Biomedical subjects

Benedick A Fraass

Publications and source records attributed to Benedick A Fraass.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Reporting and analyzing statistical uncertainties in Monte Carlo-based treatment planning.

PURPOSE: To investigate methods of reporting and analyzing statistical uncertainties in doses to targets and normal tissues in Monte Carlo (MC)-based treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Methods for quantifying statistical uncertainties in dose, such as uncertainty specification to specific dose points, or to volume-based regions, were analyzed in MC-based treatment planning for 5 lung cancer patients. The effect of statistical uncertainties on target and normal tissue dose indices was evaluated. The concept of uncertainty volume histograms for targets and organs at risk was examined, along with its utility, in conjunction with dose volume histograms, in assessing the acceptability of the statistical precision in dose distributions. The uncertainty evaluation tools were extended to four-dimensional planning for application on multiple instances of the patient geometry. All calculations were performed using the Dose Planning Method MC code. RESULTS: For targets, generalized equivalent uniform doses and mean target doses converged at 150 million simulated histories, corresponding to relative uncertainties of less than 2% in the mean target doses. For the normal lung tissue (a volume-effect organ), mean lung dose and normal tissue complication probability converged at 150 million histories despite the large range in the relative organ uncertainty volume histograms. For "serial" normal tissues such as the spinal cord, large fluctuations exist in point dose relative uncertainties. CONCLUSIONS: The tools presented here provide useful means for evaluating statistical precision in MC-based dose distributions. Tradeoffs between uncertainties in doses to targets, volume-effect organs, and "serial" normal tissues must be considered carefully in determining acceptable levels of statistical precision in MC-computed dose distributions.

Esophagus↗

PubMed2006

Multiple fields may offer better esophagus sparing without increased probability of lung toxicity in optimized IMRT of lung tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether increasing numbers of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) fields enhance lung-tumor dose without additional predicted toxicity for difficult planning geometries. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data from 8 previous three dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) patients with tumors located in various regions of each lung, but with planning target volumes (PTVs) overlapping part of the esophagus, were used as input. Four optimized-beamlet IMRT plans (1 plan that used the 3D-CRT beam arrangement and 3 plans with 3, 5, or 7 axial, but predominantly one-sided, fields) were compared. For IMRT, the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) in the whole PTV was optimized simultaneously with that in a reduced PTV exclusive of the esophagus. Normal-tissue complication probability-based costlets were used for the esophagus, heart, and lung. RESULTS: Overall, IMRT plans (optimized by use of EUD to judiciously allow relaxed PTV dose homogeneity) result in better minimum PTV isodose surface coverage and better average EUD values than does conformal planning; dose generally increases with the number of fields. Even 7-field plans do not significantly alter normal-lung mean-dose values or lung volumes that receive more than 13, 20, or 30 Gy. CONCLUSION: Optimized many-field IMRT plans can lead to escalated lung-tumor dose in the special case of esophagus overlapping PTV, without unacceptable alteration in the dose distribution to normal lung.

