Biomedical subjects

Bernard Cummings

Publications and source records attributed to Bernard Cummings.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy with and without neoadjuvant gemcitabine for locally advanced unresectable or resected pancreatic cancer: a phase I-II study.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of biweekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) for resected and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients had either LA or resected pancreatic cancer. Between March 1999 and July 2001, 63 patients (31 with LA and 32 with resected disease) were treated. Of the 63 patients, 28 were enrolled in a Phase I study of increasing radiation doses (35 Gy [n = 7], 43.75 Gy [n = 11], and 52.5 Gy [n = 10] given within 4, 5, or 6 weeks, respectively, in 1.75-Gy fractions) concurrently with 40 mg/m(2) gemcitabine biweekly. Subsequently, 35 were enrolled in a Phase II study with the addition of induction gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) within 7 or 8 weeks to concurrent biweekly gemcitabine (40 mg/m(2)) and 52.5 Gy RT within 6 weeks. RESULTS: In the LA population, the best response observed was a complete response in 1, partial response in 3, stable disease in 10, and progressive disease in 17. In the phase II trial, gemcitabine plus RT was not delivered to 8 patients because of progression with induction gemcitabine alone (n = 5) or by patient request (n = 3). On intent-to-treat analysis, the median survival in the LA patients was 13.9 months and the 2-year survival rate was 16.1%. In the resected population, the median progression-free survival was 8.3 months, the median survival was 18.4 months, and the 2- and 5-year survival rate was 36% and 19.4%, respectively. The treatment was well tolerated; the median gemcitabine dose intensity was 96% of the planned dose in the neoadjuvant and concurrent portions of the Phase II study. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Biweekly gemcitabine (40 mg/m(2)) concurrently with RT (52.5 Gy in 30 fractions of 1.75 Gy) with or without induction gemcitabine is safe and tolerable and shows efficacy in patients with LA and resected pancreatic cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Conformal radiotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of gastric cancer: Review of 82 cases.

BACKGROUND: The Intergroup 0116 study showed a survival benefit with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for resected gastric cancer. We report our experience using conformal radiotherapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty-two patients with resected gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, Stage IB to IV (M0), were treated with 45 Gy in 25 fractions using a 5-field conformal technique. Chemotherapy was in accordance with the Intergroup 0116 study, or infusional 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in a phase I/II trial. RESULTS: Mean age was 56.4 years. Median follow-up was 22.8 months. Grade 3 or greater acute toxicity (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 3.0) was noted in 57% of patients (upper gastrointestinal tract 34%, hematologic 33%). One patient died of neutropenic sepsis. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 late toxicity included esophageal strictures (3 patients) and small bowel obstruction (1 patient). Full course CRT was completed by 67% of patients. Of 26 patients who relapsed, 20 died. Site of first relapse was available on 23 patients: 8 locoregional and distant, 4 locoregional alone, 11 distant alone. Overall and relapse-free survival were 69% and 54% at 3 years. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant CRT for gastric cancer, even with conformal RT, is associated with significant toxicity. Survival was comparable to that reported in the Intergroup 0116 study.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2005

A positive prognosis.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Preoperative radiation with concurrent chemotherapy for resectable rectal cancer: effect of dose escalation on pathologic complete response, local recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

PURPOSE: Three Phase II studies of preoperative radiotherapy and concurrent 5FU chemotherapy were undertaken. The primary endpoints were acute toxicity and pathologic complete response rate (pCR). Secondary endpoints were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 134 patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum (clinical T3/T4 or N1/N2) were treated. The initial cohort received 40 Gy in 20 fractions, the second 46 Gy in 23 fractions, and the third 50 Gy in 25 fractions. 5FU (225 mg/m2/day) was given continuously throughout radiotherapy. A total of 121 patients underwent surgical resection. RESULTS: Treatment was well tolerated. Grade 3/4 acute toxicity was observed in 13%, 4%, and 14% of patients in the 40 Gy, 46 Gy, and 50 Gy cohorts, respectively (p = 0.20). pCR was documented in 15%, 23%, and 33% of patients, respectively (p = 0.07). The 2-year actuarial LRFS was 72%, 90%, and 89% (p = 0.02); DFS was 62%, 84%, and 78% (p = 0.02); and OS was 72%, 94%, and 92%, respectively (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: All treatment schedules were well tolerated. There was a trend toward increased pCR with higher doses. A statistically significant increase in LRFS, DFS, and OS was seen with radiation doses of 46 Gy and greater, but there was no difference between 46 Gy and 50 Gy.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗

