PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Bingshuang Zou

Publications and source records attributed to Bingshuang Zou.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Identification of differentially expressed cDNA transcripts from a rat odontoblast cell line.

Odontoblasts and osteoblasts are two among the myriads of cell types present in the craniofacial complex. Both have a common ectomesenchymal origin and secrete macromolecules that are necessary for the formation of dentin and alveolar bone via matrix-mediated mechanisms. The mineralized matrices of bone and dentin differ in morphology and function but several mineral associated proteins, formerly thought to be tissue specific, have been found to be common in both tissues. To decipher the complex molecular mechanisms involved in mineralized dentin formation, the suppressive subtraction hybridization (SSH) approach has been used to identify the genes expressed by polarized odontoblasts. Employing SSH, 187 cDNA clones were identified from the subtracted cDNA library. Many of these genes have not been previously reported to be expressed by terminally differentiated odontoblasts. Genes were classified into seven groups based on the predicted function of the encoded proteins: extracellular matrix; cytoskeletal components, molecules involved in adhesion and cell-cell interaction; metabolic enzymes, transporters, ion channels; protein processing, protein transport and protein folding molecules; nuclear proteins (transcription factors, DNA processing enzymes); signaling molecules and genes of yet unknown function. Northern blot and in situ hybridization analysis performed for five putative novel genes and one new isoform of amelogenin revealed differential expression levels in the osteoblasts, ameloblasts and the odontoblasts of the developing rat molars. Some of the known genes isolated from this enriched pool were the cleavage products of dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP) namely, phosphophoryn (PP) and dentin sialoprotein (DSP). Interestingly amelogenin, ameloblastin and enamelin were also expressed in the odontoblasts during dentin formation.

Animals↗

Differential expression patterns of the dentin matrix proteins during mineralized tissue formation.

Sequential and reciprocal interactions between the oral ectoderm and neural crest-derived mesenchyme are responsible for tooth development. During dentin formation, there are three components that are necessary for proper mineralization, namely, collagen which forms a scaffold, noncollagenous proteins that can specifically bind to the collagen template and function as a mineral nucleator and crystalline calcium phosphate deposited in an ordered manner. It is well established that noncollagenous proteins play an important role during mineralized tissue formation. Here we demonstrate by in situ hybridization techniques that the noncollagenous dentin matrix proteins 1, 2 (DMP1, 2) and dentin sialoprotein (DSP) have characteristic temporal and spatial expression patterns within odontogenic tissues during dentin mineralization. DMP1, DMP2 and DSP mRNA are expressed in the odontoblasts at specific and overlapping time points and are thus presumably used for different functions during dentin formation. In developing rat incisors and molars, high levels of expression of DMP2 mRNA were seen in polarized odontoblasts and preameloblasts, while DSP mRNA was expressed at significantly lower levels and was expressed by highly differentiated odontoblasts. However, their expression was continuously maintained during the mineralization of the organic matrix. In the adult rats, DMP2 and DSP mRNA was also detected in the osteoblasts. The expression of DMP1 mRNA was found to coincide with the start of the mineral nucleation process and gradually decreased during the maturation of the mineralized matrix during odontogenesis. In this study, we have also correlated the expression of these proteins relative to the presence of type I collagen and calcium phosphate crystals. Thus, the temporal and spatial differences between DMP1, DMP2 and DSP might implicate a direct demonstration of the functional difference between these three genes during calcified tissue formation.

Animals↗

[Anterior open bite: surgically or orthodontically treated].

OBJECTIVE: To study the boundary between orthodontic and surgical treatment in correction of anterior open bite. METHODS: 70 cases (18.0 ages in average) treated orthodontically and 14 cases (25.1 ages in average) treated surgically were chosen. 154 hard and soft tissue measurements were analyzed by statistical software. RESULTS: A diagnostic index, L1MP, was gained with simple factorial analysis. L1MP </= 89.5 was bound to be treated with surgery. A discriminate function, Z = -0.80188 L1MP + 0.91401 Age + 0.671111 Antigonial notch-MP + 0.599992 SNPg, was produced by multiple factorial discriminate analysis. Z < O is an indication of orthodontic treatment. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic index and discriminate function were both useful in determining which method to be chosen in treatment of anterior open bite. The discriminate function was tested to be more efficient than the diagnostic index.

Adolescent↗