Biomedical subjects

Bryann Bromley

Publications and source records attributed to Bryann Bromley.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Three-dimensional US of the fetus: volume imaging.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the rapidity, efficiency, and accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) ultrasonography (US) for complete anatomic survey in fetuses at 17-21 weeks of gestation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained, informed consent was waived, and the study was HIPAA compliant. Fifty consecutive women undergoing fetal anatomic survey at 17-21 weeks of gestation formed the study cohort. After standard 2D US was performed by one of eight sonographers, the same sonographer also obtained five 3D volumes to encompass the entire fetal anatomy. Three physicians interpreting the scans independently evaluated the completeness of the examination and time needed to read the scans, comparing the standard 2D method with the 3D volume reconstruction technique. The paired t test was used to compare biparietal diameter (BPD), femur length, and performance times between the 3D measurements and the 2D measurement. The t test was used to compare fetal anatomy according to volume angle. Differences were significant when P < .05. RESULTS: Mean time to perform 2D US was 19.6 minutes per examination, whereas mean time to perform complete 3D volume acquisition was 1.8 minutes. Mean times needed to interpret 3D images and measure the BPD and femur were 5.53, 4.79, and 5.34 minutes for the three interpreting physicians. Compared with complete fetal surveys performed with 2D US, individual fetal anatomic landmarks (except for fetal arms and cavum septum pellucidum) were identified more than 94% of the time by using 3D US. Grouping anatomic views by region, the heart, head, extremities, and abdominal views were completely seen in 88%, 90%, 90%, and 95% of patients, respectively. No significant difference was seen between the three physicians regarding completeness of the 3D examinations (P = .7). One fetus had multiple anomalies, with 3D volumes identified as abnormal by all three physicians. Overall, 74% of 3D BPD measurements were within 1 mm of the 2D measurements, and 64% of 3D femur measurements were within 1 mm of the 2D measurements. CONCLUSION: The standard fetal anatomic survey can be performed in less than 2 minutes with 3D volume US, and the volumes can be interpreted in 6-7 minutes, compared with a mean of 19.6 minutes to perform standard 2D US.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Improving the efficiency of gynecologic sonography with 3-dimensional volumes: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether 3-dimensional (3D) sonography can provide a rapid, efficient, and accurate way to do a transvaginal gynecologic scan compared with traditional 2-dimensional (2D) sonography. METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive patients who underwent gynecologic sonography formed the study cohort. After a standard 2D transvaginal scan was done, including measurements of the endometrium and abnormalities, 4 volume acquisitions were obtained, encompassing the uterus (2 volumes) and the ovaries. These volumes were reviewed offline without any patient information. Endometrium and other measurements were performed on the volumes. The 2D and 3D results were compared by paired t tests. RESULTS: The mean time needed for the standard 2D scan was 2.6 minutes compared with 1.07 minutes for the 3D volume acquisitions. The mean time for the reconstruction, measurement, and interpretation of the volumes offline was 1.19 minutes. The mean time for the entire 3D examination (both parts) was 2.26 minutes (P = .047, comparing 2D with total 3D). There was no significant difference between the measurements of the endometrium, fibroids, and ovarian cysts when comparing 2D and reconstructed 3D images. Two-dimensional and 3D sonography differed little in their ability to identify the organs and the abnormalities on the scans. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a complete transvaginal gynecologic examination can be done in 1.07 minutes of scan time and interpreted offline in an additional 1.19 minutes. The 35 cases were scanned and interpreted with the use of 3D sonography in 79.17 minutes total compared with 91.46 minutes of 2D scan time (P = .047). The accuracy of the scan was similar for both techniques.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

