PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Bennett Landman

Publications and source records attributed to Bennett Landman.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Brain atrophy in long-term abstinent alcoholics who demonstrate impairment on a simulated gambling task.

We recently demonstrated impairment on the Simulated Gambling Task (SGT) in long-term abstinent alcoholics (AbsAlc). Brain regions that have been shown to be necessary for intact SGT performance are the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) and the amygdala; patients with VMPFC or amygdalar damage demonstrate SGT impairments similar to those of substance abusing populations. We examined these brain regions, using T1-weighted MRIs, in the 101 participants from our previous study using voxel-based morphometry (VBM). VBM was performed using a modification we developed [Fein, G., Landman, B., Tran, H., Barakos, J., Moon, K., Di Sclafani, V., Shumway, R., 2006. Statistical parametric mapping of brain morphology: sensitivity is dramatically increased by using brain-extracted images as inputs. Neuroimage] of Baron's procedure, [], in which we use skull-stripped images as input. We also restricted the analysis to a ROI consisting of the amygdala and VMPFC as defined by the Talairach Daemon resource. Compared to the controls, the AbsAlc participants had significant foci of reduced gray matter density within the amygdala. Thus, SGT decision-making deficits are associated with reduced gray matter in the amygdala, a brain region previously implicated in similar decision-making impairments in neurological samples. This structurally based abnormality may be the result of long-term alcohol abuse or dependence, or it may reflect a pre-existing factor that predisposes one to severe alcoholism. From an image analysis perspective, this work demonstrates the increased sensitivity that results from using skull-stripped inputs and from restricting the analysis to a ROI. Without both of these methodological advances, no statistically significant finding would have been forthcoming from this work.

Adult↗

Statistical parametric mapping of brain morphology: sensitivity is dramatically increased by using brain-extracted images as inputs.

A major attraction of voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is that it allows researchers to explore large datasets with minimal human intervention. However, the validity and sensitivity of the Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM2) approach to VBM are the subject of considerable debate. We visually inspected the SPM2 gray matter segmentations for 101 research participants and found a gross inclusion of non-brain tissue surrounding the entire brain as gray matter in five subjects and focal areas bordering the brain in which non-brain tissue was classified as gray matter in many other subjects. We also found many areas in which the cortical gray matter was incorrectly excluded from the segmentation of the brain. The major source of these errors was the misregistration of individual brain images with the reference T1-weighted brain template. These errors could be eliminated if SPM2 operated on images from which non-brain tissues (scalp, skull, and meninges) are removed (brain-extracted images). We developed a modified SPM2 processing pipeline that used brain-extracted images as inputs to test this hypothesis. We describe the modifications to the SPM2 pipeline that allow analysis of brain-extracted inputs. Using brain-extracted inputs eliminated the non-brain matter inclusions and the cortical gray matter exclusions noted above, reducing the residual mean square errors (RMSEs, the error term of the SPM2 statistical analyses) by over 30%. We show how this reduction in the RMSEs profoundly affects power analyses. SPM2 analyses of brain-extracted images may require sample sizes only half as great as analyses of non-brain-extracted images.

Adult↗

Treated and treatment-naive alcoholics come from different populations.

In most research on alcoholism, convenience samples of individuals who have been in some type of treatment are used. Berkson's fallacy results when the associations found in studies of select samples are incorrectly presumed to apply to all alcoholics (i.e., including untreated alcoholics in the general population). In the current study, we examined whether treated and untreated alcoholics have similar early alcohol use histories by comparing abstinent alcoholics (treated and sober at least 6 months) with treatment-naive alcoholics (active drinkers). We studied 14 pairs of women and 25 pairs of men matched on the age at which they first met criteria for heavy alcohol use (women, 80 drinks per month; men, 100 drinks per month). The timeline follow-back interview method was used to gather retrospective alcohol use information. Alcohol dose and duration of use were subsequently computed for two intervals: (1) time between the person's first drink and date at which the person met criteria for heavy drinking and (2) period between when criteria for heavy drinking were met and current age of the treatment-naive person from each pair. During the period before the matching "heavy drinking" criteria were met, alcohol dose did not differ between groups. In the period after criteria for heavy alcohol use were met, in comparison with treatment-naive alcoholics, the treated alcoholics had higher average and peak alcohol doses. We rejected the hypothesis that the treatment-naive alcoholics and the treated alcoholics have similar alcohol use trajectories over time, with the treatment-naive sample simply being observed earlier in its alcohol use histories. Instead, we concluded that the two groups come from different populations with regard to alcohol use. In fact, the treated alcoholics had alcohol doses more than 50% higher than those of treatment-naive alcoholics in the years just after they began drinking heavily. This finding supports the suggestion that results from studies of alcoholics in treatment or after treatment (i.e., most studies of alcoholics) cannot be generalized to untreated individuals (who make up the majority of alcoholics).

