PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Yawn

Publications and source records attributed to B Yawn.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Missouri Advantage.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Health Maintenance Organizations↗

Rural radiology: who is producing images and who is reading them?

The purpose of this study is to identify the local availability and trends in local availability of imaging technology and interpretation services in rural hospitals in the northwestern United States during the period between 1991 to 1994. Another objective is to describe hospital and community factors associated with the diffusion of image production and interpretation services. The information for this study was gathered through telephone surveys of rural hospital administrators in eight northwestern states in 1991 and 1994. The availability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) equipment, computed tomography (CT) scanners, ultrasonography equipment, and dedicated mammography equipment increased between 1991 and 1994. The increases in MRI units were primarily in mobile equipment, while ultrasonography and mammography equipment increases were primarily fixed hospital-based units. In 1994, image interpretation in the rural hospitals was provided by both primary care and radiology physicians. Forty-six (11.5%) of the rural hospitals had no on-site radiology services and only 73 (18%) had daily radiology services. Between 1991 and 1994, 12 hospitals gained at least once-a-week radiology services, but 24 lost all radiology services. Teleradiology availability more than doubled during the three years. Radiology technology has diffused widely into rural communities in this region of the United States at differing rates for large and small hospitals. Radiologists are available to these hospitals only 46 percent of the days each year, with more days of availability in the larger hospitals and fewer days in the smaller hospitals. Teleradiology capability is increasing more rapidly in the larger hospitals that have radiologists more readily available.

Diagnostic Imaging↗

Development and validation of a discriminative quality of life questionnaire for osteoporosis (the OPTQoL).

We report the development and validation of an osteoporosis-targeted quality of life questionnaire to measure the impact of the disease in the general population. From multiple focus groups with women with osteoporosis, healthy women at risk for osteoporosis, spouses and relatives of women with osteoporosis, and health care providers, we identified over 300 potential items related to the disease. A lengthy questionnaire incorporated these items and was administered to a second large study cohort of 222 women with clinical osteoporosis (history of fracture, significant height loss, and/or kyphosis); 101 women with known low bone mineral density levels that would categorize them as osteoporotic but who had not yet shown obvious physical manifestations of the disease; and 142 women with other conditions (such as arthritis, cancer, depression) expected to also have an impact on quality of life. Final items from among the original 300 were chosen for their demonstrated relationship with osteoporosis as measured by clinical manifestations and low bone density and with quality of life measured by a standard generic questionnaire, the SF-36. The final questionnaire contains 26 scored items in three domains-physical activity, adaptations, and fears- and six nonscored questions relating to osteoporotic changes and diagnosis. This instrument is unique among osteoporosis-targeted questionnaires in that it attempts to measure the total impact of the disease on quality of life within a population at a single point in time.

Community-Institutional Relations↗

Availability of rural Minnesota obstetric services: is it a problem?

In the late 1980s several published articles predicted a crisis in the availability of obstetric care due to declining numbers of rural obstetrical providers. Several state and national studies documented the adverse impact of malpractice and time demands on both urban and rural physicians. But only limited information is available to document current trends in rural obstetrical practice and assess whether or not the predicted crisis occurred. This study sought to provide that updated information for rural Minnesota. A telephone survey of all rural Minnesota obstetrical providers was used to document the number, location, and specialty of rural obstetrical providers, their practice limitations, and plans for future practice. This data was combined with state perinatal statistics for each county to further assess obstetrical care availability and perinatal outcomes. All rural Minnesota obstetricians and certified nurse midwives provide obstetrical care as did 69 percent of all rural family physicians. Only 27 percent of rural obstetrical providers put any type of restrictions on their obstetrical practices. During the past year, 67 currently practicing rural physicians have stopped providing obstetrical care while 55 new obstetrical providers have begun rural practice. Two to 3 percent of current rural providers plan to retire or discontinue obstetrical services during the next five years. The provider demographics from the survey identified eight counties with no prenatal providers, and 12 additional communities of decreased provider availability. However, only two of the counties with no prenatal providers and five of the counties with areas of limited providers had increased percentages of adverse prenatal outcomes such as low birthweight or late prenatal care. This study concluded that Minnesota does not have a serious statewide problem with availability of rural obstetrical providers. However, a few isolated regions of the state have limited provider availability, including limited availability of local high-risk services and consultants.

Catchment Area, Health↗

Preventing cervical cancer.

Primary physicians should be sure their women patients of all ages are being screened for cervical cancer. Underinsured women with low incomes may be referred to the Minnesota Breast and Cervical Cancer Control Program for free exams.

Adult↗

Impact of fears on quality of life in patients with a silent disease: osteoporosis.

Fears and apprehensions are often cited as contributing to decreased quality of life; however, questions relating to worry over the future are rarely included in generic quality-of-life questionnaires. We report an effort to quantify the effect of fear on quality-of-life domains as measured by using the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey. In the course of developing an osteoporosis-targeted quality-of-life (OPTQoL) questionnaire, we asked participants to complete the SF-36 Health Survey and another questionnaire containing items that women with osteoporosis could be expected to find difficult or worrisome. Two hundred twenty-two women with established osteoporosis (loss of height, kyphosis, history of fractures); 101 women with known low bone mineral density (BMD) but without established osteoporosis; and 142 women with no known osteoporosis completed both the osteoporosis questionnaire and the SF-36 Health Survey. This test version of the OPTQoL contained two domains for fears of osteoporosis and the consequent fractures and deformities; these domains were termed fears now and fears future. After adjusting for age and selected comorbidities, we estimated the additional contribution of the two fears domains on the domain scores of the SF-36 Health Survey. For women with established osteoporosis, the fears now domain explained 4% to 8% of the variance within each domain of the survey. For women with low BMD only, fears now had a significant effect only on the physical functioning domain of the survey and explained 4% of the variance of that domain. Fears future had a significant role in explaining the SF-36 Health Survey score on all domains except physical functioning among women with established osteoporosis; however, the fears future domain explained less of the variance (2% to 5%) among these women than did the fears now domain. For women with low BMD only, fears future had a significant impact only on the mental health and the general health domains (4% and 5% of the variance, respectively). Osteoporosis-related fears appear to explain a small but significant percentage of the variation in quality of life for women in midlife.

Adult↗