Biomedical subjects

Benjamin P Callen

Publications and source records attributed to Benjamin P Callen.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Construction and characterization of a gold nanoparticle wire assembled using Mg2+-dependent RNA-RNA interactions.

Magnesium-ion-mediated RNA-RNA loop-receptor interactions, in conjunction with gold nanoparticles derivatized with DNA, have been used to make self-assembled nanowires. A wire located between lithographically fabricated nanoelectrodes is demonstrated that exhibits activated conduction by electron hopping at temperatures in the 150-300 K range. These techniques have the ability to link particles between devices and in the future may be used to assemble practical circuits.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed2005

Transcriptional interference--a crash course.

The term "transcriptional interference" (TI) is widely used but poorly defined in the literature. There are a variety of methods by which one can interfere with the process or the product of transcription but the term TI usually refers to the direct negative impact of one transcriptional activity on a second transcriptional activity in cis. Two recent studies, one examining Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the other Escherichia coli, clearly show TI at one promoter caused by the arrival of a transcribing complex initiating at a distant promoter. TI is potentially widespread throughout biology; therefore, it is timely to assess exactly its nature, significance and operative mechanisms. In this article, we will address the following questions: what is TI, how important and widespread is it, how does it work and where should we focus our future research efforts?

Escherichia coli↗

PubMed2004

A mathematical model for transcriptional interference by RNA polymerase traffic in Escherichia coli.

Interactions between RNA polymerases (RNAP) resulting from tandem or convergent arrangements of promoters can cause transcriptional interference, often with important consequences for gene expression. However, it is not known what factors determine the magnitude of interference and which mechanisms are likely to predominate in any situation. We therefore developed a mathematical model incorporating three mechanisms of transcriptional interference in bacteria: occlusion (in which passing RNAPs block access to the promoter), collisions between elongating RNAPs, and "sitting duck" interference (in which RNAP complexes waiting to fire at the promoter are removed by passing RNAP). The predictions of the model are in good agreement with a recent quantitative in vivo study of convergent promoters in E.coli. Our analysis predicts that strong occlusion requires the interfering promoter to be very strong. Collisions can also produce strong interference but only if the interfering promoter is very strong or if the convergent promoters are far apart (>200 bp). For moderate strength interfering promoters and short inter-promoter distances, strong interference is dependent on the sitting duck mechanism. Sitting duck interference is dependent on the relative strengths of the two promoters. However, it is also dependent on the "aspect ratio" (the relative rates of RNAP binding and firing) of the sensitive promoter, allowing promoters of equal strength to have very different sensitivities to transcriptional interference. The model provides a framework for using transcriptional interference to investigate various dynamic processes on DNA in vivo.

DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases↗

PubMed2004

Transcriptional interference between convergent promoters caused by elongation over the promoter.

Transcriptional interference with convergent transcription from face-to-face promoters is a potentially important form of gene regulation in all organisms. Using LacZ reporter studies, the mechanism of interference was determined for a pair of face-to-face prokaryotic promoters in which a strong promoter interferes 5.6-fold with a weak promoter, 62 bp away. The promoters were variously rearranged to test different models of interference. Terminating transcription from the strong promoter before it reached the weak promoter dramatically reduced interference, indicating a requirement for the passage of the converging RNAP over the weak promoter. Based on in vitro experiments showing a slow rate of escape for open complexes at the weak promoter and their sensitivity to head-on collisions with elongating RNAP, a "sitting duck" model of interference is proposed and supported with in vivo permanganate footprinting. The model is further supported by the analysis of a second set of prokaryotic face-to-face promoters.

Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial↗