PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Bettina Siewert

Publications and source records attributed to Bettina Siewert.

13 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Right lower quadrant pain: value of the nonvisualized appendix in patients at multidetector CT.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the value of the nonvisualized appendix at multidetector computed tomography (CT) in patients with acute right lower quadrant pain in whom appendicitis was a consideration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study, with waiver of informed consent. Records were retrospectively reviewed in patients who presented to the emergency department between April 29 and October 31, 2003, with right lower quadrant pain. Scanning was performed with the same eight-detector row CT scanner by using oral and (unless contraindicated) intravenous contrast agents, and transverse and coronal reformations were obtained. Two radiologists prospectively evaluated all scans at the time of the examination and rendered a consensus opinion. Clinical follow-up of at least 3 months' duration was performed retrospectively for patients whose appendix was not visualized to determine whether appendicitis had developed. Statistical analysis and calculation of percentages with confidence intervals (CIs) were performed. RESULTS: Of the 400 consecutive patients who underwent multidetector CT, 132 (33.0%) were male and 268 (67.0%) were female. Eighty patients (20.0%) had acute appendicitis and 79 (19.8%) had another cause for abdominal pain. A normal appendix with no other cause for pain was seen in 182 patients (45.5%). In 59 patients (14.8%), the appendix was not visualized. Of these 59 patients, 50 had adequate follow-up. Clinical follow-up was uneventful in 49 of these 50 patients. Thus, on otherwise normal multidetector CT scans in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis, nonvisualization of the appendix was negative for appendicitis in 98% (95% CI: 71%, 100%) of cases. Conversely, when the appendix was seen at multidetector CT and was abnormal, appendicitis was present in 95% (95% CI: 72%, 100%) of cases. CONCLUSION: In patients with right lower quadrant pain, a nonvisualized appendix at multidetector CT reliably excludes acute appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Multiple-image in-room CT imaging guidance for interventional procedures.

This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was not required. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare room use time for interventional procedures performed with multiple-image multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) fluoroscopy (n=196) and single-image spiral CT fluoroscopy (n=175). There was no statistically significant difference in age, sex, or procedural type between the two groups. The median room use time was 90 minutes (interquartile range, 65-120 minutes) for the single-image technique and 75 minutes (interquartile range, 60-105 minutes) for the multiple-image technique. A two-sample t test with equal variance assumption on the log-transformed data showed a statistically significant difference in log time (P<.001) between the two groups. This time savings could potentially have a substantial clinical effect on resource use and patient throughput.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Part I: preparing first-year radiology residents and assessing their readiness for on-call responsibilities.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an Emergency Radiology (ER) Core Curriculum training module and a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM)-based interactive examination system to prepare first-year (postgraduate year 2 [PGY-2]) radiology residents and assess their readiness for taking overnight radiology call. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained, and the study was compliant with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations. A dedicated month-long ER curriculum was designed to prepare new radiology residents for overnight radiology call that includes interpretation of off-hour urgent and emergent studies without immediate direct attending supervision. Lectures of the curriculum, provided by department staff, were based on the American Society of Emergency Radiology core curriculum. The lecture series was implemented after PGY-2 residents had completed formal introductory resident rotations during their first 6 months of training. A DICOM-based interactive computer-based testing module was developed and administered at the end of the lecture series. The module consisted of 19 actual emergency department cases with entire series of images, simulating an on-call setting. Tests were scored by two staff members blinded to resident identifying information. Upper-level residents also were tested, and comparison was made between first-year and upper-level resident test scores to determine the effectiveness of the test in determining first-year resident preparedness for call. Statistical analysis of results was performed by using t-test (P < .05). RESULTS: All residents in the residency program present during the month (nine PGY-2, six PGY-3, seven PGY-4, seven PGY-5 residents) attended the lecture series and finished the testing module at the end of the lecture series. Of 19 actual emergency cases on the testing module, five cases were neuroradiology, three cases were thoracic imaging, eight cases were body imaging, and three cases were musculoskeletal. PGY-2 residents scored an average of 73.0% (range, 63.2%-81.6%) of total points possible. PGY-3 residents scored an average of 76.8% (range, 68.4%-86.8%); PGY-4 residents scored an average of 77.4% (range, 65.8%-100%), and PGY-5 residents scored an average of 81.2% (range, 68.4%-94.7%). There was no statistically significant difference in scores according to level of training. CONCLUSION: First-year radiology residents who underwent 6 months of formal radiology training followed by an intensive ER lecture series before taking overnight call had scores similar to upper-level colleagues on an interactive computer-based ER simulation module.