Esophagus↗

PubMed2005

Esophagus sparing with IMRT in lung tumor irradiation: an EUD-based optimization technique.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate (1) the use of generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) to optimize dose escalation of lung tumors when the esophagus overlaps the planning target volume (PTV) and (2) the potential benefit of further dose escalation in only the part of the PTV that does not overlap the esophagus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The treatment-planning computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with primary lung tumors located in different regions of the left and right lung were used for the optimization of beamlet intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans. In all cases, the PTV overlapped part of the esophagus. The dose in the PTV was maximized according to 7 different primary cost functions: 2 plans that made use of mean dose (MD) (the reference plan, in which the 95% isodose surface covered the PTV and a second plan that had no constraint on the minimum isodose), 3 plans based on maximizing gEUD for the whole PTV with ever increasing assumptions for tumor aggressiveness, and 2 plans that used different gEUD values in 2 simultaneous, overlapping target volumes (the whole PTV and the PTV minus esophagus). Beam arrangements and NTCP-based costlets for the organs at risk (OARs) were kept identical to the original conformal plan for each case. Regardless of optimization method, the relative ranking of the resulting plans was evaluated in terms of the absence of cold spots within the PTV and the final gEUD computed for the whole PTV. RESULTS: Because the MD-optimized plans lacked a constraint on minimum PTV coverage, they resulted in cold spots that affected approximately 5% of the PTV volume. When optimizing over the whole PTV volume, gEUD-optimized plans resulted in higher equivalent uniform PTV doses than did the reference plan while still maintaining normal-tissue constraints. However, only under the assumption of extremely aggressive tumors could cold spots in the PTV be avoided. Generally, high-level overall results are obtained when optimization in the whole PTV is also associated with a second simultaneous optimization in the PTV minus overlapping portions of the esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: Intensity modulated radiation therapy optimizations that utilize gEUD-based cost functions for the PTV and NTCP-based constraints for the OARs result in increased doses to large portions of the PTV in cases where the PTV overlaps the esophagus, while still maintaining (and confining to the overlap region) minimum dose coverage equivalent to the homogeneous PTV optimization cases.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗

PubMed2005

A dose gradient analysis tool for IMRT QA.

The use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has led to an increase in the number of complex fields that require measurement and comparison to calculated dose distributions in 2D. Current dose-evaluation techniques, including isodose line comparisons, displays of the dose difference between calculated and measured distributions, and distance-to-agreement (DTA) comparisons, are useful for display of differences between two different dose distributions but are often of limited value for the assessment of the discrepancies in terms of significance and/or cause. In this paper, we present a new gradient compensation method for the evaluation of local dosimetric differences as a function of the dose gradient at each point in the dose distribution. To apply the method, the user specifies a distance parameter (typically 1 mm), which is the geometric tolerance the user is prepared to accept for the dose comparison. The expected geometric uncertainties in the comparison process can include finite calculation and measurement grids, small misalignments of measured and calculated results, and volume-averaging effects in the measurement detector. Since these uncertainties can obscure the interpretation of any of the analysis tools described above, removing dose differences related to the tolerable geometric uncertainty helps the gradient compensation method highlight algorithm and delivery-related differences. The remaining dose differences not explained by the geometric tolerance can then be evaluated graphically (dose difference display) or analytically (dose difference dose-volume histograms)over the entire comparison region.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2005

The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.

In this study, we show that beam model differences play an important role in the comparison of does calculated with various algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning. These differences may impact the accurate correlation of dose with clinical outcome. To accomplish this, we modified the beam model penumbral parameters in an equivalent path length (EPL) algorithm and subsequently compared the EPL doses with those generated with Monte Carlo (MC). A single AP beam was used for beam fitting. Two different beam models were generated for EPL calculations: (1) initial beam model (init_fit) and (2) optimized beam model (best_fit) , with parameters optimized to produce the best agreement with MC calculated profiles at several depths in a water phantom. For the 6 MV, AP beam, EPL(init_fit) calculations were on average within 2%/2 mm (1.4 mm max.) agreement with MC; the agreement for EPL(best_fit) was 2%/1.0 mm (1.3 mm max.) for EPL(best_fit). Treatment planning was performed using a realistic lung phantom using 6 and 15 MV photons. In all homogeneous phantom plans, EPL(best_fit) calculations were in better agreement with MC. In the heterogeneous 6 MV plan, differences between EPL(best_fit and init_fit) and MC were significant for the tumour. The EPL(init_fit), unlike the EPL(best_fit) calculation, showed large differences in the lung relative to MC. For the 15 MV heterogeneous plan, clinically important differences were found between EPL(best_fit or init_fit) and MC for tumour and lung, suggesting that the algorithmic difference in inhomogeneous cases, differences between EPL(best_fit) and MC for lung tissues were smaller compared to those between EPL(init_fit) and MC. Although the extent to which beam model differences impact the dose comparisons will be dependent upon beam parameters (orientation, field size and energy), and the size and location of the tumour, this study shows that failing to correctly account for beam model differences will lead to biased comparisons between dose algorithms. This may ultimately hinder our ability to accurately correlate dose with clinical outcome.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2005

An Active Matrix Flat Panel Dosimeter (AMFPD) for in-phantom dosimetric measurements.

