PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Bart C Vrouenraets

Publications and source records attributed to Bart C Vrouenraets.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Isolated limb perfusion in regional melanoma.

Adjuvant perfusion to excision of a primary melanoma cannot be recommended because of its limited effect. In patients who have frequently recur-ring resectable locoregional melanoma, perfusion may provide valuable loco-regional disease control by decreasing the number of recurrences and lesions per recurrence. Randomized studies are needed to further establish the role of perfusion as an adjuvant treatment for resectable recurrences of melanoma. Unresectable limb melanoma is the primary indication for perfusion. Better response rates tend to be seen when TNF-a is used in patients who have a high tumor load. Repeat perfusion is feasible, resulting in response rates similar to those of a first perfusion for locoregional melanoma. Older age itself is not a contraindication for perfusion. The long-term health-related quality of life of survivors of melanoma who underwent treatment with perfusion is comparable to that of their healthy peers in the general Dutch population.

Chemotherapy, Adjuvant↗
PubMed2006

Extent of surgical resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas.

The early-stage lymphatic dissemination in esophageal cancer poses challenges for adequate surgical treatment. The role of extensive lymph node dissections remains a matter of debate. Results of the only available large randomized controlled trial suggest that fit patients who have esophageal cancer are treated best by a transthoracic esophagectomy with extended en bloc (two-field) lymphadenectomy. For less fit patients or patients who have junctional or cardiac tumors, transhiatal esophageal resection could suffice. In patients who have truly "early" adenocarcinoma (ie, with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma) endoscopic resectional or ablative treatments may be suitable. When the tumor invades the submucosal layer, the high risk for lymph node involvement and tumor recurrence probably necessitates more extensive treatment schedules for definitive cure.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Isolated limb perfusion: what is the evidence for its use?

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to assess the best available evidence for the use of isolated limb perfusion. METHODS: Following the principles of Evidence-Based Medicine, we reviewed the best available evidence for isolated limb perfusion (ILP) for melanoma and soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the limb. RESULTS: Adjuvant ILP with melphalan (M-ILP) to wide local excision cannot be recommended for patients with primary melanoma with a limited regional benefit and no increase in overall survival (level 1b evidence). Prophylactic M-ILP next to the excision of recurrent melanoma has resulted in a nonsignificant decrease in recurrence rate (33% to 50%), with a significantly longer recurrence-free interval (10 to 17 months), but no survival benefit (level 2b evidence). Therapeutic M-ILP, with or without tumor-necrosis factor alpha and interferon gamma (T(I)M-ILP), seems indicated in unresectable melanoma (level 3 to 4 evidence). In unresectable STS of the limbs, limb salvage can be obtained in 57% to 86% of patients with neoadjuvant T(I)M-ILP (level 3 evidence). A comparison of level 3 to 4 studies on ILP and other neoadjuvant treatment modalities for unresectable STS shows that ILP results in the highest limb salvage rate with the lowest complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: Based on level 3 to 4 evidence, ILP is indicated in unresectable locoregional (recurrent) melanoma and unresectable STS of the limbs. Level 1 and 2b evidence does show an effect of prophylactic ILP on micrometastatic disease in locoregional (recurrent) melanoma of the limb. ILP seems the most effective limb sparing, neoadjuvant treatment modality when compared with other neoadjuvant treatment options for unresectable STS of the limb (level 3 to 4 evidence), although randomized studies are lacking.

Arm↗
PubMed2004

Isolated limb perfusion prolongs the limb recurrence-free interval after several episodes of excisional surgery for locoregional recurrent melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The influence of isolated limb perfusion (ILP) on the limb recurrence-free interval (LRFI) and the number of lesions per recurrence was studied for patients with frequently recurring regional in-transit metastases previously managed by excisional surgery. METHODS: All 43 patients who had their first ILP for a third or further limb recurrence were selected from our computer database of 451 patients who underwent therapeutic ILP for recurrent extremity melanoma in our centers. Eighteen patients had resectable and 25 had locally unresectable lesions at the time of ILP. The patients had a total of 269 intervals between treatment of their primary melanoma and last recurrence or last follow-up. Median follow-up was 35 months (interquartile range, 14-64 months). RESULTS: The median LRFI decreases over time from primary melanoma to the third or further recurrence for which ILP was performed (P < 0.001). The median LRFI is 4.7 times longer (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-7.9; P < 0.001) after ILP in comparison with the last interval before ILP. Patients with resectable lesions have a median LRFI that is 5.9 times longer (95% CI, 2.7-13; P < 0.001). In all patients, the number of lesions increases by 22% per recurrence number (95% CI, 10%-35%; P = 0.02). At the same recurrence number, patients before ILP have a 2.6-fold higher (95% CI, 1.6-4.5) mean number of lesions than do patients after ILP (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ILP lengthens the LRFI and decreases the number of lesions per recurrence significantly in patients with repeatedly recurrent limb melanoma. Therefore, ILP could be a valuable adjunct to excisional surgery for in-transit metastases in these patients whose LRFIs tend to shorten over time.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Adenocarcinoma in the anal canal after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis using a double-stapled technique: report of two cases.

Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is thought to abolish the risk of colorectal adenoma development in patients suffering from familial adenomatous polyposis. Both after mucosectomy with a handsewn anastomosis and after a double-stapled anastomosis, rectal mucosa is left behind at the anastomotic site. This carries the potential for the development of polyps and a subsequent malignancy. In our clinic, two patients recently developed an adenocarcinoma at the anastomotic site, despite a yearly follow-up endoscopy.A 40-year-old female underwent an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with a double-stapled anastomosis in 1991. She refrained from follow-up for several years, but returned eight years postoperatively with a fistula at the anastomotic site. Biopsies revealed an adenocarcinoma infiltrating in the fistula tract T2N0M0. The patient was treated with preoperative radiotherapy (60 Gy), abdominoperineal resection, and a permanent ileostomy.A 27-year-old male underwent an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with a double-stapled anastomosis in 1990. Because of his profession, endoscopy was performed only once every two years. Endoscopic biopsies ten years postoperatively revealed adenocarcinoma T4N0M0. The patient underwent an abdominoperineal resection with partial resection of the prostate, and a permanent ileostomy was constructed.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Isolated limb perfusion for unresectable melanoma of the extremities.

HYPOTHESIS: In patients with truly unresectable melanoma of the extremities, results after isolated limb perfusion (ILP) are absent in the literature. Complete response rates are probably lower than the reported 54% for locoregional recurrent melanoma. In these patients, ILP with melphalan and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) could be superior to ILP with melphalan alone. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis with a median follow-up period of 21 months (interquartile range, 9-40 months). SETTING: Two tertiary care cancer centers in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: We assessed all 130 consecutive patients who underwent ILP for unresectable melanoma of the extremities, performed between 1978 and 2001. Of these patients, 38% had stage IIIA melanoma and 45% had stage IIIAB melanoma according to criteria of the MD Anderson Cancer Center. Lesions were considered unresectable on the basis of their size, number, or localization. INTERVENTIONS: Forty ILPs were performed with melphalan, and 90 were done with TNF-alpha and melphalan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response rate, disease-free survival, limb salvage rate, and overall survival. RESULTS: In 45% of the patients, a complete response was attained after ILP with melphalan (95% confidence interval, 29%-61%) compared with 59% after ILP with TNF-alpha and melphalan (95% confidence interval, 49%-69%; P = .14). The time to complete response was 3 months (interquartile range, 2-6 months) vs 2 months (interquartile range, 1-3 months; P = .01), respectively. The recurrence rate and median limb recurrence-free survival were not significantly different for both ILP types. The overall limb salvage rate was 96%. Overall 5-year survival was 29% (95% confidence interval, 20%-38%). The ILP type was not an independent prognostic factor for complete response, nor was limb recurrence-free survival, whereas stage IIIA was a favorable prognostic factor (P = .01 and P = .02, respectively). Favorable prognostic factors for improved survival were complete response (P<.001) and a tumor size of 3 cm or less (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: In more than half of the patients with truly unresectable melanoma of the extremities, a complete response was obtained after ILP with melphalan with or without TNF-alpha. The ILP type was not an independent prognostic factor for complete response, limb recurrence-free survival, or overall survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Thrombolysis as initial treatment of peripheral native artery and bypass graft occlusions in a general community hospital.

