PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Brett A Miles

Publications and source records attributed to Brett A Miles.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

The efficacy of postoperative antibiotic regimens in the open treatment of mandibular fractures: a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the necessity and/or effectiveness of postoperative antibiotics in the treatment of mandible fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a prospective, randomized trial composed of patients who presented for operative treatment of open mandibular fractures and subsequently underwent open reduction and internal fixation at 1 institution. Mandibular fractures treated by an intraoral and/or extraoral open reduction with internal fixation were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups based on whether or not they received postoperative antibiotics. Both groups received preoperative antibiotics of various regimens as well as intraoperative antibiotics on the day of surgery. Group Ab patients received 2.4 mIU of intramuscular penicillin G benzathine, or if allergic, a 5- to 7-day regimen of oral clindamycin. Group non-Ab patients received no antibiotics postoperatively. Patients followed between 5 and 8 weeks were included in the data set. RESULTS: A total of 291 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 181 patients met the inclusion criteria. Group Ab included 81 and group non-Ab 100 patients. Twenty-two patients had evidence of infection noted within the 8-week follow-up period. There were 8 infections in group Ab and 14 infections in group non-Ab. Statistical analysis with the Pearson Chi-square and Student's t test showed no statistically significant difference (P = .399) between groups Ab and non-Ab. CONCLUSION: This study could not prove any statistically significant benefit to the administration of postoperative antibiotics in patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fractures.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

Experience with cranial implant-based prosthetic reconstruction.

Reconstruction of acquired or congenitally absent facial structures is a challenging task for the reconstructive surgeon. Often inadequate soft tissue, cartilaginous, or osseous support exists for a reconstruction which is functional, aesthetic, and achieved with a reasonable effort on the part of the surgeon and patient. Prosthetic reconstruction of these structures utilizing cranial implants is a viable option which offers several advantages when compared to traditional reconstructive techniques. We present our experience with 114 cranial implants in 32 patients for craniofacial reconstruction. One hundred fourteen cranial implants were placed in a total of 32 patients for reconstruction of facial structures. Indications for cranial implants with prosthetic reconstruction were lack of adequate tissue for reconstruction, failed reconstructive attempts, and selection of the technique by the patient. Seventy-two implants were placed in the mastoid region, 31 within the orbit, 7 within the nasal cavity, with four additional implants for the reconstruction of eyebrows. Cranial implants were followed by clinical and radiographic examination at intervals ranging from 3-46 months (mean 15.3 months). Patient records were retrospectively reviewed for surgical complications, soft tissue reactions, infections, and implant failures. The total success rate of cranial implantation in the study group was 92.9% (106/114). Surgical complications occurred in three of the 32 patients (9.3%). All cranial implants were successfully reconstructed after integration. Seven percent of the implants failed after initial integration was successful. The rate of significant soft tissue reactions or frank infection observed among the implanted patients was 6.1%. Titanium cranial implants coupled with custom prosthetic reconstruction offer an excellent alternative to traditional surgical techniques in the reconstruction of acquired or congenitally absent facial structures. Predictability, prosthetic adaptability, as well as superior aesthetics are major advantages to this technique when compared to traditional surgical reconstructive techniques.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Stereolithography for craniofacial surgery.

Advances in computer technology have aided in the diagnostic and clinical management of complex congenital craniofacial deformities. The use of stereolithographic models has begun to replace traditional milled models in the treatment of craniofacial deformities. Research has shown that stereolithography models are highly accurate and provide added information in treatment planning for the correction of craniofacial deformities. These include the added visualization of the complex craniofacial anatomy and preoperative surgical planning with a highly accurate three-dimensional model. While the stereolithographic process has had a beneficial impact on the field of craniofacial surgery, the added cost of the procedure continues to be a hindrance to its widespread acceptance in clinical practice. With improved technology and accessibility the utilization of stereolithography in craniofacial surgery is expected to increase. This review will highlight the development and current usage of stereolithography in craniofacial surgery and provide illustration of it use.

Child↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Metastatic breast cancer of the oral cavity.

OBJECTIVE: To present a rare case of breast carcinoma initially presenting as an oral cavity mass. STUDY DESIGN: Case report with review of the literature. RESULTS: A case is presented of a postmenopausal woman with a remote history of treated breast carcinoma who was declared disease-free 2 years before presentation. She presented with an enlarging vestibule mass consistent with metastatic breast carcinoma. Subsequent investigations revealed widely metastatic disease for which the patient was referred for palliative chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Metastatic disease to the oral cavity represents only 1% of all oral cavity malignancies. A high index of clinical suspicion is necessary when evaluating patients with a history of non-head and neck carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