PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Benjamin K Potter

Publications and source records attributed to Benjamin K Potter.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Solitary epiphyseal enchondromas.

BACKGROUND: Enchondromas originating in the epiphyses of long bones are rare. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence as well as the radiographic and clinical characteristics of epiphyseal enchondromas among patients who had been referred to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology and Walter Reed Army Medical Center. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 761 patients who had been referred to our two institutions over an approximately fifty-five-year period and who received a final diagnosis of enchondroma. All lesions had been biopsied, and the pathological diagnosis had been confirmed. Lesions of the hands, feet, or axial skeleton (253 patients) as well as lesions that appeared to originate in the metaphysis or diaphysis (475 patients) were excluded. Only enchondromas of the long bones that originated in the epiphysis were analyzed. The study group included thirty-three patients (twenty male patients and thirteen female patients) with a mean age of 26.7 years, including eleven patients with open physes. We performed additional descriptive analyses with regard to patient age, gender, lesion location, clinical presentation, and treatment as well as an extensive radiographic analysis. RESULTS: The most common locations were the proximal part of the humerus (ten lesions; 30%) and the distal part of the femur (six lesions; 18%). The most common presenting symptom was pain (twenty-three patients). Radiographic analysis demonstrated extensive matrix mineralization in association with twenty-three lesions. Twenty-eight of the thirty-three lesions were geographically well defined; of these, twenty-one had sclerotic borders, and seven did not. Although all lesions were centered and were predominantly located within the epiphysis, twenty of the thirty-three lesions demonstrated radiographic evidence of metaphyseal extension, including four of the eleven lesions in patients with open physes. Twenty-four lesions extended into the subchondral bone. The mean size of the thirty-three enchondromas in greatest radiographic dimension was 2.7 cm (range, 1.1 to 4.9 cm). Twenty-six of the thirty-three lesions were amenable to surgical treatment with curettage with or without bone-grafting, with only one recurrence. With the limited follow-up available, no lesion underwent sarcomatous degeneration. CONCLUSIONS: Epiphyseal enchondromas are rare lesions. Although their biologic behavior appears to mirror that of conventional metaphyseal enchondromas, their proximity to the joint space may lead to more frequent painful symptoms, a propensity for physeal involvement, and the need for earlier definitive surgical intervention.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Volumetric spinal canal intrusion: a comparison between thoracic pedicle screws and thoracic hooks.

STUDY DESIGN: A computer-aided design analysis. OBJECTIVES: To introduce the concept of volumetric spinal canal intrusion and report the relative intrusion volumes for thoracic pedicle screws compared to thoracic laminar and pedicle hooks. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Thoracic pedicle screws are being used more frequently; however, there is concern about neurologic risk from medial misplacement. The accepted alternative to screws is hooks. Laminar and pedicle hooks also have significant obligatory spinal canal intrusion. To date, there have been no comparison studies. METHODS: Volumetric analysis of canal intrusion of pedicle screws and hooks was performed by computer-aided design CAM. All implants were of a single product line by a single manufacturer (CD Horizon M8, Medtronic Sofamor Danek). Intrusion of pedicle screws with medial positioning was analyzed in 0.5-mm increments, including a calculation of the "screw shadow," representing additional space not available for the spinal cord between screw threads and lateral to a medially positioned screw with intrusion greater than the screw radius. The length of screw intrusion was determined from postoperative CT scans in patients with thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation. All hook styles were analyzed. The volume of the footplate in line with the dorsal surface of the footplate was considered the intruding volume for laminar hooks, with increasing offset in 0.25-mm increments to represent imperfect fit. Half of the volume of the footplate was considered to be the intruding volume for pedicle hooks since a properly positioned pedicle hook straddles the pedicle. RESULTS: Volumetric intrusion for a 4.5-mm screw ranged from 2.2 mm3 (0.5 mm medial perforation) to 83.4 mm3 (3.0 mm perforation). For a 5.5-mm screw, intrusion volume range was from 1.3 mm3 to 83.2 mm3. Accounting for the "screw shadow," the volumetric intrusion was 9.83 mm3 to 116.3 mm3 and 10.88 mm3 to 134.89 mm3, respectively. Hook volumetric intrusion ranged from 21.15 mm3 for a pediatric narrow-blade ramped pedicle hook to 113.9 mm3 for a wide-blade laminar hook with 1.0 mm of step-off. CONCLUSIONS: A 4.5-mm or 5.5-mm thoracic pedicle screw must have a medial perforation of >or=1.5 mm to have the same volumetric spinal canal intrusion as a pediatric narrow-blade pedicle hook, the smallest hook footplate. Further, the medial violation must be >3 mm to approach the same volumetric intrusion as the largest hook. Accounting for the "screw shadow," a thoracic pedicle screw must have a medial perforation of >2 mm to approach the same intrusion volume as a standard pedicle hook. In the absence of direct neural injury, this explains the clinical finding of medial perforation of up to 4 mm without neurologic compromise.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Probing for thoracic pedicle screw tract violation(s): is it valid?