How sonographic tomography will change the face of obstetric sonography: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine whether 3-dimensional (3D) volume sonography (sonographic tomography) can yield a far quicker and equally accurate anatomic examination of the second-trimester fetus compared with traditional 2-dimensional (2D) scanning. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive second-trimester fetuses with normal structural surveys on standard 2D imaging underwent 5 standard 3D volume acquisitions each (in the regions of the head, chest, abdomen, face, and lower extremities) immediately after the 2D scan. The 2D and 3D images were subsequently compared in relation to the completeness of the fetal survey, measurements of the biparietal diameter and femur length, and time required to obtain the fetal survey. RESULTS: The structural surveys were complete in 20 of 25 cases using 3D reconstructed volumes. One fetus had an incomplete evaluation of the face on 3D volumes (and limited on 2D imaging because of the prone position of the fetus). The other 4 fetuses with incomplete surveys done on 3D volumes had missing images of a hand or foot. Three-dimensional reconstructions slightly overmeasured the biparietal diameter compared with the 2D reference standard (mean difference, 1.1 mm; P < .001). For femur length, the mean difference was not statistically significant. It took a mean time of 1.1 minutes to obtain the 3D volumes and 5.5 minutes to reconstruct the complete surveys by the 3D volume method. With the standard 2D technique, the structural surveys were done in a mean time of 13.9 minutes. The mean time difference between both methods was 7.3 minutes (P = 2.4 x 10(-9)). CONCLUSIONS: Using 3D volume acquisition, it is feasible to perform and interpret a structural survey in half the time in which a 2D survey is performed. Further research is necessary to standardize the acquisition of volumes to minimize artifacts and produce uniform images.

Female↗

PubMed2004

What factors are associated with parents' desire to know the sex of their unborn child?

BACKGROUND: Parents feel strongly about whether or not to learn the sex of their fetus. We sought to determine which factors are significantly associated with parents' desire to know or not to know the fetal sex during a prenatal ultrasound. METHODS: All women undergoing prenatal ultrasound examinations, except for those with suspected failed pregnancies, were invited to answer a questionnaire at an outpatient referral center for diagnostic ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology in Boston, Massachusetts. The survey asked about demographic factors, current pregnancy, and past pregnancies, and an open-ended question about whether and why the parents wished to learn, or did not learn, the sex of their fetus. Factors significantly associated with parents' desire to learn the fetal sex prenatally were determined and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1,340 questionnaires were completed. Overall, 761/1,302 (58%) of mothers and 747/1,295 (58%) of fathers learned or planned to learn the fetal sex before delivery. Factors most associated with wanting to learn the fetal sex were conceiving accidentally, finding out the sex in a previous pregnancy, not planning to breastfeed, influence of sex on future childbearing plans, planning a move or renovation dependent on sex, and specific parental sex preference. Demographic factors most associated with wanting to learn the fetal sex were father without full-time job, lower household income, unwed mother, maternal age less than 22 or greater than 40 years, no college degree, race other than white, and religion other than Catholic. CONCLUSIONS: Specific demographic and socioeconomic characteristics predicted whether or not parents chose to know the sex of their unborn child. Families in which the pregnancy was unplanned, those in which fetal sex would influence living arrangements or future childbearing plans, and those of lower socioeconomic status wished to know the sex more frequently. Further study is needed to understand parents' motivations underlying the desire to know or not know fetal sex before delivery.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

The Genetic Sonogram Scoring Index.

This article describes the individual sonographic markers used in the Genetic Sonogram Scoring Index. The importance of the clustering of markers forms the basis of the scoring index, such that individual markers are assigned point values based on their sensitivity and specificity in the detection of Down syndrome. The points acquired by each fetus are tabulated into a final "score." The performance of the scoring index in the detection of aneuploidy is presented. The clinical application of the scoring index for the detection of chromosomally abnormal fetuses in patients both at high- and low-risk for aneuploidy is discussed.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Hypoechogenicity of fetal long bones: a new ultrasound marker for arthrogryposis.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate osteopenia associated with arthrogryposis. METHODS & RESULTS: We describe 3 cases of fetal arthrogryposis seen prenatally with the sonographic feature of severe hypoechogenicity of the long bones. This manifestation of presumed osteopenia is thought to represent osteoporosis secondary with absent fetal movement. CONCLUSION: We describe hypoechogenicity of the fetal bones as a new sonographic feature of arthrogryposis.

