Biomedical subjects

Brad Stuart

Publications and source records attributed to Brad Stuart.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

An Evaluation of the Advanced Illness Management (AIM) Program: Increasing hospice utilization in the San Francisco Bay area.

BACKGROUND: In the Medicare population, end-of-life care is fragmented and hospice is underutilized. Evidence suggests that hospice care is associated with increased patient/family satisfaction and reductions in overall health care costs. Advanced Illness Management (AIM) is a home-based program established to ease the transition between curative and comfort care for seriously ill patients who lack coordinated hospital, home health, and hospice care. OBJECTIVE: Measure the impact of the AIM program on the discharge disposition of participating home health patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING/SUBJECTS: A total of 435 patients who received home health services through the Sutter Visiting Nurse Association and Hospice (SVNA&H) and who were discharged between 2003 and September 2005 were included in this study. Participants were selected based on a life expectancy of 6 months or less and additionally matched on prognosis of current episode of illness and symptom status. Intervention patients were compared to those receiving usual home health care at two SVNA&H branches. RESULTS: In the within-branch comparison, a 28% difference was observed in the number of hospice referrals between patients who received the AIM intervention and Usual Care I (47% AIM; 33% UCI, p = 0.003). When patients receiving the AIM intervention were compared to patients from another branch, Usual Care II, a 67% difference emerged (47% AIM; 16% UCII, p < 0.0001). Among African American patients, 60% and 73% more patients were referred to hospice when AIM patients were compared to Usual Care I and Usual Care II patients, respectively (p < 0.01). These differences persisted after controlling for symptom status, patient demographics and home health length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: The AIM program was successful at increasing hospice utilization through a targeted intervention focused on palliative and end-of-life care, increased patient education and decision making, and a dynamic treatment approach. The finding of increased utilization by African Americans, a population traditionally reluctant to use hospice, was particularly noteworthy.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Late referral to hospice and bereaved family member perception of quality of end-of-life care.

The Family Evaluation of Hospice Services was used to document bereaved family members' perceptions of whether their loved ones were referred too late to hospice and to examine the association of that perception and quality of end-of-life care. A mortality follow-back survey of bereaved family members from two not-for-profit hospices found that 13.7% of decedents were referred at a time too late for hospice services. Family members of persons referred too late reported lower satisfaction with hospice services, a higher rate of unmet needs for information about what to expect at time of death, lower confidence in participating in patient care at home, more concerns with coordination of care, and lower overall satisfaction. Families reported physicians as an important barrier to earlier hospice referral in nearly one-half of cases. These results indicate a need for improved services for shorter-stay hospice patients/families and for physicians to help facilitate earlier hospice admission.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Consensus statement: Palliative and supportive care in advanced heart failure.

BACKGROUND: A consensus conference was convened to define the current state and important gaps in knowledge and needed research on "Palliative and Supportive Care in Advanced Heart Failure." EVIDENCE: Evidence was drawn from expert opinion and from extensive review of the medical literature, evidence-based guidelines, and reviews. CONCLUSIONS: The conference identified gaps in current knowledge, practice, and research relating to prognostication, symptom management, and supportive care for advanced heart failure (HF). Specific conclusions include: (1) although supportive care should be integrated throughout treatment of patients with advanced HF, data are needed to understand how to best decrease physical and psychosocial burdens of advanced HF and to meet patient and family needs; (2) prognostication in advanced HF is difficult and data are needed to understand which patients will benefit from which interventions and how best to counsel patients with advanced HF; (3) research is needed to identify which interventions improve quality of life and best achieve the outcomes desired by patients and family members; (4) care should be coordinated between sites of care, and barriers to evidence-based practice must be addressed programmatically; and (5) more research is needed to identify the content and technique of communicating prognosis and treatment options with patients with advanced HF; physicians caring for patients with advanced HF must develop skills to better integrate the patient's preferences into the goals of care.

Counseling↗

PubMed2003

CHOICES: promoting early access to end-of-life care through home-based transition management.

CHOICES is a comprehensive home-based care coordination program designed to bridge the gap between home health and hospice for Medicare + Choice enrollees with advanced chronic illness in San Francisco's East Bay region. Key elements of the program include physician education, enrollment of patients with high disease burden who may not be terminally ill, co-management of care with the primary physician, and an advanced practice clinical team that provides comprehensive in-home assessments, a flexible mix of life-prolonging and palliative care that evolves with disease progression, focused education and advance planning, and caregiver support. During a 42-month demonstration, 208 patients were enrolled in the program. Eighty percent had a non-cancer diagnosis; 40% were people of color. After an 8-month follow-up, 44% of the study cohort had died in the program or after transfer to hospice, 51% had been discharged, and 5% remained active. Median length of stay for decedents was 260 days. Preliminary evidence supports the program's feasibility and acceptability to patients, families, physicians, and agency partners. However, the uncertain future of Medicare + Choice and of managed care may jeopardize the program's sustainability. Policymakers and taxpayers will need to determine how to care for the growing number of chronically ill elderly who wish to remain at home as illness advances. The care needs of these patients and their families may overwhelm a health system organized around hospital treatment of acute illness.

Advance Care Planning↗