PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Brian McDonald

Publications and source records attributed to Brian McDonald.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Impact of neck length on the safety of percutaneous and surgical tracheotomy: a prospective, randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate a correlation between neck length and the incidence of complications after both percutaneous and surgical tracheotomy (ST) and to compare the relative safety of the two procedures at our institution. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study of patients undergoing tracheotomy at a tertiary care center. METHODS: Forty-three patients evaluated for tracheotomy at our institution between the years 2003 and 2004 were enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to receive either an ST or a percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy (PDT). All patients underwent standardized measurement of the cricosternal distance (CSD) in the neutral and extended positions before the procedure. Demographic and procedural variables were recorded, and the occurrence of postoperative complications was followed for 1 week. RESULTS: PDT was performed in 29 patients and ST in 14 patients. The mean CSD of 2.7 cm increased to 3.7 cm after extension with a shoulder roll. PDT required less time (mean 8 vs. 23 minutes) and resulted in less blood loss compared with ST. A trend toward a higher incidence of complications with PDT (40%) compared with ST (7%) and in the first half of our series (learning curve) was noted. This, however, did not reach statistical significance. There was no correlation between the incidence of complications and neck length as determined by the CSD in either group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: We failed to demonstrate a correlation between CSD and tracheotomy related complications. Patients with short necks may be at no higher risk during either a PDT or ST. Experience, awareness of complications, and a dedicated team approach are necessary for the safe performance of PDT.

Adolescent↗

Nephrology consultation in acute renal failure: does timing matter?

PURPOSE: Patients who develop acute renal failure in the intensive care unit (ICU) have extremely high rates of mortality and morbidity. The goals of this study were to identify correlates of the timing of nephrology consultation in acute renal failure, and to explore the relation between timing of consultation and outcomes. METHODS: We explored associations among timing of nephrology consultation and in-hospital mortality, lengths of hospital and ICU stay, and recovery of renal function in 215 ICU patients with acute renal failure at four U.S. teaching hospitals. We used multivariable logistic regression and propensity scores to adjust for confounding and selection effects. RESULTS: Nephrology consultation was delayed (>or=48 hours) in 61 patients (28%) (median time to consultation, 4 days). Lower serum creatinine levels (P <0.0001) and higher urine output (P = 0.002) were associated with delayed consultation. Delayed consultation was associated with increased mortality among dialyzed (31/42 [74%] vs. 50/103 [49%], P = 0.006) and nondialyzed patients (10/19 [53%] vs. 11/51 [22%], P = 0.01), and increases in lengths of hospital (median, 19 days vs. 16 days, P = 0.01) and ICU stay (17 days vs. 6 days, P <0.0001). The association between delayed consultation and mortality was attenuated by covariate adjustment, and was no longer statistically significant after adjustment for propensity score (odds ratio = 2.0; 95% confidence interval: 0.8 to 5.1). CONCLUSION: In acute renal failure, delayed nephrology consultation was associated with increased mortality and morbidity, whether or not dialysis was ultimately required. Using observational data, we cannot determine whether these findings reflect residual confounding, selection bias, adverse effects of delayed recognition of acute renal failure, or the benefits of nephrology consultation.

Acute Kidney Injury↗