An a-Si Active Matrix Flat Panel Imager (AMFPI) prototype developed in-house has been modified to function as an in-phantom dosimetry system providing high resolution two-dimensional (2-D) data. This Active Matrix Flat Panel Dosimeter (AMFPD) system can be used as a replacement device for standard in-phantom dosimeters, such as scanning ion chambers in water, or film in solid water. The initial characterization of the device demonstrates a wide dynamic range (up to 160 cGy), a stable calibration curve (less than 1.5% variation over 1 year), dose rate independence (less than 1%), and excellent agreement of output factors with ion chamber measurements for a range of field sizes (less than 2%). The device also compares well to film for 2-D planar dose distributions. It is expected that the AMFPD system will be useful for beam commissioning, algorithm verification test data, and routine IMRT quality assurance dosimetry.

Equipment Design↗

PubMed2005

Improving IMRT delivery efficiency using intensity limits during inverse planning.

Inverse planned intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) fields can be highly modulated due to the large number of degrees of freedom involved in the inverse planning process. Additional modulation typically results in a more optimal plan, although the clinical rewards may be small or offset by additional delivery complexity and/or increased dose from transmission and leakage. Increasing modulation decreases delivery efficiency, and may lead to plans that are more sensitive to geometrical uncertainties. The purpose of this work is to assess the use of maximum intensity limits in inverse IMRT planning as a simple way to increase delivery efficiency without significantly affecting plan quality. Nine clinical cases (three each for brain, prostate, and head/neck) were used to evaluate advantages and disadvantages of limiting maximum intensity to increase delivery efficiency. IMRT plans were generated using in-house protocol-based constraints and objectives for the brain and head/neck, and RTOG 9406 dose volume objectives in the prostate. Each case was optimized at a series of maximum intensity ratios (the product of the maximum intensity and the number of beams divided by the prescribed dose to the target volume), and evaluated in terms of clinical metrics, dose-volume histograms, monitor units (MU) required per fraction (SMLC and DMLC delivery), and intensity map variation (a measure of the beam modulation). In each site tested, it was possible to reduce total monitor units by constraining the maximum allowed intensity without compromising the clinical acceptability of the plan. Monitor unit reductions up to 38% were observed for SMLC delivery, while reductions up to 29% were achieved for DMLC delivery. In general, complicated geometries saw a smaller reduction in monitor units for both delivery types, although DMLC delivery required significantly more monitor units in all cases. Constraining the maximum intensity in an inverse IMRT plan is a simple way to improve delivery efficiency without compromising plan objectives.

Body Burden↗

PubMed2004

Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT.

The more complex delivery techniques required for implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) based on inverse planning optimization have changed the relationship between dose at depth and dose at buildup regions near the surface. Surface buildup dose is dependent on electron contamination primarily from the unblocked view of the flattening filter and secondarily from air and collimation systems. To evaluate the impact of beam segmentation on buildup dose, measurements were performed with 10 x 10 cm2 fields, which were delivered with 3 static 3.5 x 10 cm2 or 3 x 10 cm2 strips, 5 static 2 x 10 cm2 strips, 10 static 1 x 10 cm2 strips, and 1.1 x 10 cm2 dynamic delivery, compared with a 10 x 10 cm2 open field. Measurements were performed in water and Solid Water using parallel plate chambers, a stereotactic diode, and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) for a 6 MV X-ray beam. Depth doses at 2 mm depth (relative to dose at 10 cm depth) were lower by 6%, 7%, 11%, and 10% for the above field delivery techniques, respectively, compared to the open field. These differences are most influenced by differences in multileaf collimator (MLC) transmission contributing to the useful beam. An example IMRT field was also studied to assess variations due to delivery technique (static vs. dynamic) and intensity level. Buildup dose is weakly dependent on the multileaf delivery technique for efficient IMRT fields.

