PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Bryan J Michelow

Publications and source records attributed to Bryan J Michelow.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Stability after endoscopic forehead surgery using single-point fascia fixation.

BACKGROUND: With endoscopic forehead rejuvenation, most surgeons use at least two points of fixation for each eyebrow, often including some type of bone fixation, to achieve the aesthetic goal of lasting repositioning of the eyebrows and elimination of frown lines. In this prospective study, short-term and 1-year postoperative changes in the position of the eyebrows following extensive release of eyebrow-retaining ligaments and use of single-point fascial suture (without bone fixation) were objectively evaluated. METHODS: Front-view, life-size photographs of 48 patients undergoing endoscopic forehead surgery for treatment of migraine headaches were analyzed preoperatively and 1 and 12 months postoperatively. The distance of the caudal portion of each eyebrow from a horizontal line passing through the medial canthi was measured at three levels: (1) the lateral canthus, (2) midpupil on a straight gaze, and (3) medial canthus. RESULTS: Statistical analysis revealed a significant elevation of the eyebrows at each of these three reference points when preoperative and 1-month postoperative data were compared (p = 0.001). Twelve months postoperatively, the eyebrows remained significantly elevated at each of the three reference points on both the left (p = 0.001) and right (p = 0.001) sides. Comparison of data at 1 and 12 months postoperatively did not show any statistically significant difference (p = 0.1 to 0.9 at the three levels), indicating that the eyebrow elevation was maintained. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that wide release of the eyebrow-retaining ligaments with single-point fascial fixation is an effective method for elevation of the eyebrows, and that bone fixation should be used when an alteration of eyebrow arch form or correction of eyebrow asymmetry is indicated.

Adult↗

A new dressing for laser-treated areas.

Contemporary studies and observations have left no doubt that occlusive dressings are superior to open treatment after laser resurfacing. The currently available occlusive dressings, however, are time-consuming to apply, often dislodge shortly after application, and most require reapplication. The authors report a cross-sectional observational study of patients who were treated with a new dual silicone-based dressing (DiamondSeal) after full-face laser resurfacing, with or without rhytidectomy. Patients who previously underwent similar surgeries and who were treated with a popular occlusive tape dressing (Flexzan) acted as historic controls. A combination of two silicones produced a gel-like silicone admixture that was spread evenly over the laser-treated areas. The silicone gel solidified into a flexible membrane and remained on the patient's face for 5 days. Questionnaires were sent to patients who were treated with the silicone dressing and those who were treated with a currently popular occlusive dressing. When the attributes of these dressings were compared, the superiority of the silicone dressing approached statistical significance ( = 0.08). The majority of patients treated with the silicone dressing (71 percent) had a positive experience with this dressing, stating they would repeat the experience if necessary. Only 54 percent of patients with a tape dressing were willing to repeat their experience ( = 0.18). The major advantages of this dressing, noted from the surgeon's perspective, were the speed with which the mask was applied; the ease of application, without the need for templates; the acceptable cure duration, allowing spontaneous contouring of the silicone along facial contours; the simple tailoring of the dressing; the reduced need for and minimal time for reapplication; and the paucity of complications.

Adult↗