PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Barry E Bleske

Publications and source records attributed to Barry E Bleske.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

3-HMG-Coenzyme A reductase inhibition and extracellular matrix gene expression in the pressure-overloaded rat heart.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether 3-HMG-Coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibition would attenuate the early pressure overload-induced activation of extracellular matrix genes in the left ventricle (LV) of the heart. Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups: sham-operation+vehicle (SH-V), aortic constriction+vehicle (AC-V), AC+rosuvastatin (RSV, 2 mg/kg; AC-LO), and AC+RSV (10 mg/kg; AC-HI). Rats were injected with normal NaCl (V) or RSV once daily, beginning 1 day before surgery, and killed 1 or 3 days after surgery. Hemodynamic measurements were made in the open-chest anesthetized state. LV levels of transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-beta1), procollagen 1 (C1), and fibronectin (FN) mRNA were measured by Northern blotting. AC induced a approximately 25% increase in LV weight after 3 days that was not altered by RSV treatment. LV expression of TGF-beta1, C1, and FN mRNA was approximately 2-fold, approximately 2.5-fold, and approximately 5-fold greater, respectively, in hearts of AC-V compared to SH-V rats 3 days post-operation, and was not significantly decreased by either dose of RSV. Inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase does not attenuate the pronounced aortic constriction-induced increases in the early expression of TGF-beta1, C1, and FN in this model of acute pressure overload of the rat heart.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Key articles, guidelines, and consensus papers relative to the treatment of dyslipidemias--2005.

Hypercholesterolemia is a major risk factor for development of coronary heart disease. Proper diagnosis and adequate treatment are vital to reducing morbidity and mortality associated with elevated serum lipid levels. The amount of literature in this area is overwhelming. To aid practitioners and educators in organizing this large body of information, we compiled key articles, guidelines, and consensus papers relative to the treatment of dyslipidemias. Research articles were chosen based on the significance of findings, relevance to practice, quality of research, and timeliness; recent articles were given priority over earlier ones unless they demonstrated groundbreaking findings.

Consensus↗
PubMed2005

Neutral effect on markers of heart failure, inflammation, endothelial activation and function, and vagal tone after high-dose HMG-CoA reductase inhibition in non-diabetic patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and average low-density lipoprotein level.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the effect of aggressive 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy on surrogate markers in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients and average low-density lipoprotein (LDL) concentrations. BACKGROUND: The effects of statins may well go beyond lipid lowering, and these pleiotropic effects may be of benefit in the treatment of heart failure. METHODS: Fifteen patients with NICM on standard maximized heart failure medication were enrolled in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Patients received 80 mg atorvastatin (ATV) or matching placebo for a 12-week treatment period with a minimum of an 8-week washout period. The following surrogate markers were evaluated: N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, oxidized LDL antibody, soluble receptor tumor necrosis factor, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, circulating levels of vascular adhesion molecule-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, P-selectin, non-invasive endothelial function studies, and heart rate variability. RESULTS: After ATV therapy, there was a significant decrease in LDL concentration from 110 +/- 27 mg/dl to 55 +/- 18 mg/dl (p < 0.05). There were no differences between ATV and placebo with regard to the surrogate markers measured. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings, it seems that the administration of high-dose statins to a heart failure population with modest LDL levels and no other indication for statin therapy was neither beneficial nor detrimental as determined by surrogate marker measures. Further studies are needed to determine whether there is an appropriate patient population and optimal dose (LDL concentration) for the treatment of systolic heart failure with statin therapy.

C-Reactive Protein↗
PubMed2004

Food: an unrecognized source of loop diuretic resistance.

Food significantly affects the pharmacokinetics of oral loop diuretics in healthy individuals, but studies have not been performed in patients with edema. Because of this omission, food's effect on pharmacokinetics has been overlooked and may decrease the pharmacodynamic response in patients who rely on diuretics. Despite this potential interaction, reference manuals do not provide warnings about the effects of food on loop diuretic absorption. We reviewed the published human studies investigating the effects of food on loop diuretics. Peak plasma concentrations and urinary recovery were significantly decreased when taken with food, but only one study showed a corresponding decrease in total urine output, which is likely related to the diuretic threshold effect. These healthy subjects probably were always above the diuretic threshold under both fed and fasting conditions and thus could not augment their urine output. Based on these data in healthy subjects, the special implications for patients who routinely take diuretics are discussed. Therefore, food is more likely to have a clinical effect on the diuretic threshold given its effect in healthy subjects and the special considerations for patients with edema. Additional studies are needed to help answer these questions. Until such data are available, the most conservative, effective clinical approach is to administer oral loop diuretics without food.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Interaction study between digoxin and a preparation of hawthorn (Crataegus oxyacantha).

Hawthorn, an herbal supplement, is currently being evaluated for the treatment of heart failure. The flavonoid components of hawthorn may be responsible for hawthorn's beneficial effects in the treatment of heart failure. However, these components may also affect P-glycoprotein function and cause interactions with drugs that are P-glycoprotein substrates, such as digoxin, which is also used to treat heart failure. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of hawthorn on digoxin pharmacokinetic parameters. A randomized, crossover trial with 8 healthy volunteers was performed evaluating digoxin 0.25 mg alone (D) for 10 days and digoxin 0.25 mg with Crataegus special extract WS 1442 (hawthorn leaves with flowers; Dr. Willmar Schwabe Pharmaceuticals) 450 mg twice daily (D + H) for 21 days. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed for 72 hours. There were no statistically significant differences in any measured pharmacokinetic parameters. The AUC0-infinity, Cmax-Cmin, Cmin, and renal clearance for the D group were 79 +/- 26 mcg.h/L, 1.4 +/- 0.7 mcg/L, 0.84 +/- 0.2 mcg/L, and 74 +/- 10 mL/min versus 73 +/- 20 mcg.h/L, 1.1 +/- 0.1 mcg/L, 0.65 +/- 0.2 mcg/L, and 81 +/- 22 mL/min for the D + H group, respectively (p > 0.05). Following 3 weeks of concomitant therapy, hawthorn did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetic parameters for digoxin. This suggests that both hawthorn and digoxin, in the doses and dosage form studied, may be coadministered safely.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Controversies in the use of beta blockers in heart failure.

Recent evidence from randomized controlled trials has provided compelling evidence to support the use of beta blockers in most patients with heart failure due to systolic dysfunction. There is little disagreement about the mortality benefit provided by adding beta blockers to standard therapy, which may include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and sometimes digoxin. A few areas are still controversial. The authors review the available literature encompassing four of those controversial areas: 1) the comparability among beta blockers; 2) the utility of beta blockers among patients with New York Heart Association class I and class IV heart failure symptoms; 3) the impact of race on the effectiveness of beta blockers; and 4) the safety and efficacy of beta blockers among patients on concomitant therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or spironolactone.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