Low output, low gradient aortic stenosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aortic Valve Stenosis↗
Biomedical subjects
B de Bruyne
Publications and source records attributed to B de Bruyne.
Coronary flow velocity reserve after percutaneous interventions is predictive of periprocedural outcome.
BACKGROUND: Because heterogeneous results have been reported, we assessed coronary flow velocity changes in individuals who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and examined their impact on clinical outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: As part of the Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe (DEBATE) II study, 379 patients underwent Doppler flow-guided angioplasty. All patients were evaluated according to their coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) results (> or =2.5 or < 2.5) at the end of the procedure. A CFVR < 2.5 after angioplasty was associated with an elevated baseline blood flow velocity in both the target artery and reference artery. CFVR before PTCA and CFVR in the reference artery were independent predictors of an optimal CFVR after balloon angioplasty (CFVR before PTCA: odds ratio [OR], 2.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57 to 3.24; CFVR in reference artery: OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.21 to 2.98; both P<0.001) and stent implantation (before PTCA: OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.47 to 4.36; reference artery: OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.07 to 3.87; both P<0.05). A low CFVR at the end of the procedure was an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days (OR, 4.71; 95% CI, 1.14 to 25.92; P=0.034) and at 1 year (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.16 to 3.66; P=0.014). After excluding MACE at 30 days, no difference in MACE at 1 year was observed between the patients with and without a CFVR < 2.5 at the end of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: A low postprocedural CFVR was associated with a worse periprocedural outcome (which was related to microcirculatory disturbances), but there was no significant difference at late follow-up.
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
Value of coronary stenotic flow velocity acceleration in prediction of angiographic restenosis following balloon angioplasty.
INTRODUCTION: Quantitative angiographic assessment after balloon angioplasty is a poor predictor of immediate and long-term outcome. However, the measurement of blood flow velocity during angioplasty has been proved clinically useful. AIMS: To analyse the value of the maximal stenotic flow velocity and the presence of stenotic flow velocity acceleration (aSV) for the long-term outcome after balloon angioplasty. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing single lesion angioplasty within the DEBATE trial were included. aSV was defined as acceleration in the stenotic coronary flow velocity >50% baseline velocity assessed at a reference site of the target vessel. After balloon angioplasty diameter stenosis, minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and coronary flow velocity reserve were similar between the aSV (n=54) and non-aSV group (n=125). At follow-up, the aSV group had a higher restenosis rate (52% vs 30%, P=0.006) The presence of aSV was the strongest independent predictor of restenosis (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.35 to 7.05, P=0.008). The best predictive cut-off value of SV was 101cm.s(-1) (sensitivity of 46%, specificity of 81%, positive predictive value of 85% and a negative predictive value of 58%). CONCLUSION: Following angioplasty, SV appears to be exquisitely sensitive to the changes experienced at the treated area without depending on the status of the microcirculation.
Angioplasty, Balloon↗
Stent placement to prevent restenosis after angioplasty in small coronary arteries.
BACKGROUND: Lesions in small-diameter vessels (<3 mm) define a group with distinct clinical and morphological characteristics. There is an inverse relationship between vessel size and angiographic restenosis rate. This study assessed whether stents reduce angiographic restenosis in small coronary arteries compared with standard balloon angioplasty. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned 351 symptomatic patients needing dilatation of 1 native coronary vessel between 2.3 and 2.9 mm in size to angioplasty alone (n=182) or stent implantation (n=169). The primary end point was angiographic restenosis at 6 months. Secondary end points included death, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, and target vessel revascularization in hospital and at 6 months. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of major in-hospital complications. There was a trend toward fewer in-hospital events in the stent group (3% versus 7.1% in angioplasty group, P=0.076). Crossovers to stent occurred in 37 patients (20.3%). Repeat angiography at 6-month follow-up was performed in 85.3% of patients. Angiographic restenosis occurred in 28% of the stent group and 32.9% of the angioplasty group (P=0.36). Target vessel revascularization was required in 17.8% versus 20.3% of patients (P=0.54), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Stenting and standard coronary angioplasty are associated with equal restenosis rate in small coronary arteries. With a lower in-hospital complication rate, stenting may be a superior strategy in small vessels.
