Spouses who placed partners in care homes experienced emotional reactions to separation and made efforts to maintain their relationship.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Comment↗
Biomedical subjects
Barbara Given
Publications and source records attributed to Barbara Given.
Year 2000 Oncology Nursing Society Research Priorities Survey.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To determine the Oncology Nursing Society's (ONS's) research priorities for 2001-2005 for oncology nursing across the entire scope of cancer care, including prevention, detection, treatment, and palliative care. DESIGN: A cross-sectional, mailed survey. SAMPLE: Stratified by the general member group (i.e., a random sample of 1,850 ONS members) and researcher group (i.e., census of 150 ONS researchers). 788 responded for an overall response rate of 39%. MAIN RESARCH VARIABLES: 113 topics that were identified from the 1994 ONS Research Priority Survey questionnaire and earlier ONS Research Priority Surveys, with the addition of 20 new items to existing questionnaire categories and one new category area: health services research. FINDINGS: Top 20 research priorities were distributed across six of eight questionnaire categories, and the number of top 20 priorities within categories differs. Compared to the 1994 survey, 9 topics were common to both top 20 lists; 8 were new to the top 20, and 11 dropped out of the top 20. When the researcher group and adjusted total sample group top 20 priority ratings were compared, nine topics were common to both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Examining research priorities affords different perspectives to guide practice, education, research, management, and administration. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: ONS Research Priority Survey results provide an important foundation for developing future research across the entire scope of oncology nursing.
Cross-Sectional Studies↗
Pain and fatigue management: results of a nursing randomized clinical trial.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: Through a randomized clinical trial, to compare patients undergoing an initial course of chemotherapy who report pain and fatigue at baseline and who are receiving conventional care alone with those receiving conventional care plus a nursing intervention on outcomes reported at 20 weeks. SETTING: Chemotherapy clinics of two comprehensive and two community cancer centers. METHODS: Interviews were conducted at baseline and 10 and 20 weeks. An 18-week, 10-contact nursing intervention utilizing problem-solving approaches to symptom management and improving physical functioning and emotional health was implemented. SAMPLE: The sample consisted of 53 patients in the experimental arm and 60 in the control arm who reported pain and fatigue at baseline. VARIABLES: Pain and fatigue, numbers of other symptoms, and physical role impact and social-functioning subscales from the Medical Outcomes Study 36 Short Form. FINDINGS: Patients who received the intervention reported a significant reduction in the number of symptoms experienced and improved physical and social functioning. Fewer patients in the experimental arm reported both pain and fatigue at 20 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioral interventions targeted to patients with pain and fatigue can reduce symptom burden, improve the quality of the daily life of patients, and demonstrate the "value-added" role of nursing care for patients undergoing chemotherapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: These data support the "value-added" role of nursing interventions for symptom management and improved quality of life during the course of cancer treatment.
Activities of Daily Living↗
Minor acute illness: a preliminary research report on the "worried well".
OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to determine how patients who make frequent use of the medical system (high users) with medically unexplained symptoms met our chart-rating criteria for somatization and minor acute illness and what the stability of such diagnoses were over time. STUDY DESIGN: A chart review was performed at baseline and 1 and 2 years; we re-rated the charts of patients initially rated as having somatization, as well as a 15% sample of those with minor acute illness. POPULATION: We obtained a random sample of high-use patients (= 6 visits/year) aged 21 to 55 years who were identified from the management information system. OUTCOMES: We measured chart review designations as organic disease, somatization, or minor acute illness. RESULTS: Among 883 high users at baseline, 35% had organic diseases; 14% had somatization; and 51% had minor acute illness as their primary problems. No patients with initial minor acute diagnoses were reclassified as having somatization 1 or 2 years later, and all but 2 patients had minor acute illness in 1 or both follow-up years. CONCLUSIONS: Minor acute illness was more common among high users than somatization and organic diseases combined. It has not previously been studied but probably has been recognized by clinicians as the "worried well." Diagnoses of somatization were unstable over 2 years follow-up, while minor acute diagnoses were stable, supporting the latter as a valid entity.
Adult↗
Using nurse practitioners to implement an intervention in primary care for high-utilizing patients with medically unexplained symptoms.
Patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) often are a source of frustration for clinicians, and despite high quality biomedical attention and frequent diagnostic tests, they have poor health outcomes. Following upon progress in depression treatment approaches, we developed a multidimensional treatment protocol for deployment by primary care personnel. This multi-faceted intervention for MUS patients emphasized cognitive-behavioral principles, the provider-patient relationship, pharmacological management, and treating comorbid medical diseases. We deployed it in an HMO using nurse practitioners (NP) to deliver the intervention to 101 patients, while 102 controls continued to receive medical care from their usual primary care physician. Successful deployment of the intervention required training the NPs, continuing support for the NPs in their management of this difficult population, and establishing strong communication links with the HMO. This paper addresses the practical considerations of using primary care personnel to implement a complex intervention in primary care, and it includes a discussion of special challenges encountered as well as solutions developed to overcome them.
