Treating prehypertension.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers↗
Biomedical subjects
Benedict Martina
Publications and source records attributed to Benedict Martina.
Impact of baseline echocardiography on treatment outcome in primary care patients with newly detected arterial hypertension: a randomized trial.
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to test whether baseline echocardiography in newly detected hypertension improves left ventricular mass index and blood pressure control. This is a randomized trial with primary care patients. METHODS: After routine clinical work-up 177 consecutive patients with newly detected hypertension were randomized according to result of their echocardiogram (echo group and control group). Treating physicians were encouraged to prescribe angiotensin II receptor antagonist therapy for patients with evidence of hypertensive target organ damage. Mean blood pressure (BP) and echocardiographic left ventricular mass index were measured at baseline and after 6 months of therapy in both groups. RESULTS: More patients with hypertensive target organ damage were identified in the echo group as compared to the control group (58 of 91 [64%] v 42 of 86 [49%] patients (difference 15%, 95% CI 1%-29%). In the echo group, 41 patients (45%) received angiotensin II receptor antagonist therapy as compared to 27 patients (31%) in the control group (difference 14%, 95% CI 0-28%). After 6 months, there were no differences in mean left ventricular mass index, mean diastolic 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, or mean systolic and diastolic office BP between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with newly detected hypertension, baseline echocardiography detects more patients with hypertensive target organ damage, but does not lead to a reduction in left ventricular mass index or improved BP control after 6 months of therapy.
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers↗
Routine blood pressure measurements do not predict adverse events in hospitalized patients.
PURPOSE: Countless blood pressure measurements are performed every day for almost every hospitalized patient. We analyzed the value of routine blood pressure measurements on patient care in an unselected group of hospitalized patients. METHODS: The study included 639 patients who were admitted to the hospital with a broad range of medical conditions. Two independent investigators reviewed the medical charts of the patients. Routine blood pressure values were abstracted from the patient charts and evaluated with respect to the occurrence of adverse clinical events in the study group. Changes in blood pressure between the last measurement just before adverse clinical events and the mean blood pressure values 72 hours before the adverse events were calculated and compared with mean normal day-to-day variations in blood pressure. RESULTS: In every patient, a mean of 1.6 +/- 0.6 routine blood pressure measurements per day were performed. Of the 639 patients in the study, 122 (19%) had clinical complications. The most commonly occurring complications were gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 15), falls (n = 13), other bleeding (n = 12) and pneumonia (n = 8). In patients who experienced clinical complications, pre-event systolic and diastolic blood pressure changes of at least 10 mm Hg occurred in 41% and 24% of the group, respectively, but this was not different from the normal day-to-day variations observed in patients who had no clinical complications. The results also were similar for patients who died or who had a severe adverse event that required admission to an intensive care unit. CONCLUSION: Routine blood pressure measurements in a general hospital patient population do not predict clinical adverse events.
Blood Pressure↗
High prevalence of newly detected hypertension in hospitalized patients: the value of inhospital 24-h blood pressure measurement.
OBJECTIVE: Screening for hypertension in hospitalized patients could reduce the number of individuals with unrecognized hypertension. We hypothesized that 24-h blood pressure monitoring is an adequate tool to detect unrecognized hypertension among inpatients. METHODS: Clinically stable inpatients in the Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Visceral Surgery and Department of Orthopaedics were included in the cross-sectional study. Every patient underwent inhospital 24-h blood pressure measurement. Previously unknown hypertension was defined as 24-h blood pressure of at least 125/80 mmHg in the absence of known hypertension. Forty-two patients had an additional 24-h blood pressure measurement after discharge, to compare mean inhospital and outpatient 24-h blood pressure values. RESULTS: In 314 consecutive inpatients, 24-h blood pressure measurement was performed. Among 139 patients without known hypertension, 53 were hypertensive. The mean routine and 24-h blood pressures in these patients were 135/77 and 137/82 mmHg, respectively. Thirty-seven of these patients had normal routine blood pressure and could be detected only by 24-h blood pressure measurement. Patients with unknown hypertension had a marked cardiovascular risk profile, 26 being at high or very high cardiovascular risk. However, documented cardiovascular disease was present in only seven patients, suggesting that effective treatment could prevent a considerable number of cardiovascular events. The agreement between inhospital and outpatient 24-h blood pressure measurement in 42 patients was good. CONCLUSIONS: By performing inhospital 24-h blood pressure measurement, a considerable number of patients with previously unknown hypertension can be detected.
