Biomedical subjects

Ben Singer

Publications and source records attributed to Ben Singer.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Accommodation with higher-order monochromatic aberrations corrected with adaptive optics.

Higher-order monochromatic aberrations in the human eye cause a difference in the appearance of stimuli at distances nearer and farther from best focus that could serve as a signed error signal for accommodation. We explored whether higher-order monochromatic aberrations affect the accommodative response to 0.5 D step changes in vergence in experiments in which these aberrations were either present as they normally are or removed with adaptive optics. Of six subjects, one could not accommodate at all for steps in either condition. One subject clearly required higher-order aberrations to accommodate at all. The remaining four subjects could accommodate in the correct direction even when higher-order aberrations were removed. No subjects improved their accommodation when higher-order aberrations were corrected, indicating that the corresponding decrease in the depth of field of the eye did not improve the accommodative response. These results are consistent with previous findings of large individual differences in the ability to accommodate in impoverished conditions. These results suggest that at least some subjects can use monochromatic higher-order aberrations to guide accommodation. They also show that some subjects can accommodate correctly when higher-order monochromatic aberrations as well as established cues to accommodation are greatly reduced.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

PubMed2005

Different sensations from cones with the same photopigment.

We used adaptive optics to study color fluctuation in the appearance of tiny flashes of light. For five subjects, near threshold, monochromatic stimuli with full widths at half maximum of 1/3 arcmin were delivered throughout a patch of retina near 1 deg in which we also determined the locations of L, M, and S cones. Subjects reported a wide variety of color sensations, even for long-wavelength stimuli, and all subjects reported blue or purple sensations at wavelengths for which S cones are insensitive. Subjects with more L cones reported more red sensations, and those with more M cones tended to report more green sensations. White responses increased linearly with the asymmetry in L to M cone ratio. The diversity in the color response could not be completely explained by combined L and M cone excitation, implying that photoreceptors within the same class can elicit more than one color sensation.

Color Perception↗

PubMed2005

Image metrics for predicting subjective image quality.

PURPOSE: Despite the proliferation of wavefront sensors to characterize the optical quality of individual eyes, there is not yet an accurate way to determine from a wave aberration how severely it will impact the patient's vision. Some of the most commonly used metrics, such as RMS wavefront error and the Strehl ratio, predict subjective image quality poorly. Our goal is to establish a better metric to predict subjective image quality from the wave aberration. METHODS: We describe three kinds of experiments designed to compare the effectiveness of different metrics in determining the subjective impact of the wave aberration. Subjects viewed a visual stimulus through a deformable mirror in an adaptive optics system that compensated for the subject's wave aberration. In the first experiment, we show that some Zernike modes such as spherical aberration and defocus interact strongly in determining subjective image quality. In the second experiment, the subject's wave aberration was replaced by the wave aberration corresponding to an individual Zernike mode. The subject then adjusted the coefficient of the Zernike mode to match the blur of a standard stimulus. In the third experiment, the subject viewed the same stimulus through the wave aberration of one of 59 different postoperative patients who had undergone LASIK and matched the blur by adjusting defocus. We then determined which among many image quality metrics best predicted these matching data. RESULTS: RMS wavefront error was a poor predictor of the data, as was the Strehl ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The neural sharpness metric best described the subjective sharpness of images viewed through the wave aberrations of real eyes. This metric can provide a single number that describes the subjective impact of each patient's wave aberration and will also increase the accuracy of refraction estimates from wavefront-based autorefractors and phoropters.

Humans↗

PubMed2004

Neural compensation for the eye's optical aberrations.

A fundamental problem facing sensory systems is to recover useful information about the external world from signals that are corrupted by the sensory process itself. Retinal images in the human eye are affected by optical aberrations that cannot be corrected with ordinary spectacles or contact lenses, and the specific pattern of these aberrations is different in every eye. Though these aberrations always blur the retinal image, our subjective impression is that the visual world is sharp and clear, suggesting that the brain might compensate for their subjective influence. The recent introduction of adaptive optics to control the eye's aberrations now makes it possible to directly test this idea. If the brain compensates for the eye's aberrations, vision should be clearest with the eye's own aberrations rather than with unfamiliar ones. We asked subjects to view a stimulus through an adaptive optics system that either recreated their own aberrations or a rotated version of them. For all five subjects tested, the stimulus seen with the subject's own aberrations was always sharper than when seen through the rotated version. This supports the hypothesis that the neural visual system is adapted to the eye's aberrations, thereby removing somehow the effects of blur generated by the sensory apparatus from visual experience. This result could have important implications for methods to correct higher order aberrations with customized refractive surgery because some benefits of optimizing the correction optically might be undone by the nervous system's compensation for the old aberrations.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Adaptive optics for vision: the eye's adaptation to point spread function.

PURPOSE: Despite the fact that ocular aberrations blur retinal images, our subjective impression of the visual world is sharp, which suggests that the visual system compensates for subjective influence. If the brain adjusts for specific aberrations of the eye, vision should be clearest when looking through a subject's typical wave aberration rather than through an unfamiliar one. We used adaptive optics techniques to control the eye's aberrations in order to evaluate this hypothesis. METHODS: We used adaptive optics to produce point spread functions (PSFs) that were rotated versions of the eye's typical PSF by angles in 45 degrees intervals. Five normal subjects were asked to view a stimulus with their own PSF or with a rotated version, and to adjust the magnitude of the aberrations in the rotated case to match the subjective blur of the stimulus to that seen when the wave aberration was in typical orientation. RESULTS: The magnitude of the rotated wave aberration required to match the blur with the typical wave aberration was 20% to 40% less, indicating that subjective blur for the stimulus increased significantly when the PSF was rotated. CONCLUSION: These results support the hypothesis that the neural visual system is adapted to an eye's aberrations and has important implications for correcting higher order aberrations with customized refractive surgery or contact lenses. The full visual benefit of optimizing optical correction requires that the nervous system compensate for the new correction.

Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological↗