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
Endoluminal beta-radiation therapy for the prevention of coronary restenosis after balloon angioplasty. The Dose-Finding Study Group.
BACKGROUND: Beta radiation is effective in reducing vascular neointimal proliferation in animals after injury caused by balloon angioplasty. However, the lowest dose that can prevent restenosis after coronary angioplasty has yet to be determined. METHODS: After successful balloon angioplasty of a previously untreated coronary stenosis, 181 patients were randomly assigned to receive 9, 12, 15, or 18 Gy of radiation delivered by a centered yttrium-90 source. Adjunctive stenting was required in 28 percent of the patients. The primary end point was the minimal luminal diameter six months after treatment, as a function of the delivered dose of radiation. RESULTS: At the time of follow-up coronary angiography, the mean minimal luminal diameter was 1.67 mm in the 9-Gy group, 1.76 mm in the 12-Gy group, 1.83 mm in the 15-Gy group, and 1.97 mm in the 18-Gy group (P=0.06 for the comparison of 9 Gy with 18 Gy), resulting in restenosis rates of 29 percent, 21 percent, 16 percent, and 15 percent, respectively (P=0.14 for the comparison of 9 Gy with 18 Gy). At that time, 86 percent of the patients had had no serious cardiac events. In 130 patients treated with balloon angioplasty alone, restenosis rates were 28 percent, 17 percent, 16 percent, and 4 percent, respectively (P=0.02 for the comparison of 9 Gy with 18 Gy). Among these patients, there was a dose-dependent enlargement of the lumen in 28 percent, 50 percent, 45 percent, and 74 percent of patients, respectively (P<0.001 for the comparison of 9 Gy with 18 Gy). The rate of repeated revascularization was 18 percent with 9 Gy and 6 percent with 18 Gy (P=0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary beta radiation therapy produces a significant dose-dependent decrease in the rate of restenosis after angioplasty. An 18-Gy dose not only prevents the renarrowing of the lumen typically observed after successful balloon angioplasty, but actually induces luminal enlargement.
Aged↗
The immediate and long-term effect of optimal balloon angioplasty on the absolute coronary blood flow velocity reserve. A subanalysis of the DEBATE study. Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe.
BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding the immediate and long-term effect of balloon angioplasty on the coronary flow reserve evaluated in a multicentre setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 86 patients with one-vessel disease and normal left ventricular function were analysed before and after optimal balloon angioplasty (diameter stenosis <35%) and at 6-month follow-up. Coronary flow reserve was assessed with a Doppler guide wire. A low coronary flow reserve ( 2.5 (46% vs 23% and 36% vs 16%, respectively; P<0.05) due to a trend towards restenosis (29% vs 16%; P=0.15) or a low coronary flow reserve at follow-up due to persistent elevated baseline blood flow velocity. Patients without restenosis showed a decrease or increase of coronary flow reserve during follow-up, determined by alterations of hyperaemic blood flow velocity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with an impaired coronary flow reserve directly after optimal balloon angioplasty showed a higher target lesion revascularization rate compared to patients with a coronary flow reserve >2.5. This patient group consists of patients prone to develop restenosis, while other patients are characterized by a persistently low coronary flow reserve, probably secondary to disturbed autoregulation and/or diffuse mild coronary atherosclerosis. Coronary flow reserve alterations in patients without restenosis were related to changes in hyperaemic blood flow velocity, suggesting that this phenomenon relates to epicardial remodelling.
Adult↗
Value of coronary stenotic flow velocity acceleration on the prediction of long-term improvement in functional status after angioplasty.
