Biomedical subjects

Behrooz Koucheki

Publications and source records attributed to Behrooz Koucheki.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Pointwise linear regression analysis for detection of visual field progression with absolute versus corrected threshold sensitivities.

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of point-wise linear regression analysis (PLR) with total deviation (TD) versus corrected or pattern deviation (PD) threshold sensitivities for detection of visual field progression. METHODS: Four hundred two eyes (402 patients) enrolled in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) were selected. Criteria for progression according to PLR were a slope or=2 worsening points within the same Glaucoma Hemifield Test cluster. PLR was performed on TD and PD threshold sensitivities and compared to clinical evaluation. Eyes were classified into three groups based on mean deviation (MD): mild (MD>or=-6 dB), moderately advanced (-6 dB>MD>or=-12 dB), and advanced (MD<-12 dB) glaucoma. RESULTS: Visual field progression was observed in 154 (38%), 85 (21%), and 175 (44%) eyes, according to PLR(TD) and PLR(PD), and clinical evaluation. The pair-wise agreement between clinicians and PLR(TD) was significantly greater than that of clinicians and PLR(PD) (kappa=0.48, 95% CI: 0.44-0.52 vs. kappa=0.31, 95% CI: 0.27-0.35). Agreement between PLR(TD) and PLR(PD) decreased with increasing glaucoma severity: kappa (95% CI)=0.60 (0.52-0.67), 0.41 (0.35-0.47), and 0.33 (0.27-0.40) for mild, moderately advanced, and advanced glaucoma, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Point-wise linear regression analysis on TD threshold sensitivities performed better than the same analysis on PD when clinical evaluation was used as a reference. Agreement between the two methods was less in moderately advanced and advanced glaucoma.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Visual field changes after cataract extraction: the AGIS experience.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that cataract extraction in glaucomatous eyes improves overall sensitivity of visual function without affecting the size or depth of glaucomatous scotomas. DESIGN: Experimental study with no control group. METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight eyes (of 140 patients) from the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study with at least two reliable visual fields within a year both before and after cataract surgery were included. Average mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and corrected pattern standard deviation (CPSD) were compared before and after cataract extraction. To evaluate changes in scotoma size, the number of abnormal points (P < .05) on the pattern deviation plot was compared before and after surgery. We described an index ("scotoma depth index") to investigate changes of scotoma depth after surgery. RESULTS: Mean values for MD, PSD, and CPSD were -13.2, 6.4, and 5.9 dB before and -11.9, 6.8, and 6.2 dB after cataract surgery (P < or = .001 for all comparisons). Mean (+/- SD) number of abnormal points on pattern deviation plot was 26.7 +/- 9.4 and 27.5 +/- 9.0 before and after cataract surgery, respectively (P = .02). Scotoma depth index did not change after cataract extraction (-19.3 vs -19.2 dB, P = .90). CONCLUSIONS: Cataract extraction caused generalized improvement of the visual field, which was most marked in eyes with less advanced glaucomatous damage. Although the enlargement of scotomas was statistically significant, it was not clinically meaningful. No improvement of sensitivity was observed in the deepest part of the scotomas.

Aged↗