Biomedical subjects

Bono Lucić

Publications and source records attributed to Bono Lucić.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Toward generating simpler QSAR models: nonlinear multivariate regression versus several neural network ensembles and some related methods.

In this study we want to test whether a simple modeling procedure used in the field of QSAR/QSPR can produce simple models that will be, at the same time, as accurate as robust Neural Network Ensemble (NNE) ones. We present results of application of two procedures for generating/selecting simple linear and nonlinear multiregression (MR) models: (1) method for selecting the best possible MR models (named as CROMRsel) and (2) Genetic Function Approximation (GFA) method from the Cerius2 program package. The obtained MR models are strictly compared with several NNE models. For the comparison we selected four QSAR data sets previously studied by NNE (Tetko et al. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 794-803. Kovalishyn et al. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 651-659.): (1) 51 benzodiazepine derivatives, (2) 37 carboquinone derivatives, (3) 74 pyrimidines, and (4) 31 antimycin analogues. These data sets were parameterized with 7, 6, 27, and 53 descriptors, respectively. Modeled properties were anti-pentylenetetrazole activity, antileukemic activity, inhibition constants to dihydrofolate reductase from MB1428 E. coli, and antifilarial activity, respectively. Nonlinearities were introduced into the MR models through 2-fold and/or 3-fold cross-products of initial (linear) descriptors. Then, using the CROMRsel and GFA programs (J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 121-132) the sets of I (I < or = 8, in this paper) the best descriptors (according to the fit and leave-one-out correlation coefficients) were selected for multiregression models. Two classes of models were obtained: (1) linear or nonlinear MR models which were generated starting from the complete set of descriptors, and (2) nonlinear MR models which were generated starting from the same set of descriptors that was used in the NNE modeling. In addition, the descriptor selection method from CROMRsel was compared with the GFA method included in the QSAR module of the Cerius2 program. For each data set it has been found that the MR models have better cross-validated statistical parameters than the corresponding NNE models and that CROMRsel selects somewhat better MR models than the GFA method. MR models are also much simpler than NNEs, which is the important surprising fact, and, additionally, express calculated dependencies in a functional form. Moreover, MR models were shown to be better than all other models obtained by different methods on the same data sets ("old" multivariate regressions, functional-link-net models, back-propagation neural networks, genetic algorithm, and partial least squares models). This study also indicated that the robust NNE models cannot generate good models when applied on small data sets, suggesting that it is perhaps better to apply robust methods (like NNE ones) on larger data sets.

Journal Article↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Use of variable selection in modeling the secondary structural content of proteins from their composition of amino acid residues.

The possibility of prediction of protein secondary structure content from composition of their amino acid residues can help in bridging the gap between proteins of known primary sequence having an unknown secondary structure. Almost all recently published models for understanding the relationship between composition (frequency of occurrence) of amino acid residues and secondary structure content of proteins involved composition of all 20 amino acid residues. However, it is well-known that many amino acid residues are mutually similar according to their physicochemical properties (hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity, charge, size, etc.). Because of that, we were motivated to investigate the possibility of reduction of the total number of terms (frequencies of amino acid residues) in the models for describing the relation between the composition of amino acid residues and the percentage of residues belonging to alpha, beta, and coil secondary structure. For this purpose, the CROMRsel algorithm (J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 121-132) for selection of a small subset of the most important variables/descriptors into the multiregression (MR) models, i.e., frequency of occurrence of amino acid residues in proteins, was used. Analysis was performed on a data set containing 475 proteins, taken from Proteins 1996, 25, 157-168. A complete data set was partitioned into a 317-protein training set and 158-protein test set. The best possible linear models containing I=1, ..., 20 frequencies were selected among all 20 frequencies of occurrence of amino acid residues on the 317-protein training set, and were used for performing prediction of the corresponding percentage of secondary structure content on the 158-protein test set. For the 317-protein data set the best selected concise models for the alpha, beta, and coil secondary structure contain only 9, 5, and 8 frequencies, respectively. Selected concise models are of the same or better fitted, cross-validated, and predictive statistical parameters than the models containing all 20 frequencies. Additionally, for each I (I=1, ...., 20) 30 the best possible random models were selected. In each case, the best possible real models are much better than each of the best possible random models, showing clearly that there is no risk of a chance correlation (what one could expect due to the application of an exhaustive search for the best model having I frequencies among all 20!/I!(20-I)! possible models). Finally, the best selected models on the complete 475-protein data set for the alpha, beta, and coil secondary structure contain only 7, 4, and 7 frequencies of amino acid residues, respectively. These models are much simpler and have better fitted and cross-validated errors than the corresponding models from the literature, that were obtained without using a procedure for selection of the most important frequencies of amino acid residues in proteins.

Amino Acids↗