PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Bryan L Martin

Publications and source records attributed to Bryan L Martin.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Absence of oropharyngeal vaccinia virus after vaccinia (smallpox) vaccination.

BACKGROUND: With the resumption of the vaccinia (smallpox) vaccination, questions regarding transmission risk prompted this study to determine whether vaccinia virus could be detected in the oropharynx of adults recently vaccinated with vaccinia (smallpox) vaccine. German, Russian, and American studies on the oropharyngeal presence of vaccinia virus revealed conflicting results in different age groups. OBJECTIVE: To measure vaccinia viral particle or antigen presence in the oropharynx of adult health care workers after vaccination with vaccinia (smallpox) vaccine using viral culture and high-sensitivity assays (polymerase chain reaction [PCR] and electrochemiluminescence) and to determine whether there is an association between the presence of vaccinia virus and adverse reactions. METHODS: A total of 155 adults (primary vaccinees and revaccinees) were enrolled for 1 baseline and 5 subsequent throat swabs. The swabs were evaluated using viral culture, PCR, and electrochemiluminescence. RESULTS: Of the 155 participants, 144 had more than 2 throat swabs in the 2 weeks after vaccination. Of the 801 specimens evaluated, there were no positive results by culture, PCR, or electrochemiluminescence except in the control samples (n = 6), which were positive by all 3 methods. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the absence of detectable vaccinia virus in this study population, one can be 95% certain that the true rate of vaccinia virus in the oropharynx of adults during the 2 weeks after vaccination with vaccinia (smallpox) vaccine is 0% to 3.3%. These data should be reassuring to the medical community and support the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice guidelines that respiratory precautions are not necessary after vaccinia (smallpox) vaccination in healthy adults.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

A novel connexin 26 gene mutation associated with features of the keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome and the follicular occlusion triad.

We report the case of a congenitally deaf white male with mild palmoplantar keratoderma, ichthyosiform scaling, follicular hyperkeratosis, and mild keratitis, features consistent with keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome. His major problem was severe, disfiguring, inflammatory dissecting folliculitis of the scalp, hidradenitis suppurativa, and cystic acne, features comprising the follicular occlusion triad. This unusual phenotype is associated with a novel heterozygous point mutation (C119T) in the gap junction beta2 gene that substitutes a valine for alanine at codon 40 (A40V) in the connexin 26 protein. Through Xenopus oocyte expression studies, this mutant protein was shown to significantly disrupt the function of the specialized gap junctions connecting the cytoplasm of adjacent cells critical for tissue homeostasis. Mutations within the connexin 26 protein are associated with syndromes involving both sensorineural deafness and hyperkeratotic skin disorders. This is the first report of an association between a connexin 26 protein mutation, follicular hyperkeratosis of keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome, and severe follicular occlusion triad.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed2004

Airway hyperresponsiveness by methacholine challenge testing following negative exercise challenge.

BACKGROUND: Exercise challenge testing (ECT) to diagnose exercise-induced bronchospasm has been demonstrated to be an insensitive screening test to demonstrate the presence or absence of airway hyperreactivity. Previous studies have not compared this procedure to methacholine challenge testing (MCT) in a clinical setting. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of positive MCT in subjects with exertional dyspnea, normal baseline spirometry, and negative ECT. METHODS: Observational study of 215 military patients at an Army Community Hospital referred for evaluation of exertional dyspnea with normal baseline spirometry. Subjects were further evaluated with ECT on a graded treadmill with pre- and postexercise spirometry. Those without evidence of bronchial hyperreactivity as defined by a 15% decrease in FEV1 postexercise were evaluated with methacholine challenge testing (MCT). RESULTS: Two hundred ten military subjects were evaluated. Eighty-two patients underwent ECT as the only method of bronchoprovocation testing with 25 positive tests (57 were negative but not referred for further testing). The remaining 128 patients with a negative ECT underwent MCT. Seventy-six (59%) had a negative MCT and 52 (41%) had a positive MCT. Of the positive MCT studies, 74% were positive at a methacholine concentration of 2.5 mg/mL or less. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that a significant number of patients being evaluated for exertional dyspnea will have a positive MCT after a negative ECT. Our findings lead us to question the utility of ECT as an initial diagnostic test for the exercise-induced bronchospasm.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Adverse reactions to vaccines.