Adult↗
C-reactive protein and B-type natriuretic peptides in never-treated white coat hypertensives.
Arterial hypertension has been associated with increased plasma concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). This study tested the hypothesis that patients with white coat hypertension have lower plasma CRP and BNP concentrations than those with sustained hypertension. A total of 109 consecutive medical outpatients with never-treated office hypertension underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and blood sampling to determine CRP and BNP concentrations. Patients with treated hypertension, lipid-lowering therapy, renal insufficiency or structural heart disease other than left ventricular hypertrophy were excluded. White coat hypertension was defined as office hypertension associated with mean daytime blood pressure values below 135/85 mmHg. A control group of 48 consecutive, age- and sex-matched patients without office hypertension were recruited during the same period. Twenty-six patients (24%) had white coat hypertension. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline variables between patients with sustained hypertension and white coat hypertensives, except for mean blood pressure values. Mean CRP was 3.2+/-5.1 mg/l in patients with white coat hypertension compared to 3.4+/-4.2 mg/l in those with sustained hypertension (p=0.79). Control patients had significantly lower CRP values than patients with either white coat or sustained hypertension (1.2+/-0.9 mg/l, p=0.002 and p=0.038, respectively). Mean BNP concentrations were 21+/-25 pg/l and 44+/-125 pg/l in white coat and sustained hypertensives, respectively (p=0.36). The plasma concentrations of CRP and BNP did not differ between patients with white coat hypertension and those with sustained hypertension.
Adult↗
Usefulness of B-type natriuretic peptide and C-reactive protein in predicting the presence or absence of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with systemic hypertension.
The diagnosis of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, an independent predictor of death and cardiovascular events, is difficult without using echocardiography. This study tested the hypothesis whether C-reactive protein (CRP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) would be useful to exclude echocardiographic LV hypertrophy. Consecutive hypertensive outpatients were asked to participate. Exclusion criteria were overt heart failure, severe renal insufficiency or any other severe concomitant illness. A venous blood sample was taken to measure plasma CRP and BNP concentrations. Echocardiographic LV hypertrophy was defined as LV mass > or =125 g/m2 for men and > or =110 g/m2 for women. In total, 320 patients were studied, and 37 patients (12%) had echocardiographic LV hypertrophy. Patients with LV hypertrophy were significantly older and had higher CRP and BNP concentrations and higher systolic blood pressure than those without LV hypertrophy. The optimal cut-off points for the diagnosis of LV hypertrophy were 35 pg/ml for BNP (sensitivity 73%, specificity 72%) and 2.5 mg/L for CRP (sensitivity 68%, specificity 59%). Only 1 of 123 patients with values of BNP and CRP less than the optimal cut-off point had echocardiographic LV hypertrophy, resulting in a high negative predictive value of 99% for the 2 blood tests combined to exclude LV hypertrophy. In conclusion, in hypertensive patients, echocardiographic LV hypertrophy can be excluded on the basis of a single blood sample for the determination of BNP and CRP.
Adult↗
Diagnostic value of lung auscultation in an emergency room setting.