BACKGROUND: The coronary flow velocity acceleration at the stenotic site (SVA), defined as a > or = 50% increase in resting stenotic velocity when compared with the reference segment, has been shown to be highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of a hemodynamically significant stenosis. In this study, we describe the value of postprocedural SVA for the prediction of a lack of improvement in functional activity at long-term follow-up balloon angioplasty (BA). METHODS: We investigated the improvement in functional activity in patients undergoing single native vessel angioplasty and intracoronary Doppler (before BA, after BA, and again at 6-month follow-up) as part of the Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe (DEBATE) I trial. Lack of improvement was defined as no change in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) at 6-month follow-up, whereas SVA was defined as > or = 50% elevation in resting velocity at the treated area compared with the distal measurement. RESULTS: SVA was found more frequently in patients without improvement in DASI (45% vs 31%, P =.03). Similar percent diameter stenosis and coronary flow velocity reserve were observed in patients with and those without improvement in DASI at follow-up. By multivariate regression analysis, the presence of SVA (P = .029; odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 3.63) and an elevated DASI at baseline (P < .001; odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.07) were associated with a lack of improvement at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of SVA was associated with failure of improvement in functional activity at follow-up after coronary intervention.
Angioplasty, Balloon↗
Uncomplicated moderate coronary artery dissections after balloon angioplasty: good outcome without stenting.
OBJECTIVE: To study the relation between moderate coronary dissections, coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), and long term outcome. METHODS: 523 patients undergoing balloon angioplasty and sequential intracoronary Doppler measurements were examined as part of the DEBATE II trial (Doppler endpoints balloon angioplasty trial Europe). After successful balloon angioplasty, patients were randomised to stenting or no further treatment. Dissections were graded at the core laboratory by two observers and divided into four categories: none, mild (type A-B), moderate (type C), severe (types D to F). Patients with severe dissections (n = 128) or without available reference vessel CFVR (n = 139) were excluded. The remaining 256 patients were divided into two groups according to the presence (group A, n = 45) or absence (group B, n = 211) of moderate dissection. RESULTS: Following balloon angioplasty, there was no difference in CFVR between the two groups. At 12 months follow up, a higher rate of major adverse cardiac events was observed overall in group A than in group B (10 (22%) v 23 (11%), p = 0.041). However, the risk of major adverse events was similar in the subgroups receiving balloon angioplasty (group A, 6 (19%) v group B, 16 (16%), NS). Among group A patients, the adverse events risk was greater in those randomised to stenting (odds ratios 6.603 v 1.197, p = 0.046), whereas there was no difference in risk if the group was analysed according to whether the CFVR was < 2.5 or >/= 2.5 after balloon angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate dissections left untreated result in no increased risk of major adverse cardiac events. Additional stenting does not improve the long term outcome.
Aortic Dissection↗
Randomized comparison of primary stenting and provisional balloon angioplasty guided by flow velocity measurement. Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe (DEBATE) II Study Group.
BACKGROUND: Coronary stenting improves outcomes compared with balloon angioplasty, but it is costly and may have other disadvantages. Limiting stent use to patients with a suboptimal result after angioplasty (provisional angioplasty) may be as effective and less expensive. METHODS AND RESULTS: To analyze the cost-effectiveness of provisional angioplasty, patients scheduled for single-vessel angioplasty were first randomized to receive primary stenting (97 patients) or balloon angioplasty guided by Doppler flow velocity and angiography (523 patients). Patients in the latter group were further randomized after optimization to either additional stenting or termination of the procedure to further investigate what is "optimal." An optimal result was defined as a flow reserve >2.5 and a diameter stenosis <36%. Bailout stenting was needed in 129 patients (25%) who were randomized to balloon angioplasty, and an optimal result was obtained in 184 of the 523 patients (35%). There was no significant difference in event-free survival at 1 year between primary stenting (86.6%) and provisional angioplasty (85.6%). Costs after 1 year were significantly higher for provisional angioplasty (EUR 6573 versus EUR 5885; P:=0.014). Results after the second randomization showed that stenting was also more effective after optimal balloon angioplasty (1-year event free survival, 93.5% versus 84.1%; P:=0. 066). CONCLUSIONS: After 1 year of follow-up, provisional angioplasty was more expensive and without clinical benefit. The beneficial value of stenting is not limited to patients with a suboptimal result after balloon angioplasty.
Analysis of Variance↗
Angiographical and Doppler flow-derived parameters for assessment of coronary lesion severity and its relation to the result of exercise electrocardiography. DEBATE study group. Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe.
