PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Bryn Williams-Jones

Publications and source records attributed to Bryn Williams-Jones.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Global bioethics -- myth or reality?

BACKGROUND: There has been debate on whether a global or unified field of bioethics exists. If bioethics is a unified global field, or at the very least a closely shared way of thinking, then we should expect bioethicists to behave the same way in their academic activities anywhere in the world. This paper investigates whether there is a 'global bioethics' in the sense of a unified academic community. METHODS: To address this question, we study the web-linking patterns of bioethics institutions, the citation patterns of bioethics papers and the buying patterns of bioethics books. RESULTS: All three analyses indicate that there are geographical and institutional differences in the academic behavior of bioethicists and bioethics institutions. CONCLUSION: These exploratory studies support the position that there is no unified global field of bioethics. This is a problem if the only reason is parochialism. But these regional differences are probably of less concern if one notices that bioethics comes in many not always mutually understandable dialects.

Advisory Committees↗
PubMed2006

Pharmacogenetics: the bioethical problem of DNA investment banking.

Concern about the ethics of clinical drug trials research on patients and healthy volunteers has been the subject of significant ethical analysis and policy development--protocols are reviewed by Research Ethics Committees and subjects are protected by informed consent procedures. More recently attention has begun to be focused on DNA banking for clinical and pharmacogenetics research. It is, however, surprising how little attention has been paid to the commercial nature of such research, or the unique issues that present when subjects are asked to consent to the storage of biological samples. Our contention is that in the context of pharmacogenetic add-on studies to clinical drug trials, the doctrine of informed consent fails to cover the broader range of social and ethical issues. Applying a sociological perspective, we foreground issues of patient/subject participation or 'work', the ambiguity of research subject altruism, and the divided loyalties facing many physicians conducting clinical research. By demonstrating the complexity of patient and physician involvement in clinical drug trials, we argue for more comprehensive ethical review and oversight that moves beyond reliance on informed consent to incorporate understandings of the social, political and cultural elements that underpin the diversity of ethical issues arising in the research context.

Biological Specimen Banks↗
PubMed2006

Democratising access to genetic services.

Professional and policy discussions about the appropriate funding and allocation of health cares services are an essential part of the management of public and private health care insurance plans. However, the ability of governments and health professionals to equitably decide on the distribution of health care is being challenged by the increasing drive to patent health care technologies. Referring to the case of genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer (and Myriad Genetics' patenting of the BRCA1 & BRCA2 genes), this paper applies some concepts from moral philosophy to think through the effects of the commercialisation of genetic technologies, and what would constitute a more just and rational approach to health care decision-making, in the context of the Canadian health insurance system.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2006

Could endogenous substrates of drug-metabolizing enzymes influence constitutive physiology and drug target responsiveness?

Integration of genomic data from pharmacokinetic pathways and drug targets is an emerging trend in bioinformatics, but is there a clear separation of pharmacokinetic pathways and drug targets? Should we also consider the potential interactions of endogenous substrates of drug-metabolizing enzymes with receptors and other molecular drug targets as we combine pharmacogenomic datasets? We discuss these overarching questions through a specific pharmacogenomic case study of the cytochrome P450 (CYP)2D6, serotonin and dopamine triad. Importantly, CYP2D6 may contribute to the regeneration of serotonin from 5-methoxytryptamine by virtue of its catalytic function as a 5-methoxyindolethylamine O-demethylase. Furthermore, serotonergic neurons provide a regulatory feedback on dopaminergic neurotransmission. Hence, we hypothesize that independent of its role as a pharmacokinetic gene, CYP2D6 may nuance the regulation of serotonergic and dopaminergic neurophysiology. Additionally, we reflect upon the contribution of hyperspecialization in biomedicine to the present disconnect between research on pharmacokinetics and drug targets, and the potential for remedying this important gap through informed dialogue among clinical pharmacologists, human geneticists, bioethicists and applied social scientists.