BACKGROUND: In daily routine, physicians use history, physical examination and technology-based information such as laboratory tests and imaging studies to diagnose the patients' disease. We determined the diagnostic value of lung auscultation in patients admitted to the Medical emergency room with chest symptoms. METHODS: Two-hundred-and forty-three consecutive patients (137 males), mean age 59.2 years were included. Internal Medicine registrars had to make a presumptive diagnosis, 1) after having taken the history and 2) after having auscultated the lungs. Thereafter, routine diagnostic procedures were performed. The estimated diagnosis was compared with the final diagnosis based on the written report to the Family Practitioner. RESULTS: Two-hundred-eighty-seven diagnoses were made. Eighteen percent of patients suffered from left heart failure, 13% from unexplained chest pain, 10.5% from chest wall pain, and 10.5% from pneumonia. Forty-one percent of the diagnoses were already correct when based only on the patient's history. Lung auscultation improved the diagnostic yield only in 1% and worsened it in another 3%. By multiple logistic regression, normal lung auscultation (OR 0.12 [95CI% 0.053-0.29]) was the independent predictor for not having a lung or heart disease. However, elevation of B-type natiuretic peptide (BNP) (OR 1.16 per 100 pg/ml (95CI% 1.004-1.35), wheezing (OR 0.023 [0.002-0.33]) and pCO2 (OR 0.25 (0.10-0.621) were independent predictors for having a heart disease, whereas wheezing (OR 7.41 [3.26-16.83]) and CRP (OR 1.008 per 10 units [1.003-1.014]) were risk factors for having a lung disease. CONCLUSION: In contrast to history taking, abnormal lung auscultation does not appear to contribute considerably to the final diagnosis in patients presenting with chest symptoms in an emergency room setting. However, normal lung auscultation is a valuable predictor for not having a lung or heart disease, whereas wheezing is a predictor for having a lung disease and not having a heart disease.
Adolescent↗
Can airway obstruction be estimated by lung auscultation in an emergency room setting?
OBJECTIVE: Lung auscultation is a central part of the physical examination at hospital admission. In this study, the physicians' estimation of airway obstruction by auscultation was determined and compared with the degree of airway obstruction as measured by FEV(1)/FVC values. METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-three patients consecutively admitted to the medical emergency room with chest problems were included. After taking their history, patients were auscultated by an Internal Medicine registrar. The degree of airway obstruction had to be estimated (0=no, 1=mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe obstructed) and then spirometry was performed. Airway obstruction was defined as a ratio of FEV(1)/FVC <70%. The degree of airway obstruction was defined on FEV(1)/FVC as mild (FEV(1)/FVC <70% and >50%), moderate (FEV(1)/FVC <50% >30%) and severe (FEV(1)/FVC <30%). RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-five patients (57.9%) had no sign of airway obstruction (FEV(1)/FVC >70%). Spirometry showed a mild obstruction in 51 patients (21.9%), a moderate obstruction in 27 patients (11.6%) and a severe obstruction in 20 patients (8.6%). There was a weak but significant correlation between FEV(1)/FVC and the auscultation-based estimation of airway obstruction in Internal Medicine Registrars (Spearman's rho=0.328; P<0.001). The sensitivity to detect airway obstruction by lung auscultation was 72.6% and the specificity only 46.3%. Thus, the negative predictive value was 68% and the positive predictive value 51%. In 27 patients (9.7%), airway obstruction was missed by lung auscultation. In these 27 cases, the severity of airway obstruction was mild in 20 patients, moderate in 5 patients and severe in 2 patients. In 82 patients (29.4%) with no sign of airway obstruction (FEV(1)/FVC >70%), airway obstruction was wrongly estimated as mild in 42 patients, as moderate in 34 patients and as severe in 6 patients, respectively. By performing multiple logistic regression, normal lung auscultation was a significant and independent predictor for not having an airway obstruction (OR 2.48 (1.43-4.28); P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Under emergency room conditions, physicians can quite accurately exclude airway obstruction by auscultation. Normal lung auscultation is an independent predictor for not having an airway obstruction. However, airway obstruction is often overestimated by auscultation; thus, spirometry should be performed.
