PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Burkhard F Leeb

Publications and source records attributed to Burkhard F Leeb.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

A meta-analysis of controlled clinical studies with diacerein in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: This systematic meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials with diacerein was performed to provide an evidence-based assessment of its symptomatic efficacy in the treatment of osteoarthritis. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials with diacerein. A manual review of the literature, abstracts, and posters was also conducted. Unpublished final reports were obtained from the manufacturer. Only studies performed in knee and/or hip osteoarthritis were chosen for review. Study inclusion, quality scoring, and data extraction were performed by 2 reviewers independently. Objectives for analysis comprised pain, function, escape medication use, global efficacy, and safety ratings by patients and investigators. Specific study periods, such as the active treatment period and the treatment-free follow-up period (when present), were analyzed. Statistical analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle as far as possible, and acknowledged tests were used for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 23 studies were identified, 19 of which were included. Diacerein was significantly superior to placebo during the active treatment phase (Glass score, 1.50 [95% confidence interval, 0.80-2.20]). Both diacerein and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were similarly efficacious during the treatment period; however, diacerein, but not NSAIDs, showed a carryover effect, persisting up to 3 months after treatment, with a significant analgesic-sparing effect during the follow-up period (Glass score, 2.06 [95% confidence interval, 0.66-3.46]). Tolerability assessment revealed no differences between diacerein and NSAIDs, although the latter showed more severe events. CONCLUSION: This systematic meta-analysis provides evidence for the symptomatic efficacy of diacerein in the treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis, with reasonable tolerability.

Anthraquinones↗
PubMed2006

Leflunomide/chloroquin combination therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study.

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a combination of leflunomide (LEF) and chloroquin (ChL) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Fifteen female RA patients (46-80 years, mean disease duration 100.7 months, ten patients RF+) were enrolled into this open trial. Patients were either treatment failures or partial responders to LEF (n=6) or ChL (n=9). At week 8 and 16, DAS28 and morning stiffness (MST) were evaluated. Moreover, safety was assessed by reporting of side effects, laboratory examinations, and blood pressure measurement. Baseline mean disease activity Index including a 28-joint count (DAS28) amounted to 5.61 and decreased to 4.54 at week 8 (p=0.023) and to 3.79 (p=0.00031) at week 16. MST remained unchanged. DAS28 values significantly decreased statistically in originally ChL-treated patients with additional LEF but did not in LEF patients with additional ChL (DAS28: 1.48; 2.29 vs 0.60; 0.87). Adverse reactions were observed in four patients. Three patients had to be withdrawn from the study. Combination therapy with LEF and ChL was effective and reasonably tolerated. The far higher treatment response could be observed in originally ChL-treated patients after initiation of LEF.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Intravenous application of omega-3 fatty acids in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. The ORA-1 trial. An open pilot study.

The objective of this work was to assess the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of intravenously applied n-3-PUFA in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Thirty-four patients with active RA [identified as having a DAS28 (disease activity score including a 28 joint count) > 4.0] were enrolled into this 5-wk open pilot study (one group design). From the time of screening (visit 0, or V0), background therapy had to remain unchanged. Patients received 2 mL/kg (= 0.1-0.2 g fish oil/kg) fish oil emulsion intravenously on 7 consecutive days (Visit 1-Visit 2, or V1-V2) in addition to their background therapy. A decrease of the DAS28 > 0.6 at day 8 (Visit 2) was the primary efficacy measure. Moreover, the DAS28 at day 35 (Visit 3, or V3), the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria (V2, V3) and the Short Form-36 (V3) were assessed. Thirty-three patients completed the trial. The mean DAS28 at V1 was 5.45;at V2, 4.51 (P < .001 V1-V2) and at V3, 4.73 (P < .001 V1-V3; V2-V3, not significantly different). Of the 34 patients, 56% achieved a reduction of the DAS28 > 0.6 at V2 (mean 1.52); 27% > 1.2. At V3, 41% of the patients showed a DAS28 reduction > 0.6 (mean 1.06), and 36% > 1.2. ACR 20 and 50% responses at V2 were seen in 29 and 12% of patients, respectively; at V3, the comparable values were 18 and 9%, respectively. Overall tolerability was excellent. Intravenous application of n-3-PUFA (as an add-on therapy) was considerably well tolerated and led to improvement of the disease activity status in a reasonable number of RA patients. Future trials are warranted to answer whether the intravenous application of n-3-PUFA constitutes a therapeutic option in RA patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Diagnosis, differential diagnosis and treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica.