PubMed2005

Primary radical external beam radiotherapy of rectal adenocarcinoma: long term outcome of 271 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess local control, survival and toxicity following primary radical external beam radiotherapy of rectal adenocarcinoma treated between 1978 and 1997, and to compare practices and outcomes between the two decades of study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 271 patients who underwent primary radical external beam radiotherapy, without prior or concurrent chemotherapy, was conducted. All patients received radiation doses of at least 40 Gy. Most patients (82%) were followed until death. RESULTS: Tumor fixation was the only significant prognostic factor for complete response by multivariate analysis. Complete response rates for mobile, partially fixed and fixed tumors were 49, 22 and 9%, respectively. For patients with mobile, partially fixed and fixed tumors, overall 5 year survival was 48, 26 and 6%, respectively, and cancer specific 5 year survival was 59, 33 and 9%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, tumor fixation and CEA higher than 8.7 microg/L at presentation were associated with significantly shortened survival. Outcomes did not change significantly during the two decades of the study. RTOG grade 3 or higher acute (1.8%) and late (1.5%) toxicity occurred only in the first decade of study. CONCLUSIONS: Radical external beam radiotherapy is a reasonable treatment option for rectal carcinoma for patients who are not surgical candidates or refuse surgery. However in patients with fixed tumors in this study, the outcome is poor and treatment should be considered palliative. Severe radiation toxicity is infrequent with current schedules and techniques of radiotherapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2005

IMRT for adjuvant radiation in gastric cancer: a preferred plan?

PURPOSE: To assess the potential advantage of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) over conformal planning for postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with gastric carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients who had undergone treatment planning with conformal beam arrangements for 4500 cGy adjuvant radiotherapy between 2000 and 2001 underwent repeat planning using IMRT techniques. Conformal five-field plans were compared with seven- to nine-field coplanar sliding-window IMRT plans. For each patient, the cumulative dose-volume histograms and organ-dose summaries (without distributions or digitally reconstructed radiographs) were provided to two independent, "blinded" GI radiation oncologists. The oncologists indicated which plan provided better planning target volume coverage and critical organ sparing, any safety concerns with either plan, and which plan they would choose to treat the patient. RESULTS: In 18 (90%) of 20 cases, both oncologists chose the same plan. Cases with disagreement were given to a third "blinded" reviewer. A "preferred plan" could be determined in 19 (95%) of 20 cases. IMRT was preferred in 17 (89%) of 19 cases. In 4 (20%) of 20 IMRT plans at least one radiation oncologist had safety concerns because of the spinal cord dose (3 cases) or small bowel dose (2 cases). Of 42 ratings, IMRT was thought to provide better planning target volume coverage in 36 (86%) and better sparing of the spinal cord in 31 (74%) of 42, kidneys in 29 (69%), liver in 30 (71%), and heart in 29 (69%) of 42 ratings. The median underdose volume (1.7 vs. 4.1 cm3), maximal dose to the spinal cord (36.85 vs. 45.65 Gy), and dose to 50% of the liver (17.29 vs. 27.97), heart (12.89 vs. 15.50 Gy), and left kidney (15.50 vs. 16.06 Gy) were lower with IMRT than with the conformal plans. CONCLUSION: Compared with the conformal plans, oncologists frequently preferred IMRT plans when using dose-volume histogram data. The advantages of IMRT plans include both improved planning target volume coverage and improved sparing of critical organs. We are currently studying organ motion in the upper abdomen as a prerequisite to using IMRT for actual patient treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Postradiotherapy quality of life for head-and-neck cancer patients is independent of xerostomia.

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between quality of life (QOL) and xerostomia over time for patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for head-and-neck cancer in a prospective clinical trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with head-and-neck cancer were randomized to pilocarpine (n = 65) vs. placebo (n = 65) during RT. QOL was measured using the McMaster Head and Neck Radiotherapy Questionnaire (HNRQ). Xerostomia was measured on a linear analog scale. No statistically significant differences were observed between arms; all 130 patients were analyzed together. RESULTS: Baseline QOL data were obtained for 98.5% of participants. The baseline HNRQ score of 5.7 declined significantly to 4.0 (p <0.0001) by RT Week 6 and returned to baseline (5.8) by 6 months after treatment. This represents a large, clinically important change of 1.7 of 7 (24%; effect size 1.34). The decline in HNRQ score during RT paralleled the onset of xerostomia on the linear analog scale (r = 0.36 at 1 month). After treatment, the QOL scores recovered without improvement in xerostomia. The trajectory of the linear analog scale score resembled that of the HNRQ's single xerostomia question (r = 0.75 at 1 month). CONCLUSION: Quality of life recovers to baseline after RT, despite persistent xerostomia. Either a response shift occurs or xerostomia in the absence of acute mucositis has a relatively small influence on overall QOL.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

PubMed2004

Impact of body mass index on outcomes and treatment-related toxicity in patients with stage II and III rectal cancer: findings from Intergroup Trial 0114.