Photons↗

PubMed2004

Dosimetry around metallic ports in tissue expanders in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy: an ex vivo evaluation.

Postmastectomy breast reconstruction can be accomplished utilizing tissue expanders and implants. However, in patients who require postoperative radiotherapy, the complication rate with tissue expander/implant reconstruction can exceed 50%. One potential cause of this high complication rate may be the metallic port in the tissue expander producing altered dosimetry in the region of the metallic device. The purpose of this study was to quantify the radiation dose distribution in the vicinity of the metallic port and determine its potential contribution to this extremely high complication rate. The absolute dosimetric effect of the tissue expander's metallic port was quantified using film and thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD) studies with a single beam incident on a metallic port extracted from an expander. TLD measurements were performed at 11 reproducible positions on an intact expander irradiated with tangential fields. A computed tomography (CT)-based treatment plan without inhomogeneity corrections was used to derive expected doses for all TLD positions. Multiple irradiation experiments were performed for all TLD data. Confidence intervals for the dose at TLD sites with the metallic port in place were compared to the expected dose at the site without the metallic port. Film studies did not reveal a significant component of scatter around the metallic port. TLD studies of the extracted metallic port revealed highest doses within the casing of the metallic port and no consistent increased dose at the surface of the expander. No excess dose due to the metallic port in the expander was noted with the phantom TLD data. Based upon these results, it does not appear that the metallic port in tissue expanders significantly contributes to the high complication rate experienced in patients undergoing tissue expander breast reconstruction and receiving radiation therapy. Strategies designed to reduce the breast reconstruction complication rate in this clinical setting will need to focus on factors other than adjusting the dosimetry around the tissue expander metallic port.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2004

Enhanced spectral discrimination through the exploitation of interface effects in photon dose data.

The convolution/superposition algorithm for computing dose from photon beams in radiation therapy planning requires knowledge of the energy spectrum. The algorithm can compute the dose for a polyenergetic beam as the weighted sum of the individual dose contributions from monoenergetic beams. In this study we exploit interface effects apparent in the dose distributions to discriminate among spectra of high energy photon beams. We have studied the sensitivity of the depth dose distribution to the energy components using a hypothetical beam for various field sizes and depths in water and water-lung-water media. Six theoretical spectra were simulated. We compared depth dose data from these spectra using three quantitative measures which are inherently free of normalization ambiguities: for homogeneous water, the ratio D20/D10 and a logarithmic derivative in the buildup region LD(build-up) and for inhomogeneous lung/water, the lung correction factor (CF). It was found that the ability of both the CF and the LD(build-up) tests to discriminate between the various theoretical spectra were superior to that of the D20/D10 test. This discriminating power of the CF test decreases with increasing field size due to restored electronic equilibrium. The CF test, though, has some advantages over the LD(build-up) test since it is less prone to electron contamination issues and numerical errors. A practical example with a 15 MV photon beam illustrates the process. Consequently, we suggest that as part of a beam-commissioning methodology, designated electronic disequilibrium test cases be implemented in unambiguously determining the correct energy spectrum to be used.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2004

Accounting for center-of-mass target motion using convolution methods in Monte Carlo-based dose calculations of the lung.