Curriculum↗
PubMed2006

MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in pregnant patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the committee on clinical investigations and was HIPAA compliant. The informed consent requirement was waived. MR images were obtained in 51 consecutive pregnant patients (mean age, 28.3 years) who were clinically suspected of having acute appendicitis. In this protocol for pregnant patients, MR imaging is performed when findings at ultrasonography (US) are inconclusive or additional information is needed. Four patients had appendicitis, which was confirmed at surgery in three patients and at follow-up computed tomography in one patient. Initial interpretations were used for patient care and to calculate diagnostic accuracy. The appendix was considered normal at MR imaging if its diameter was less than or equal to 6 mm or if it was filled with air, oral contrast material, or both. An enlarged fluid-filled appendix (>7 mm in diameter) was considered an abnormal finding. An appendix with a diameter of 6-7 mm was considered an inconclusive finding; in those cases, the presence of periappendiceal inflammation was used for the final diagnosis. Three radiologists retrospectively assessed the visualization of the appendix by using a 5-point scale. Statistical analysis was performed by using the median and Fisher exact tests and the Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS: MR images were positive for appendicitis in four patients and inconclusive in three. In the three patients with inconclusive results, the appendix was not seen in two patients and was borderline enlarged (7 mm in diameter) in the third. The overall sensitivity, specificity, prevalence-adjusted positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for MR imaging was 100%, 93.6%, 1.4%, 100%, and 94.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MR imaging is an excellent modality for use in excluding acute appendicitis in pregnant women who present with acute abdominal pain and in whom a normal appendix is not visualized at US.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Impact of CT-guided drainage in the treatment of diverticular abscesses: size matters.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether abscess size can be used as a discriminating factor to guide management of patients with diverticular abscesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a word search of our CT database between July 2001 and July 2002 for the CT diagnosis of diverticulitis. CTs were retrospectively reviewed as consensus opinion of two reviewers. CTs were evaluated for presence of an abscess, its location, maximum diameter, and feasibility of percutaneous abscess drainage. Abscesses were categorized into smaller than 3 cm and larger than or equal to 3 cm, and the management of these groups was compared. RESULTS: Thirty-one abscesses were noted in 30 (17%) of 181 patients with a CT diagnosis of diverticulitis. Twenty-two (73%) of 30 patients had 23 abscesses, all of which were smaller than 3 cm and were treated and resolved with antibiotics alone (p < 0.001). Eight (36%) of 22 required surgical treatment. Eight (26%) of 31 abscesses had a maximum diameter larger than or equal to 3 cm. Four (50%) of eight patients with abscesses 3.4-4.1 cm were treated with antibiotics alone. Four (50%) of eight abscesses, all larger than 4.1 cm, were treated with CT-guided drainage and one abscess required repeat drainage. After resolution of symptoms, surgery was performed in five (62.5%) of eight of the larger abscesses. CONCLUSION: Patients with abscesses smaller than 3 cm in size can be treated with antibiotics alone and, in some cases, as outpatients, and may not uniformly require surgery. This is also likely true for patients with abscesses 3-4 cm in size, although our results in this group were limited by a small sample size. Patients with abscesses larger than or equal to 4 cm can be managed with CT-guided abscess drainage followed by referral for surgical treatment.

Abdominal Abscess↗
PubMed2004

Utility and safety of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of salivary gland masses including a cytologist's review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility and safety of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the salivary glands for diagnosis of focal masses in the salivary glands, including the prevalence of nondiagnostic sampling, the impact of the presence of a cytologist during the procedure, and the usefulness of flow cytometry. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 43 ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations of the salivary glands from 36 lesions in 33 patients was performed. Fine-needle aspirations were obtained under sonographic guidance, and 1 to 6 punctures were made with 20- to 25-gauge needles. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations obtained in the presence of a cytologist were compared with those performed without a cytologist regarding the adequacy of the specimen and the number of punctures performed. Postprocedural complications and the frequency with which flow cytometry was performed were noted. Cytopathologic diagnosis was correlated with clinical follow-up (n = 33) and surgical pathologic findings (n = 10). RESULTS: Cytologic diagnosis was made in 31 (94%) of 33 patients, confirming a neoplastic process in 18 (50%) of 36 and a non-neoplastic process in 16 (44%) of 36. Although the presence of a cytologist at the bedside resulted in a higher prevalence of diagnostic sampling (P < .05), it did not alter the number of punctures performed (mean, 3 punctures). No complications were encountered except for pain in 2 patients. Flow cytometry was helpful in 8 (22%) of 36 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the salivary glands is a safe procedure with a low prevalence of nondiagnostic sampling. Approximately 44% of patients can be spared surgical intervention through diagnosis of a non-neoplastic process. The presence of a cytologist increases the likelihood of obtaining a diagnostic sample. Flow cytometry was helpful in 22% of patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Acute appendicitis: effect of increased use of CT on selecting patients earlier.

