PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B T Wright

Publications and source records attributed to B T Wright.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

The possible role of disulfide bond reduction in transformation of the 10 S androgen receptor.

Dissociation of the 10 S androgen receptor to 8, 6, and 4.5 S forms was dependent on temperature, the reducing and ionic environment, and the binding of androgen. The [3H]dihydrotestosterone-labeled 10 S receptor was observed at low ionic strength using rat Dunning prostate tumor cytosol freshly prepared in the absence of an exogenous sulfhydryl reducing agent. Addition of mercaptoethanol caused 10 S receptor dissociation to 8 S following incubation at 0 degrees C for 30 min, to 6 S after a 30-min incubation at 23 degrees C at low ionic strength, and to 4.5 S at high ionic strength. Mercaptoethanol-induced dissociation required binding of [3H]dihydrotestosterone. Treatment with cupric phenanthroline, a disulfide-forming reagent, stabilized the 10 S receptor in 0.4 M KCl, but the receptor remained sensitive to dissociation by mercaptoethanol. Zn2+ (25 microM) and sodium molybdate (10 mM) also stabilized the 10 S receptor. A Stokes radius of 96 +/- 5 A was determined for the 10 S receptor by Sepharose-6B chromatography, with a calculated Mr of 396,000. The 10 S receptor was not retained by DNA-Sepharose, while dissociated forms displayed binding affinity for DNA. It is proposed that the 10 S receptor represents the nontransformed androgen receptor, composed of the 4.5 S steroid binding units plus a nonsteroid binding protein, perhaps in a tetrameric configuration. Binding of dihydrotestosterone appears to sensitize the 10 S receptor to disulfide bond reduction, resulting in transformation by subunit dissociation.

Animals↗

Comparison of stated and measured patient heights and weights.

Stated and measured patient heights and weights were compared, and the clinical importance of any differences was determined. A total of 112 health-clinic patients were interviewed for height and weight determinations. They were divided into four groups: men 21-35 years old; men 65 years and older; women 21-35 years old; and women 65 years and older. The stated and the actual heights and weights were analyzed for significant differences. Calculations of body surface area (BSA) and basal energy expenditure (BEE) were used to determine the clinical impact of any discrepancies. Patients in all groups tended to overestimate their height, but only the estimates of men differed significantly from the measured values. Differences between stated and measured heights for older women showed statistical differences from younger men and women but not from older men. All groups except young men overestimated their weight. Older men showed the greatest tendency towards overestimation of weight. In elderly men, the calculations of BSA and BEE were significantly different (p less than 0.002) when stated versus measured values were used. These differences were not considered clinically important. Overall, patients in all groups were well aware of their heights and weights.

Adult↗