PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Brona McDowell

Publications and source records attributed to Brona McDowell.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Electrical stimulation in cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial.

A randomized placebo-controlled trial was carried out to investigate the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and threshold electrical stimulation (TES) in strengthening the quadriceps muscles of both legs in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Sixty children (38 males, 22 females; mean age 11y [SD 3y 6mo]; age range 5-16y) were randomized to one of the following groups: NMES (n=18), TES (n=20), or placebo (n=22). Clinical presentations were diplegia (n=55), quadriplegia (n=1), dystonia (n=1), ataxia (n=1), and non-classifiable CP (n=2). Thirty-four children walked unaided, 17 used posterior walkers, six used crutches, and the remaining three used sticks for mobility. Peak torque of the left and right quadriceps muscles, gross motor function, and impact of disability were assessed at baseline and end of treatment (16wks), and at a 6-week follow-up visit. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated between NMES or TES versus placebo for strength or function. Statistically significant differences were observed between NMES and TES versus placebo for impact of disability at the end of treatment, but only between TES and placebo at the 6-week follow-up. In conclusion, further evidence is required to show whether NMES and/or TES may be useful as an adjunct to therapy in ambulatory children with diplegia who find resistive strengthening programmes difficult.

Adolescent↗

Estimating mechanical cost in subjects with myelomeningocele.

An attempt was made to validate a system of calculating mechanical cost using 3-D motion analysis by using Oxygen cost measurements in 26 subjects with myelomeningocele. The three models investigated were (i) vertical excursion of the centre of mass (model 1), (ii) external work done by the centre of mass (CM) (model 2) and (iii) a full body model allowing energy transfers between segments within limbs (model 3). Oxygen cost, and models 1 and 3 all demonstrated significant differences between S1 and L4/L5 level involvement (P=0.001, 0.002 and 0.01, respectively). No significant differences were observed between subjects who had L4 and L5 level involvement. While further analysis showed a moderate correlation between Oxygen cost and the vertical excursion of CM model (R2=0.60), a lack of correlation for the more sophisticated models 2 and 3 questions their use as a method of assessing the energy cost of locomotion in this population.

Adolescent↗