Biomedical subjects

C A Berrevoets

Publications and source records attributed to C A Berrevoets.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1998

Glucocorticoid receptor expression in human bronchial epithelial cells: effects of smoking and COPD.

Previously, we found that inflammatory mediators modulated the number and binding affinity of glucocorticoid receptors (GR) in human bronchial epithelial cell lines. In this study we investigated whether smoking and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), both characterized by airway inflammation with increased levels of inflammatory mediators, affect GR characteristics in cultured human bronchial epithelial cells (HBEC). A statistically significant difference was found between the dissociation constant (Kd) values in HBEC from smoking (Kd = 0.98+/-0.08 nM; n = 6) and nonsmoking controls (Kd = 0.76+/-0.10 nM, P = 0.03; n = 5), but no significant difference was found between the mean number of binding sites. Our results are the first indication that cultured HBEC from smokers possess GR with a lower binding affinity. This may result from the inflammation found in the airways from smokers. Furthermore, these results provide further evidence that the bronchial epithelium may be an actual target for inhaled glucocorticoid therapy.

Aged↗

PubMed1998

Functional interactions of the AF-2 activation domain core region of the human androgen receptor with the amino-terminal domain and with the transcriptional coactivator TIF2 (transcriptional intermediary factor2).

Previous studies in yeast and mammalian cells showed a functional interaction between the amino-terminal domain and the carboxy-terminal, ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the human androgen receptor (AR). In the present study, the AR subdomains involved in this in vivo interaction were determined in more detail. Cotransfection experiments in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and two-hybrid experiments in yeast revealed that two regions in the NH2-terminal domain are involved in the functional interaction with the LBD: an interacting domain at the very NH2 terminus, located between amino acid residues 3 and 36, and a second domain, essential for transactivation, located between residues 370 and 494. Substitution of glutamic acid by glutamine at position 888 (E888Q) in the AF-2 activation domain (AD) core region in the LBD, markedly decreased the interaction with the NH2-terminal domain. This mutation neither influenced hormone binding nor LBD homodimerization, suggesting a role of the AF-2 AD core region in the functional interaction between the NH2-terminal domain and the LBD. The AF-2 AD core region was also involved in the interaction with the coactivator TIF2 (transcriptional intermediary factor 2), as the E888Q mutation decreased the stimulatory effect of TIF2 on AR AF-2 activity. Cotransfection of TIF2 and the AR NH2-terminal domain expression vectors did not result in synergy between both factors in the induction of AR AF-2 activity. TIF2 highly induced AR AF-2 activity on a complex promoter [mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)], but it was hardly active on a minimal promoter (GRE-TATA). In contrast, the AR NH2-terminal domain induced AR AF-2 activity on both promoter constructs. These data indicate that both the AR NH2-terminal domain and the coactivator TIF2 functionally interact, either directly or indirectly, with the AF-2 AD core region in the AR-LBD, but the level of transcriptional response induced by TIF2 depends on the promoter context.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Functional in vivo interaction between the amino-terminal, transactivation domain and the ligand binding domain of the androgen receptor.

The ligand binding domain (LBD) and the amino-terminal, transactivation domain (TAD) of the androgen receptor (AR) were separately linked to the GAL4 DNA binding domain (DBD) and to the GAL4(TAD). Resulting constructs were tested in the yeast two-hybrid system for protein-protein interactions. In the presence of androgen [methyltrienolone (R1881) or dihydrotestosterone (DHT)] a transcriptionally active complex was formed, reflecting an association between the AR(LBD) and the AR(TAD). No interactions were found in the presence of low-affinity ligands like estradiol (E2), promegestone (R5020), or progesterone (Pg). Use of the Thr-868-Ala mutated AR(LBD) in the assay resulted not only in a clear AR TAD-LBD interaction in the presence of R1881 and DHT but also in the presence of E2, Pg, and R5020, corresponding to the alteration in ligand specificity induced by the mutation. Coexpression of the fusion protein Gal4(DBD)AR(LBD) and the separate AR(TAD) also gave rise to the formation of a transcriptionally active complex. No interactions were found between two AR LBDs at the low-expression level of the two components. However, LBD-LBD interaction was detectable by application of a high-expression vector for GAL4(TAD)AR(LBD), albeit at high ligand concentrations. To substantiate the observation of the AR LBD-TAD interaction, CHO cells were cotransfected with expression plasmids for a truncated AR, which lacks the TAD [AR(DBD)(LBD)], and for the separate AR(TAD). This resulted in stimulation of a MMTV-LUC reporter gene in the presence of R1881 but not in the absence of hormone. This finding indicates that, like in the yeast system, in mammalian cells, TAD-LBD interactions are of importance for AR activation. In the mammalian system, a maximal AR TAD-LBD interaction was obtained at approximately 10-fold higher ligand concentrations than required for full-length AR activation. In the presence of low-affinity ligands, the AR TAD-LBD interaction as measured by transcriptional activation was considerably weaker than the activity of the full-length AR. From the present results a concept of hormone-dependent AR activation is proposed, which requires a functional, direct or indirect intramolecular interaction between the TAD and the LBD.