Large series with long-term follow-up of thrombolytic therapy in the treatment of lower limb arterial occlusion from a single, general, non-university hospital are absent. We studied retrospectively the results of 129 consecutive patients who underwent thrombolysis with intraarterial urokinase as initial treatment for lower limb native artery or bypass graft occlusions. The mean age of patients was 71 years; 55% of the patients were male, and preexisting peripheral arterial disease was present in 47%. Presenting symptoms were disabling claudication (31%) and limb-threatening ischemia (69%). Forty-two percent of the patients presented with acute symptoms (<1 week duration). The mean follow-up of patients still alive at the time of analysis was 36 months (range 1-120 months). Thrombolytic treatment was successful in 93 patients (72%). In 53% of the patients acute surgical intervention could be avoided: 28 patients (22%) did not need any additional procedure and 40 (31%) underwent a concomitant angioplasty. When thrombolysis failed, 6 patients (5%) underwent successful surgical revascularization and 11 patients (8%) eventually underwent major amputation during their hospital stay. Amputation-free survival at 6 months and at last follow-up was 88% and 83%, respectively. The mortality rates were 4% at 30 days, 5% at 6 months, and 30% at last follow-up. Thrombolysis was significantly less successful when patients had diabetes (62% vs. 81%, p = 0.019) or preexisting peripheral arterial disease (61% vs. 80%, p= 0.018). Successful radiological treatment (thrombolysis+/-angioplasty) could less often be performed in patients with preexisting peripheral arterial disease (41% vs. 59%, p = 0.011) and in patients with occluded bypass grafts (33% vs. 62%, p= 0.002). Duration of symptoms and Fontaine stage at presentation did not predict thrombolysis outcomes. Thrombolytic-related complications occurred in 17 patients (13%), with significant bleeding from the puncture site in 3 patients (2%). Thrombolysis can safely and effectively be performed in a general community hospital with results comparable to those reported from specialized university centers and large randomized trials.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Isolated limb perfusion with tumor necrosis factor-alpha and melphalan for patients with unresectable soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities.

BACKGROUND: Since 1992, isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) and melphalan has been used for the treatment of patients with unresectable soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. The authors retrospectively studied the results of limb salvage surgery using TNFalpha-ILP at their institution. METHODS: From 1992 to 2001, 49 patients (mean age, 51 years; range, 14-85 years) underwent ILP for unresectable soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. All patients received melphalan and TNFalpha (four patients also received interferon-gamma). The median follow-up was 26 months (range, from 2 days to 103 months). RESULTS: In 1 patient (2%) who died 2 days after undergoing ILP, response and acute limb toxicity could not be assessed. One patient (2%) attained a clinical complete response (2%), 23 patients (47%) attained a clinical partial response, 17 patients (35%) demonstrated no change, and 7 patients (14%) had tumor progression. Thirty-one patients (63%) underwent tumor resection. Histologic material also was available from eight amputations and three punctures/biopsies. Pathologic response was complete in 4 patients (8%), partial in 14 patients (29%), and no change was observed in 24 patients (49%). Final response, based on both clinical and pathologic assessment in which pathology was decisive, was complete in 4 patients (8%) and partial in 27 patients (55%), resulting in a final overall response rate of 63%. Local control with preservation of the limb was attained in 28 patients (57%). Four of 32 patients (13%) who had been rendered tumor free by ILP with or without undergoing resection and radiation therapy, developed a local recurrence. The 5-year disease specific survival rate was 48% for the 49 patients. Acute limb toxicity after ILP was a mild Grade 1-2 reaction in 35 patients (71%) patients, a Grade 3 reaction in 12 patients (25%), and a Grade 4 reaction in 1 patient (2%). Three major ILP-related complications were encountered, including arterial thrombosis in two patients and a fulminant Clostridial infection leading to death in one patient. There were no severe cardiovascular reactions after ILP. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unresectable soft tissue sarcomas of the limbs who underwent ILP with TNFalpha and melphalan followed by resection of the tumor remnant when possible, a 63% overall tumor response rate and a 57% local control rate with limb preservation was achieved.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Long-term results of a double perfusion schedule using high dose hyperthermia and melphalan sequentially in extensive melanoma of the lower limb.

The aim of this study was to assess the results of an isolated limb perfusion (ILP) schedule with high dose hyperthermia (42-43 degrees C) and melphalan, applied sequentially in patients with advanced melanoma of the limbs. Seventeen patients with extensive recurrent or bulky melanoma of a limb were treated with hyperthermic femoral ILP (42-43 degrees C) without drugs followed by normothermic (37-38 degrees C) ILP with melphalan. Eleven patients (65%) had a complete response. Three patients (27%) had limb recurrences after 5, 6 and 18 months, respectively. The 5 year limb recurrence-free interval for patients with a complete response was 63%. Limb toxicity was mild; pressure-related blistering and transient sensory disturbances occurred after the hyperthermic ILP, and 88% of the patients had a grade II reaction (mild erythema and oedema) after the second ILP. This sequential ILP schedule resulted in a high complete response rate and a low limb-recurrence rate in patients with extensive, recurrent melanoma of the limbs at the cost of only mild toxicity. This regimen could be an alternative to ILP with tumour necrosis factor-alpha and melphalan.

Adult↗