PURPOSE: To explore the possibility of a relationship between increased use of computed tomography (CT) for diagnosis of appendicitis and increased occurrence of minimal or subtle CT and surgical findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups, each with 50 consecutive patients who underwent CT before appendectomy in 1997 and 2000, were compared. CT scans and surgery-pathology reports were evaluated on a six-grade scale from normal to abscess or inflammatory mass. The demographics, surgical techniques, hospital stay, and grade distribution for the two groups were compared, and the CT results were correlated with surgical findings. RESULTS: In 1997, CT was performed in 33% (50 of 152) of patients undergoing appendectomy, as compared with 59% (50 of 85) 3 years later (P <.001). There was excellent correlation between surgical-pathologic and CT grades (weighted kappa, 0.75; P <.001; Spearman rank correlation, 0.83). There was no significant difference in demographics, rate of surgery, or surgical techniques used, but there was a significant decrease in the median surgical-pathologic grades, from 3.0 to 2.5 (P =.05) for all patients and from 3.5 to 2.6 (P =.003) for patients who underwent CT. Similarly, the median CT grade decreased from 4 to 3 (P <.001). Seven patients had subtle CT findings in 1997 compared with 16 in 2000 (P =.004), and there was a significant decrease in mean hospital stay, from 2.8 days +/- 4 (SD) to 1.5 days +/- 2 (P =.008). CONCLUSION: With increased CT use, there were less severe imaging findings, including absence of periappendiceal stranding, and a significant decrease in surgical-pathologic severity of appendiceal disease and hospital stay.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

CT predictors of failed laparoscopic appendectomy.

PURPOSE: To identify computed tomographic (CT) signs that may help predict possible failure of laparoscopic appendectomy and subsequent conversion to open appendectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 234 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative CT and in whom laparoscopic appendectomy was attempted, 26 required conversion to open appendectomy. Conversion was correlated with the following CT findings: appendix location, appendicolith, cecal wall thickening involving the base of the appendix, lymphadenopathy, and appendiceal diameter. The extent of inflammation was graded by using a six-point scale: 0 meant normal appendix; 1, possibly abnormal appendix (6-mm diameter without other abnormality); 2, abnormal appendix (diameter > or = 6 mm with wall enhancement) without adjacent fat stranding; 3, abnormal appendix surrounded by fat stranding; 4, abnormal appendix surrounded by fat stranding and fluid; and 5, inflammatory mass or abscess. Student t and chi2 tests were used for statistical analysis of interval and nominal values, respectively. RESULTS: Although there was a significant difference in appendiceal diameter between the patients in whom laparoscopic appendectomy was successfully completed (11.3 mm +/- 3.5 [SD]) and those who required conversion (12.9 mm +/- 3.9), no distinct cutoff point was identified. Of the five CT findings evaluated, none was a significant predictor of conversion to open appendectomy. Eleven (7%) of 164 patients with a CT inflammation grade of 0-3 required conversion, whereas 15 (21%) of 70 patients with a grade of 4 or 5 required conversion (P <.04). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with appendicitis can be treated with laparoscopic appendectomy. Nevertheless, patients who require conversion to open appendectomy tend to have high CT inflammation grades of 4 or 5, which indicate the presence of periappendiceal fluid or an inflammatory mass or abscess.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Value of abdominal CT in the emergency department for patients with abdominal pain.