Animals↗

PubMed1995

Ligand-induced conformational alterations of the androgen receptor analyzed by limited trypsinization. Studies on the mechanism of antiandrogen action.

Limited proteolysis of in vitro produced human androgen receptor was used to probe the different conformations of the receptor after binding of androgens and several antiandrogens. The results provide evidence for five different conformations of the receptor, as detected by the formation of proteolysis resisting fragments: 1) an initial conformation of the unoccupied receptor not resisting proteolytic attack; and receptor conformations characterized by 2) a 35-kDa proteolysis resisting fragment spanning the ligand binding domain and part of the hinge region, obtained with most antagonists, and in an initial step after agonist binding; 3) a 29-kDa proteolysis resisting fragment spanning the ligand binding domain, obtained in the presence of agonists after an activation process; 4 and 5) 30- and 25-kDa fragments, derived from 2 and 3, but missing part of the C terminus, obtained with RU486 (RU486 has antiandrogenic properties, besides its effects as an antiprogestagen/antiglucocorticoid). Concomitantly with the change from 2 to 3 (and of 4 to 5 for RU486), dissociation of the 8 S complex of receptor with associated proteins occurred. With a mutant receptor (LNCaP cell mutation in C-terminal region), some antagonists activated transcription analogous to agonists, and induced the activated receptor conformation 3. A mutant lacking the C-terminal 12 amino acids bound RU486 but not androgens, and formed with RU486 conformation 5. These data imply that, after the initial rapid binding of ligand, androgens induce a conformational change of the receptor, a process that also involves release of associated proteins. RU486 induces an inappropriate conformation of the C-terminal end, similar as found for its effect on the progesterone receptor. In contrast, the other antiandrogens act at a different step in the mechanism of action: they do not induce an abnormal conformation, but act earlier and prevent a conformation change by stabilizing a complex with associated proteins.

Androgen Antagonists↗

PubMed1994

Studies on the human prostatic cancer cell line LNCaP.

The effects of androgens, antiandrogens, and other steroid hormones on growth of the human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP were studied. Despite the absence of receptors for progesterone and estradiol, the growth rate of the androgen responsive LNCaP-FGC cells increased when cultured in the presence of either estrogens or progestagens. In addition, most antiandrogens were also growth stimulators. This aberrant response was due to a threonine to alanine substitution at amino acid position 868 in the steroid binding domain of the androgen receptor (AR). Only the antiandrogen ICI 176,334 could block transcription and cell growth by the mutant receptor. By immunoprecipitation of the AR from LNCaP cells with the specific antibody F39.4.1 and Western blotting, three types of heat-shock proteins co-precipitated: hsp90, hsp70 and hsp56. This co-isolation could be prevented by pre-incubating the cells with androgens or with the antiandrogen hydroxyflutamide. Only the antiandrogen ICI 176,334 could block the effect of androgens on complex dissociation and prevent tight nuclear binding of the AR. Hydroxyflutamide could only inhibit tight nuclear binding of the wild-type AR. Therefore, in LNCaP cells the mutation in the steroid binding domain of the AR prevents a blockade of receptor function by most antiandrogens, but not by ICI 176,334, probably because of a different mechanism by which this compound blocks receptor function.

Androgen Antagonists↗

PubMed1993

Effects of antiandrogens on transformation and transcription activation of wild-type and mutated (LNCaP) androgen receptors.

LNCaP cells contain androgen receptors with a mutation in the steroid binding domain (Thr 868 changed to Ala) resulting in a changed hormone specificity. Both the wild-type and mutated androgen receptors were transfected into COS cells. Transcription activation was studied in cells co-transfected with an androgen sensitive reporter (CAT) gene. The wild-type androgen receptor was activated by the agonist R1881, but the antiandrogens did not enhance transcription apart from a partial agonistic effect at high concentrations of cyproterone acetate. The mutated androgen receptor was fully activated by R1881, cyproterone acetate and hydroxyflutamide, but not by ICI 176,334. Receptor transformation to a tight nuclear binding state was studied by preparation of detergent washed nuclei and Western blotting with a specific antibody against the androgen receptor. Nuclei of COS cells transfected with wild-type receptor retained the receptor when the cells had been treated with the agonist R1881, partially retained receptors when treated with antiandrogen cyproterone acetate, but did not retain receptor when treated with hydroxyflutamide or ICI 176,334. The cells transfected with the mutated receptor additionally retained nuclear receptors after treatment with hydroxyflutamide. We conclude that each one of the three antiandrogens tested displayed different characteristics with respect to its effect on transformation and transcription activation.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1992

Hormone-induced dissociation of the androgen receptor-heat-shock protein complex: use of a new monoclonal antibody to distinguish transformed from nontransformed receptors.

