Biomedical subjects

B van Pinxteren

Publications and source records attributed to B van Pinxteren.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Short-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists and prokinetics for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms and endoscopy negative reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 25% of adults experience heartburn, the cardinal feature of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), at least monthly. The evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected GORD is associated with a substantial economic burden. Most patients are treated empirically (without specific diagnostic evaluation). They include a wide range of underlying oesophageal injury. The severity of oesophageal injury can only be established in those who have undergone upper endoscopy. Patients without visible damage to the oesophagus have been referred to as having endoscopy negative reflux disease (ENRD). The pathogenesis of ENRD as well as its response to treatment may differ from GORD with oesophagitis. OBJECTIVES: Summarise, quantify and compare the efficacy of the short-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) and prokinetics in adults with GORD, treated empirically and in those with endoscopy negative reflux disease (ENRD). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2005), MEDLINE (January 1966 to December 2005), EMBASE (January 1988 to December 2005). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials focussing on symptomatic outcome after short-term treatment for GORD using proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists or prokinetic agents. Studies were included provided that participants could be classified in the empirical treatment group (no endoscopy used in treatment allocation) or in the endoscopy negative reflux disease group (no endoscopic signs of erosive oesophagitis). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-one trials (9457 participants) were included: fifteen in the empirical treatment group, twelve in the ENRD group and four in both. In empirical treatment of GORD the relative risk (RR) for heartburn remission (the primary efficacy variable) in placebo-controlled trials for PPI was 0.37 (two trials, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32 to 0.44), for H2RAs 0.77 (two trials, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.99) and for prokinetics 0.86 (one trial, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.01). In a direct comparison PPIs were more effective than H2RAs (seven trials, RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.73) and prokinetics (two trials, RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.87). In treatment of ENRD, the RR for heartburn remission for PPI versus placebo was 0.69 (seven trials, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.78) and for H2RA versus placebo was 0.84 (two trials, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.95). The RR for PPI versus H2RA was 0.78 (three trials, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.97) and for PPI versus prokinetic 0.72 (one trial, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.92). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: PPIs are more effective than H2RAs in relieving heartburn in patients with GORD who are treated empirically and in those with ENRD, although the magnitude of benefit is greater for those treated empirically.

Endoscopy, Digestive System↗

PubMed2006

[Summary of the practice guideline 'Urinary-tract infections' (second revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners].

The 1999 practice guideline 'Urinary-tract infections' from the Dutch College of General Practitioners has been revised. Not only febrile urinary-tract infections are now regarded as 'complicated', but also all urinary-tract infections in men, pregnant women, children, and patients with kidney or urinary-tract disease, impaired immune response or an indwelling catheter. Under certain conditions, in women recognising the symptoms of an earlier uncomplicated urinary-tract infection, treatment may be instituted without performing supplementary urinalysis. The nitrite dipstick test and dipslide culturing are recommended for the diagnosis of urinary-tract infections; the value of the leukocyte esterase dipstick test is limited. A group-B streptococcal urinary-tract infection during pregnancy is an indication for intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis during the delivery. The recommended duration of treatment with nitrofurantoin is extended from three to five days. Both increased bacterial resistance to trimethoprim and the intention to reduce the use of fluoroquinolones in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary-tract infections were reasons for including phosphomycin in the guideline. In addition to antibiotic prophylaxis, cranberry products may be of value in the prevention of recurrent urinary-tract infections.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed2005

[Guideline "Dyspepsia"].

For the management of patients with dyspepsia a multidisciplinary working party has made recommendations, i.e. about indications for prompt endoscopy, the management of dyspeptic complaints of recent onset, the application of diagnostic tests and treatment of recurrent dyspepsia and the indications for long term use of acid suppressants. Endoscopy is indicated in every patient with alarm symptoms, i.e. blood loss, dysphagia, weight loss or anemia in combination with dyspepsia. Age alone is not a decisive factor in this. Given the good prognosis of recent onset dyspepsia, the application of diagnostic tests is generally not required. Treatment should be restricted to antacids or H2 receptor antagonists. Only in case of persistent or recurring complaints, diagnostic tests or another treatment (Helitobacter pylori diagnostic tests, empirical treatment or endoscopy) should be considered. Testing for H. pylori is especially effective in patients at risk for peptic ulcer disease: those with recurrent complaints, and those with a history of peptic ulcer, without typical reflux symptoms or those with a history ofpeptic ulcer. Short term empirical treatment with a proton pump inhibitor is especially effective in patients with typical reflux symptoms. Endoscopy is the only way to rule out malignancy, and should be used to solve serious diagnostic uncertainty in patient or physician. The only indication for continuous proton pump inhibitor treatment is severe oesophagitis. All other patients with less severe reflux disease should preferably be treated on either on demand or intermittent basis. Long term proton pump inhibitor treatment is not indicated for patients with peptic ulcer disease or functional dyspepsia.