5-Methoxytryptamine↗
PubMed2004

Social contract theory and just decision making: lessons from genetic testing for the BRCA mutations.

Decisions about funding health services are crucial to controlling costs in health care insurance plans, yet they encounter serious challenges from intellectual property protection--e.g., patents--of health care services. Using Myriad Genetics' commercial genetic susceptibility test for hereditary breast cancer (BRCA testing) in the context of the Canadian health insurance system as a case study, this paper applies concepts from social contract theory to help develop more just and rational approaches to health care decision making. Specifically, Daniel's and Sabin's "accountability for reasonableness" is compared to broader notions of public consultation, demonstrating that expert assessments in specific decisions must be transparent and accountable and supplemented by public consultation.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2003

Actor-network theory: a tool to support ethical analysis of commercial genetic testing.

Social, ethical and policy analysis of the issues arising from gene patenting and commercial genetic testing is enhanced by the application of science and technology studies, and Actor-Network Theory (ANT) in particular. We suggest the potential for transferring ANT's flexible nature to an applied heuristic methodology for gathering empirical information and for analysing the complex networks involved in the development of genetic technologies. Three concepts are explored in this paper--actor-networks, translation, and drift--and applied to the case of Myriad Genetics and their commercial BRACAnalysis genetic susceptibility test for hereditary breast cancer. Treating this test as an active participant in socio-technical networks clarifies the extent to which it interacts with, shapes and is shaped by people, other technologies, and institutions. Such an understanding enables more sophisticated and nuanced technology assessment, academic analysis, as well as public debate about the social, ethical and policy implications of the commercialization of new genetic technologies.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2003

Where there's a web, there's a way: commercial genetic testing and the Internet.

The Internet has become a "global marketplace", enabling consumers to purchase health care products and services, including genetic testing, through a variety of national and international sources. A web search for commercial (for-profit) genetic testing companies found 12 with a web presence that were offering adult genetic susceptibility testing, of which 3 offered direct-to-consumer access. In this paper, Canada--with its educated population and universal health care system--will serve as a case study for illustrating the social, ethical and policy issues (e.g., information privacy, just access to health care, product safety, and access to unbiased health information) arising with Internet-based access to commercial genetic testing. Health professionals, policy makers and consumers in all developed nations will be faced with complex technical, social and ethical issues, but without further discussion it will not be possible to determine how best to manage and maximise the benefits of this increased accessibility and choice, while minimising the associated personal and social costs.

Genetic Counseling↗
PubMed2003

Rhetoric and hype: where's the 'ethics' in pharmacogenomics?

There is increasing discussion in public and academic forums about the anticipated benefits of pharmacogenomics, as well as the attendant social and ethical implications of this research. Yet there is often an implicit assumption that the benefits of pharmacogenomics are 'just around the corner' and will significantly outweigh the costs. Furthermore, it is argued that the associated ethical issues are not as profound as those that emerge in other areas of genetics, and that experience gained wrestling with these other issues provides ample ethical and regulatory tools to deal with any problems arising with pharmacogenomics. We contend that this vision of ethical and social issues associated with pharmacogenomics is not so clear-cut. The scientific evidence is more complex and contested than the public, academics, and policy makers, have been led to believe, and while there may be real clinical benefits from this research, they are not likely to arrive in the near future. Pharmacogenomics research is also occurring in a terrain occupied by a multitude of different and powerful actors, with diverse and often competing interests. It is therefore essential to investigate the broader social and political context, unravel the various interests pressuring for early implementation, and deconstruct the hype in order to appreciate a fuller range of ethical and social consequences associated with the current developments of pharmacogenomics.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Ethics and genetics: susceptibility testing in the workplace.

Genetic testing in the workplace is a technology both full of promise and fraught with ethical peril. Though not yet common, it is likely to become increasingly so. We survey the key arguments in favour of such testing, along with the most significant ethical worries. We further propose a set of pragmatic criteria, which, if met, would make it permissible for employers to offer (but not require) workplace genetic testing.

Employment↗