(The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.) Immunization healthcare is becoming increasingly complex as the number and types of vaccines have continued to expand. Like all prescription drugs, vaccines may be associated with adverse events. The majority of these reactions are self-limited and not associated with prolonged disability. The media, Internet and public advocacy groups have focused on potentially serious vaccine-associated adverse events with questions raised about causal linkages to increasing frequencies of diseases such as autism and asthma. Despite a lack of evidence of a causal relationship to a variety of vaccine safety concerns, including extensive reviews by the Institute of Medicine, questions regarding vaccine safety continue to threaten the success of immunization programs. Risk communication arid individual risk assessment is further challenged by the public health success of vaccine programs creating the perception that certain vaccines are no longer necessary or justified because of the rare reaction risk. There is a need for improved understanding of true vaccine contraindications and precautions as well as host factors and disease threat in order to develop a patient specific balanced risk communication intervention. When they occur, vaccine related adverse events must be treated, documented and reported through the VAERS system. The increasing complexity of vaccination health care has led the Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to identify Vaccine Safety Assessment and Evaluation as a potential new specialty.

Drug Hypersensitivity↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of two single-headed and two multi-headed allergen skin test devices.

Given the potential differences in performance of skin test devices, the purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the performance of two single-headed and two multiheaded devices for allergy skin testing in terms of wheal size, sensitivity, specificity, intradevice variability, and pain level. Two single-headed devices (Greer Pick, Duotip-Test) and two multiheaded devices (Multi-Test II, OMNI) were tested in 15 subjects in a prospective partially blind fashion looking at wheal reactions and pain using histamine and glycerol-saline on the arms and back. Differences among devices in wheal size and pain were noted. Sensitivity, specificity, and intradevice variability were calculated. Differences between corner and interior heads in multiheaded devices were analyzed. No significant differences were observed in wheal size between Greer Pick (7.1+/-1.4 mm) and Duotip-Test (7.2+/-1.6 mm). Multiheaded devices were significantly different in wheal size compared with each other and to the single-headed devices (Multi-Test II, 5.4+/-1.7 mm; OMNI, 3.3+/-1.2 mm). Single-headed devices were more sensitive (100% each, 95% CI of 92-100%) than the multiheaded devices. Multi-Test II was significantly more sensitive (83%, 95% CI of 78-87%) than OMNI (57%, 95% CI of 51-62%). There was significant intradevice variability for the multiheaded devices with corner heads being significantly more sensitive than interior heads. Specificities for all devices were equally good (-97%). Pain was greater for multiheaded devices than single-headed devices but was generally mild. In conclusion, this study supports the idea that single-headed devices may be more sensitive and consistent than multiheaded devices. Multi-Test II is more sensitive than OMNI. In multiheaded devices, corner heads are more sensitive than interior heads.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Asthma in pregnancy.

Asthma, one of the most common serious medical problems to complicate pregnancy, affects 3-8% of pregnancies in the United States. The goals of therapy in the pregnant asthmatic patient do not differ from those in non-pregnant patients. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are preferred in the management of all levels of persistent asthma in pregnant patients, because these agents have been shown to reduce asthma exacerbations during pregnancy. Asthma in pregnancy is often undertreated due to physician and patient concerns over the effects of asthma medications on the fetus. However, undertreatment leads to loss of asthma control and increases in maternal morbidity, perinatal mortality, preeclampsia, preterm birth, and low birth weight infants. Recent prospective clinical cohort studies with active asthma management by NAEPP guidelines show no evidence of increased maternal or fetal morbidity or mortality. Therefore, it is critical for the mother to understand that failure to control asthma during pregnancy may lead to poor outcomes. A case study follows to highlight clinical pearls and pitfalls in the management of asthma in the pregnant patient.

Administration, Inhalation↗