PURPOSE: To study the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and rates of sphincter-preserving operations, overall survival, cancer recurrence, and treatment-related toxicities in patients with rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated a nested cohort of 1,688 patients with stage II and III rectal cancer participating in a randomized trial of postoperative fluorouracil-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy. RESULTS: Obese patients were more likely to undergo an abdominoperineal resection (APR) than normal-weight patients (odds ratio, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.46). When analyzed by sex, increasing adiposity in men was a strong predictor of having an APR (P <.0001). Obese men with rectal cancer were also more likely than normal-weight men to have a local recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; 95% CI, 1.00 to 2.59). In contrast, obesity was not predictive of cancer recurrence in women, nor was BMI predictive of overall mortality in either men or women. Underweight patients had an increased risk of death (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.89) compared with normal-weight patients but no increase in cancer recurrences. Among all study participants, obese patients had a significantly lower rate of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and stomatitis and a lower rate of any grade 3 or worse toxicity when compared with normal-weight individuals. CONCLUSION: Increasing BMI in male patients with rectal cancer is associated with a decreased likelihood of sphincter preservation and a higher chance of local recurrence. For both men and women, overweight and obese patients experience less toxicity associated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, suggesting that actual body weight dosing of fluorouracil for obese patients is justified.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2003

Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: a practice guideline.