Abnormalities, Multiple↗

PubMed2002

The genetic sonogram: a method of risk assessment for Down syndrome in the second trimester.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of Down syndrome in fetuses with sonographic markers using the Bayes theorem and likelihood ratios. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the midtrimester sonographic features of fetuses with Down syndrome and compared them with euploid fetuses. Patients were referred for an increased risk of aneuploidy and evaluated for the presence of structural defects, a nuchal fold, short long bones, pyelectasis, an echogenic intracardiac focus, and hyperechoic bowel. All fetuses underwent amniocentesis at the time of sonographic assessment. The sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios for markers were calculated both as nonisolated and isolated findings. RESULT: There were 164 fetuses with Down syndrome and 656 euploid fetuses. The presence of any marker resulted in sensitivity for the detection of Down syndrome of 80.5% with a false-positive rate of 12.4%. The absence of any markers conferred a likelihood ratio of 0.2, decreasing the risk of Down syndrome by 80%. As an isolated marker, the nuchal fold had an "infinite" likelihood ratio for Down syndrome; a short humerus had a likelihood ratio of 5.8, whereas structural anomalies had a likelihood ratio of 3.3. Other isolated markers had low likelihood ratios because of the higher prevalence in the unaffected population. The likelihood ratios for the presence of 1, 2, and 3 of any of the markers were 1.9, 6.2, and 80, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although an isolated marker with a low likelihood ratio may not increase a patient's risk of Down syndrome, the presence of such a marker precludes reducing the risk of aneuploidy. Clusters of markers appear to confer a higher risk.

Aneuploidy↗

PubMed2002

Fetal nose bone length: a marker for Down syndrome in the second trimester.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the significance of nasal bone length in relation to the detection of Down syndrome in the second trimester. METHODS: We evaluated consecutive fetuses referred to our facility between 15 and 20 weeks' gestation for sonography and amniocentesis because of an increased risk of aneuploidy. A detailed structural survey, biometric measurements, and measurement of the nasal bone were obtained at the time of amniocentesis and subsequently compared with karyotype. The characteristics of the fetuses with Down syndrome were compared with those of the euploid fetuses. RESULTS: A total of 239 fetuses were evaluated. Sixteen fetuses (7%) had Down syndrome, and 223 were euploid. In fetuses with Down syndrome, 6 (37%) of 16 did not have detectable nose bones, compared with 1 (0.5%) of 223 control fetuses, yielding a likelihood ratio of 83. Detectable nasal bones were seen in 10 fetuses with Down syndrome and 222 euploid fetuses. A receiver operating characteristic curve for the biparietal diameter-nasal bone length ratio showed that a value of 9 or greater detected 100% of fetuses with Down syndrome and 22% of euploid fetuses. If the ratio were 10 or greater, then 81 % fetuses with Down syndrome and 11 % of euploid fetuses would have been identified. If the ratio were 11 or greater, 69% of fetuses with Down syndrome would be identified, compared with 5% of euploid fetuses. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of a nasal bone is a powerful marker for Down syndrome. A short nasal bone is associated with an increased likelihood for fetal Down syndrome in a high-risk population.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Is 3-dimensional volume sonography an effective alternative method to the standard 2-dimensional technique of measuring the nuchal translucency?

PURPOSE: To determine whether 3-dimensional (3D) volume scanning is an effective alternative method of measuring nuchal translucency in first-trimester fetuses compared with the standard 2-dimensional (2D) technique, and to report a standardized method of evaluation. METHODS: We measured the nuchal translucency of 29 fetuses between 11.4 and 13.9 weeks of age using the standard 2D sonographic technique with the fetus in a sagittal view. We then rescanned the fetus in a coronal orientation and obtained a 3D volume of the fetal neck area from crown to rump using a consistent technique. The sagittal orientation was reconstructed, and the width of the nuchal translucency was measured electronically using the reconstructed midsagittal view. The measurements using a conventional 2D sagittal view were then compared with the 3D reconstructed sagittal view. The nuchal translucency was adequately measured in all fetuses in which the 3D assessment was attempted. RESULTS: The nuchal translucencies of 29 consecutive fetuses were measured using both 2D and 3D multiplanar reconstruction of the fetal neck. The mean +/- standard deviation for the standard 2D assessment of the nuchal translucency was 1.7 +/- 1.4 mm. Using 3D reconstruction of the Z plane, the measurement was 1.8 +/- 1.6 mm. This was not a statistically significant difference (P = 0.4). There was a very high correlation between the two techniques (r = 0.984, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is an excellent correlation between the measurements of the nuchal translucency using standard 2D scanning and those obtained from 3D multiplanar reconstruction of the Z plane. Using a consistent technique, the nuchal translucency can be accurately and reliably measured with a 3D rendering. This technique is potentially useful in fetuses that are not in an optimal position for standard 2D nuchal translucency measurement.

Embryo, Mammalian↗