Biomedical subjects

Bernt Guldbrandtsen

Publications and source records attributed to Bernt Guldbrandtsen.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

The efficiency of mapping of quantitative trait loci using cofactor analysis in half-sib design.

This simulation study was designed to study the power and type I error rate in QTL mapping using cofactor analysis in half-sib designs. A number of scenarios were simulated with different power to identify QTL by varying family size, heritability, QTL effect and map density, and three threshold levels for cofactor were considered. Generally cofactor analysis did not increase the power of QTL mapping in a half-sib design, but increased the type I error rate. The exception was with small family size where the number of correctly identified QTL increased by 13% when heritability was high and 21% when heritability was low. However, in the same scenarios the number of false positives increased by 49% and 45% respectively. With a liberal threshold level of 10% for cofactor combined with a low heritability, the number of correctly identified QTL increased by 14% but there was a 41% increase in the number of false positives. Also, the power of QTL mapping did not increase with cofactor analysis in scenarios with unequal QTL effect, sparse marker density and large QTL effect (25% of the genetic variance), but the type I error rate tended to increase. A priori, cofactor analysis was expected to have higher power than individual chromosome analysis especially in experiments with lower power to detect QTL. Our study shows that cofactor analysis increased the number of false positives in all scenarios with low heritability and the increase was up to 50% in low power experiments and with lower thresholds for cofactors.

Chromosome Mapping↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Irreducibility and efficiency of ESIP to sample marker genotypes in large pedigrees with loops.

Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods have been proposed to overcome computational problems in linkage and segregation analyses. This approach involves sampling genotypes at the marker and trait loci. Among MCMC methods, scalar-Gibbs is the easiest to implement, and it is used in genetics. However, the Markov chain that corresponds to scalar-Gibbs may not be irreducible when the marker locus has more than two alleles, and even when the chain is irreducible, mixing has been observed to be slow. Joint sampling of genotypes has been proposed as a strategy to overcome these problems. An algorithm that combines the Elston-Stewart algorithm and iterative peeling (ESIP sampler) to sample genotypes jointly from the entire pedigree is used in this study. Here, it is shown that the ESIP sampler yields an irreducible Markov chain, regardless of the number of alleles at a locus. Further, results obtained by ESIP sampler are compared with other methods in the literature. Of the methods that are guaranteed to be irreducible, ESIP was the most efficient.

Algorithms↗

PubMedDate not supplied

On the need for a control line in selection experiments: a likelihood analysis.

The question of whether selection experiments ought to include a control line, as opposed to investing all facilities in a single selected line, is addressed using a likelihood perspective. The consequences of using a control line are evaluated under two scenarios. In the first one, environmental trend is modeled and inferred from the data. In this case, a control line is shown to be highly beneficial in terms of the efficiency of inferences about heritability and response to selection. In the second scenario, environmental trend is not modeled. One can imagine that a previous analysis of the experimental data had lent support to this decision. It is shown that in this situation where a control line may seem superfluous, inclusion of a control line can result in minor gains in efficiency if a high selection intensity is practiced in the selected line. Further, if there is a loss, it is moderately small. The results are verified to hold under more complicated data structures via Monte Carlo simulation. For completeness, divergent selection designs are also reviewed, and inferences based on a conditional and full likelihood approach are contrasted.

Computer Simulation↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of alternative methods to compute conditional genotype probabilities for genetic evaluation with finite locus models.

An increased availability of genotypes at marker loci has prompted the development of models that include the effect of individual genes. Selection based on these models is known as marker-assisted selection (MAS). MAS is known to be efficient especially for traits that have low heritability and non-additive gene action. BLUP methodology under non-additive gene action is not feasible for large inbred or crossbred pedigrees. It is easy to incorporate non-additive gene action in a finite locus model. Under such a model, the unobservable genotypic values can be predicted using the conditional mean of the genotypic values given the data. To compute this conditional mean, conditional genotype probabilities must be computed. In this study these probabilities were computed using iterative peeling, and three Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods--scalar Gibbs, blocking Gibbs, and a sampler that combines the Elston Stewart algorithm with iterative peeling (ESIP). The performance of these four methods was assessed using simulated data. For pedigrees with loops, iterative peeling fails to provide accurate genotype probability estimates for some pedigree members. Also, computing time is exponentially related to the number of loci in the model. For MCMC methods, a linear relationship can be maintained by sampling genotypes one locus at a time. Out of the three MCMC methods considered, ESIP, performed the best while scalar Gibbs performed the worst.

Genotype↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of bivariate and univariate QTL mapping in livestock populations.

This study presents a multivariate, variance component-based QTL mapping model implemented via restricted maximum likelihood (REML). The method was applied to investigate bivariate and univariate QTL mapping analyses, using simulated data. Specifically, we report results on the statistical power to detect a QTL and on the precision of parameter estimates using univariate and bivariate approaches. The model and methodology were also applied to study the effectiveness of partitioning the overall genetic correlation between two traits into a component due to many genes of small effect, and one due to the QTL. It is shown that when the QTL has a pleiotropic effect on two traits, a bivariate analysis leads to a higher statistical power of detecting the QTL and to a more precise estimate of the QTL's map position, in particular in the case when the QTL has a small effect on the trait. The increase in power is most marked in cases where the contributions of the QTL and of the polygenic components to the genetic correlation have opposite signs. The bivariate REML analysis can successfully partition the two components contributing to the genetic correlation between traits.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The effect of using approximate gametic variance covariance matrices on marker assisted selection by BLUP.

Under additive inheritance, the Henderson mixed model equations (HMME) provide an efficient approach to obtaining genetic evaluations by marker assisted best linear unbiased prediction (MABLUP) given pedigree relationships, trait and marker data. For large pedigrees with many missing markers, however, it is not feasible to calculate the exact gametic variance covariance matrix required to construct HMME. The objective of this study was to investigate the consequences of using approximate gametic variance covariance matrices on response to selection by MABLUP. Two methods were used to generate approximate variance covariance matrices. The first method (Method A) completely discards the marker information for individuals with an unknown linkage phase between two flanking markers. The second method (Method B) makes use of the marker information at only the most polymorphic marker locus for individuals with an unknown linkage phase. Data sets were simulated with and without missing marker data for flanking markers with 2, 4, 6, 8 or 12 alleles. Several missing marker data patterns were considered. The genetic variability explained by marked quantitative trait loci (MQTL) was modeled with one or two MQTL of equal effect. Response to selection by MABLUP using Method A or Method B were compared with that obtained by MABLUP using the exact genetic variance covariance matrix, which was estimated using 15,000 samples from the conditional distribution of genotypic values given the observed marker data. For the simulated conditions, the superiority of MABLUP over BLUP based only on pedigree relationships and trait data varied between 0.1% and 13.5% for Method A, between 1.7% and 23.8% for Method B, and between 7.6% and 28.9% for the exact method. The relative performance of the methods under investigation was not affected by the number of MQTL in the model.

Chromosome Mapping↗