Adult↗
Value of a standard urinary dipstick test for detecting microalbuminuria in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension.
PRINCIPLES: Microalbuminuria may indicate target organ damage in hypertensive patients. However, testing for microalbuminuria is not yet consistently used in general practice. This may be partly due to a lack of data regarding the diagnostic value of practice-based dipstick testing in newly diagnosed hypertension. Objectives were to assess the diagnostic value of a standard dipstick test for urinary protein excretion. METHOD: 186 patients who had been newly diagnosed with hypertension were screened for microalbuminuria. A spot urine sample from each of the subjects was evaluated by using a standard dipstick test (Combur 10, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) in a primary care setting. The albumin/creatinine ratio was used as the "gold standard". RESULTS: Dipstick testing for protein was positive in 31 urine samples (16.7% of the test samples). The albumin/creatinine ratio was elevated in 33 samples (17.7% of the test samples). The sensitivity of detecting microalbuminuria was 26%, specificity 89%, positive predictive value 45%, and the negative predictive was 88%. Repeated dipstick testing 48 hours after the initial testing in 40 randomly selected patients showed a good reproducibility (98%). CONCLUSIONS: In a primary care setting a positive standard dipstick test of a random spot urine in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension may indicate the presence of microalbuminuria with high specificity. However, because of its low sensitivity, the standard urinary dipstick test can not be recommended as the sole method of screening for renal target organ damage. In addition standard dipstick testing is important to exclude confounding factors that can falsify the measurement of urinary protein excretion.
Albuminuria↗
Moderate-to-severe blood pressure elevation at ED entry: hypertension or normotension?
PURPOSE: It is controversial whether arterial hypertension (AHT) can be diagnosed in the emergency department (ED). We sought to prospectively investigate the natural time course of blood pressure (BP) to define an optimal period for AHT screening in ED patients with an elevated initial BP. PROCEDURES: Patients with a BP greater than 160/100 mm Hg upon ED admission underwent repeated BP measurements every 5 minutes for 2 hours using an automated device. Arterial hypertension was confirmed using 12-hour ambulatory BP measurement or repeated office BP measurement according to the Joint National Committee VII guidelines by the primary care physician after discharge from the hospital. MAIN FINDINGS: Systolic BP decreased significantly during the first 10 to 20 minutes of ED stay in hypertensive and normotensive patients without further significant changes thereafter. Diastolic BP remained stable in both hypertensive and normotensive patients. Discrimination between hypertensive and normotensive patients was best between minutes 60 and 80 after ED admission. An average BP of 165/105 mm Hg or higher during this period strongly suggests AHT whereas a BP of less than 130/80 mm Hg excludes AHT with high sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for AHT in the ED is possible with high specificity and sensitivity. Blood pressure measurements between minutes 60 and 80 after entry into the ED yield the highest diagnostic value.
Blood Pressure Determination↗
White coat effect and white coat hypertension in community pharmacy practice.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a white coat effect (WCE) can be observed and quantified in community pharmacy practice. METHODS: In five community pharmacies of Basel, Switzerland, clients asking for blood pressure (BP) measurement were recruited to participate in a free of charge study. Blood pressure was measured in four different settings: pharmacy (using mercury sphygmomanometers), outpatient clinic (measurement by a nurse using mercury sphygmomanometers), self-measurement at home (using automated wrist devices) and daytime ambulatory BP (ABP) monitoring (using SpaceLabs 90207 monitors). WCE was defined as the difference between pharmacy or outpatient and daytime ABP. RESULTS: A total of 50 subjects completed all measurements (42% male, mean age 53.7 years+/-14.0). Blood pressure values of the different settings: (means in mmHg+/-SD, systolic; diastolic): pharmacy BP 129+/-19; 82+/-10, outpatient clinic BP 127+/-15; 82+/-10, home BP 119+/-15; 73+/-9, daytime ABP 124+/-10; 79+/-8. Pharmacy BP was significantly higher (P=0.03 systolic; P=0.02 diastolic) compared with daytime ABP and differences among subjects with antihypertensive medication (n=22) were even more significant (P<0.01). Individual differences were found between pharmacy BP and daytime ABP: +4.6+/-14.8; +2.9+/-8.3. Outpatient BP was significantly higher compared with daytime ABP in diastolic (P=0.04) but not in systolic values. Individual differences between outpatient BP and daytime ABP were +2.5+/-13.1; +2.8+/-9.2. 'Clinically important WCE' (>or=20 mmHg systolic or >or=10 mmHg diastolic) was observed in 24% of all subjects in the pharmacy and in 20% in the outpatient clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that WCE and white coat hypertension exist in community pharmacy practice and are similar to the effects in an outpatient clinic.