We have applied convolution methods to account for some of the effects of respiratory induced motion in clinical treatment planning of the lung. The 3-D displacement of the GTV center-of-mass (COM) as determined from breath-hold exhale and inhale CT scans was used to approximate the breathing induced motion. The time-course of the GTV-COM was estimated using a probability distribution function (PDF) previously derived from diaphragmatic motion [Med. Phys. 26, 715-720 (1990)] but also used by others for treatment planning in the lung [Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 53, 822-834 (2002); Med. Phys. 30, 1086-1095 (2003)]. We have implemented fluence and dose convolution methods within a Monte Carlo based dose calculation system with the intent of comparing these approaches for planning in the lung. All treatment plans in this study have been calculated with Monte Carlo using the breath-hold exhale CT data sets. An analysis of treatment plans for 3 patients showed substantial differences (hot and cold spots consistently greater than +/- 15%) between the motion convolved and static treatment plans. As fluence convolution accounts for the spatial variance of the dose distribution in the presence of tissue inhomogeneities, the doses were approximately 5% greater than those calculated with dose convolution in the vicinity of the lung. DVH differences between the static, fluence and dose convolved distributions for the CTV were relatively small, however, larger differences were observed for the PTV. An investigation of the effect of the breathing PDF asymmetry on the motion convolved dose distributions showed that reducing the asymmetry resulted in increased hot and cold spots in the motion convolved distributions relative to the static cases. In particular, changing from an asymmetric breathing function to one that is symmetric results in an increase in the hot/cold spots of +/- 15% relative to the static plan. This increase is not unexpected considering that the target spends relatively more time at inhale as the asymmetry decreases (note that the treatment plans were generated using the exhale CT scans).

Body Burden↗

PubMed2003

Potential gains for irradiation of chest wall and regional nodes with intensity modulated radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To develop an intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique for postmastectomy RT that improves target coverage while sparing all appropriate normal tissues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IMRT plans were generated using an in-house optimization system. Priority was given to matching the heart doses achieved with partially wide tangent fields (PWTFs) while maintaining 50 Gy +/- 5% to the chest wall, internal mammary nodes, and supraclavicular nodes. Other normal tissue doses were then minimized. Metrics for plan comparisons included minimal, maximal, and mean doses and normal tissue complication probability. RESULTS: IMRT resulted in more uniform chest wall coverage than did PWTFs. The average chest wall minimal dose was 43.7 +/- 1.1 Gy for IMRT and 31.2 +/- 16.5 Gy for PWTFs (p = 0.04). The average internal mammary node minimal dose was 42.8 +/- 2.1 Gy for IMRT and 21.8 +/- 13.2 Gy for PWTFs (p = 0.001). IMRT matched the <1% heart normal tissue complication probability achieved using PWTFs. The average contralateral breast mean dose was 2.8 +/- 1.7 Gy for IMRT, but a greater breast volume was exposed compared with PWTFs. The mean ipsilateral lung normal tissue complication probability was lower for IMRT (0.0) than for PWTFs (0.07 +/- 0.07; p = 0.02). The mean contralateral lung dose was greater for IMRT (5.8 +/- 1.8 Gy) than for PWTFs (1.6 +/- 0.1 Gy; p = <0.0001). CONCLUSION: A new IMRT technique achieves full target coverage while maintaining similar doses to heart and ipsilateral lung as conventional techniques. However, contralateral lung and breast volumes exposed to low doses were increased with IMRT and will need to be reduced in future studies.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2003

Photon beam relative dose validation of the DPM Monte Carlo code in lung-equivalent media.

Validation experiments have been conducted using 6 and 15 MV photons in inhomogeneous (water/lung/water) media to benchmark the accuracy of the DPM Monte Carlo code for photon beam dose calculations. Small field sizes (down to 2 x 2 cm2) and low-density media were chosen for this investigation because the intent was to test the DPM code under conditions where lateral electronic disequilibrium effects are emphasized. The treatment head components of a Varian 21EX linear accelerator, including the jaws (defining field sizes of 2 x 2, 3 x 3 and 10 x 10 cm2), were simulated using the BEAMnrc code. The phase space files were integrated within the DPM code system, and central axis depth dose and profile calculations were compared against diode measurements in a homogeneous water phantom in order to validate the phase space. Results of the homogeneous phantom study indicated that the relative differences between DPM calculations and measurements were within +/- 1% (based on the rms deviation) for the depth dose curves; relative profile dose differences were on average within +/- 1%/1 mm. Depth dose and profile measurements were carried out using an ion-chamber and film, within an inhomogeneous phantom consisting of a 6 cm slab of lung-equivalent material embedded within solid water. For the inhomogeneous phantom experiment, DPM depth dose calculations were within +/- 1% (based on the rms deviation) of measurements; relative profile differences at depths within and beyond the lung were, on average, within +/- 2% in the inner and outer beam regions, and within 1-2 mm distance-to-agreement within the penumbral region. Relative point differences on the order of 2-3% were within the estimated experimental uncertainties. This work demonstrates that the DPM Monte Carlo code is capable of accurate photon beam dose calculations in situations where lateral electron disequilibrium effects are pronounced.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

