PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Becky Briesacher

Publications and source records attributed to Becky Briesacher.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Patient-reported underuse of prescription medications: a comparison of nine surveys.

Nine national surveys documenting patient underuse of prescription medications were examined to describe the variation and trends in that underuse and identify possible reasons for the substantially different rates that were reported. Underuse includes unfilled prescriptions, delayed therapy, reduced frequency, and lowered dosage. Rates of cost-related patient underuse in the studies ranged from 1.6 to 22 percent. Insurance coverage, level of wealth, age, and health status were the sociodemographic variables most strongly related to underuse. Seven additional factors in the design and administration of the surveys were identified as providing plausible explanations for the variance across surveys. The most conspicuous variation was between three government-sponsored periodic surveys and six generally one-time assessments, with the latter yielding higher rates and greater variance in underuse. Understanding the factors contributing to the variation in reported rates of underuse of medications is an important prerequisite for the design of effective prescription-drug benefit programs.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Evaluation of nationally mandated drug use reviews to improve patient safety in nursing homes: a natural experiment.

OBJECTIVES: To test whether nationally required drug use reviews reduce exposure to inappropriate medications in nursing homes. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, longitudinal study. SETTING: Data source is the 1997-2000 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, a nationally representative survey of Medicare beneficiaries. PARTICIPANTS: Nationally representative population sample of 8 million nursing home (NH) residents (unweighted n=2,242) and a comparative group of 2 million assisted living facility (ALF) residents (unweighted n=664). MEASUREMENTS: Prevalence and incident use of 38 potentially inappropriate medications compared before and after the policy: 32 restricted for all NH residents and six for residents with certain conditions. Inappropriate medications were stratified by potential for legitimate exceptions: always avoid, rarely appropriate, or some acceptable indications. RESULTS: In July 1999, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) mandated expansions to the drug use review policy for nursing home certification. Using explicit criteria, surveyors and consultant pharmacists must evaluate resident records for potentially inappropriate medication exposures and related adverse drug reactions. Nursing homes in noncompliance may receive citations for deficient care. Before the CMS policy, 28.8% (95% confidence interval (CI)=27.3-30.3) of Medicare beneficiaries in NHs and 22.4% (95% CI=19.8-25.0) in ALFs received potentially inappropriate medications. Nearly all prepolicy use came from medications with some acceptable indications: 23.4% in NHs (95% CI=20.4-26.4) and 18.0% in ALFs (95% CI=15.6-20.4). After the policy, exposures in NHs declined to 25.6% (95% CI=24.1-27.1, P<.05), but similar declines occurred in ALFs (19.0%, 95% CI=16.7-21.3, nonsignificant). Postpolicy use of inappropriate medications with exempted indications remained high, and more than half was incident use: 20.6% of NH residents (95% CI=19.0-22.0) and 15.6% of ALF residents (95% CI=15.2-15.7). Use of drugs that are restricted with certain diseases increased 33% in NHs between 1997 and 2000 (from 9.3% to 13.2%; P<.05). Multivariate results detected no postpolicy differences in inappropriate drug use between long-term care facilities with mandatory drug use reviews and those without. CONCLUSION: Some postpolicy declines were noted in NH use of potentially inappropriate medications, but the decrease was uneven and could not be attributed to the national drug use reviews. This study is the first evaluation of the CMS policy, and it highlights the unclear effectiveness of drug use reviews to improve patient safety in NHs even though state and federal agencies have widely adopted this strategy.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

National estimates of exposure to prescription drugs with addiction potential in community-dwelling elders.