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a common disorder in the elderly population. The diagnosis is based upon recognition of a clinical syndrome, consisting of pain and stiffness in the shoulder and pelvic girdle, muscle tenderness of the upper and lower limbs and nonspecific somatic complaints. In addition, in most cases the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration are highly elevated. Although PMR and giant cell arteritis (GCA) are commonly regarded as two clinical variations of the same disease, their clinical picture is quite different. Whilst in PMR the musculoskeletal symptoms predominate, the major features of GCA are arterial inflammation and its consequences, which suggests clinical and pathological discrepancies between the two syndromes and important differences with respect to morbidity and mortality. The prognosis of correctly diagnosed PMR is excellent. It is well known that corticosteroid therapy in PMR usually leads to rapid and dramatic improvement of patients' complaints and returns them to previous functional status. However, prolonged corticosteroid treatment, sometimes for several years, may be necessary to maintain clinical improvement. Despite all the knowledge about the beneficial effects of corticosteroid treatment, data concerning the optimal dosage regimen are lacking. Long-term corticosteroid use can be associated with various adverse events, of which induction of osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus and infection among the worst. A Corticosteroid Side Effect Questionnaire has been shown to dose-dependently detect adverse effects perceived by patients. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria for PMR comprise a core set of markers for monitoring therapeutic responses in PMR, namely ESR or CRP, the visual analogue scale of patient's pain and physician's global assessment, as well as morning stiffness and the ability to elevate the upper limbs. The PMR-disease activity score has been developed on the basis of EULAR response criteria as a means of expressing disease activity as an absolute number. A score <7 indicates low disease activity, scores 7-17 suggest medium activity, and a score >17 is indicative of high disease activity. The PMR-disease activity score has been proven to be highly correlated with patient's global assessment, patient satisfaction and ESR. It provides an easily applicable and valid tool for disease activity monitoring in patients with PMR. Improved knowledge of disease activity processes, exact monitoring of disease activity and treatment responses, and increased risk-estimation of treatment schedules should ultimately improve the care of patients with PMR.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Disease activity measurement of rheumatoid arthritis: Comparison of the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) and the disease activity score including 28 joints (DAS28) in daily routine.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and congruency of the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) compared with the Disease Activity Score including 28 joints (DAS28) in daily practice. METHODS: In 399 consecutive rheumatoid arthritis patients (307 women, 92 men), the SDAI and the DAS28 were calculated. Additionally, 115 of them were observed for 1 year and changes of both values were recorded. Joint assessments were performed by 4 experienced physicians. DAS28 and SDAI values and the respective changes were compared by correlation and regression analyses. Reliability assessment and factor analyses were performed. Disease activity categorizing was compared by the Wilcoxon's rank sum test. RESULTS: The median +/- SD scores were 3.42 +/- 1.45 for the DAS28 and 11.50 +/- 11.50 for the SDAI. Spearman's rho was 0.897 (P < 0.0001). Score changes were also significantly correlated. Reliability testing and factor analysis revealed that both scores can be regarded as monocomponent. Categorizing patients according to the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria (EULARC) or the SDAI revealed statistically significant differences between the 2 scales (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: SDAI values are considerably shifted to the left compared with DAS28 levels. Internal consistency and reliability of both scores are comparable. For the differences in disease activity categorizing due to the SDAI compared with the EULARC, a major limitation of the application of this newly developed disease activity score is given, unless these incongruencies can be cleared.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

[Biologicals in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory arthropathies].

The ongoing evaluation of the cytokine-cascade and the steadily growing knowledge about cytokine mediated processes seem to open striking therapeutical options in the fields of sepsis, autoimmune and chronic inflammatory joint or bowel diseases via modulation or inhibition of the cytokine-cascade. There is no doubt about the efficacy of the various anticytokine-treatments in the therapy of chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases. A large number of preclinical and clinical studies forms the scientific basis for these almost widely established therapies. These so-called "biologicals" are fully accepted as disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, equal to or even more potent than the classical substances. On the one hand, these agents are acting as tumor necrosis factor-alpha-blockers, like a chimeric (human/mouse) monoclonal anti-tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha-antibody (Infliximab), a recombinant soluble tumor necrosis factor-receptor p75 fusion protein (Etanercept), and a fully humanized anti-tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha-antibody (Adalimumab); on the other hand a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (Anakinra) is used in clinical practice. Generally these drugs are very well tolerated; the most common adverse events are higher infection rates (including tuberculosis) and injection-site reactions for the subcutaneously administered agents. Of course one should be aware of the possibly elevated risk for malignancies although there is no evidence for that so far, but the observation time since launching of these drugs is considerably short. To conclude, involved physicians should use these new "tools" very carefully and critically, because long-term tolerance and safety is a matter of ongoing investigation and last but not least because of the growing importance of cost effectiveness when using such expensive medications. Above all initiation and monitoring of those therapies should be restricted to rheumatologists

Adalimumab↗