Gabapentin for postherpetic neuralgia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to B V Stadel.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Intracranial hypertension with papilledema has been reported in renal patients, but a survey of the literature suggests that the incidence rate is low. We present reports of 15 of approximately 1,670 patients with renal disorders, who were treated with growth hormone for impaired growth and subsequently developed symptoms and/or signs of intracranial hypertension. The male:female ratio was 6.5:1, and the median age was 12 years. The median duration of growth hormone treatment before onset of symptoms or signs was 13 weeks. All but 2 patients were symptomatic. In the patients in whom growth hormone therapy is known to have been discontinued, the symptoms and signs of intracranial hypertension abated. At least 4 of these patients experienced a recurrence when re-exposed to growth hormone. Many of the affected patients presented with predisposing conditions, but growth hormone appears to have been the precipitating factor. Prospective funduscopic evaluation may be warranted in patients with renal disorders who are receiving growth hormone.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We report 13 cases of benign intracranial hypertension (IH) in children with growth hormone (GH) deficiency treated with GH in the United States. The group consisted of eight boys and five girls, 3 to 16 years of age (median, 9 years). The interval from starting GH therapy to diagnosis of IH was 2 weeks or less in six patients, between 2 and 12 weeks in four, 8 months in one, 5 years in one, and unknown in one. Seven patients were not known to have previously described IH risk factors; the other six had at least one factor each. All patients but one had headache, nausea, vomiting, and visual changes. All had papilledema, and cerebrospinal fluid pressures were elevated (> 250 mm H2O) in all nine patients tested. The GH dosage range was 0.17 to 0.35 mg per kilogram body weight per week (median, 0.30 mg/kg per week) for the 11 patients with dosage data. After discontinuation of GH and treatment with lumbar punctures and/or medications, signs and symptoms resolved in eight children; in two of these children signs and symptoms reappeared when GH therapy was restarted. In four patients signs and symptoms resolved while GH therapy was continued; one child was treated with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt because of an arachnoid cyst, after which GH was restarted without subsequent IH. In the 12 patients with idiopathic GH deficiency the course of IH was benign, with complete resolution of all signs and symptoms. Because doses and scheduling of GH administration have changed since the introduction of recombinant GH, higher doses and increased frequency of administration may be contributing to the development of IH in some patients. We suggest beginning therapy at the lowest recommended dose, with gradual titration to higher doses, and the performance of routine funduscopic examinations during initiation of GH therapy and whenever signs or symptoms of IH develop.
We report 22 cases of prepubertal gynecomastia diagnosed during growth hormone (GH) treatment. The age and dose range were 2 to 12 years and 0.18 [corrected] to 0.3 mg/kg per week, respectively. In most of the patients, gynecomastia appeared between 0.5 and 7 months after GH was started. Three boys were using drugs other than GH. This condition appears to be self-limited and benign.
Short-term use (less than 1 year) or oral contraceptives has been associated with increased to slightly decreased risks of epithelial ovarian cancer in several studies. To determine what might account for a statistically significant 40% reduction in risk associated with as little as 3 to 6 months of use, a finding previously reported from the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study, and to consider the implications for mechanisms of pathogenesis, the authors compared numerous characteristics of short-term users of oral contraceptives (41 cases, 412 controls) with those of never users (242 cases, 1,517 controls). The reduced risk among short-term users was consistently restricted to women who stopped using oral contraceptives for medical reasons, which were essentially side effects; there was little evidence of a protective effect among women who stopped for nonmedical reasons. Factors such as age, parity, family history of ovarian cancer, estrogen dose, history of sterilization, and latency (interval from first use) could not account for the finding. These analyses suggest that short-term use of oral contraceptives has little to no effect per se on reducing the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer and that side effects resulting in cessation of oral contraceptive use shortly after it was begun may be indicative of factors that are protective against the disease.