The hormone-induced transformation process of the androgen receptor in the androgen-responsive human prostatic carcinoma cell line LNCaP was studied. Immunoprecipitation of the nontransformed cytosolic receptor (8S on sucrose gradients) with a specific monoclonal antibody (F39.4.1) resulted in coprecipitation of three heat-shock proteins (hsp90, hsp70, and hsp56). Upon incubation of the cells with the synthetic androgen R1881, the sedimentation value of the receptor complex decreased to an intermediate form of 6S, and an almost complete loss of coprecipitating heat-shock proteins was observed. After a 2-h incubation, the receptor was recovered in considerable part from the nuclear fraction (extraction with high salt; 4.6S form). By use of the bifunctional cross-linker dimethyl pimelimidate, dissociation of the 8S complex, but not of the 6S complex, was blocked. A newly developed monoclonal antibody (F52.24.4), directed against the C-terminal part of the DNA-binding domain of the androgen receptor, specifically recognized both the 4.6S and the 6S forms of the receptor but did not react with the nontransformed 8S form. It is concluded that the unoccupied androgen receptor is associated with several heat-shock proteins and that transformation of the receptor to the tight nuclear-binding form is a multistep process that involves the dissociation of heat-shock proteins from the receptor.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1992

Anti-androgens and the mutated androgen receptor of LNCaP cells: differential effects on binding affinity, heat-shock protein interaction, and transcription activation.

Previous studies from this laboratory have described that LNCaP prostate tumor cells contain an androgen receptor (AR) with a point mutation in the steroid-binding domain (codon 868, Thr to Ala). This defect leads to a change in specificity of the AR. Estrogens, progestagens, and some anti-androgens (e.g., cyproterone acetate, hydroxyflutamide, nilutamide) stimulate LNCaP cell growth rate through the AR. The present studies indicate that not all anti-androgens showed agonistic effects with the mutated receptor. The growth rate of LNCaP cells did not increase with the anti-androgen ICI 176334, nor could this compound increase transcription activation of the reporter gene construct via the mutant receptor in a cotransfection system [HeLa cell cotransfection system with an androgen-regulated reporter gene construct (pG29G-tk-CAT) and the mutant receptor as trans-vector]. Interaction of the AR of LNCaP cells with heat-shock proteins was studied by isolation of the receptor with a specific monoclonal antibody and characterization of associated proteins. Hsp90, hsp70, and hsp56 were found to coprecipitate with the AR. Incubation of the cells at 37 degrees C with androgen (R1881, 10 nM) or the anti-androgen hydroxyflutamide, prior to receptor isolation, resulted in dissociation of the AR-heat-shock protein complex. This dissociation is paralleled by the transformation to a tight nuclear-binding form of the AR. In contrast, ICI 176334 could not induce a release of heat-shock proteins and did not increase nuclear binding, but inhibited the transformation process induced by R1881.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Androgen Antagonists↗

PubMed1992

The androgen receptor in LNCaP cells contains a mutation in the ligand binding domain which affects steroid binding characteristics and response to antiandrogens.

The human prostate tumor cell line LNCaP contains an abnormal androgen receptor system with broad steroid binding specificity. Progestagens, estradiol and several antiandrogens compete with androgens for binding to the androgen receptor in the cells to a higher extent than in other androgen sensitive systems. Optimal growth of LNCaP cells is observed after addition of the synthetic androgen R1881 (0.1 nM). In addition, estrogens, progestagens and several antiandrogens do not inhibit androgen responsive growth, but have striking growth stimulatory effects and increase EGF receptor level and acid phosphatase secretion. We have found that the androgen receptor in the LNCaP cells contains a single point mutation changing the sense of codon 868 (Thr to Ala) in the ligand binding domain. Expression vectors containing the normal or mutated androgen receptor sequence were transfected into COS or HeLa cells. Androgens, progestagens, estrogens and several antiandrogens bind the mutated androgen receptor protein and activate the expression of an androgen-regulated reporter gene (GRE-tk-CAT), indicating that the mutation directly affects both binding specificity and the induction of gene expression. Interestingly, the antiandrogen casodex showed antiandrogenic properties in growth studies of LNCaP cells and did not induce reporter gene activity in Hela cells transfected with the mutant receptor. The mutated androgen receptor of LNCaP cells is therefore a useful tool in the elucidation of different levels of action of steroids and antisteroids.

