Biomedical subjects

B Scharling

Publications and source records attributed to B Scharling.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1992

Effects, side effects and plasma concentrations of terbutaline in adult asthmatics after inhaling from a dry powder inhaler device at different inhalation flows and volumes.

1. The efficacy of a metered dose inhaler (MDI) is highly dependent on the mode of inhalation. The relatively high built-in resistance in the Turbohaler (TBH), a new dry powder inhaler device for inhalation of terbutaline sulphate and budesonide, reduces the flow during inhalation. We compared five different modes of inhalation using the terbutaline TBH in 10 stable asthmatic subjects, who were tested on 5 consecutive days. 2. Measurement of 10 different parameters of pulmonary function indicated that the full bronchodilatory effect of an inhaled dose was already achieved at 5 min after the inhalation. Inspiratory flows through the TBH varying from 34 to 88 l min-1 resulted in comparable bronchodilation, and a previous exhalation to residual volume proved of no value. However, if, prior to inhalation, an exhalation through the device was performed, a substantially reduced effect was seen. 3. Reducing the inspiratory flow to approximately 34 l min-1 produced slightly reduced side effects and lower plasma terbutaline concentrations.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Bronchial allergen challenge: dose versus concentration.

This study was designed to investigate if two equivalent doses of allergen administered by different dosing regimes--two breaths and 10 breaths of each concentration--would result in the same magnitude of the early and late asthmatic response. Fifteen patients with extrinsic allergic asthma were challenged twice with either two or 10 breaths of twofold increasing allergen concentrations. The challenge was continued until a 20% decrease in FEV1 had been achieved. A non-cumulative PC20FEV1 allergen was derived, and the cumulative dose of allergen given was similarly derived. In order to assess the reproducibility of the challenge, seven patients were challenged twice with two-breath regime. The mean value of allergen PC20 obtained by the two-breath regime was 4.1 fold (95% CI: 2.3-7.1 fold) greater than those obtained by the 10-breath regime (P less than 0.05), whereas the difference was 1.4 fold (95% CI: -3.3-0.5 fold) for the cumulative dose (P greater than 0.05). A statistically significant larger magnitude of the early asthmatic response, as determined by the maximum per cent fall in FEV1, and late asthmatic response determined by the maximum per cent fall in peak expiratory flow domiciliary recorded during the following 24 hr after challenge, was observed in favour of the 10-breath regime compared to the two-breath regime (mean difference 6%, 95% CI: 0.6-11%). The reproducibility of the provocation test was acceptable (+/- 1.8 two-fold concentration difference). These results confirm the 'equivalent dose hypothesis', and demonstrates that dosage rather than concentration appears to determine the early and late asthmatic response after bronchial allergen challenge.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1992

Comparison between two different assays for measurements of allergen-specific IgE and skin prick test in the diagnosis of insect venom allergy.

Forty-one patients stung by wasp and 29 by bee were evaluated by comparing the correlation between skin prick test (SPT), Phadebas radioallergosorbent test (P-RAST) and Magic Lite SQ Specific IgE assay (LIA). All patients had had a systemic reaction to insect sting. In the patients stung by bee we found agreement between SPT and P-RAST, and SPT and LIA. Similarly, there were no significant differences in sensitivity between P-RAST and LIA (p > 0.05). In patients stung by wasp, SPT was found to be more sensitive than P-RAST. There were no differences between SPT and LIA or between P-RAST and LIA.

Allergens↗

PubMed1989

Clinical comparison of inhaled budesonide delivered either via pressurized metered dose inhaler or Turbuhaler.

The aim of this open, randomized cross-over study was to compare the efficacy and safety of inhaled budesonide administered either via a pressurized metered dose inhaler with a 750 ml spacer attached, or via a new dry powder inhaler, Turbuhaler, in 28 patients with stable bronchial asthma. During the 2-week run-in period, the patients received their ordinary inhaled steroid treatment. This was followed by two 4-week periods of active treatment with inhaled budesonide given via Turbuhaler or pressurized MDI. The patients were divided into two groups according to their previous, inhaled steroid doses. Group A received 400 micrograms of budesonide b.i.d, and Group B 800 micrograms of budesonide b.i.d. Diary cards were used by the patients at home to report asthma symptoms, beta 2-agonist consumption, and PEF twice daily, as well as the number of coughs experienced in a 5-min period after steroid inhalation. Budesonide Turbuhaler produced a significantly better effect on morning peak flow than budesonide MDI. The number of coughs in the 5 min after steroid inhalation was significantly lower with the Turbuhaler than with the MDI. In all other parameters recorded (e.g. FEV1, evening PEF, histamine PC20 and other diary measurements) there were no statistically significant differences between the two devices. Turbuhaler was significantly more appreciated than MDI in all questions of preference. The study showed that budesonide via Turbuhaler was at least as effective and safe as budesonide via a pressurized MDI at daily doses of 800 and 1,600 micrograms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Inhalation↗