Antacids↗

PubMed2004

Short-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists and prokinetics for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms and endoscopy negative reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Heartburn affects 25% of the adult population on a monthly basis and represents the core symptom of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Treatment is readily available and puts a large demand on healthcare budgets. A majority of GORD patients show no endoscopic abnormalities and in daily practice most patients are treated empirically. OBJECTIVES: Summarise, quantify and compare the efficacy of the short-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) and prokinetics in adults with GORD and endoscopy negative reflux disease (ENRD). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to December 2003), EMBASE (January 1988 to December 2003). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials focussing on symptomatic outcome after short-term treatment for GORD using proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists or prokinetic agents. Participants had to be classifiable in the empirical treatment group (no endoscopy used in treatment allocation) or in the endoscopy negative reflux disease group (no endoscopic signs of erosive oesophagitis). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-seven trials (8402 participants) were included: thirteen in the empirical treatment group, ten in the ENRD group and four in both. In empirical treatment of GORD the relative risk (RR) for heartburn remission in placebo-controlled trials for PPI was 0.37 (two trials, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32 to 0.44), for H2RAs 0.77 (two trials, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.99) and for prokinetics 0.86 (one trial, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.01). In a direct comparison PPIs were significantly (p < 0.05) more effective than H2RAs (five trials, RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.77) and prokinetics (two trials, RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.87). In treatment of ENRD, RR for heartburn remission for PPI versus placebo was 0.68 (six trials, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.78) and for H2RA versus placebo was 0.84 (two trials, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.95). The RR for PPI versus H2RA was 0.74 (three trials, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.03) and for PPI versus prokinetic 0.72 (one trial, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.92). REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this review suggest that antisecretory drugs are effective in the empirical treatment of complaints likely to originate from GORD and in treatment of ENRD and furthermore that PPIs are superior to H2RAs in empirical treatment of typical GORD symptoms.

Endoscopy, Digestive System↗

PubMed2000

Short-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists and prokinetics for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms and endoscopy negative reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Heartburn affects 25% of the adult population on a monthly basis and represents the core symptom of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Treatment is readily available and puts a large demand on healthcare budgets. Research in the past has focused largely on the treatment of oesophagitis. A majority of GORD patients show no endoscopic abnormalities and in daily practice most patients are treated empirically. OBJECTIVES: Summarise, quantify and compare the efficacy of the short-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) and prokinetics in the empirical treatment of GORD and the treatment of endoscopy negative reflux disease (ENRD). SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches were performed of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Bibliographies were screened. SELECTION CRITERIA: Included were randomised controlled trials focussing on symptomatic outcome after short-term treatment for GORD using proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists or prokinetic agents. Participants had to be classifiable in the empirical treatment group (no endoscopy used in treatment allocation) or in the endoscopy negative reflux disease group (no endoscopic signs of erosive oesophagitis). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data from included trials were extracted by two reviewers independently. The impact of interventions was expressed as relative risks (RR) together with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Meta-analysis was only performed if there were sufficient trials of similar comparisons reporting the same outcomes. Relative risks were combined for binary outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-one trials were included: eleven in the empirical treatment group, seven in the ENRD group and three in both. In empirical treatment of GORD the RR for heartburn remission in placebo-controlled trials for PPI was 0.35 (1 trial, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.46), for H2RAs 0.77 (2 trials, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.99) and for prokinetics 0.86 (1 trial, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.01). In direct comparison PPIs were significantly (p<0.05) more effective than H2RAs (3 trials, RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.80) and prokinetic's (2 trials, RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.87). In treatment of ENRD, RR for heartburn remission for PPI versus placebo was 0.68 (4 trials, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.88) and for H2RA versus placebo was 0.84 (2 trials, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.95). The RR for PPI versus H2RA was 0.69 (2 trials, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.20) and versus prokinetic 0.72 (1 trial, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.92). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this review suggest that antisecretory drugs are effective in the empirical treatment of complaints likely to originate from GORD and in treatment of ENRD and furthermore that PPIs are superior to H2RAs in empirical treatment of typical GORD symptoms.

Endoscopy, Digestive System↗

PubMed1999

Curvature of the lower lumbar facet joints: variations at different levels and relationship with orientation.

The curvature of the lower lumbar facet joints in the transverse plane was measured using an innovative computed tomographic approach, and its relationship with the orientation of the joints was evaluated. Two hundred three vertebral levels were examined in 116 patients with low back pain. Reference circles were used to quantify joint curvature. The mean curvature (+/- SD) at the levels L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 conformed to circles of 27.3 mm +/- 11.5; 35.1 mm +/- 14.6; and 51.0 mm +/- 34.5 in diameter respectively. The ratio between the curvature of the facets and their orientation was 62.6% +/- 19.0; 57.8% +/- 21.6; and 64.9% +/- 48.9. From L3-L4 down to L5-S1 the curvature of the facet joints decreases. The differences between L3-L4 and L4-L5 is smaller than between L4-L5 and L5-S1. The curvatures of the joints conform to circles that are in mean approximately 40% in diameter smaller than those to which their orientations conform.

Anthropometry↗

PubMed1997

The facet orientation circle. A new parameter for facet joint angulation in the lower lumbar spine.

STUDY DESIGN: A descriptive quantitative evaluation was done of the transverse orientation of the lower lumbar facet joints as measured by computed tomography scanning. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a new parameter for facet joint angulation in the transverse plane (the "facet orientation circle") and to obtain reference values for this new parameter. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In other studies, both in vitro and in vivo, the angulation of the facet joints has been measured in degrees relative to the frontal or sagittal plane. These methods have some limitations. The parameter used in the present study has not been described in the literature. METHODS: Lower lumbar facet joint orientation was measured in 212 vertebral levels of 123 consecutive patients using the facet orientation circle parameter. Patients with degenerative or developmental abnormalities of the lumbar spine were excluded, as were those with technically inadequate computed tomography studies. RESULTS: Mean facet orientation circle diameters (+/-SD) were: L3-L4, 43.7 +/- 10.5 mm; L4-L5, 63.8 +/- 26.4 mm; and L5-S1, 82.3 +/- 23.5 mm. Differences between right and left sides were: L3-L4, 6.3 +/- 7.1 mm; L4-L5, 13.9 +/- 25.3 mm; and L5-S1, 17.9 +/- 16.2 mm, intra-observer variability was 2.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of facet joint angulation using the facet orientation circle is possible and reproducible. The morphometric data presented may be useful as a reference for biomechanical and clinical research of facet joint orientation and asymmetry.

Adolescent↗