The purpose of our study is to demonstrate the value of CT in the emergency department (ED) for patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain. Between August 1998 and April 1999, 536 consecutive patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain were entered into our study. Using a computer order entry system, physicians were asked to identify: (a) their most likely diagnosis; (b) their level of certainty in their diagnosis; (c) if they thought CT would be normal or abnormal; (d) their treatment plan (prior to knowledge of the CT results); and (e) their role in deciding to order CT. This information was correlated with each patient's post-CT diagnosis and subsequent management. Pre- and post-CT diagnoses were concordant in 200 of 536 (37%) patients. The physicians' certainty in the accuracy of their pre-CT diagnosis was less than high in 88% of patients. Prior to CT, the management plan included hospital admission for 402 patients. Following CT, only 312 patients were actually admitted; thus, the net impact of performing CT was to obviate the need for hospital admission in 90 of 536 (17%) of patients with abdominal pain. Prior to CT, 67 of 536 (13%) of all patients would have undergone immediate surgery; however, following CT only 25 (5%) actually required immediate surgery. Among patients with the four most common pre-CT diagnoses (appendicitis, abscess, diverticulitis, and urinary tract stones) CT had the greatest impact on hospital admission and surgical management for patients with suspected appendicitis. For patients with suspected appendicitis, CT reduced the hospital admission rate in 28% (26 of 91) of patients and changed the surgical management in 40% (39 of 91) of patients. Our study demonstrates the advantage of performing abdominal CT in the ED for patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain.

Abdomen, Acute↗
PubMed2002

Factors associated with conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been increasingly adopted for its advantages over the open technique, but there is a possibility of conversion to open appendectomy (OA) if complications occur or the extent of inflammation prohibits successful dissection. This study aimed to identify the preoperative predictors for conversion from laparoscopic to open appendectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Medical records of 705 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for suspected appendicitis were reviewed retrospectively. LA was attempted in 595 patients by 25 different surgeons. Factors evaluated were age, gender, body mass index, previous abdominal surgery, previous appendicitis attack, pain, nausea, vomiting, fever, duration of symptoms, local or diffuse tenderness, leukocyte count and surgeon's experience in LA. RESULTS: Conversion to OA occurred in 58 patients (9.7%). The most common reason for conversion was dense adhesions due to inflammation, followed by localized perforation and diffuse peritonitis. Based on 261 patients evaluated by CT scan preoperatively, significant factors in the final multivariate analysis associated with conversion to OA were age > or = 65 [Odds ratio (OR) = 3.78, 95% CI:1.11-12.84], diffuse tenderness on physical examination (OR = 11.32, 95% CI: 1.32-96.62), and a surgeon with less experience in LA (< or = 10 operations, OR = 3.38, 95% CI:1.02-11.17). The presence of significant fat stranding associated with fluid accumulation, inflammatory mass or localized abscess in CT scan also significantly increased the possibility of conversion (OR = 5.60, 95% CI:2.48-12.65). CONCLUSIONS: Identifying the potential factors for conversion preoperatively may assist the surgeons in making decisions concerning the management of patients with appendicitis and in the judicious use of LA.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Excessive collapsibility of bronchi in bronchiectasis: evaluation on volumetric expiratory high-resolution CT.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency and severity of bronchomalacia, defined as excessive collapsibility of bronchi, in bronchiectasis; to compare the extent of air trapping in bronchiectasis patients with/without bronchomalacia; and to correlate the severity of bronchomalacia and the extent of air trapping versus pulmonary function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients with bronchiectasis evaluated by volumetric expiratory high-resolution computed tomography (CT) and pulmonary function tests were studied. The presence and severity of bronchomalacia were evaluated on contiguous axial high-resolution CT images using a 4-point scale. The extent of air trapping was graded on coronal reformations using a 5-point scale. Differences in the extent of air trapping in patients with/without bronchomalacia and the correlation between the severity of bronchomalacia and the extent of air trapping were investigated. The severity of bronchomalacia and the extent of air trapping were correlated with pulmonary function. RESULTS: Of 46 patients with bronchiectasis, 32 patients (70%) had bronchomalacia. Air trapping was present in 43 patients (93%). The extent of air trapping in patients with bronchomalacia was significantly greater compared with the patients without bronchomalacia (P=0.0308). The correlation between the severity of bronchomalacia and extent of air trapping was not statistically significant (rs=0.029, P=0.8457). CONCLUSIONS: The extent of air trapping in bronchiectasis patients with bronchomalacia was significantly greater compared with bronchiectasis patients without bronchomalacia, suggesting that the bronchomalacia is one of the underlying mechanisms of air trapping in bronchiectasis.

Adult↗