Binding Sites↗

PubMed1991

Hormone-dependent androgen receptor phosphorylation is accompanied by receptor transformation in human lymph node carcinoma of the prostate cells.

Phosphorylation of the androgen receptor was investigated in the absence of hormone as well as during and after transformation of the receptor to the tight nuclear binding form. Human prostate tumor cells (LNCaP) were labeled for 4 h with [32P]orthophosphate in the presence or absence of steroid. Subsequently, androgen receptors were immunoprecipitated either from total cell lysates or from nuclear extracts using a specific monoclonal antibody. The immunoprecipitated receptor preparations were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, Western blotting, using a polyclonal antiserum, and autoradiography. It was observed that the androgen receptor is already phosphorylated in the absence of hormone, but undergoes a hormone-induced additional phosphorylation. After administration of 10 nM R1881, a 1.8-fold increase in phosphorylation over nonstimulated control cells was reached. Moreover, the amount of nuclear extractable androgen receptor was increased; the acquisition of tight nuclear binding capacity was accompanied by hormone-induced receptor phosphorylation.

Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel↗

PubMed1991

Epitope prediction and confirmation for the human androgen receptor: generation of monoclonal antibodies for multi-assay performance following the synthetic peptide strategy.

The human androgen receptor (hAR) is an important regulatory protein particularly in male sexual differentiation. The investigation of hAR functionality has been hampered by the lack of AR specific monoclonal antibodies recognizing the functional domains of the receptor. Therefore production of high affinity mono-specific polyclonal (PAbs) and monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed to the hAR was initiated following the synthetic peptide (SP) strategy. Five hAR specific peptides were selected on the basis of their predicted antigenic properties avoiding homology with other steroid hormone receptors. Peptide specific polyclonal antisera were obtained following selected immunization protocols. Mono-specific polyclonal antibody responses were elicited to all peptides in mice and rabbits. Crossreactivity of the peptide specific antisera with the native hAR in various biochemical assays was observed with two out of five peptides. Peptide SP61 (hAR residues 301-320) was used for the generation site-directed MAbs specific for the hAR. Specificity for the hAR was established by immunoprecipitation, immune-complex density gradient centrifugation and immunohistochemistry on human prostate tissue sections. The multi-assay performance of the selected high affinity antibodies proved the usefulness of the straight forward peptide approach and opens a wide field of possible biochemical and physiological investigations into questions related to androgen action.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1990

A candidate reference method for coupled sodium-water determination in human serum.

A candidate reference method is described for coupled sodium-water determination based on ion-exchange sodium separation from the serum matrix followed by gravimetry as Na2SO4, and serum water determination by means of microwave evaporation. For sera with normal sodium and water contents, the mean relative standard deviation is 0.6% (0.8 mmol/l). Mean inaccuracy for the coupled sodium-water determination is -0.3% (0.4 mmol/l). The candidate reference method can be considered a reference method because the reference method value did not differ significantly from the definitive value, there is no known source for interferences or bias, and misinterpretation due to abnormal protein or lipid levels is excluded because serum sodium is determined on a plasma water basis. Sodium concentrations determined by the candidate reference method are used for comparing field methods with the candidate reference method. If the resulting regression equation is used in the calibration procedure, good correlation between all (in)direct field methods and the candidate reference method is ensured, and accurate results are produced. Results of proficiency testing show a good correlation between (in)direct field methods and the candidate reference method, because sera with approximately normal water contents are used.

Chemistry Techniques, Analytical↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Mechanisms of androgen receptor activation and function.

Androgens play a crucial role in several stages of male development and in the maintenance of the male phenotype. Androgens act in their target cells via an interaction with the androgen receptor, resulting in direct regulation of gene expression. The androgen receptor is a phosphoprotein and modulation of the phosphorylation status of the receptor influences ligand-binding and consequently transcription activation of androgen responsive genes. Androgen binding induces a conformational change in the ligand-binding domain, accompanied by additional receptor phosphorylation. Subsequently the liganded androgen receptor interacts with specific androgen response elements in the regulatory regions of androgen target genes, resulting in stimulation of gene expression. Anti-androgens induce a different conformational change of the ligand-binding domain, which does not or only partially result in stimulation of transactivation. Interestingly, different anti-androgens can induce different inactive conformations of the androgen receptor ligand-binding domain. Recent evidence strongly supports a ligand dependent functional interaction between the ligand-binding domain and the NH2-terminal transactivating domain of the androgen receptor. Two regions in the NH2-terminal domain are involved in this interaction, whereas in the ligand-binding domain the AF-2 AD core region is involved.

Androgens↗