PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Brad Petrisor

Publications and source records attributed to Brad Petrisor.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Sonography of the superomedial part of the spring ligament complex of the foot: a study of cadavers and asymptomatic volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of high-resolution sonography for assessing the thickness and echogenicity of the superomedial part of the normal spring ligament in the foot in cadavers and asymptomatic volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The superomedial part of the normal spring ligament of four cadaveric feet was imaged with a high-resolution linear array transducer. Upon localization, the ligament was injected with 0.1% methylene blue with sonographic guidance. A posteromedial approach was used to dissect the feet immediately following injection to confirm accurate identification of the ligament. The bilateral ligaments in 40 asymptomatic adult volunteers were subsequently imaged. RESULTS: Surgical dissection confirmed the accurate injection of methylene blue into all four cadaveric ligaments. The superomedial part of the normal spring ligament was identified bilaterally in all of the 40 asymptomatic volunteers, with a mean thickness of 3 mm in longitudinal short axes. The ligament was echogenic relative to surrounding fat, and it was thinner in women. Differences in ligament measurements with respect to age, sex, side (left vs. right) and foot dominance were not significant. The volunteers' height, weight and body mass index had a weakly positive correlation with ligament thickness. CONCLUSION: High-resolution ultrasound can be used to identify and measure the thickness of the superomedial part of the normal spring ligament. The provided baseline measurements for the normal ligament could prove valuable when assessing the abnormal ligament.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Electrical bone stimulation: an overview and its use in high risk and Charcot foot and ankle reconstructions.

Since early work done in the 1950s on the "piezoelectricity of bone," a growing body of basic science and clinical evidence suggests the use of electrical bone stimulation as an adjunct in the treatment of foot and ankle nonunions, fusions, and Charcot arthropathy. Both implantable designs (that allow for direct constant stimulation of bone) and nonimplantable (such as pulsed and combined electromagnetic fields) devices have been studied. Ongoing research continues to support the potential usefulness of these modalities.

Ankle Joint↗
PubMed2005

Infection after reamed intramedullary nailing of the tibia: a case series review.

OBJECTIVE: We reviewed those patients who developed a postoperative infection after reamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures to investigate the possible causes of infection, its effect on union time, and the requirement for reconstructive surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective review of patients who developed deep infection after reamed tibial nailing during a 15-year period. SETTING: University Level II Trauma Center. PATIENTS: Thirty-five with tibial diaphyseal fractures. INTERVENTION: All patients were treated with reamed intramedullary nailing. OUTCOME MEASURES: Union, union time, compartment syndrome, requirement for reconstructive procedures, and development of deep infection. RESULTS: In the closed-fracture group, 43.8% of patients were considered to have developed infection because of inappropriate fasciotomy closure, exchange nailing, and thermal necrosis. In the open-fracture group, 62.5% were considered to have developed infection attributable to late complications of plastic surgery. The most significant problem was marginal necrosis after flap cover. CONCLUSIONS: A number of deep infections after reamed intramedullary tibial nailing are avoidable. Particular attention must be paid to correct reaming, exchange nailing, and fasciotomy closure in closed fractures. In open fractures, marginal flap necrosis should be actively treated and not left to granulate.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

The value of washers in cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures.