The use of prescription drugs with addiction potential is an overlooked and growing problem among today's elderly. This paper provides national prevalence estimates of exposure to prescription drugs with addiction potential among community-dwelling elders and explores risk factors for such exposure. Using the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, a nationally-representative database of Medicare eligibles, we calculated the prevalence of abusable prescription drug use, overall, by therapeutic class, and by drug. Nearly 22% (7.22 million) of all community-dwelling Medicare elders used at least one prescription medication with addiction potential. Opioid analgesics were used most frequently (14.9%; 95% CI 14.0, 15.8%); central nervous system (CNS) depressants were used by 10.4% of the nation's elders (95% CI 9.5, 10.8%). Using logistic regression analysis, we examined the association of explanatory variables with three outcome variables: any controlled substances use, any opioid analgesic use, and any CNS depressant use. We found that females, whites, those aged 65-79, and those with non-spousal others, were significantly more likely to use one or more prescription drugs with addiction potential, controlling for health status and severity-of-illness. The significance and magnitude of several explanatory variables, including age, race, ethnicity, living arrangement, and health status, varied by therapeutic category. This paper provides an important first step in acknowledging the widespread use of abusable prescription drugs in elders, and provides a foundation for future research and practical solutions to preventing subsequent problem use of prescription drugs.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Impact of prescription coverage on hospital and physician costs: a case study of medicare beneficiaries with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: It is widely believed that appropriate use of prescription medicines can reduce avoidable hospitalizations and more expensive nonpharmacologic therapies, but identifying such cost offsets in operational programs is elusive. Any possible impact would be most apparent in patients with medication-sensitive disease conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to develop an observational study design appropriate for estimating potential cost savings in the US Medicare budget as a result of extending drug coverage to persons with particular chronic diseases and to apply these study methods, in an exploratory analysis, to a sample of Medicare beneficiaries with COPD. METHODS: Spending for drugs, hospitalizations, and physician services was compared for COPD patients with and without prescription coverage using data from the 1999 and 2000 US Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. To control for channeling bias, multivariate matching on observable variables was combined with tests for missing variable bias. The matching algorithm used propensity score weighting to ensure comparability between the 2 groups on all observed characteristics at baseline. RESULTS: Our sample comprised 462 beneficiaries with prevalent COPD in the year 2000: 384 (83.1%) had prescription coverage the entire year and 78 (16.9%) had no coverage. After adjustment, drug coverage was associated with 61% higher spending on medications and 29% lower spending on physician services (both, P < 0.05). Hospital costs appeared slightly lower for those with drug benefits, but the difference was not statistically significant. No statistically significant effects were found for services specific to COPD. However, effect sizes were large even for nonsignificant findings. CONCLUSIONS: Although this analysis did not establish a strong causal link between drug benefits and lower costs, 11 of our 12 comparisons had signs consistent with the cost-offset hypothesis.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Trends in the prescription of inappropriate drugs for the elderly between 1995 and 1999.

BACKGROUND: Using criteria developed by Beers et al between 1991 and 1997, previous studies have reported high levels of inappropriate drug prescribing for community-dwelling elderly patients (age>or=65 years). However, it is not known whether the Beers criteria have had a beneficial effect on prescribing practices. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare the prevalence of potentially inappropriate drug use (based on the Beers list) among older Americans between 1995 and 1999; to determine whether any decreases in such use were more likely to be the result of improved adherence to guidelines or of replacement of older medications by newer drugs; and to examine individual characteristics that place elderly patients at increased risk for inappropriate drug use. METHODS: This was a panel study involving nationally representative samples of community-dwelling elderly persons from the 1995 and 1999 Medicare Current Beneficiary Surveys (MCBS). For comparison, data were analyzed from samples of disabled Medicare beneficiaries aged <65 years for the same periods. The samples were assessed for the use of 36 individual drugs, drug classes, and combinations carrying a risk for adverse out comes in the elderly based on the 1997 Beers criteria for drugs to be avoided in this population. RESULTS: The study samples contained 7628 community-dwelling elderly persons from the 1995 MCBS and 8902 from the 1999 MCBS, and 1863 and 1851 disabled Medicare beneficiaries aged <65 years for the respective survey years. The proportion of elderly patients taking >or=1 drug on the Beers list declined from 24.8% in 1995 to 21.3% in 1999 (P<0.05). There was a nonsignificant increase in the proportion of disabled Medicare beneficiaries taking >or=1 drug on the Beers list from 31.1% in 1995 to 31.5% in 1999. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant decline in the use of potentially inappropriate drugs by elderly patients between 1995 and 1999, particularly in the use of those drugs linked to the most severe outcomes. However, approximately 7 million elderly patients still received potentially inappropriate drugs in 1999, underscoring the continued need for effective interventions to improve prescribing for this vulnerable population.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Predictability of prescription drug expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries.

MCBS data are used to analyze the predictability of drug expenditures by Medicare beneficiaries. Predictors include demographic characteristics and measures of health status, the majority derived using CMS' diagnosis cost group/hierarchical condition category (DCG/HCC) risk-adjustment methodology. In prospective models, demographic variables explained 5 percent of the variation in drug expenditures. Adding health status measures raised this figure between 10 and 24 percent of the variation depending on the model configuration. Adding lagged drug expenditures more than doubled predictive power to 55 percent. These results are discussed in the context of forecasting, and risk adjustment for the proposed new Medicare drug benefit.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Participation and crowd-out in a Medicare drug benefit: simulation estimates.