BACKGROUND: Cerebellar toxicity is a severe, therapy-limiting adverse reaction of cytarabine given in high doses. The Food and Drug Administration received a report of an increased frequency of cerebellar toxicity at the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics after a switch from the product (Cytosar-U) manufactured by The Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, Mich., to the generic form made by Quad Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Indianapolis, Ind. PURPOSE: To compare the incidence of cerebellar toxicity in Quad-treated patients with Upjohn-treated patients, a record-based cohort study was conducted at the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics between January 1986 and August 1989. METHODS: The incidence of cerebellar toxicity was studied in 63 leukemia patients according to the manufacturer of the product received (34 Upjohn only, 25 Quad only, and four both manufacturers). The relative risk of cerebellar toxicity was adjusted for other known risk factors. RESULTS: Patients in the manufacturer-defined treatment groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, sex, type of leukemia, disease stage, calculated creatinine clearance, presence of abnormal liver function tests, or total dose received. The crude relative risk of cerebellar toxicity comparing the Quad product with the Upjohn product was 5.0 (95% confidence interval = 1.8-13.7). Adjustment for potential confounders did not alter the association. Other risk factors for cerebellar toxicity, independent of manufacturer, were age greater than 50 years, type of leukemia, disease stage, total dose greater than or equal to 20 g/m2, abnormal pretreatment liver function, and reduced creatinine clearance. CONCLUSION: This study found a significantly higher incidence of cerebellar toxicity with high-dose cytarabine manufactured by Quad Pharmaceuticals when compared with the incidence of cerebellar toxicity with the Upjohn product. Further research at independent institutions would be necessary to allow generalization of this finding. In addition, our findings suggest that a dose reduction in high-dose cytarabine therapy may be indicated for patients with reduced glomerular filtration rates.
Analyses of tumor size and breast cancer stage were used to determine whether biased detection of breast cancer could have materially influenced estimates of risk associated with use of oral contraceptives. In a population-based case-control study conducted from 1980-1982, surveillance for breast cancer by breast exams, but not mammography, was found to be strongly linked to use of oral contraceptives. Tumors were slightly smaller and less likely to be late-stage (TNM stage III or IV) in patients who had used oral contraceptives. The net effect of any diagnostic bias on advancing the date of cancer diagnosis, whether from breast exams or other sources, was estimated to be less than 8 weeks. This corresponds to spuriously increasing the risk of early-occurring breast cancer in oral contraceptive users by at most 2.4% (relative risk = 1.024).
Despite the well-recognized association between oral contraceptives and deep venous thromboembolism, little is known about the risks associated with currently marketed formulations containing less than 50 micrograms of estrogen. To assess the venous thrombogenicity of low-estrogen oral contraceptives (those containing less than 50 micrograms of estrogen) relative to intermediate-dose (50 micrograms of estrogen) and high-dose (greater than 50 micrograms of estrogen) formulations, we conducted a cohort study of oral contraceptive users between the ages of 15 and 44 years in the Michigan Medicaid population. The period of the study was from 1980 through the third quarter of 1986. A total of 2,739,400 oral contraceptive prescriptions received by 234,218 women were analyzed. Using the low-estrogen cohort as the referent group, the age and calendar period adjusted relative risk of venous thromboembolism in users of intermediate-dose formulations was 1.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-2.1, p = 0.04), and the relative risk in users of high-dose formulations was 1.7 (95% CI 0.9-3.0, p = 0.06). These data provide evidence that the dose-response relation between oral contraceptive estrogen and venous thromboembolism extends from 50 to 30 micrograms of estrogen, the dose range of currently marketed formulations.
Drug marketing and physician survey data were used to examine trends in the use and hormonal content of oral contraceptives in the United States between 1964 and 1988. Retail prescriptions for oral contraceptives peaked at approximately 68 million in 1973 and have remained between 50 million and 60 million since 1981. Despite this relative consistency in the number of prescriptions, physician "mentions" of oral contraceptives have increased by approximately 75 percent. This increase may reflect closer monitoring of women on oral contraceptives. Use of multiphasic formulations has steadily risen, accounting for 37 percent of the oral contraceptive prescriptions in 1988. Mean estrogen and progestin doses in all types of formulations have steadily declined. A change in the type of estrogen and progestin used in preparations has coincided with this decline in dose. The association between age and use of high-dose formulations seen in the past was no longer evident in 1988. The data demonstrate that oral contraceptive formulations in wide use today differ in hormone content from those of the past, when most of the major studies addressing the risks associated with oral contraceptive use were completed. There is therefore a need to determine the risks and long-term effects associated with these newer formulations.