BACKGROUND: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the literature regarding the impact of follow-up on colorectal cancer patient survival and, in a second phase, recommendations were developed. METHODS: The MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, and Cochrane Library databases, and abstracts published in the 1997 to 2002 proceedings of the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology were systematically searched for evidence. Study selection was limited to randomized trials and meta-analyses that examined different programs of follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer where five-year overall survival was reported. External review by Ontario practitioners was obtained through a mailed survey. Final approval of the practice guideline report was obtained from the Practice Guidelines Coordinating Committee. RESULTS: Six randomized trials and two published meta-analyses of follow-up were obtained. Of six randomized trials comparing one follow-up program to a more intense program, only two individual trials detected a statistically significant survival benefit favouring the more intense follow-up program. Pooling of all six randomized trials demonstrated a significant improvement in survival favouring more intense follow-up (Relative Risk Ratio 0.80 (95%CI, 0.70 to 0.91; p = 0.0008). Although the rate of recurrence was similar in both of the follow-up groups compared, asymptomatic recurrences and re-operations for cure of recurrences were more common in patients with more intensive follow-up. Trials including CEA monitoring and liver imaging also had significant results, whereas trials not including these tests did not. CONCLUSION: Follow-up programs for patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer do improve survival. These follow-up programs include frequent visits and performance of blood CEA, chest x-rays, liver imaging and colonoscopy, however, it is not clear which tests or frequency of visits is optimal. There is a suggestion that improved survival is due to diagnosis of recurrence at an earlier, asymptomatic stage which allows for more curative resection of recurrence. Based on this evidence and consideration of the biology of colorectal cancer and present practices, a guideline was developed. Patients should be made aware of the risk of disease recurrence or second bowel cancer, the potential benefits of follow-up and the uncertainties requiring further clinical trials. For patients at high-risk of recurrence (stages IIb and III) clinical assessment is recommended when symptoms occur or at least every 6 months the first 3 years and yearly for at least 5 years. At the time of those visits, patients may have blood CEA, chest x-ray and liver imaging. For patients at lower risk of recurrence (stages I and Ia) or those with co-morbidities impairing future surgery, only visits yearly or when symptoms occur. All patients should have a colonoscopy before or within 6 months of initial surgery, and repeated yearly if villous or tubular adenomas >1 cm are found; otherwise repeat every 3 to 5 years. All patients having recurrences should be assessed by a multidisciplinary team in a cancer centre.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Limitation of conventional two dimensional radiation therapy planning in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the adequacy of coverage of gross tumor volume (GTV) with traditional two dimensional (2D) radiation therapy (RT) planning in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprised 94 of 179 patients treated with definitive RT between 1993 and 1997. The inclusion requirement was the availability of a digitally archived pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging. The digital images were used to record the precise location of the GTV in the sagittal plane. As a separate procedure, sagittal dose distributions for each treatment phase were created by digitizing the simulation field parameters into treatment planning software without knowledge of the GTV. The location of the GTV and dose distribution in the sagittal plane were superimposed on each other and GTV coverage by the 50, 90 and 95% isodose lines determined for each phase of treatment. RESULTS: The 1997 tumour node metastasis (TNM) stage distribution was: 7 (8%) stage I, 16 (16%) stage II, 30 (32%) stage III and 41 (44%) stage IV. Median follow-up was 4.4 years. Median primary dose was 66 Gy. The actuarial 5-year overall survival, disease free survival and local relapse free rates were 88, 54 and 66%, respectively. The GTV was covered by the 50, 90 and 95% isodose lines for all phases of the multiphase plan in only 53, 20 and 9% of patients, respectively. The GTV was more likely to be undercovered in the latter phases of the plan particularly in those patients with advanced T category. CONCLUSION: 2D RT planning has significant limitations in achieving adequate GTV coverage in NPC. We strongly recommend 3D planning using either conformal techniques of dose delivery or intensity modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of these patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Loss of p16 expression has prognostic significance in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: p16 is an important inhibitor of cell cycle progression; absence of p16 can thus result in increased cellular proliferation. In nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), absence of p16 has been reported in association with presence of the EBV and pRb. We therefore examined p16, pRb, and EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) expression in biopsy specimens from 84 patients with newly diagnosed NPC, who were treated primarily with curative radiation therapy. Our objective was to determine whether there was a correlation between these parameters and clinical outcome in NPC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Sections were cut from archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor blocks from NPC patients. p16 and pRb expression were determined using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies, respectively. The presence of EBV was determined by in situ hybridization for EBER. The percentage of positively staining tumor nuclei was scored for p16 or pRb immunoreactivity. Relative intensity and proportion of cells with EBER signals were also documented. RESULTS: p16 expression was reduced (</=5% positive immunoexpression) in 59 of 84 (70%) NPC samples; in contrast, pRb was observed in all (100%) tumors. EBER signals were detected in 67 of 83 (81%) NPC specimens. There was a weak correlation between EBER presence and loss of p16 (P = 0.1). Using a Cox regression model controlling for known prognostic parameters, such as age, weight loss, and tumor stage, complete absence of p16 expression (0%, i.e., no immunostaining identified throughout the specimen) was associated with an inferior overall survival rate (P = 0.022). In addition, EBER-positive NPC was strongly associated with improved overall survival (P = 0.005) as reported previously (Shi et al., Cancer, 94: 1997, 2002). CONCLUSION: These results provide the first evidence suggesting that inactivation of p16 appears to be a significant predictor for poor overall survival in NPC. Given that reduced p16 expression is observed in the majority of patients with NPC, this indicates that therapeutic strategies targeting the p16 pathway may be a biologically rational approach for NPC. The favorable prognostic value of EBER suggests that future clinical trials with NPC should consider stratifying for EBER status.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Radiotherapy alone in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: comparison with an intergroup study. Is combined modality treatment really necessary?

PURPOSE: To examine the outcome of radiotherapy (RT) alone in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and to compare the results with those reported by the Intergroup study 0099 (IGS) comparing RT to combined modality therapy (CMT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the period 1985-1992, 198 NPC patients presenting without distant metastatic disease were treated for cure. Of these, 172 had stage III/IV (UICC 1987, 1992). Planned RT was 2 Gy/day fraction to 60-66 Gy to the primary tumor, with 50 and 60 Gy to the node negative and to palpable nodes, respectively. Outcomes included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), defined from the time of registration at our institution. RESULTS: The TNM categories and other prognostic factors were similar to the IGS, though 80% had stage IV compared to 91% in IGS. The 5 year OS and DFS for the 172 patients with stage III/IV disease were 62 and 48%, respectively, as compared to the IGS results of OS 37% and DFS 29% for RT alone, and OS 67% and DFS 58% for the CMT arm of IGS. When the distribution of adverse prognostic factors was balanced between both studies the comparative results were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The early results for RT alone of this single institution experience are superior to those of the IGS control arm (RT), while somewhat inferior to those reported in the chemo-radiotherapy arm. The surprisingly poor outcome of the IGS/RT control arm may have resulted by chance, suggesting the need for a confirmatory randomized trial to fully establish the role of combined chemotherapy and radiation, as used in the IGS.

Adolescent↗