This article provides information on likely participation in the Medicare prescription drug plan and expected crowd-out. We use a microsimulation model based on data from the MCBS to estimate the costs and benefits of a Medicare drug plan, including the benefits from reductions in risk. The simulations are repeated using different combinations of benefits and subsidies. In addition, the simulations explore the effects of different behavioral parameters for moral hazard (the extent to which participants increase drug spending in response to reduced costs) and risk aversion (the extent to which participants would be willing to pay to avoid risk) to identify the impact of these factors on participation and crowd-out.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Racial and ethnic disparities in prescription coverage and medication use.

This study compared drug coverage and prescription drug use by race and Hispanic ethnicity for Medicare beneficiaries with three chronic conditions: diabetes, hypertension, or heart disease. We found that among beneficiaries without any drug coverage black persons and Hispanics used 10 to 40 percent fewer medications, on average, than white persons with the same illness, and spent up to 60 percent less in total drug costs. Having drug coverage somewhat lessened these differences although the effect was consistent with only M + C prescription benefits. Substantially lower medication use remained for dually eligible black beneficiaries and Hispanics with employer-sponsored drug benefits.

Black or African American↗
PubMed2002

Medication decisions--right and wrong.

This paper reviews the recent literature on problems associated with prescription drug use in older adults. The authors address four major issues: Why giving patients the wrong drug is so common; how taking the wrong amount is an even larger problem; why good drugs may be wrong for particular patients; and how high out-of-pocket spending and inadequate insurance coverage may disrupt otherwise sound drug regimens. The organizing theme of this review is the right drug for the right patient, taken in the right way at the right price. Despite significant gaps in the research record the evidence leaves no doubt that elderly individuals are at significant risk for inappropriate medication use. The paper concludes with an agenda for future studies: the need to validate standards for geriatric drug use, assess inappropriate drug use at the national level, establish population-based risk factors, and target research to the most significant adverse outcomes.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Three-tiered-copayment drug coverage and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of 3-tier formularies are rare, although the evidence suggests that their cost-sharing structure reduces overall drug spending. However, it is unclear how incentive-based formularies affect the selection of medications with safety advantages, or restrict the access that high-risk populations have to recommended therapies in the higher tiers. This study was designed to determine whether 3-tier formularies influence the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in a population of patients with arthritis. METHODS: This retrospective study used the 2000 MarketScan Research Database, which contains person-level claims data for employer-sponsored health plans. The sample for this study consisted of 20 868 individuals treated for osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis and using NSAIDs while enrolled in tiered drug plans (n = 32). The likelihood of any use of cyclo-oxygenase (COX-2)-selective inhibitors was determined as a function of tiered drug plan coverage, adjusting for other person-level and plan-level covariates. RESULTS: Use of COX-2-selective inhibitors decreased (63.0% vs 53.6% vs 41.6%, respectively) and use of generic NSAIDs increased (37.7% vs 40.7% vs 55.7%, respectively) as formularies incorporated 1, 2, and 3 tiers. Enrollees in 3-tier plans with arthritis and serious gastrointestinal comorbidities (odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.66) were significantly less likely to use COX-2-selective inhibitors compared with patients in 1-tier plans. CONCLUSIONS: Three-tier formularies appear to reduce the use of COX-2-selective inhibitors among all patients with arthritis, even those at risk of experiencing gastrointestinal complications from using nonselective NSAIDs. These findings are among the first to suggest that tiered-copayment drug plans may be influencing the selection of medications beyond generic and branded products.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

How do incentive-based formularies influence drug selection and spending for hypertension?

This study examined the association between incentive-based formularies and antihypertensive drug selection and spending. We compared the use of drugs from five drug classes by the number of tiers and copayment differentials. We found that raising copayments within a single-tier formulary system had a relatively modest impact on use of antihypertensives, compared with raising them in multi-tier systems. Likelihood of using ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers was lower among two-tier plans with generic/brand differentials of dollars 10 relative to flat-copayment plans. Incentive formularies were associated with lower total antihypertensive spending by plans, but enrollees paid more out of pocket.

Deductibles and Coinsurance↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Employer-sponsored health insurance and prescription drug coverage for new retirees: dramatic declines in five years.

Employer-sponsored health insurance is often described as the most reliable private source of Medicare supplementation, particularly for prescription drug benefits. This study's findings show that employer coverage is becoming an increasingly less dependable source of coverage for new retirees, and the problem is likely to get worse. We found that the proportion of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65-69 with employer coverage declined from 46 percent in 1996 to 39 percent in 2000. The proportion with drug coverage from an employer declined from 40 percent in 1996 to 35 percent in 2000. Losses among males, the group most affected, would have been even greater had it not been for a slight increase in benefits from spouses' policies.

Aged↗