PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Wellman

Publications and source records attributed to B Wellman.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Complementary and alternative groups contemplate the need for effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness research.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the views of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) groups on the need to demonstrate the effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of their therapies and practices. DESIGN: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 22 representatives of three CAM groups (chiropractic, homeopathy and Reiki). Qualitative content analysis was used to identify similarities and differences among and across groups. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: There were striking differences in the views of the three sets of respondents. The chiropractors agreed that it was essential for their group to provide scientific evidence that their interventions work, are safe and cost-effective. The leaders of the homeopathic group were divided on these points and the Reiki respondents showed virtually no interest in undertaking such research. CONCLUSIONS: CAM groups that are more formally organized are most likely to recognize the importance of scientific research on their practices and therapies.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2001

Computer networks as social networks.

Computer networks are inherently social networks, linking people, organizations, and knowledge. They are social institutions that should not be studied in isolation but as integrated into everyday lives. The proliferation of computer networks has facilitated a deemphasis on group solidarities at work and in the community and afforded a turn to networked societies that are loosely bounded and sparsely knit. The Internet increases people's social capital, increasing contact with friends and relatives who live nearby and far away. New tools must be developed to help people navigate and find knowledge in complex, fragmented, networked societies.

Community Networks↗
PubMed1997

Health care and consumer choice: medical and alternative therapies.

This paper reports on research conducted in a large Canadian city during 1994-1995. The study examines the motivations of patients who choose to seek care from one of five different types of practitioners: family physicians, chiropractors, acupuncturists/traditional Chinese doctors, naturopaths and Reiki practitioners. We use the Andersen socio-behavioural model to help explain why people choose orthodox medicine or a type of alternative care. The data are derived from face to face interviews with 300 patients: 60 from each of the five modes of treatment. The findings demonstrate that this model can explain the use of alternative as well as orthodox medical services. Patients choose specific kinds of practitioners for particular problems, and some use a mixture of practitioners to treat a specific complaint. The choice of type of practitioner(s) is multidimensional and cannot solely be explained either by disenchantment with medicine or by an "alternative ideology".

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Who seeks alternative health care? A profile of the users of five modes of treatment.

This article compares the social and health characteristics of patients of five kinds of practitioners: family physicians (used as a baseline group); chiropractors; acupuncturist/traditional Chinese medicine doctors; naturopaths; and Reiki practitioners. The data were gathered in a large Canadian city during the period 1994 to 1995. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 300 patients (60 from each type of treatment group). While the most striking social and health differences occur between patients of family physicians and the patients of alternative practitioners, significant differences are also evident between the different groups of alternative patients. Reiki patients, for example, have a higher level of education and are more likely to be in managerial or professional positions than other alternative patients. The profiles presented here indicate that users of alternative care should not be regarded as a homogeneous population. The findings also show that almost all alternative patients also consult family physicians. The pattern revealed is one of multiple use: patients choose the kind of practitioner they believe can best help their particular problem.

Adult↗