCl density gradients to separate DNA-protein complexes from free protein. Peak gradient fractions are assayed for the presence of specific proteins by immunoblot of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel patterns. Using this approach, we find that 0.15% formaldehyde is optimal for cross-linking ER to chromatin. We detect ER and the large subunit of RNA polymerase II with DNA from formaldehyde-treated, but not from untreated cells. On the other hand, actin (a cytoplasmic protein) and small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle proteins (nuclear RNA binding proteins) are not cross-linked to DNA. Therefore, cross-linking appears to be selective and fractionation is efficient. Interestingly, we detect similar levels of ER (as well as RNA polymerase II) with DNA from formaldehyde-treated cells, regardless of whether the cells are preexposed to estrogen (17 beta-estradiol at 10(-8) M), antiestrogen (ICI 164,384 at 10(-7) or 10(-6) M), or no hormone. These results, using covalent cross-linking in intact cells, indicate that both ligand-occupied and unoccupied ER are associated with chromatin.
Breast Neoplasms↗
A tribute to Jack Gorski: estrogen receptor model builder and scientific friend to many.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗
Estrogen regulation of proliferation and hormonal modulation of estrogen and progesterone receptor biosynthesis and degradation in target cells.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Breast Neoplasms↗
Identification of cysteine 530 as the covalent attachment site of an affinity-labeling estrogen (ketononestrol aziridine) and antiestrogen (tamoxifen aziridine) in the human estrogen receptor.
Radiosequence analysis of peptide fragments of the estrogen receptor (ER) from MCF-7 human breast cancer cells has been used to identify cysteine 530 as the site of covalent attachment of an estrogenic affinity label, ketononestrol aziridine (KNA), and an antiestrogenic affinity label, tamoxifen aziridine (TAZ). ER from MCF-7 cells was covalently labeled with [3H]TAZ or [3H]KNA and purified to greater than 95% homogeneity by immunoadsorbent chromatography. Limit digest peptide fragments, generated by prolonged exposure of the labeled receptor to trypsin, cyanogen bromide, or Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease, were purified to homogeneity by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and the position of the labeled residue was determined by sequential Edman degradation. With both aziridines, the labeled residue was at position 1 in the tryptic peptide, position 2 in the cyanogen bromide peptide, and position 7 in the V8 protease peptide. This localizes the site of labeling to a single cysteine at position 530 in the receptor sequence. The identity of cysteine as the site of labeling was confirmed by HPLC comparison of the TAZ-labeled amino acid (as the phenylthiohydantoin and phenylthiocarbamyl derivatives) and the KNA-labeled amino acid (as the phenylthiocarbamyl derivative) with authentic standards prepared by total synthesis. Cysteine 530 is located in the hormone binding domain of the receptor, near its carboxyl terminus. This location is consistent with earlier studies using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to analyze the size of the proteolytic fragments containing the covalent labeling sites for TAZ and KNA and the antigen recognition sites for monoclonal antibodies. The fact that both the estrogenic and antiestrogenic affinity labeling agents react covalently with the same cysteine indicates that differences in receptor-agonist and receptor-antagonist complexes do not result in differential covalent labeling of amino acid residues in the hormone binding domain.
Affinity Labels↗
Progression of human breast cancer cells from hormone-dependent to hormone-independent growth both in vitro and in vivo.
We have isolated a series of sublines of the hormone-dependent MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line after selection both in vivo and in vitro for growth in the presence of subphysiological concentrations of estrogens. These sublines represent a model system for study of the processes leading to hormonal autonomy. The cells form growing tumors in ovariectomized athymic nude mice in the absence of estrogen supplementation but retain some responsivity to estrogen as determined by stimulation of the rate of tumor growth in vivo and by induction of progesterone receptor. An ovarian-independent but hormone-responsive phenotype may occur early in the natural progression to hormone-independent and unresponsive growth in breast cancer. We observed no change in the affinity or decrease in the level of expression of estrogen receptors and progesterone receptors among the sublines and the parental cells. Epidermal growth factor receptors are not overexpressed in ovarian-independent cells. Thus, altered hormone receptor expression may be a late event in the acquisition of a hormone-independent and unresponsive phenotype. Sublines isolated by in vivo but not in vitro selection are more invasive than the parental cells both in vivo and across an artificial basement membrane in vitro. Thus, as yet unknown tumor-host interactions may be important in the development of an invasive phenotype. Furthermore, acquisition of the ovarian-independent and invasive phenotypes can occur independently.
Animals↗
Regulation of estrogen receptor messenger ribonucleic acid and protein levels in human breast cancer cell lines by sex steroid hormones, their antagonists, and growth factors.
Since sex steroid hormones and growth factors are known to modulate the proliferation of breast tumors, we have studied the effects of estrogen and progestin, their antagonists, and growth factors on the regulation of estrogen receptor (ER) mRNA and protein levels in T47D breast cancer cells, which contain low levels of ER, and in two sublines of MCF-7 cells which contain high ER levels. The mRNA levels were measured by Northern blot analysis using lambda OR8, a cDNA probe for ER, and protein levels were measured by hormone binding or Western blot analysis. Treatment of T47D cells with estradiol (E2) caused a 2.5-fold increase in ER mRNA (6.6 kilobases) levels after 48 h. The progestin R5020 evoked a marked decrease in ER mRNA and protein levels to 20% of control values, while the antiprogestin RU38,486 caused no change in ER. In MCF-7 cells, the effect of E2 on ER levels was dependent on the prior growth history of the cells. In cells grown in low estrogen [5% charcoal-dextran-treated calf serum with phenol red for 8 yr (MCF-7-K2)], which are still E2 responsive, treatment with E2, the antiestrogen LY117018, or both produced little change in ER mRNA or protein; in contrast, ER mRNA and protein were reduced by E2 to 40% and 50% of control levels, respectively, in MCF-7 cells (denoted MCF-7-K1) which had been maintained routinely in medium containing 5% calf serum. This decrease in ER mRNA was dose dependent; 10(-11) E2 reduced levels to 60%, and 10(-10) M E2 evoked the maximal drop to 40% of the control level in 2 days. LY117018 alone did not alter ER mRNA levels in these cells, but it completely prevented the down-regulation of ER by E2. Administration of progestin, but not antiprogestin, along with E2 partially prevented the decrease in ER evoked by E2. Addition of epidermal growth factor or insulin-like growth factor-I to MCF-7-K1 cells, which increased cell proliferation, had no detectable effect on ER levels. Treatment with transforming growth factor-beta, which decreased cell proliferation, reduced ER by about 20%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Breast Neoplasms↗