AIMS: Evaluation of angiographical and intracoronary Doppler-derived parameters of coronary stenosis severity. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 225 patients with one-vessel disease were studied before PTCA and at 6 months follow-up. Exercise electrocardiography was performed to document presence (n = 157) or absence (n = 138) of an ST segment shift (> or =0.1 mV). Intracoronary blood flow velocity analysis was performed to determine the proximal/distal flow velocity ratio, the distal diastolic/systolic flow velocity ratio and coronary flow velocity reserve. Receiver operator characteristic curves were calculated to assess the predictive value of these variables compared with the exercise test. The distal coronary flow velocity reserve demonstrated the best linear correlation for both percentage diameter stenosis and minimum lumen diameter (r = 0.67 and r = 0.66; P<0.01), compared to the diastolic/systolic flow velocity ratio (r = 0.19 and r = 0.14; P<0.01) and the proximal/distal flow velocity ratio (r = 0.03 and r = 0.07; not significant). The areas under the curve were 0. 84+/-0.02; 0.82+/-0.03 and 0.83+/-0.03 for diameter stenosis, minimum lumen diameter and coronary flow velocity reserve, respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the percentage diameter stenosis or minimum lumen diameter and coronary flow velocity reserve were independent predictors for the result of stress testing. CONCLUSIONS: The distal coronary flow velocity reserve is the best intracoronary Doppler parameter for evaluation of coronary narrowings. Angiographical estimates of coronary lesion severity and distal coronary flow velocity reserve are good and independent predictors for the assessment of functional severity of coronary stenosis, emphasizing the complementary role of these parameters for clinical decision making.
Adult↗
Effects of dobutamine on coronary stenosis physiology and morphology: comparison with intracoronary adenosine.
BACKGROUND: The mechanisms leading to dobutamine-induced ischemia are not fully understood. In the present study, we investigated the effects of high-dose intravenous dobutamine on morphological and physiological indexes of coronary stenoses. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with normal left ventricular function and isolated coronary stenoses were studied. At catheterization, mean aortic pressure (P(a)), mean distal coronary pressure (P(d)), and P(d)/P(a) as an index of myocardial resistance were recorded at rest, after intracoronary adenosine, and during intravenous infusion of dobutamine (10 to 40 micrograms . kg(-1). min(-1)). Reference vessel diameter and minimal luminal diameter, as assessed by coronary angiography, did not change during dobutamine infusion compared with baseline (2.84+/-0.49 versus 2.77+/-0.41 mm and 1.35+/-0.38 versus 1. 27+/-0.31 mm, respectively; both P=NS). During peak dobutamine infusion, P(d) and P(d)/P(a) reached similar levels as during adenosine infusion (60+/-18 versus 59+/-18 mm Hg and 0.68+/-0.18 versus 0.68+/-0.17, respectively; all P=NS). In 9 patients, an additional bolus of intracoronary adenosine given at the peak dose of dobutamine failed to further decrease P(d)/P(a). Furthermore, in patients with dobutamine-induced wall motion abnormalities, the maximal decrease in P(d)/P(a) was similar during dobutamine and adenosine infusions. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose intravenous infusion of dobutamine does not modify the dimensions of the epicardial coronary stenosis. However, much like the direct coronary vasodilator adenosine, dobutamine fully exhausts myocardial resistance regardless of the presence of mechanical dysfunction.
Adenosine↗
A prospective hemodynamic evaluation of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction.
A prospective invasive hemodynamic evaluation in 11 unselected patients with medically refractory chronic atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction was performed. The resultant rate regulation and control caused a hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement despite persistent fibrillation at the atrial level.
Aged↗
Prognostic value of intracoronary flow velocity and diameter stenosis in assessing the short- and long-term outcomes of coronary balloon angioplasty: the DEBATE Study (Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe).
BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective, multicenter study was the identification of Doppler flow velocity measurements predictive of clinical outcome of patients undergoing single-vessel balloon angioplasty with no previous Q-wave myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 297 patients, a Doppler guidewire was used to measure basal and maximal hyperemic flow velocities proximal and distal to the stenosis before and after angioplasty. In 225 patients with an angiographically successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), postprocedural distal coronary flow reserve (CFR) and percent diameter stenosis (DS%) were correlated with symptoms and/or ischemia at 1 and 6 months, with the need for target lesion revascularization, and with angiographic restenosis (defined as DS > or = 50% at follow-up). Logistic regression and receiver operator characteristic curve analyses were applied to determine the prognostic cutoff value of CFR and DS separately and in combination. Optimal cutoff criteria for predictors of these clinical events were DS, 35%; CFR, 2.5. A distal CFR after angioplasty > 2.5 with a residual DS < or = 35% identified lesions with a low incidence of recurrence of symptoms at 1 month (10% versus 19%, P=.149) and at 6 months (23% versus 47%, P=.005), a low need for reintervention (16% versus 34%, P=.024), and a low restenosis rate (16% versus 41%, P=.002) compared with patients who did not meet these criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of distal CFR after PTCA, in combination with DS%, have a predictive value, albeit modest for the short- and long-term outcomes after PTCA, and thus may be used to identify patients who will or will not benefit from additional therapy such as stent implantation.
Aged↗
Effect of nadroparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, on clinical and angiographic restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty: the FACT study. Fraxiparine Angioplastie Coronaire Transluminale.
BACKGROUND: Experimental studies suggest that the antiproliferative effect of heparin after arterial injury is maximized by pretreatment. No previous studies of restenosis have used a pretreatment strategy. We designed this study to determine whether treatment with nadroparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, started 3 days before the procedure and continued for 3 months, affected angiographic restenosis or clinical outcome after coronary angioplasty. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial, elective coronary angioplasty was performed on 354 patients who were treated with daily subcutaneous nadroparin (0.6 mL of 10,250 anti-Xa IU/mL) or placebo injections started 3 days before angioplasty and continued for 3 months. Angiography was performed just before and immediately after angioplasty and at follow-up. The primary study end point was angiographic restenosis, assessed by quantitative coronary angiography 3 months after balloon angioplasty. Clinical follow-up was continued up to 6 months. Clinical and procedural variables and the occurrence of periprocedural complications did not differ between groups. At angiographic follow-up, the mean minimal lumen diameter and the mean residual stenosis in the nadroparin group (1.37+/-0.66 mm, 51.9+/-21.0%) did not differ from the corresponding values in the control group (1.48+/-0.59 mm, 48.8+/-18.9%). Combined major cardiac-related clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization) did not differ between groups (30.3% versus 29.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with the low-molecular-weight heparin nadroparin continued for 3 months after balloon angioplasty had no beneficial effect on angiographic restenosis or on adverse clinical outcomes.
Adolescent↗
Comparison of exercise electrocardiography and dobutamine echocardiography with invasively assessed myocardial fractional flow reserve in evaluation of severity of coronary arterial narrowing.
This study compares side-by-side exercise electrocardiography and dobutamine echocardiography with an invasively assessed index of myocardial flow (pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve). The data show that ST-segment depression > or = 0.1 mV and the occurrence of new wall motion abnormalities during dobutamine infusion reflect a similar impairment of myocardial blood flow.
Cardiotonic Agents↗
From research to clinical practice: current role of intracoronary physiologically based decision making in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Decisions regarding coronary interventions should be combined with objective evidence of myocardial ischemia. The most common physiologic approach utilizes hospital facilities outside the catheterization laboratory, requiring additional time and cost. With the introduction of sensor-tipped angioplasty guide wires, distal coronary flow velocity and pressure can be obtained in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, facilitating physiologically based decisions regarding the need for intervention. In the catheterization laboratory, physiologically significant stenoses can be characterized as having impaired post-stenotic coronary flow reserve < 2.0 and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve < 0.75, both variables related strongly to positive ischemic perfusion imaging or stress testing results. Deferring coronary interventions on the basis of normal translesional physiology is safe and is associated with a low rate (< 10%) of lesion progression over a 10-month follow-up period. Preliminary data indicate that excellent physiologic and anatomic end points after balloon angioplasty are associated with low (< 20%) restenosis rates at 6-month follow-up. Clinically relevant relations of in-laboratory physiology support the insight that physiologic, as much as or more than anatomic variables, ultimately determine the functional status of a patient. Current data suggest that an intracoronary physiologic approach complements coronary lumenology and appears to have important clinical and economic implications for patients undergoing invasive evaluation and treatment of coronary artery disease.
