Biomedical subjects

Bettina Forster

Publications and source records attributed to Bettina Forster.

16 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Altered tactile spatial attention in the early blind.

To investigate whether superior tactile acuity in the blind is due to alterations of attentional selection mechanisms, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were measured in a group of early blind and a group of sighted individuals who performed a difficult tactile spatial selection task. We found systematic differences in the attentional processing of tactile events between early blind and sighted individuals. The blind not only responded faster to tactile targets, but also showed attentional modulations of early somatosensory ERP components (P100 and N140). In contrast, ERP effects of spatial attention in the sighted only emerged at longer-latencies (about 200 ms post-stimulus). Our findings suggest that increased use of one sense due to sensory deprivation, such as touch in blind people, leads to alterations of attentional selection mechanism within modality-specific cortex.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Shifts of attention in the early blind: an erp study of attentional control processes in the absence of visual spatial information.

To investigate the role of visual spatial information in the control of spatial attention, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded during a tactile attention task for a group of totally blind participants who were either congenitally blind or had lost vision during infancy, and for an age-matched, sighted control group who performed the task in the dark. Participants had to shift attention to the left or right hand (as indicated by an auditory cue presented at the start of each trial) in order to detect infrequent tactile targets delivered to this hand. Effects of tactile attention on the processing of tactile events, as reflected by attentional modulations of somatosensory ERPs to tactile stimuli, were very similar for early blind and sighted participants, suggesting that the capacity to selectively process tactile information from one hand versus the other does not differ systematically between the blind and the sighted. ERPs measured during the cue-target interval revealed an anterior directing attention negativity (ADAN) that was present for the early blind group as well as for the sighted control group. In contrast, the subsequent posterior late direction attention negativity (LDAP) was absent in both groups. These results suggest that these two components reflect functionally distinct attentional control mechanisms which differ in their dependence on the availability of visually coded representations of external space.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

Vision and gaze direction modulate tactile processing in somatosensory cortex: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Several behavioural studies have shown that directing one's gaze at a body part reduces detection speed and enhances discrimination of tactile stimuli at that location. We investigated how vision of a body part stimulated and manipulations of gaze direction affect tactile processing. Participants' gaze was directed to one of their hands, with vision of this hand either available or prevented in different experiments. They had to detect infrequent tactile targets among non-targets. Somatosensory event-related brain potentials were recorded in response to stimulation of the hand towards which gaze was directed (G+ trials) and in response to stimulation of the other hand (G- trials). When vision (V+) of the hand gaze was directed at was available (G+V+), an early positivity overlapping with the P45 and N 80 component was observed for G+V+ trials relative to G-V- trials. In contrast, when the hands were occluded from view (V-), an enhanced N 140 component followed by a late negativity was observed for G+V- as compared to G-V- trials. It is suggested that vision of the body part stimulated can modulate processing in primary somatosensory cortex (S1), while effects of gaze direction in the absence of vision of the body part touched are located in higher order somatosensory areas. Such effects of vision and gaze on tactile processing may be mediated by pathways from multimodal brain regions to somatosensory cortex.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional shifts: ERP evidence for the premotor theory of attention.

The premotor theory of attention claims that the preparation of goal-directed action and shifts of attention are closely linked, because they are controlled by shared sensorymotor mechanisms. Until now, support for this theory has come primarily from studies demonstrating links between saccade programming and attention shifts. The present event-related brain potential (ERP) study demonstrated that attentional orienting processes are also elicited during the covert preparation of unimanual responses. ERPs were recorded in the interval between a visual response-hand selection cue and a subsequent visual Go/Nogo signal when participants prepared to lift their left or right index finger. Lateralised ERP components elicited during response preparation were very similar to components previously observed during instructed endogenous attention shifts, indicating that analogous attentional orienting processes are activated in both cases. Somatosensory ERP components (P90, N140) were enhanced when task-irrelevant tactile probes were delivered during response preparation to the hand involved in an anticipated response, even when probes were presented well in advance of response execution. These results suggest that attentional shifts are triggered during unimanual response preparation, as predicted by the premotor theory. This link between manual response programming and attention is consistent with the hypothesis that common mechanisms are involved in the control of attention and action.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Covert attention in touch: behavioral and ERP evidence for costs and benefits.