A fluence convolution method to account for respiratory motion in three-dimensional dose calculations of the liver: a Monte Carlo study.

We describe the implementation of a fluence convolution method to account for the influence of superior-inferior (SI) respiratory induced motion on a Monte Carlo-based dose calculation of a tumor located in the liver. This method involves convolving the static fluence map with a function describing the SI motion of the liver-the motion function has been previously derived from measurements of diaphragm movement observed under fluoroscopy. Significant differences are noted between fluence-convolved and static dose distributions in an example clinical treatment plan; hot and cold spots (on the order of 25%) are observed in the fluence-convolved plan at the superior and inferior borders of the liver, respectively. This study illustrates that the fluence convolution method can be incorporated into Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms to account for some of the effects of patient breathing during radiotherapy treatment planning, thus leading to more accurate dose calculations.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

Summary and recommendations of a National Cancer Institute workshop on issues limiting the clinical use of Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms for megavoltage external beam radiation therapy.

Due to the significant interest in Monte Carlo dose calculations for external beam megavoltage radiation therapy from both the research and commercial communities, a workshop was held in October 2001 to assess the status of this computational method with regard to use for clinical treatment planning. The Radiation Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, in conjunction with the Nuclear Data and Analysis Group at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, gathered a group of experts in clinical radiation therapy treatment planning and Monte Carlo dose calculations, and examined issues involved in clinical implementation of Monte Carlo dose calculation methods in clinical radiotherapy. The workshop examined the current status of Monte Carlo algorithms, the rationale for using Monte Carlo, algorithmic concerns, clinical issues, and verification methodologies. Based on these discussions, the workshop developed recommendations for future NCI-funded research and development efforts. This paper briefly summarizes the issues presented at the workshop and the recommendations developed by the group.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

Dosimetric comparison of extended dose range film with ionization measurements in water and lung equivalent heterogeneous media exposed to megavoltage photons.

In this study, a dosimetric evaluation of the new Kodak extended dose range (EDR) film versus ionization measurements has been conducted in homogeneous solid water and water-lung equivalent layered heterogeneous phantoms for a relevant range of field sizes (up to a field size of 25x25 cm2 and a depth of 15 cm) for 6 and 15 MV photon beams from a linear accelerator. The optical density of EDR film was found to be linear up to about 350 cGy and over-responded for larger fields and depths (5% for 25x25 cm2 at depth of 15 cm compared to a 10x10 cm2, 5 cm depth reference value). Central axis depth dose measurements in solid water with the film in a perpendicular orientation were within 2% of the Wellhöfer IC-10 measurements for the smaller field sizes. A maximum discrepancy of 8.4% and 3.9% was found for the 25x25 cm2 field at 15 cm depth for 6 and 15 MV photons, respectively (with curve normalization at a depth of 5 cm). Compared to IC-10 measurements, film measured central axis depth dose inside the lung slab showed a slight over-response (at most 2%). At a depth of 15 cm in the lung phantom the over-response was found to be 7.4% and 3.7% for the 25x25 cm2 field for 6 and 15 MV photons, respectively. When results were presented as correction factors, the discrepancy between the IC-10 and the EDR was greatest for the lowest energy and the largest field size. The effect of the finite size of the ion chamber was most evident at smaller field sizes where profile differences versus film were observed in the penumbral region. These differences were reduced at larger field sizes and in situations where lateral electron transport resulted in a lateral spread of the beam, such as inside lung material. Film profiles across a lung tumor geometry phantom agreed with the IC-10 chamber within the experimental uncertainties. From this investigation EDR film appears to be a useful medium for relative dosimetry in higher dose ranges in both water and lung equivalent material for moderate field sizes and depths.

Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation↗

PubMed2002

Experimental validation of the DPM Monte Carlo code using minimally scattered electron beams in heterogeneous media.

A comprehensive set of measurements and calculations has been conducted to investigate the accuracy of the Dose Planning Method (DPM) Monte Carlo code for electron beam dose calculations in heterogeneous media. Measurements were made using 10 MeV and 50 MeV minimally scattered, uncollimated electron beams from a racetrack microtron. Source distributions for the Monte Carlo calculations were reconstructed from in-air ion chamber scans and then benchmarked against measurements in a homogeneous water phantom. The in-air spatial distributions were found to have FWHM of 4.7 cm and 1.3 cm, at 100 cm from the source, for the 10 MeV and 50 MeV beams respectively. Energy spectra for the electron beams were determined by simulating the components of the microtron treatment head using the code MCNP4B. Profile measurements were made using an ion chamber in a water phantom with slabs of lung or bone-equivalent materials submerged at various depths. DPM calculations are, on average, within 2% agreement with measurement for all geometries except for the 50 MeV incident on a 6 cm lung-equivalent slab. Measurements using approximately monoenergetic, 50 MeV, 'pencil-beam'-type electrons in heterogeneous media provide conditions for maximum electronic disequilibrium and hence present a stringent test of the code's electron transport physics; the agreement noted between calculation and measurement illustrates that the DPM code is capable of accurate dose calculation even under such conditions.

Electrons↗

PubMed2002

Postmastectomy radiotherapy of the chest wall: dosimetric comparison of common techniques.

PURPOSE: To compare seven techniques for irradiation of the postmastectomy chest wall (CW) using normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) predictions for pneumonitis and ischemic heart disease and dose-volume histogram analyses for normal and target tissues. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Plan comparisons were performed for 20 left-sided postmastectomy CW RT cases using target volumes based on clinical delineation of standard field borders. Seven common treatment techniques were planned for each case, using a prescription of 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the CW and internal mammary node (IMN) targets. NTCP model metrics were used to quantify the risks of pneumonitis and ischemic heart disease, supplemented by dose-volume metrics to assess the target coverage to the CW and IMNs, as well as normal tissue dose (lung and heart). RESULTS: Overlap in the distributions of the CW mean dose for all plans was found, except cobalt, which was significantly less than the remaining techniques (global F test, F = 21.90, p <0.0001). Standard tangents produced a significantly lower IMN mean dose than all other methods, as expected (F = 59.55, p < 0.0001); the reverse hockey stick and cobalt techniques were lower than the other methods, which were statistically similar. Cobalt produced a significantly higher percentage of the heart that received >30 Gy (V30) than the other methods (F = 49.76, p <0.0001). Use of partially wide tangent fields (PWTFs) resulted in the smallest heart V30. Use of cobalt fields resulted in a significantly greater NTCP estimate for ischemic heart disease than all the remaining techniques (F = 70.39, p <0.0001). Standard tangents resulted in a percentage of the lung receiving >20 Gy (V20) significantly less than with PWTFs, 30/70 and 20/80 photon/electron mix, and reverse hockey stick techniques. NTCP estimates for pneumonitis revealed significantly better results with standard tangents (F = 6.57, p <0.0001). CONCLUSION: No one technique studied combines the best CW and IMN coverage with minimal lung and heart complication probabilities. The choice of technique should be based on clinical discretion and the technical expertise available to implement these complex plans. Of the seven techniques studied, this analysis supports PWTFs as the most appropriate balance of target coverage and normal tissue sparing when irradiating the CW and IMN.

Body Mass Index↗