Adolescent↗
An analytic strategy for modeling multiple-item responses: a breast cancer symptom example.
BACKGROUND: Item Response Theory (IRT) is increasingly applied in health research to combine information from multiple-item responses. IRT posits that a person's susceptibility to a symptom is driven by the interaction of the characteristics of the symptom and person. This article describes the statistical background of incorporating IRT into a multilevel framework and extends this approach to longitudinal health outcomes, where the self-report method is used to construct a multi-item scale. METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from 2 descriptive longitudinal studies is performed. The data include 21 symptoms reported across time by 350 women with breast cancer. A 3-level hierarchical linear model (HLM) was used for the analysis. Level 1 models the item responses, consisting of symptom presence or absence. Level 2 models the trajectory of each individual, representing change over time of the IRT-created latent variable symptom experience. Level 3 explains that trajectory using person-specific characteristics such as age and location of care. The purpose of the analysis is to examine if older and younger women with breast cancer differ in their symptom experience trajectory after controlling for location of care. RESULTS: Fatigue and pain were the most prevalent symptoms. The symptom experience of women with breast cancer was found to improve over time. Neither age nor location of care was significantly associated with the symptom experience trajectory. DISCUSSION: Embedding IRT into an HLM framework produces several benefits. The example provided demonstrates benefits through the creation of a latent symptom experience variable that can be used either as an outcome or as a covariate in another model, examining the latent symptom experience trajectory and its relationship with covariates at the individual level, and managing symptom nonresponse.
Adult↗
Physical functioning: effect of behavioral intervention for symptoms among individuals with cancer.
BACKGROUND: Individuals with cancer receiving chemotherapy suffer deterioration in physical functioning due to symptoms arising from the cancer disease process and its treatment. OBJECTIVES: To determine if age, chronic health conditions (comorbidity), stage of cancer, depressive symptomatology, symptom limitations, sex, and site of cancer moderate the effects of cognitive behavioral intervention on physical function and to determine if symptom limitations mediate the effect of the intervention on physical functioning. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-seven individuals with solid tumor cancer (118 experimental and 119 control group) participated in this 10-contact, 18-week randomized control trial. Cognitive behavioral theory guided the nurse-delivered problem-solving experimental intervention. The control group received conventional care. Interviews occurred at baseline and 10, 20, and 32 weeks. RESULTS: Women with breast cancer had significantly better physical functioning than women with lung cancer. Chronic health conditions, symptom limitation, and depressive symptomatology at baseline were found to moderate the effect of intervention on physical function. Symptom limitation, however, was not found to mediate the effect of intervention on physical functioning. DISCUSSION: The intervention was shown to affect physical function trajectories differently for individuals with different personal and health characteristics. Because poor physical functioning is strongly associated with mortality and poor quality of life, this information may be used by health professionals to target interventions to those who might be most responsive.
Activities of Daily Living↗
Exploration of DSM-IV criteria in primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms.
OBJECTIVES: Investigators and clinicians almost always rely on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, 4th edition's (DSM-IV) somatoform disorders (and its derivative diagnoses) to characterize and identify patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). Our objective was to evaluate this use by determining the prevalence of DSM-IV somatoform and nonsomatoform disorders in patients with MUS proven by a gold standard chart review. METHODS: In a community-based staff model HMO, we identified subjects for a clinical trial using a systematic and reliable chart rating procedure among high-utilizing MUS patients. Only baseline data are reported here. The World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview provided full and abridged DSM-IV diagnoses. Patients with full or abridged DSM-IV somatoform diagnoses were labeled "DSM somatoform-positive," whereas those without them were labeled "DSM somatoform-negative." RESULTS: Two hundred six MUS patients averaged 13.6 visits in the year preceding study, 79.1% were females, and the average age was 47.7 years. We found that 124 patients (60.2%) had a nonsomatoform ("psychiatric") DSM-IV diagnosis of any type; 36 (17.5%) had 2 full nonsomatoform diagnoses, and 41 (19.9%) had >2; 92 (44.7%) had some full anxiety diagnosis and 94 (45.6%) had either full depression or minor depression diagnoses. However, only 9 of 206 (4.4%) had any full DSM-IV somatoform diagnosis, and only 39 (18.9%) had abridged somatization disorder. Thus, 48 (23.3%) were "DSM somatoform-positive" and 158 (76.7%) were "DSM somatoform-negative." The latter exhibited less anxiety, depression, mental dysfunction, and psychosomatic symptoms (all p <.001) and less physical dysfunction (p = .011). Correlates of this DSM somatoform-negative status were female gender (p = .007), less severe mental (p = .007), and physical dysfunction (p = .004), a decreased proportion of MUS (p <.10), and less psychiatric comorbidity (p <.10); c-statistic = 0.77. CONCLUSION: We concluded that depression and anxiety characterized MUS patients better than the somatoform disorders. Our data suggested radically revising the somatoform disorders for DSM-V by incorporating a new, very large group of now-overlooked DSM somatoform-negative patients who were typically women with less severe dysfunction.
Anxiety Disorders↗