A method of pharmacoepidemiologic data analysis that utilizes computerized Medicaid data is presented. A cohort design in which Medicaid enrollees receiving drugs that are normally used to treat similar underlying conditions is described. A period of time in which Medicaid service transactions are evident is required before an individual is eligible for selection into a cohort. Selection of study subjects and descriptions of cohorts are based on Medicaid service histories occurring during the preliminary, prerequisite period. Time at risk is considered to begin after a prescription for a study drug is dispensed and continues until either a refill is dispensed, a prescription for an alternative drug within the same therapeutic class is dispensed, or a predetermined number of days has passed. Subjects are followed forward in time and relevant health care transactions that are suggestive of suspected adverse drug reactions are noted. Incidence densities associated with sequentially ranked prescriptions within sequential courses of therapy are compared. Methods to increase the accuracy of case ascertainment are briefly discussed. Separate validation studies may be used to evaluate the validity of computerized case ascertainment methods and to compensate for misclassification of outcome. The proposed method is intended to provide timely estimates of risk for selected outcomes. For outcomes that cannot be accurately ascertained from computerized data, this method may be useful in determining the feasibility of more customized studies.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
To evaluate the effect of oral contraceptive use on the risk of breast cancer from 20-54 years of age in women with a family history of the disease, we analyzed data from the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study of the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. For 2 years, beginning December 1980, the study enrolled from eight geographical areas in the United States 4730 women with breast cancer and 4646 controls who were breast cancer-free. For women with a first-degree family history of breast cancer, 554 cases and 280 controls, there was no evidence that use of oral contraceptives, even long-term, contributed to their risk of the disease. Neither total duration of use nor duration of use before first term pregnancy bore any relationship with breast cancer risk. Analyses designed to reveal a potential latent effect also showed no evidence of an adverse effect. For women with a second-degree family history of breast cancer, 777 cases and 595 controls, some isolated elevations in risk were observed for selected subgroups of oral contraceptive users. Detailed analyses of oral contraceptive formulation, the characteristics of the women involved, and the patterns of risk observed by latent period and duration of use suggest that these results, most within the limits of chance variation, are not likely to be a consequence of oral contraception.
A long-term effect of oral contraceptives (OCs) on breast cancer risk has been suggested as an explanation for some studies' failure to detect an association between OCs and breast cancer. To address this latency hypothesis, we analyzed data on 4714 case subjects and 4540 control subjects from the population-based Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study. No support was evident for a latent effect of OCs on breast cancer risk through age 54 years: among parous women who had cumulated more than six years of OC use before their first term pregnancy, the risk of breast cancer, relative to nonusers before first term pregnancy, was 0.6 at zero to four years after first term pregnancy (95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.2 to 1.8), 0.7 at five to nine years (95% Cl, 0.3 to 1.7), and 1.1 at ten to 14 years (95% Cl, 0.3 to 3.9). Among nulliparous women with more than six years of OC use in total, the relative risk of breast cancer, by interval from last use of OCs, was 1.3 at zero to four years (95% Cl, 0.8 to 2.0), 1.1 at five to nine years (95% Cl, 0.5 to 2.0), and 0.6 at ten to 14 years (95% Cl, 0.1 to 3.7).
Characteristics of women with potential for modifying the relationship between use of oral contraceptives (OCs) and the risk of premenopausal breast cancer were investigated using data from the Cancer and Steroid Hormone study, a population-based, case-control study conducted in eight geographic areas of the United States. Cases consisted of 2945 women who were premenopausal and 20-54 years of age when breast cancer was diagnosed between December 1, 1980, and December 31, 1982; controls consisted of 2646 women with no history of breast cancer who were also premenopausal and 20-54 years of age when selected during the same period. Results are presented with the cases and controls divided into eight groups on the basis of age at diagnosis on selection (20-44, 45-54), parity (0, greater than or equal to 1), and age at menarche (less than 13, greater than or equal to 13). Among nulliparous women who experienced menarche before age 13, the relative risk of developing breast cancer in the age interval 20-44 years is estimated to be 1.0 for never-users of OCs (reference), 1.3 for greater than 0-3 years of use (95% confidence intervals 0.7-2.4), 1.3 for 4-7 years (95% CI 0.7-2.6), 2.7 for 8-11 years (95% CI 1.2-6.3), and 11.8 for 12 years or longer (95% CI 1.4-95.7). OC use is not significantly related to the risk of breast cancer among women in any of the other seven groups. These findings suggest that prolonged OC use may accelerate the onset of breast cancer for a small group of susceptible women while having no appreciable impact on overall risk. The findings should be regarded as tentative, however, since they are based upon numerous comparisons and because age of menarche was stratified at 13 years to highlight the concentration of breast cancer risk apparent in our data.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.