PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Wasylyk

Publications and source records attributed to B Wasylyk.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Serum, AP-1 and Ets-1 stimulate the human ets-1 promoter.

The ets-1 proto-oncogene codes for a transcription factor. In order to understand how ets-1 is regulated, we have cloned its promoter. We show that the promoter is inducible by serum and expression of c-Fos and c-Jun, and it is positively auto-regulated by its gene product. A 50 base-pair sequence is sufficient to confer c-Fos + c-Jun and c-Ets-1 responsiveness to a heterologous promoter. This element contains two AP1 and one Ets-1 like motifs. Striking, AP-1 and Ets-1 motifs are found in oncogene responsive units (ORU's) of other promoters, suggesting that combining these motifs is a common mechanism for generating mitogen responsive transcription elements.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1992

A novel modulator domain of Ets transcription factors.

The ets gene family is composed of several oncogenes and codes for transcription factors. The Ets proteins have a similar sequence called the ets domain and bind to the core motif A/CGGAA. We show here that several members of the ets family have different trans-activating properties. The ets domain of Ets-1 is required for DNA binding. Adjacent to this domain there is a novel element that inhibits DNA binding. It appears to alter the structure of the DNA-binding domain before it interacts with DNA. There is a similar sequence in Ets-2 that also inhibits DNA binding. This sequence is absent in alternative splice products of h-Ets-1. PU1, the most distantly related member of the ets gene family, lacks this novel element. It has a distinct DNA-binding specificity that is determined by DNA sequences outside the core motif. These results have important implications for both the oncogenic and normal functions of ets family members.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1992

Oncogenic conversion alters the transcriptional properties of ets.

The vEts oncoprotein and its progenitor cEts1(p68) belong to a growing family of transcription factors that are related by the conserved ets domain. We show here that the ets domain and adjacent COOH-terminal amino acids are required for DNA binding by cEts1(p68). vEts differs from cEts1(p68) in both the COOH-terminal sequence and an amino acid substitution in the ets domain. The change in the COOH-terminal sequence markedly decreases its affinity for specific DNA, and the ets domain mutation further diminishes binding. vEts does not trans-activate through the ets (PEA3) motif in vivo. Surprisingly, vEts still efficiently trans-activates the promoters of two genes, stromelysin and collagenase, that are found to be overexpressed in transformed cells. The AP1 motifs of both promoters are required for efficient activation. vEts does not bind to the AP1 motif, even in the presence of cJun and cFos. The DNA-binding domain of Ets1 is required for activation through the AP1 element. Activation is inhibited by the expression of the glucocorticoid and retinoic acid receptors, suggesting that activation by Ets does not involve reversal of negative regulators of AP1. We suggest that activation is by an indirect mechanism involving activation of endogenous genes. Our results show that vEts differs from its progenitor cEts1(p68) in its trans-activating properties. The findings suggest that activation of the Jun and Fos oncoprotein pathway is important for transformation by Ets.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1992

Two independent activation domains in c-Ets-1 and c-Ets-2 located in non-conserved sequences of the ets gene family.

The c-Ets-1 oncoprotein is a transcription activator that specifically binds to DNA. We show, using fusion proteins with heterologous DNA-binding domains, that chicken c-Ets-1 (p68) contains two independent activation domains. The N-terminal activation domain is absent in c-Ets-1 (p54) that is generated from an alternatively spliced mRNA. A closely related member of the ets gene family, c-Ets-2, also contains two separate activation domains. They lie in the regions of the protein that are least conserved with c-Ets-1, suggesting that the activating function will determine the different physiological roles of these two proteins. The activation domains of c-Ets-1 (p68) and -2 are separated by a moderately conserved region that does not activate on its own. These sequences appear to affect stimulation by the domains, suggesting that they regulate transcription activation. Competition experiments show that c-Ets-1 and -2 interact with a common limiting coactivator. These studies provide important clues about the physiological roles of closely related members of the ets gene family.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Transformation suppressor activity of a Jun transcription factor lacking its activation domain.

