PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Barbara Murphy

Publications and source records attributed to Barbara Murphy.

39 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Establishing the safety and efficacy of an opioid titration protocol.

The primary goal of this single-group study was to determine the safety of a standard opioid titration order sheet to manage pain in ambulatory cancer patients. Secondary goals were to examine opioid toxicity and efficacy of this pain protocol. Twenty-seven patients who required fixed-dose opioids and who had uncontrolled pain were enrolled. All patients had their initial opioid dose titrated by the study physician using the opioid titration order sheet. Data were obtained by the study nurse during a weekly telephone interview and used to determine if pain was controlled. After initial titration, a trained study nurse titrated opioid doses based upon the standing order sheet. At each contact, patients were assessed for adverse effects, pain intensity, and analgesics used. Patients who completed the four-week trial (n = 17) did not differ from patients who did not complete the trial. No adverse effects were observed in 39 opioid titrations completed by the study nurse. Opioid toxicities, worst pain, usual pain, and pain-related distress declined from baseline to week four Patients who were adherent to their prescribed medications reported significantly lower pain intensity and distress (ps < or = . 06). The opioid titration order sheet, used by a trained nurse, is safe to use in ambulatory cancer patients who have moderate to severe pain. Common opioid toxicities were reduced. The protocol also demonstrated initial efficacy in improving worst and usual pain and pain-related distress. Further research to establish efficacy of the protocol is recommended.

Ambulatory Care↗

Pain-related distress and interference with daily life of ambulatory patients with cancer with pain.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To examine the unique and combined effects of pain intensity, pain-related distress, analgesic prescription, and negative mood on interference with daily life because of pain. DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional. SETTING: Two cancer clinics in academic medical centers in the southeastern United States. SAMPLE: 64 ambulatory patients with cancer who had pain that required analgesics. METHOD: Participants completed a number of self-report instruments during a regularly scheduled clinic visit. Standard instruments were selected to measure the main research variables. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Worst pain intensity, pain-related distress, analgesic adequacy, negative mood, and interference with daily life. FINDINGS: Patients with higher levels of worst pain, pain-related distress, and negative mood and inadequately prescribed analgesics reported greater interference with daily life because of pain. Multiple regression analysis indicated that interference with daily life was explained by the combination of these four predictors. All variables except negative mood were significant predictors of interference. The unique variance explained by pain-related distress exceeded that explained by worst pain intensity or inadequately prescribed analgesics. CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest that pain-related distress may be an important factor when investigating interference with daily life caused by pain. In addition, pain-related distress may provide a target for future intervention studies aimed at improving the impact of cancer-related pain on daily life. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Assessment of pain-related distress may be important in planning interventions. Common nursing interventions may be employed to reduce pain intensity and pain-related distress, which may result in enhanced physical and emotional well-being.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Nursing home administrators' level of job satisfaction.

Job satisfaction has been shown to have a direct relationship to the quality of work. Are nursing home administrators satisfied with their work? How do they compare with their counterparts in other industries? The results of this survey, using the Job Description Index (JDI) and the Job in General (JIG) scale as published by Bowling Green State University, indicate that nursing home administrators have a more compressed rate of job satisfaction than their counterparts in other industries. They focus their dissatisfaction on their coworkers and pay. They demonstrate dissatisfaction by rotating their positions at a rate of every 31 months. This suggests some significant problems in the development and maintenance of quality care and some areas that could be addressed to raise the level of satisfaction among nursing home administrators.

Data Collection↗