Adult↗

Treated and treatment-naive alcoholics come from different populations.

In most research on alcoholism, convenience samples of individuals who have been in some type of treatment are used. Berkson's fallacy results when the associations found in studies of select samples are incorrectly presumed to apply to all alcoholics (i.e., including untreated alcoholics in the general population). In the current study, we examined whether treated and untreated alcoholics have similar early alcohol use histories by comparing abstinent alcoholics (treated and sober at least 6 months) with treatment-naive alcoholics (active drinkers). We studied 14 pairs of women and 25 pairs of men matched on the age at which they first met criteria for heavy alcohol use (women, 80 drinks per month; men, 100 drinks per month). The timeline follow-back interview method was used to gather retrospective alcohol use information. Alcohol dose and duration of use were subsequently computed for two intervals: (1) time between the person's first drink and date at which the person met criteria for heavy drinking and (2) period between when criteria for heavy drinking were met and current age of the treatment-naive person from each pair. During the period before the matching "heavy drinking" criteria were met, alcohol dose did not differ between groups. In the period after criteria for heavy alcohol use were met, in comparison with treatment-naive alcoholics, the treated alcoholics had higher average and peak alcohol doses. We rejected the hypothesis that the treatment-naive alcoholics and the treated alcoholics have similar alcohol use trajectories over time, with the treatment-naive sample simply being observed earlier in its alcohol use histories. Instead, we concluded that the two groups come from different populations with regard to alcohol use. In fact, the treated alcoholics had alcohol doses more than 50% higher than those of treatment-naive alcoholics in the years just after they began drinking heavily. This finding supports the suggestion that results from studies of alcoholics in treatment or after treatment (i.e., most studies of alcoholics) cannot be generalized to untreated individuals (who make up the majority of alcoholics).

Adult↗

Controlling for premorbid brain size in imaging studies: T1-derived cranium scaling factor vs. T2-derived intracranial vault volume.

Intracranial vault (ICV) volume, obtained from T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is generally used to estimate premorbid brain size in imaging studies. T1-weighted sequences lack the signal characteristics for ICV measurements [they have poor contrast at the outer boundary of sulcal cranium scaling factor (CSF)] but are valuable in imaging studies due to their excellent gray vs. white matter contrast. Smith et al. [NeuroImage 17 (2002) 479] suggested a T1-derived cranium scaling factor as an alternative control variable for premorbid brain size in cross-sectional studies. This index, which is computed using the SIENAX software, is a scaling factor comparing an individual's skull to a template skull derived from the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) average of 152 T1 studies (the MNI152). SIENAX computes coarsely defined estimates for the individual and MNI skulls rather than well-defined volumes. To test how well this approach would work as a control variable for premorbid brain size in cross-sectional studies, we compared the T1-derived cranium scaling factor to T2-derived ICV measurements in a sample of 92 individuals: 39 white males, 22 white females, and 31 African-American males, with an age range of 26-78 years. The correlation between T1- and T2-derived variables was 0.94 and did not differ across subject groups. The T1-derived cranium scaling factor accounted for a statistically significant portion (87%) of the variance of the T2-derived ICV measure and thus is a good surrogate for ICV measurement of premorbid brain size as a reference measure in MRI atrophy studies. Furthermore, neither race, sex, nor age accounted for any additional variance in ICV, indicating that neither race-, gender-, nor age-associated cranial bone thickness effects were present in this data set.

Adult↗