Biomedical subjects

Babajide O Familoni

Publications and source records attributed to Babajide O Familoni.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Gastric electrical stimulation has an immediate antiemetic effect in patients with gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: Electrical stimulation has been successfully employed to treat diseases involving electro-pathology in the heart, skeletal muscles, and the brain, but not in the GI tract. AIM: This study examined the clinical feasibility and efficacy of GES in treating patients with severe gastroparesis. METHODS: Nausea, vomiting, GEA, and liquid and solid gastric emptying were monitored in eleven patients with refractory gastroparesis at baseline and after one week of continuous electrical stimulation administered at 12 cycles/min. Eight patients were subsequently implanted with permanent stimulation devices. Follow-up studies were conducted after 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo. of stimulation. RESULTS: After one week of stimulation, patients' quantified symptoms of nausea and vomiting decreased significantly, and liquid emptying and GEA improved. This improvement was maintained over time in the patients who continued to receive stimulation. Emptying of solids showed progressive improvement that became significant after 3 mo. The three patients who did not receive stimulation after the trial period showed significantly higher symptoms at 12 mo. CONCLUSION: This paper demonstrates that GES at a frequency of 12 cycles/min has an immediate antiemetic effect, followed by an improvement in disordered gastric emptying.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Driving gastric electrical activity with electrical stimulation.

Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) therapy is generating a lot of interest, but it is still investigational. Its efficacy in driving gastric electrical activity and improving motility, and the ideal frequency for bringing this about are still controversial. In this study, a rule-based computer model of tissue electrical response to stimulation was developed to examine the interaction between tissue electrical refractoriness and the onset of tissue activation. The results were compared to response to GES in 8 dogs implanted with electrodes and strain gauges and stimulated at frequencies ranging from 3 to 30 cycles/min. Simulated electrical control activity at an intrinsic frequency of 5/min was entrained from 2.0 cycles/min to 7.92 cycles/min. The regularity of the ECA elicited by stimulation depended on the number of pulses injected. Electrical stimulation in canine stomach entrained the native electrical control activity from a baseline average of 5.14 +/- 0.32 cycles/min up to 9.2 cycles/min. Contractile response to stimulation at 20-30 cycles/min were significantly higher (p < 0.05). Computer simulation of GES may be a useful tool to complement and reduce some of the costs associated with empirical studies of gastric electrical stimulation in establishing its possible use in treating drug refractory gastroparesis.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Gastric electrical stimulation in intractable symptomatic gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of gastroparesis remains unsatisfactory despite prokinetic and anti-emetic drugs. Gastric electrical stimulation has been proposed as a therapeutic option. We have assessed the effect of gastric electrical stimulation on symptoms, medical treatment, body weight and gastric emptying in patients with intractable symptomatic gastroparesis in a non-placebo-controlled study. METHODS: In this multicenter study, 38 highly symptomatic patients with drug-refractory gastroparesis were enrolled. Patients first received temporary electrical stimulation using percutaneous electrodes. The 33 responders to temporary stimulation then underwent surgical implantation of a permanent stimulator. Severity of vomiting and nausea was assessed before and after stimulation. Patients were reassessed 3, 6, and 12 months after permanent implantation. RESULTS: With stimulation, 35/38 patients (97%) experienced >80% reduction in vomiting and nausea. This effect persisted throughout the observation period (2.9-15.6 months, 341 patient-months). Gastric emptying did not initially change, but improved in most patients at 12 months. At 1 year, the average weight gain was 5.5% and 9/14 patients initially receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition were able to discontinue it. CONCLUSION: Electrical stimulation of the stomach has an immediate and potent anti-emetic effect. It offers a safe and effective alternative for patients with intractable symptomatic gastroparesis.

Adolescent↗