BACKGROUND: Given the limited evidence to support the technical aspects of screw placement for treatment of femoral neck fractures, we conducted an observational study to evaluate demographic and radiographic variables associated with fixation failure. METHODS: Eligible patients with femoral neck fractures were treated with multiple cannulated screws across three academic centers during a 6-year period. The following variables were evaluated for their predictive value for fixation failure: age, gender, fracture type, presence of comminution, total number of screws, the absence of a washer, the screw configuration, reduction quality, the distance of the most inferior screw to the inferior neck, and screw alignment. Variables were evaluated separately and in a multivariable regression model. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included in the study. The overall failure rate was 30%. We identified four variables associated with fixation failure. These included the lack of washers (odds ratio [OR], 11.2; p = 0.03), imperfect quality of reduction (OR, 9.7; p < 0.01), age greater than 75 years (OR, 5.1; p = 0.04), and displaced versus undisplaced fracture type (OR, 3.8; p < 0.01). These four variables accounted for 43% of the variability in fixation failure (R(2) = 0.43). All other variables including the distance of the most inferior screw to the inferior/medial neck were found to be not significant. CONCLUSION: This study confirms previous findings in the literature that increased age, a displaced fracture type, and poor reduction increase the risk of fixation failure. Contradictory to current belief, there was no significant association between the distance of the inferior screw to the inferior/medial femoral neck cortex and fixation failure. A novel finding of the present study is that the use of washers significantly decreases the risk of fixation failure.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures occur in 280,000 North Americans each year. Although surgeons have reached consensus with regard to the treatment of undisplaced fractures of the hip, the surgical treatment of displaced fractures remains controversial. Identifying surgeons' preferences in techniques, and the rationale for their choices, may aid in focusing educational activities to the orthopaedic community as well as planning future clinical trials. Our objective was to clarify current opinion with regard to the operative treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional survey design and a sample-to-redundancy strategy to examine surgeons' preferences in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures. We mailed this survey to members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and European-AO International-affiliated trauma centers. RESULTS: Of 442 surgeons who received the questionnaire, 298 (67%) responded. The typical respondent was a North American man over the age of forty years who was in academic practice, supervised residents, had fellowship training in trauma, and worked in a low-volume center (<100 hip fractures per year), treating an equal proportion of displaced and undisplaced femoral neck fractures. Most surgeons believed that internal fixation was the procedure of choice in younger patients (those who are less than sixty years old) with a displaced fracture (Garden type III or IV). For patients over eighty years old with Garden type-III or IV fractures, almost all surgeons preferred arthroplasty. Respondents varied widely in their preferences for the treatment of patients who were sixty to eighty years old with a displaced fracture (Garden type III or IV) or active patients with a Garden type-III fracture. Many surgeons believed there was no difference between arthroplasty and internal fixation when considering mortality (45%), infection rates (30%), and quality of life (37%). Surgeons also revealed variable preferences in their choice of the optimal approach to arthroplasty for patients between sixty and eighty years old with a type-IV fracture (32% preferred unipolar; 41%, bipolar; and 17%, total hip arthroplasty) and in the optimal choice of implant for internal fixation. CONCLUSIONS: While surgeons prefer internal fixation for younger patients and arthroplasty for older patients, they disagree about the optimal approach to the management of patients between sixty and eighty years old with a displaced fracture and active patients with a Garden type-III fracture. Surgeons also disagree on the optimal implants for internal fixation or arthroplasty.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Predictors of reoperation following operative management of fractures of the tibial shaft.

BACKGROUND: Accurate prediction of likelihood of reoperation in patients with tibial shaft fractures would facilitate optimal management. Previous studies were limited by small sample sizes and noncomprehensive examination of possible risk factors. OBJECTIVE: We conducted an observational study to determine which prognostic factors were associated with an increased risk of reoperation following operative treatment in a heterogeneous population of patients with tibial shaft fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. METHODS: We identified 200 patients with tibial shaft fractures from two university-affiliated centers. Two reviewers independently abstracted data regarding 20 possible prognostic variables, reviewed preoperative and postoperative radiographs, and documented reoperations (defined as any surgical procedure </=1 year after the initial surgery that was aimed specifically at achieving bony union of the fracture, including bone grafts, implant exchanges, or débridement for infections). We chose a Cox proportion hazards model to conduct a survival analysis for time to reoperation and constructed a multivariable model to estimate the relative risk of reoperation and associated 95%confidence interval (CI) for each predictor variable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to reoperation following the initial surgery. RESULTS: Complete follow-up information was available for 192 of 200 (96%) patients. Three variables predicted reoperation: the presence of an open fracture wound (relative risk 4.32, 95% CI 1.76 to 11.26), lack of cortical continuity between the fracture ends following fixation (relative risk 8.33, 95% CI 3.03 to 25.0), and the presence of a transverse fracture (relative risk 20.0, 95% CI 4.34 to 142.86). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a set of three simple prognostic variables (open fracture, transverse fracture, and postoperative fracture gap) that can assist surgeons in predicting reoperation following operative treatment of tibial shaft fractures.

Adult↗