PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Byoung Chul Cho

Publications and source records attributed to Byoung Chul Cho.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Genomic Profiling of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer after Progression on First-line Osimertinib: Phase II ORCHARD Study.

PURPOSE: Osimertinib is the standard of care for first-line treatment for epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Understanding the tumor molecular profile of patients following progression on osimertinib could help inform optimal second-line treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ORCHARD (NCT03944772), a phase II biomarker-directed study, enrolled patients with EGFRm NSCLC who progressed on first-line osimertinib to receive treatment based on their tumor molecular profile after progression. The study comprised three groups into which patients were allocated based on the molecular profile of their tumor, determined via next-generation sequencing (NGS) of a tumor biopsy. We report results from a prespecified, exploratory analysis of baseline tumor tissue and plasma samples to evaluate mechanisms of resistance to first-line osimertinib identified by tissue and plasma NGS. Agreement between tissue and plasma NGS data was also assessed. RESULTS: This study provided a comprehensive dataset exploring tissue (n = 400) and plasma (n = 191) genomics, enabling characterization of the histogenomic landscape after first-line osimertinib treatment. TP53 and MDM2/4 alterations were mutually exclusive and occurred in 86% of tumors. When combining tissue and plasma genomics, resistance alterations were detected in 87% of samples, with multiple resistance alterations in 46%. Alterations in the PI3K pathway, SOX2, and MYC were frequently detected in histologically transformed tumors. Additionally, differential patterns of co-occurring EGFR mutations in tumors with L858R versus exon 19 deletion were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive analysis highlights potential heterogeneous resistance to first-line osimertinib treatment, providing a rationale for combining treatments with broad activity to improve patient outcomes. See related commentary by Gupta et al., p. 3718.

Humans

Patient-reported outcomes with tarlatamab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy: results from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial.

BACKGROUND: Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is associated with a high symptom burden and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This prespecified analysis from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for tarlatamab versus standard-of-care (SoC) chemotherapy following first-line platinum-based therapy. METHODS: DeLLphi-304 is a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 3 study in adults with ES-SCLC. PROs were assessed using validated instruments, including the EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-LC13, FACT-G GP5, BPI-SF, and the EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale. Change from baseline, response rates, and time to deterioration in these PROs were analyzed. RESULTS: PRO data from all 509 patients enrolled were evaluated. Compliance with QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 assessments remained above 69% through 19 weeks. A higher proportion of patients receiving tarlatamab achieved symptom or functional improvement at 19 weeks compared with SoC in chest pain (19% vs 10%), cough (35% vs 26%), dyspnea (22% vs 7%), physical functioning (13% vs 8%), and global health status (23% vs 15%), respectively. Tarlatamab also delayed deterioration in symptoms, physical functioning, and pain at worst relative to SoC. FACT-G GP5 results indicated that patients receiving tarlatamab were less bothered by treatment side effects over time. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to its previously reported antitumor activity, tarlatamab demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms and HRQoL compared with SoC. These findings support a favorable benefit-risk profile of tarlatamab in patients previously treated for ES-SCLC.

Humans

Assessing time to symptomatic progression, a patient-relevant efficacy endpoint, in the MARIPOSA study in non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In the phase 3 randomized MARIPOSA study, amivantamab and lazertinib combination therapy demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus osimertinib in participants with previously untreated, epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Time to symptomatic progression (TTSP) was introduced to assess clinical worsening and complement endpoints that investigate radiographic disease progression and patient-reported outcomes. TTSP provides an easily interpretable measure of disease-specific symptom worsening to further support patient experience. METHODS: In MARIPOSA, TTSP was quantitatively assessed as a secondary efficacy endpoint and defined as the time from randomization until participants experience disease-specific symptom worsening requiring a clinical intervention or treatment change, or death. To evaluate the impact of amivantamab and lazertinib on TTSP considering its established OS benefit against osimertinib, an exploratory analysis censoring death events was performed. RESULTS: At the final protocol-specified OS analysis (median follow up: 37.8 months), median TTSP was 43.6 months with amivantamab and lazertinib versus 29.3 months with osimertinib (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.83; p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.0001). Amivantamab and lazertinib reduced deaths following a TTSP event compared to osimertinib. A strong correlation between TTSP and PFS or OS was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Amivantamab and lazertinib significantly delayed TTSP versus osimertinib. TTSP offers a clinician-validated measurement of disease-specific symptom worsening, capturing symptoms perceived by patients that prompt clinical action. TTSP is highly correlated with PFS and OS, providing complementary insights alongside traditional endpoints. TTSP enhances understanding of treatment benefit and supports informed clinical decision-making by integrating patient experience.

Humans

Intracranial and systemic progression on amivantamab in platinum-treated epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Amivantamab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-MET bispecific antibody, is approved as monotherapy and as combination therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring various EGFR mutations in first-line and refractory settings. Sites of progressive disease on amivantamab monotherapy are not well understood and could be instructive for treatment management. METHODS: CHRYSALIS (NCT02609776) enrolled participants with NSCLC, including those with treated brain metastases. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was required at screening but performed per local practice after enrollment (conducted postbaseline every 6 [&#xb1;1] weeks after Cycle 1 Day 1). Sites of target, non-target, and new lesion progression were reported. This analysis includes 114 participants with EGFR exon 20 insertion (Ex20ins) NSCLC after disease progression on platinum-based chemotherapy who received amivantamab monotherapy on or before June 4, 2020. RESULTS: As of March 30, 2021, the median follow-up was 12.5&#xa0;months (range, 0.2-30.5). Among 114 participants, the objective response rate by blinded independent central review was 43&#xa0;%; median duration of response was 10.8&#xa0;months, and median progression-free survival was 6.7&#xa0;months. RECIST-defined progressive disease occurred in 72/114 participants (63&#xa0;%); 25/72 (35&#xa0;%) continued amivantamab after progression (4.2 median additional months; range, 1.0-12.5). The most common first sites of progression were the lungs/pleura (29&#xa0;%), followed by bone (21&#xa0;%), brain (15&#xa0;%), and lymph node (12&#xa0;%). Thirteen participants (11&#xa0;%) had intracranial-only first progression. Six of these 13 participants underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) while continuing amivantamab. The median duration of amivantamab treatment post-progression in these 6 participants was 4.0&#xa0;months (range, 2.3-6.0). SRS was well tolerated, with 2 adverse events reported (nausea and fatigue, n&#xa0;=&#xa0;1 each). CONCLUSIONS: Amivantamab monotherapy in post-platinum Ex20ins NSCLC demonstrated meaningful antitumor activity in participants, and intracranial-only progression was infrequent. Treatment of brain progression with SRS while continuing amivantamab appears feasible and tolerable.

Adult