Biomedical subjects

Bernhard Komischke

Publications and source records attributed to Bernhard Komischke.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Partial unilateral lesions of the mushroom bodies affect olfactory learning in honeybees Apis mellifera L.

The mushroom bodies (MBs) are central structures in the insect brain that have been associated with olfactory learning and memory. Here we used hydroxyurea (HU) to treat honeybee larvae and induce partial MB ablations at the adult stage. We studied olfactory learning in honeybees with unilateral loss of the median calyces of their MBs and compared their ability to solve different forms of olfactory discrimination. When odorants were delivered in a side-specific manner, ablated bees could not solve either discrimination of the unambiguous problem (Paradigm 1: A+, B- on one antenna, C+, D- on the other; A+B-/C+D-) whereas they could solve at least one of both discriminations of the ambiguous problem (Paradigm 2: A+B-/A-B+), namely that proposed to their intact brain side. Non-ablated bees could learn side-specific discriminations on both brain sides. When odorants were delivered simultaneously to both antennae (Paradigm 3: A+B-C+D-), HU-ablated bees learned slower than HU-normal bees. Thus, in all three paradigms, the unilateral loss of a median calyx affected olfactory learning. We propose that the MBs are required for solving elemental olfactory tasks whose complexity is increased by the number of stimuli involved and that MB ablations could have an effect on the inhibition of information exchange between brain hemispheres.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Non-elemental processing in olfactory discrimination tasks needs bilateral input in honeybees.

In patterning discriminations, animals have to differentiate a compound stimulus AB from each of its elements A and B. In positive patterning (PP), the compound is reinforced whilst the single elements are non-reinforced. In negative patterning (NP), single elements are reinforced whilst the compound is non-reinforced. Using olfactory conditioning of the proboscis extension response (PER), we asked whether honeybees (Apis mellifera) can solve these patterning problems when odorants are given unilaterally as well as bilaterally to the antennae. Separating the olfactory input space of bees into two independent zones using plastic walls placed between the antennae, we conditioned bees in PP and NP procedures, with input on one side, on both sides, or in an ambiguous problem where bees had to solve PP on one side and NP on the other side. We found that bees with simultaneous bilateral input solve both patterning tasks efficiently. In contrast, PP but not NP was learned by bees receiving unilateral olfactory input. Bees subjected to the ambiguous NP/PP problem only solved PP. As PP can be solved through mere elemental processes, but NP is critically dependent on the use of non-elemental learning processes, our results suggest that bilateral olfactory input is necessary for non-elemental processing to take place in the bee brain.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Successive olfactory reversal learning in honeybees.

Honeybees Apis mellifera can associate an originally neutral odor with a reinforcement of sucrose solution. Forward pairings of odor and reinforcement enable the odor to release the proboscis extension reflex in consecutive tests. Bees can also be conditioned differentially: They learn to respond to a reinforced odor and not to a nonreinforced one. They can also learn to reverse their choice. Here we ask whether honeybees can learn successive olfactory differential conditioning tasks involving different overlapping pairs of odors. The conditioning schedules were established in order to train the animals with 3, 2, 1, or 0 reversals previous to a last differential conditioning phase in which two additional reversals were present. We studied whether or not successive reversal learning is possible and whether or not learning olfactory discrimination reversals affects the solving of subsequent discrimination reversals. Therefore we compared the responses of bees that had experienced reversals with those of bees that had not experienced such reversals when both are confronted with a new reversal situation. In experiment 1 we showed that bees that had experienced three previous reversals were better in solving the final reversal task than bees with no previous reversal experience. In experiment 2, we showed that one reversal learning is enough for bees to perform better in the final reversal task. The successive different reversals trained in our experiments resemble the natural foraging situation in which a honeybee forager has to switch successively from an initial floral species to different ones. The fact that experiencing such changes seems to improve a bee's performance in dealing with further new exploited food sources has therefore an adaptive impact for the individual and for the colony as a whole.

Animals↗