Blood Flow Velocity↗
Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans. Feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve.
BACKGROUND: To assess coronary lesion severity in the catheterization laboratory, several guide wire-based methods have been proposed. The purpose of the present study was to compare the feasibility and the reproducibility of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity-pressure slope index (IHDVPS), and pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFRmyo). METHODS AND RESULTS: From distal coronary pressure and flow velocity signals (0.014-in guide wires), CFVR, IHDVPS, and FFRmyo were computed in 15 stenoses (13 patients) under the four following pairs of conditions: (1) twice under baseline conditions; (2) during atrial pacing at 80 and 110 bpm; (3) before and during intravenous infusion of nitroprusside; and (4) before and during intravenous infusion of dobutamine. A total of 104 measurements were obtained. Both CFVR and FFRmyo could be calculated in all cases. IHDVPS could be calculated in only 79% of cases. The mean value of CFVR did not change between the two baseline measurements and during infusion of nitroprusside but decreased from 1.85 +/- 0.41 to 1.66 +/- 0.45 (P < .05) during atrial pacing and from 1.90 +/- 0.50 to 1.41 +/- 0.28 (P < .05) during dobutamine infusion. The mean values of IHDVPS and FFRmyo remained similar, whichever the changes in hemodynamic conditions. The coefficient of variation between two consecutive measurements was significantly lower for FFRmyo (4.2%) than for CFVR (17.7%) and for IHDVPS (24.7%). CONCLUSIONS: CFVR is easy to measure but sensitive to hemodynamic changes. IHDVPS can be measured only in < 80% of cases and is highly variable even without changes in hemodynamic conditions. FFRmyo is easy to measure and almost independent of hemodynamic changes.
Aged↗
Abnormal systolic intraventricular flow velocities after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Mechanisms, predictive factors, and prognostic significance.
BACKGROUND: Dynamic intraventricular flow velocities after valve replacement for aortic stenosis have been associated with high in-hospital morbidity and mortality. The aims of the present study were to determine the mechanisms and preoperative predictors of abnormal flow velocity (AFV) after valve replacement for aortic stenosis and to assess the clinical course of patients with AFV after surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients with pure aortic stenosis were studied prospectively before operation by cardiac catheterization and Doppler echocardiography. After surgery, intraventricular flow was studied by Doppler echocardiography at rest, during nipride infusion, and during dobutamine infusion. AFV (defined as a systolic dagger-shaped Doppler spectrum > 2 m/s) occurred in 14 patients at rest and in 27 patients during nipride and/or dobutamine infusion. In most patients, AFV was associated with left ventricular cavity squeezing. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, preoperative intraventricular flow velocity and septal-to-posterior wall thickness ratio by Doppler echocardiography, and mean transvalvular pressure gradient and ejection fraction by catheterization emerged as predictors of resting postoperative AFV. Patients with resting AFV had a higher incidence of dyspnea or hypotension (64% versus 21%, P < .01) and a longer hospital stay (13.1 +/- 5.8 versus 11.1 +/- 2.5, P < .05) than patients without AFV. In contrast, at a 1-year follow-up, no patient with resting AFV died. CONCLUSIONS: First, AFV occurs in 14% of patients at rest after valve replacement for aortic stenosis and can be provoked or worsened by ventricular unloading or inotropic stimulation. Second, AFV is related more frequently to cavity squeezing than to systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve apparatus. Third, a typical pattern (small, hyperdynamic, and asymmetrically hypertrophied ventricle) is predictive for postoperative AFV and should be taken into account for the postoperative management. Finally, the presence of AFV at rest is associated with high in-hospital morbidity but good long-term prognosis.
Adult↗