The oncoprotein c-Jun is thought to be a mediator of ras transformation as both its synthesis and activity as a transcription factor are stimulated by ras expression. But c-Jun co-operates with ras in transformation assays, suggesting that they act along different pathways (reviewed in ref. 4). Here we show by means of a dominant-negative mutated transcription factor that c-Jun potentially in conjunction with other factors that interact with it is necessary for transformation by ras. The mutant Jun lacks an activation domain and blocks stimulation of transcription by several oncoproteins, including Ras, v-Src, polyoma middle T, c-Jun and c-Fos, as well as by the tumour promoter 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA). The inhibition is specific for motifs that bind Jun: activation of an NF-kappa B/Rel motif is not affected. This Jun mutant acts as an anti-oncogene in ras-transformed cells, generating non-transformed revertants that have acquired anchorage and density-dependent growth, as well as reduced tumorigenicity in vivo. Mutants of other transcription factors designed to inhibit transformation will enable us to study their role in signal transduction.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Repression by Jun of the Polyoma-virus enhancer overrides activation in a cell specific manner.

The activities of promoters and enhancers are generated by the combinatorial effects of the factors which interact with them. The Polyoma virus (Py) enhancer contains sequences that are positively regulated by the proto-oncogene Jun. Surprisingly, Jun has an additional and overriding repressing effect on enhancer activity, which is cell specific. Thus overall enhancer activity cannot be simply deduced from the properties of individual elements. We present evidence that repression is indirect.

Blotting, Western↗
PubMed1991

The c-Ets oncoprotein activates the stromelysin promoter through the same elements as several non-nuclear oncoproteins.

The c-ets protooncogenes have recently been shown to code for transcription factors that activate the oncogene responsive unit of the polyoma virus enhancer. We show that transcription of the stromelysin gene, which is highly expressed in transformed cells and tumours, is efficiently activated by c-Ets-1 and -2 through two DNA elements. The distal element is a highly conserved palindrome composed of two strong binding sites for c-Ets-1. The proximal element does not bind c-Ets-1, but may be activated indirectly by increased synthesis of c-Jun and c-Fos. Both ets responsive elements mediate activation by the oncoproteins Ha-Ras, v-Src and v-Mos. These results suggest that c-Ets participates in the mechanisms by which stromelysin gene expression is deregulated in transformed cells and tumours.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Nuclear targets for transcription regulation by oncogenes.

Recent discoveries have highlighted the importance of transcription in cellular transformation. Transcription factors have a crucial role as nuclear targets that convert mitogenic signals from oncogenes into changes in gene expression.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1991

Cell-specific regulation of oncogene-responsive sequences of the c-fos promoter.

We have identified oncogene-responsive sequences in the human c-fos promoter that mediate induction of transcription by several nonnuclear oncoproteins and the tumor promoter TPA. These sequences are regulated in a cell-specific manner. (i) In NIH 3T3 cells, the CArG box of the c-fos promoter is sufficient to mediate activation by oncogenes. (ii) In contrast, in HeLa cells, additional flanking sequences are also required, including the outer arm of the serum response element and the FAP site. We also show that the serum response factor, which binds to the CArG box, activates transcription in vivo in NIH 3T3 cells but not in HeLa cells. Finally, we present evidence that the intracellular level of the c-Fos protein could be a major determinant of cell-specific regulation of these oncogene-responsive elements of the c-fos promoter.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1990

The c-ets proto-oncogenes encode transcription factors that cooperate with c-Fos and c-Jun for transcriptional activation.

Cell transformation by oncogenes leads to changes in gene expression. A key event in this process seems to be activation of the transcription factors AP-1 and PEA 3. Their synergistic activities are required for efficient activation of transcription from different promoters by many different oncogenes, serum growth factors and the tumour promoter TPA. We show here that the products of the ets-1 and -2 proto-oncogenes, whose biological function was previously unknown, are transcription factors that activate transcription through the PEA 3 motif. The p68c-ets-1 protein specifically binds to DNA and contains a transcriptional activation domain. The ets-like gene family therefore seems to encode a new family of transcription factors, apparently unrelated to other transcription factors. The p68c-ets-1 protein cooperates with c-Fos and c-Jun (components of AP-1) for activation of transcription from the oncogene-responsive domain of the polyoma enhancer, indicating that combined activity of all three oncoproteins could be involved in the response of cells to growth stimuli.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1990

The collagenase gene promoter contains a TPA and oncogene-responsive unit encompassing the PEA3 and AP-1 binding sites.

