PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Björn N S Vlaskamp

Publications and source records attributed to Björn N S Vlaskamp.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Crowding degrades saccadic search performance.

The identity of a target is more difficult to acquire when it is surrounded by distracters. The purpose of the present experiments was to investigate the implications of this crowding phenomenon for performance and eye movements in a real-life task as search with eye movements. The participants searched for a target in a one dimensional search strip. Above and below this search strip additional elements were added. In three conditions, the similarity of these mask elements to the search elements was varied. The spatial extent of crowding is known to increase with target-mask similarity [Nazir, T. A. (1992). Effects of lateral masking and spatial precueing on gap-resolution in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 32, 771-777, Kooi, F. L., Toet, A., Tripathy, S. P., & Levi, D. M. (1994). The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. Spatial Vision, 8(2), 255-279]. One condition did not contain masks. In a visibility experiment, we firstly validated this crowding manipulation. In the search experiment, we subsequently found that with increasing crowding search times were up to 76% longer. Eye movements were also affected. The number of fixations and fixation duration increased and saccade amplitude decreased with increasing crowding. We conclude that in order to understand eye movements in (everyday) tasks that require active exploration of the visual scene, crowding should be taken into account.

Adult↗

Saccadic search performance: the effect of element spacing.

In a saccadic search task, we investigated whether spacing between elements affects search performance. Since it has been suggested in the literature that element spacing can affect the eye movement strategy in several ways, its effects on search time per element are hard to predict. In the first experiment, we varied the element spacing (3.4 degrees -7.1 degrees distance between elements) and target-distracter similarity. As expected, search time per element increased with target-distracter similarity. Decreasing element spacing decreased the search time per element. However, this effect was surprisingly small in comparison to the effect of varying target-distracter similarity. In a second experiment, we elaborated on this finding and decreased element spacing even further (between 0.8 degrees and 3.2 degrees). Here, we did not find an effect on search time per element for element spacings from 3.2 degrees to spacings as small as 1.5 degrees . It was only at distances smaller than 1.5 degrees that search time per element increased with decreasing element spacing. In order to explain the remarkable finding that search time per element was not affected for such a wide range of element spacings, we propose that irrespective of the spacing crowding kept the number of elements processed per fixation more or less constant.

Adult↗