BACKGROUND: Preparation of the thoracic pedicle screw tract is a critical step prior to the placement of screws. The ability to detect pedicle wall violation(s) by probing prior to insertion of thoracic pedicles screws, however, has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intraobserver agreement and the accuracy in detecting thoracic pedicle screw tract violation(s) among surgeons at various levels of training. METHODS: With use of a straightforward trajectory, under direct visualization, 108 thoracic pedicle screw tracts (54 cadaveric thoracic vertebrae) were prepared in a standard fashion, followed by tapping with a 4.5-mm cannulated tap. A deliberate pedicle violation was randomly created by an independent investigator in either the anterior, the medial, or the lateral wall in 65 pedicles. Following this, four blinded, independent surgeons at various levels of training probed the specimens on three separate occasions to determine if a breach was present (1,296 discrete data points). Surgeon findings were then recorded as breach present or absent and, if present, breach location. The Cohen kappa correlation coefficient (kappa a) and 95% confidence interval were used to assess the accuracy of the observers and the inter- and intraobserver agreement. RESULTS: The mean accuracy over three iterations, the validity in detecting the breach location, and the intraobserver agreement varied by level of training and experience, with the most experienced observer (observer 1) scoring the best and the least experienced observer (observer 4) scoring the worst. The three most senior surgeons had good intraobserver agreement. Interobserver agreement was low between the four observers. CONCLUSIONS: An observer's ability to accurately detect the presence or absence of a pedicle tract violation and the breach location, if present, is dependent on the surgeon's level of training. Probing the pedicle tract prior to placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine is likely a learned skill that improves with repetition and experience.

Bone Screws↗
PubMed2004

Prevention and management of iatrogenic flatback deformity.

The most common cause of iatrogenic flatback syndrome is Harrington distraction instrumentation extending into the lower lumbar spine. Other common causes and exacerbating factors include failure to enhance regional lordosis during lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylosis, development of pseudarthrosis or postoperative loss of correction, development of kyphosis at the thoracolumbar junction, development of degeneration and decompensation cephalad or caudad to a prior fusion, and hip flexion contractures. Prevention of flatback syndrome involves preoperative assessment of sagittal balance, avoidance of distraction instrumentation and extension of long fusions into the lower lumbar spine, enhancement of physiologic lordosis during lumbar fusions, and intraoperative positioning with the hips extended. Treatment of flatback syndrome involves corrective pedicle subtraction or Smith-Petersen osteotomies with segmental instrumentation. Polysegmental osteotomies and vertebral column resection may be utilized in cases of sloping global sagittal imbalance and related severe coronal imbalance, respectively. Following surgical treatment, sagittal balance is generally improved with fair-to-good clinical outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and moderately high perioperative complication rates.

Humans↗