Adult↗
Use of B-type natriuretic peptide in the evaluation and management of acute dyspnea.
BACKGROUND: B-type natriuretic peptide levels are higher in patients with congestive heart failure than in patients with dyspnea from other causes. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled study of 452 patients who presented to the emergency department with acute dyspnea: 225 patients were randomly assigned to a diagnostic strategy involving the measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide levels with the use of a rapid bedside assay, and 227 were assessed in a standard manner. The time to discharge and the total cost of treatment were the primary end points. RESULTS: Base-line demographic and clinical characteristics were well matched between the two groups. The use of B-type natriuretic peptide levels reduced the need for hospitalization and intensive care; 75 percent of patients in the B-type natriuretic peptide group were hospitalized, as compared with 85 percent of patients in the control group (P=0.008), and 15 percent of those in the B-type natriuretic peptide group required intensive care, as compared with 24 percent of those in the control group (P=0.01). The median time to discharge was 8.0 days in the B-type natriuretic peptide group and 11.0 days in the control group (P=0.001). The mean total cost of treatment was 5,410 dollars (95 percent confidence interval, 4,516 dollars to 6,304 dollars) in the B-type natriuretic peptide group, as compared with 7,264 dollars (95 percent confidence interval, 6,301 dollars to 8,227 dollars) in the control group (P=0.006). The respective 30-day mortality rates were 10 percent and 12 percent (P=0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Used in conjunction with other clinical information, rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency department improved the evaluation and treatment of patients with acute dyspnea and thereby reduced the time to discharge and the total cost of treatment.
Acute Disease↗
Initial clinical evaluation of cardiac systolic murmurs in the ED by noncardiologists.
It is not exactly known how ED physicians perform in evaluating cardiac systolic murmurs. In 203 consecutive medical ED patients with systolic murmur, we compared the initial clinical evaluation, including auscultation, with transthoracic echocardiography. Of the 203 patients, 132 (65%) had innocent murmurs and 71 patients (35%) had valvular heart disease. Sensitivity and specificity of the initial clinical routine evaluation in diagnosing echocardiographic valvular heart disease were 82% (70%-86%) and 69% (60%-76%), respectively. Independent significant positive predictors of valvular heart disease were grade >2/6 systolic murmur (odds ratio [OR], 8.3; confidence interval [CI], 3.5-19.7, P<.001) and pathologic electrocardiogram (ECG) (OR, 8.4; CI, 3.2-22, P<.001. Patients younger than 50 years with a systolic murmur graded < or =2/6 had innocent murmurs in 98%. The initial clinical evaluation, including auscultation, by experienced ED physicians in internal medicine distinguishes well between innocent murmurs and valvular heart disease in medical patients with cardiac systolic murmurs.
Adolescent↗
Blood pressure and heart rate of students undergoing a medical licensing examination.