To investigate the mechanism underlying tactile spatial attention, reaction times (RTs) and event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in response to mechanical stimuli delivered to the hands. At the start of each trial cues indicated either the correct (valid) or incorrect (invalid) tactile stimulus location or were uninformative (neutral). RT costs (suppression of invalid compared to neutral trials) were found to be larger than benefits (enhancement of valid compared to neutral trials). ERPs showed that costs and benefits contribute equally to attentional modulations of the somatosensory N140 component, whereas these were largely due to costs at longer latencies. These results differ from the pattern of attentional ERP modulations previously found for vision and audition, where costs precede benefits, and therefore suggest that the mechanisms of attentional selectivity in touch might be different from attentional processes in other modalities.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Cutaneous saltation within and across arms: a new measure of the saltation illusion in somatosensation.

A new objective procedure was used to measure the strength of cutaneous saltation, in order to clarify current debates about the nature of this illusion. Three taps were presented successively to three possible forearm locations. Participants attended to the middle location and reported whether a tap was perceived there. When all stimuli were delivered to the same arm and intertap intervals were short, participants were unable to distinguish real and illusory stimuli at the middle location. When both arms were stimulated, location judgments on one arm were shifted toward a tap subsequently delivered to the other arm. These results challenge the view that saltation is a purely attentional phenomenon, but they are inconsistent with the idea that this illusion is produced in the primary somatosensory cortex.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

The attentional selection of spatial and non-spatial attributes in touch: ERP evidence for parallel and independent processes.

To investigate the functional relationship between spatial and non-spatial attentional selectivity in somatosensory processing, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to mechanical tactile stimuli, which were delivered to the right or left hand, and were low or high in frequency (Experiment 1), or soft or strong in intensity (Experiment 2). Participants' task was to attend to a specific combination of one stimulus location and one non-spatial attribute. Spatial attention was reflected in enhanced N140 components followed by a sustained attentional negativity. ERP effects of non-spatial attention (enhanced negativities to the attended frequency or intensity) were observed in the same latency range, suggesting that the attentional selection of relevant spatial and non-spatial attributes occurs in parallel. Most importantly, ERP correlates of attention directed to stimulus frequency and intensity were unaffected by the current focus of spatial attention. In contrast to vision, where the selective processing of non-spatial attributes is hierarchically dependent on selection by location, but similar to auditory attention, spatial and non-spatial attentional selectivity appear to operate independently in touch.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Effects of hand posture on preparatory control processes and sensory modulations in tactile-spatial attention.

OBJECTIVE: Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were measured to investigate spatial coordinate systems involved in the control of preparatory tactile-spatial orienting, and in subsequent attentional modulations of somatosensory processing. METHODS: On each trial, a visual precue directed attention to the left or right hand, where infrequent tactile targets had to be detected. Hands were positioned either close together or wide apart. ERPs were recorded in the cue-target interval and in response to attended and unattended tactile non-targets. RESULTS: A frontal anterior directing attention negativity (ADAN) and a posterior late directing attention positivity (LDAP) were elicited in the cue-target interval contralateral to the direction of an attentional shift. The ADAN was unaffected by hand posture, but the LDAP was attenuated when hands were close together. N140 amplitudes were enhanced in response to tactile stimuli presented to the attended hand, and this effect was more pronounced when hands were wide apart. CONCLUSIONS: ADAN and LDAP are linked to separable anterior and posterior attentional control systems, which use coordinate systems based on somatotopic and external space, respectively. Effects of spatial attention on somatosensory stimulus processing are affected by variations in body posture. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results demonstrate that representations of body locations in external space play a central role in the control of tactile attention.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Uni- and cross-modal temporal modulation of tactile extinction in right brain damaged patients.