PEA3 is a transcription factor which binds to the polyoma virus enhancer and whose activity is regulated by the expression of a number of oncogenes. We show here that PEA3 also binds specifically to the collagenase and fos cellular promoters. On the collagenase promoter, PEA3 acts synergistically with AP-1 to achieve maximum levels of transcription activation by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA), and non-nuclear oncoproteins, thereby defining a TPA- and oncogene-responsive unit (TORU). From a comparative study of the collagenase TORU and the analogous polyoma virus TORU, we conclude that both the binding affinity of the PEA3 motif and the spacing between PEA3 and AP-1 modulate transcription activation induced by oncogene expression.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1990

Oncogene v-jun modulates DNA replication.

Cell transformation leads to alterations in both transcription and DNA replication. Activation of transcription by the expression of a number of transforming oncogenes is mediated by the transcription factor AP1 (Herrlich & Ponta, 1989; Imler & Wasylyk, 1989). AP1 is a composite transcription factor, consisting of members of the jun and fos gene-families. c-jun and c-fos are progenitors of oncogenes, suggestion that an important transcriptional event in cell transformation is altered activity of AP1, which may arise either indirectly by oncogene expression or directly by structural modification of AP1. We report here that the v-jun oncogene and its progenitor c-jun, as fusion proteins with the lex-A-repressor DNA binding domain, can activate DNA replication from the Polyoma virus (Py) origin of replication, linked to the lex-A operator. The transcription-activation region of v-jun is required for activation of replication. When excess v-jun is expressed in the cell, replication is inhibited or 'squelched'. These results suggest that one consequence of deregulated jun activity could be altered DNA replication and that there are similarities in the way v-jun activates replication and transcription.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1989

PEA3 is a nuclear target for transcription activation by non-nuclear oncogenes.

We have found that the activity of the transcription factor PEA3 is regulated by the expression of non-nuclear oncogenes. This factor, although distinct from PEA1 (AP1), is activated by the same oncogenes (v-src, polyoma (Py) middle T, c-Ha-ras, v-mos, v-raf), by tetradecanoyl phorbol-acetate (TPA) and by serum components. We present evidence that PEA3 and PEA1 co-operate in the response of the polyoma virus (Py) alpha domain to oncogene expression. However, in contrast to PEA1, c-fos does not appear to be necessary for activation of PEA3, suggesting that PEA3 is a fos independent target for regulation of transcription by non-nuclear oncogenes.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

AP1, a composite transcription factor implicated in abnormal growth control.

Growth factors activate cascades of intracellular events, some of which result in altered gene expression. A series of recent discoveries have highlighted the role of the transcription factor AP1 as a mediator of the effects of growth factors, as well as those of oncogenes and the tumour promoter TPA. We discuss the molecular composition of AP1, how its activity is thought to be regulated, and the evidence that AP1 activation is involved in transformation.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Expression of raf oncogenes activates the PEA1 transcription factor motif.

PEA1 (AP1) motif transcription enhancer activity was stimulated by v-raf and more efficiently by activated c-raf-1 or A-raf than by their normal counterparts, in agreement with a role for PEA1 in transformation by raf. Mutations in the ATP-binding site of v-raf prevented activation, suggesting that phosphorylation is somehow required.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed1988

Mutational analysis of the contribution of sequence motifs within the IgH enhancer to tissue specific transcriptional activation.

We have investigated the role of sequence motifs in the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) enhancer on its activity in myeloma and fibroblast cell-lines. In transient transfection assays the transcription stimulatory activity of the enhancer is decreased in myeloma cells by mutating the E motifs 1, 2 and 3, the core motifs C1, C2, C3 and the octamer motif (OC) and in fibroblasts by mutating E2, E3, and C2. Our results suggest that transcription factors binding to E1, C1, C3 and OC contribute in a positive manner to the tissue specificity of the IgH enhancer.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1988

v-jun is a transcriptional activator, but not in all cell-lines.

The recently isolated v-jun oncogene encodes a protein with sequence homology to the transcription factor AP1, as well as a similar DNA binding specificity. We show, by expressing v-jun in F9 embryocarcinoma cells, that v-jun is also a transcriptional activator. However, v-jun expression does not activate transcription in several other cell-lines, suggesting that cell-specific factors are required for v-jun activity.

Animals↗