AIMS: To assess the effect of a real life mental stress situation on blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in students undergoing a medical licensing examination. METHOD: Prospective observational study of 121 medical students taking the final licensing exam. BP and HR were taken before and after the exam. Additionally, BP was measured by ambulatory BP monitoring device and HR was recorded continuously by an HR monitor belt in 25 students throughout the examination. MAJOR FINDINGS: Diastolic BP (DBP) increased from 81 +/- 10 mmHg before the exam to 86 +/- 9 mmHg (p = 0.008) during the exam and to 88 +/- 11 mmHg, (p = 0.007) 15 min after the exam. Systolic BP (SBP) did not increase significantly during (from 131 +/- 14 before the exam to 136 +/- 18 mmHg) and after the exam (135 +/- 16 mmHg). HR decreased during (to 100 +/- 18 beats/min, p < 0.001), and after the exam (to 95 +/- 19 beats/min, p < 0.001) compared to values before the exam (114 +/- 19 beats/min). SBP was higher in male students compared to female students before (138 +/- 10 vs 125 +/- 18 mmHg) and after (126 +/- 18 vs 115 +/- 17 mmHg) the exam (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Only DBP increased during medical licensing examination, albeit within a small range. SBP did not change significantly and HR decreased during the exam. Male students showed a higher SBP compared to female students.
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
Increased renovascular response to angiotensin II in persons genetically predisposed to arterial hypertension disappears after chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition.
OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: Functional changes in the kidneys of healthy men with (FH+) (n = 15) and without (FH-) (n = 15) family history of primary arterial hypertension were examined during administration of low-dose exogenous angiotensin II (A2) (1 ng/kg per min) before and after acute (1 mg intravenous enalaprilat) and chronic (7 days oral enalapril, 30 mg/day) angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition. RESULTS: Before chronic ACE inhibition, A2 increased mean arterial blood pressure (FH+, 8.7 +/- 0.8 mmHg; FH-, 8.9 +/- 0.9 mmHg), plasma immunoreactive A2 (FH+, 21 +/- 2 pg/ml; FH-, 18 +/- 3 pg/ml) and plasma aldosterone (FH+, 64 +/- 7 pg/ml; FH-, 56 +/- 6 pg/ml) to a similar degree in both groups. Chronic ACE inhibition had no impact on A2 blood pressure, plasma A2, or plasma aldosterone effects. A2 significantly increased renal vascular resistance in both groups (FH+, 3956 +/- 462 dyne s cm(-5); FH-, 2219 +/- 550 dyne s cm(-5)), but the effect was more pronounced in FH+ (P = 0.02). Glomerular hemodynamics, estimated by a modified Gomez model, revealed increased afferent and efferent responsiveness to A2 in FH+ subjects. These differences disappeared after chronic ACE inhibition when total, afferent and efferent sensitivities to A2 were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic blood pressure and plasma aldosterone responses to A2 were similar in men with or without a genetic disposition to primary arterial hypertension. However, our data demonstrate that men with a family history of hypertension have increased renovascular sensitivity to A2, and that chronic ACE inhibition normalizes their sensitivity.
Adolescent↗
Reduced length of stay in medical emergency department patients: a prospective controlled study on emergency physician staffing.
OBJECTIVE: Patients, emergency department staff and hospital managers are often confronted with a prolonged length of stay of emergency department patients, with resulting overcrowding in the emergency department. We hypothesized that additional medical personnel would reduce the length of stay. METHODS: We prospectively studied consecutive patients managed in a medical emergency department by internal medicine residents during the evening shift. Data were collected on patients managed before (n=200) and after (n=160) the addition of a second physician on the shift. RESULTS: The addition of a physician in the busy evening shift decreased the length of stay from 176+/-137 to 141+/-86 min (mean+/-SD, P=0.012) for outpatients discharged after evaluation and management in the emergency department. The length of stay for emergency department inpatients admitted for hospitalization was not significantly reduced. CONCLUSION: An additional physician significantly reduced the length of stay of medical emergency department outpatients.
Adult↗
Effects of telmisartan and losartan on left ventricular mass in mild-to-moderate hypertension. A randomized, double-blind trial.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