The influence of ipsilesional tactile and visual stimuli on the ability to detect contralesional tactile stimuli was investigated in eight right brain damaged patients (RBD) with tactile extinction and in eight healthy subjects by delivering a series of single and double stimuli. Double stimuli were unimodal (tactile or visual) or cross-modal (tactile and visual) and could be delivered simultaneously or sequentially at three possible intervals (65, 125, 305 ms). In sequential double trials, left-sided stimuli preceded or followed right-sided stimuli. Subjects were asked to verbally report number (1 or 2), side (left or right) and modality (tactile, visual, visuo-tactile). Control subjects were highly accurate in detecting single and double stimuli. RBD patients detected all right-sided stimuli and left single visual or tactile stimuli with high accuracy; however, they omitted left-sided tactile stimuli in a high proportion of double trials due to the presence of tactile extinction. Omissions of left-sided tactile stimuli were minimal at the longest SOA. Moreover, at 0 and 65 ms SOA omissions were significantly higher in unimodal than in cross-modal combinations. This figure indicates that detection of contralesional tactile stimuli is modulated over time both uni- and cross-modally.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Modulations of early somatosensory ERP components by transient and sustained spatial attention.

To investigate when and how spatial attention affects somatosensory processing, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded in response to mechanical tactile stimuli delivered to the left and right hand while attention was directed to one of these hands. The attended hand either remained constant throughout an experimental block (sustained attention), or was changed across successive trials (transient attention). Attentional modulations of the N140 component and a sustained 'processing negativity' for attended stimuli were observed in both attention conditions. However, attentional effects on earlier somatosensory components differed systematically. Sustained attention resulted in a contralateral negativity overlapping with the N80 component, while transient attention was reflected by a bilateral positivity overlapping with the P100 component. This dissociation indicates that sustained and transient attention affect different somatosensory areas. It is suggested that sustained attention can modulate tactile processing within primary somatosensory cortex (S1), while effects of transient attention are located beyond S1. Overall, results demonstrate that spatial selectivity in touch is mediated by activity modulations in modality-specific somatosensory cortex.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Temporal discrimination of cross-modal and unimodal stimuli in generalized dystonia.

BACKGROUND: Motor and nonmotor timing functions and cross-modal processing of visual-tactile signals may be linked to basal ganglia. These neural structures are thought to be dysfunctional in dystonia. OBJECTIVE: To test whether cross-modal stimulation influences deficits of temporal discrimination in dystonia. METHODS: Eight patients with generalized dystonia and 10 control subjects were asked to discriminate whether pairs of unimodal (tactile or visual) and cross-modal (visual and tactile) stimuli were simultaneous or sequential and, in the latter case, which stimulus preceded the other. Visual stimuli consisted of red lights and tactile stimuli of non-noxious electrical shocks. Intervals between stimuli in each pair were increased from 0 to 400 msec (in steps of 10 msec). RESULTS: Patients with dystonia recognized the asynchrony between the experimental stimuli and judged correctly which stimulus in a pair came first, at significantly longer intervals than did controls. Moreover, differences in performance between patients and controls were maximal for cross-modal stimuli. The defective performance of patients with dystonia in the cross-modal combinations showed a high positive correlation with the severity of symptoms. CONCLUSION: Patients with generalized dystonia present with difficulties both in timing functions and in cross-modal processing of visual-tactile stimuli.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Shifts of attention in light and in darkness: an ERP study of supramodal attentional control and crossmodal links in spatial attention.

Crossmodal links in spatial attention, uncovered by recent behavioural and electrophysiological studies, have been interpreted as evidence for supramodal processes controlling shifts of attention. However, previous experiments have usually been conducted in illuminated environments. Continuously available visuo-spatial information might result in shifts of attention being primarily guided by visible information, even when another modality is task-relevant. The present ERP study evaluated this. A symbolic auditory cue directed attention to the left or right hand. Participants had to detect infrequent tactile targets delivered to the cued hand, while ignoring any visual stimuli. Stimuli were presented either in a lit environment or in darkness. Although continuous ambient visuo-spatial information was eliminated in the latter condition, processing of task-irrelevant visual events was still modulated by spatial attention for the tactile task. Moreover, ERP correlates of attentional shifts in the cue-target interval were similar for both illumination conditions. This was further confirmed in a follow-up experiment where the darkness condition was repeated without any peripheral visual stimulation ever occurring. These findings demonstrate that the ERP correlates of crossmodal attention (both preparatory effects in the cue-target interval, and also modulations of stimulus-evoked components) do not depend on selection being guided by ambient visible information in a lit environment. They suggest instead that spatial shifts of attention are controlled supramodally.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2003

The spatial distribution of attentional selectivity in touch: evidence from somatosensory ERP components.

OBJECTIVE: Somatosensory event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were measured to investigate the spatial distribution of selective attention in touch, and whether the focus of tactile attention can be split between non-contiguous areas of the body surface. METHODS: On each trial, vibratory tactile stimuli were delivered to one of 4 possible locations of the right hand. Participants had to attend to either one or two locations in order to detect infrequently presented target stimuli there. ERPs were recorded to tactile non-targets at attended and unattended locations. RESULTS: Attention directed to one finger versus another was reflected by amplitude modulations of the sensory-specific P100 component and a subsequent attentional negativity (Nd). These effects were smaller for within-finger as compared to between-finger selection. When attention was directed simultaneously to non-adjacent fingers, ERPs in response to stimuli delivered to spatially and anatomically intervening fingers showed no attentional modulations whatsoever. CONCLUSIONS: Allocating tactile-spatial attention to one finger versus another affects early modality-specific somatosensory processing stages, and these effects of within-hand attentional selectivity decrease gradually with increasing distance from the current attentional focus. Unlike vision, the focus of tactile attention can be split, and directed simultaneously to non-adjacent areas, thus excluding spatially and anatomically intermediate regions from attentional processing.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Anterior and posterior attentional control systems use different spatial reference frames: ERP evidence from covert tactile-spatial orienting.

To investigate whether processes controlling preparatory covert shifts of spatial attention operate within external and anatomically defined spatial coordinates, lateralized event-related potentials components sensitive to the direction of attentional shifts were measured in response to visual precues directing attention to the relevant location of tactile events. Participants had to detect infrequent tactile targets delivered to the hand located on the cued side. In different blocks, hands were uncrossed or crossed, so that external and anatomical codes specifying task-relevant locations were either congruent or incongruent. With uncrossed hands, an anterior directing attention negativity and a posterior directing attention positivity were elicited in the cue-target interval contralateral to the side of a cued attentional shift. Although the posterior effect was unaffected by hand posture, the anterior effect was delayed and reversed polarity with crossed relative to uncrossed hands. This pattern of results provides new evidence that different spatial coordinate systems may be used by separable attentional control processes. It is suggested that a posterior process operates on the basis of external spatial coordinates, whereas an anterior process is based primarily on anatomically defined spatial codes.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Redundant target effect and intersensory facilitation from visual-tactile interactions in simple reaction time.

In a simple reaction time (RT) task, normal observers responded faster to simultaneous visual and tactile stimuli than to single visual or tactile stimuli. RT to simultaneous visual and tactile stimuli was also faster than RT to simultaneous dual visual or tactile stimuli. The advantage for RT to combined visual-tactile stimuli over RT to the other types of stimulation could be accounted for by intersensory neural facilitation rather than by probability summation. The direction of gaze (and presumably of visual attention) to space regions near to or far from the site of tactile stimulation had no effect on tactile RT. However, RT to single or dual tactile stimuli was fastest when observers could see the sites of tactile stimulation on their hands both directly and through a mirror at the same time. All these effects can be ascribed to the convergence of tactile and visual inputs onto neural centers which contain flexible multimodal representations of body parts.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Temporal dynamics of lateralized ERP components elicited during endogenous attentional shifts to relevant tactile events.

To investigate the temporal dynamics of lateralized event-related brain potential (ERP) components elicited during covert shifts of spatial attention, ERPs were recorded in a task where central visual symbolic cues instructed participants to direct attention to their left or right hand in order to detect infrequent tactile targets presented to that hand, and to ignore tactile stimuli presented to the other hand, as well as all randomly intermingled peripheral visual stimuli. In different blocks, the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between cue and target was 300 ms, 700 ms, or 1,100 ms. Anterior and posterior ERP modulations sensitive to the direction of an attentional shift were time-locked to the attentional cue, rather than to the anticipated arrival of a task-relevant stimulus. These components thus appear to reflect central attentional control rather than the anticipatory preparation of sensory areas. In addition, attentional modulations of ERPs to task-irrelevant visual stimuli were found, providing further evidence for crossmodal links in spatial attention between touch and vision.

Adult↗