PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C A Camargo

Publications and source records attributed to C A Camargo.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Tiotropium for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of tiotropium, a long acting anticholinergic drug, on clinical events, symptom scales, pulmonary function, and adverse events in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: A systematic search was made of the Cochrane trials database, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and a hand search of 20 respiratory journals. Missing data were obtained from authors and the manufacturer. Randomised controlled trials of > or =12 weeks' duration comparing tiotropium with placebo, ipratropium bromide, or long acting beta2 agonists (LABA) were reviewed. Studies were pooled to yield odds ratios (OR) or weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Nine trials (8002 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Tiotropium reduced the odds of a COPD exacerbation (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.81) and related hospitalisation (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.84) but not pulmonary (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.19 to 1.29) or all-cause (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.47) mortality compared with placebo and ipratropium. Reductions in exacerbations and hospitalisations compared with LABA were not statistically significant. Similar patterns were evident for quality of life and symptom scales. Tiotropium yielded greater increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) from baseline to 6-12 months than did placebo, ipratropium, and LABA. Decline in FEV1 over 1 year was 30 ml (95% CI 7 to 53) slower with tiotropium than with placebo and ipratropium (data were not available for LABA). Reports of dry mouth and urinary tract infections were increased with tiotropium. CONCLUSIONS: Tiotropium reduced COPD exacerbations and related hospitalisations, improved quality of life and symptoms, and may have slowed the decline in FEV1. Long term trials are warranted to evaluate the effects of tiotropium on decline in FEV1 and to clarify its role compared with LABA.

Acute Disease↗

Association between leptin and asthma in adults.

BACKGROUND: Leptin, a pro-inflammatory cytokine produced by adipose tissue, has previously been shown to be associated with asthma in children. We hypothesised that high serum leptin concentrations would also be associated with asthma in adults. METHODS: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey is a cross sectional study that included fasting serum leptin concentrations and self-report of doctor diagnosed asthma. Data were analysed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 5876 participants, those with current asthma had a higher mean unadjusted leptin concentration than those who had never had asthma (geometric mean (SE) 9.2 (0.6) microg/l v 7.6 (0.2) microg/l; p = 0.02). After adjustment for triceps skinfold thickness and other covariates, the association between leptin and asthma appeared stronger in women than in men, and in premenopausal women than in postmenopausal women. Body mass index (BMI) was also associated with current asthma in women, but this association was not significantly affected by adjustment for leptin concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large population based study support the hypothesis that leptin is associated with asthma in women. In addition, while BMI also is related to asthma in women, this study does not support the suggestion that leptin contributes significantly to this association.

Adult↗

Boys with high body masses have an increased risk of developing asthma: findings from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relation between body mass index and the development of asthma in children. DESIGN: Prospective study of 4393 asthma-free children followed for up to 14 years. SETTING: Children of participants in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. METHODS: Analysis was limited to children who were followed from birth and were asthma-free during the first 24 months of life. The outcome was the development of asthma during follow-up (incident asthma). Body mass index (BMI) was our main predictor of interest. Survival analyses, using time to development of asthma as the main endpoint, were stratified by sex and controlled for race/ethnicity, poverty status, and prenatal maternal smoking. RESULTS: Asthma developed in 218 (5.0 %) children during the follow-up period. The relation between BMI and incident asthma varied by sex. A BMI > or =85th percentile at age 2-3 years was a risk factor for subsequent asthma development in boys (hazard ratio (HR) 1.6 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1, 2.4) but not girls (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.5, 1.4). Similarly, boys with BMIs always > or =85th percentile were at increased risk for subsequent asthma development (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4, 4.4) but not girls (HR 1.5, 95% CI 0.7, 2.9). CONCLUSION: Boys with high body masses may be at an increased risk for developing asthma.

Asthma↗

Headache in United States emergency departments: demographics, work-up and frequency of pathological diagnoses.

Headache is a common complaint in the emergency department (ED). In order to examine headache work-ups and diagnoses across the USA, we queried a representative sample of adult ED visits (the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey) for the years 1992-2001. Headache accounted for 2.1 million ED visits per year (2.2% of visits). Of the 14% of patients who underwent neuroimaging, 5.5% received a pathological diagnosis. Of the 2% of patients who underwent lumbar puncture, 11% received a pathological diagnosis. On multivariable analysis, a decreased rate of imaging was noted for patients without private insurance [odds ratio (OR) 0.61, confidence interval (CI) 0.44, 0.86] and for those presenting off-hours (OR 0.55, CI 0.39, 0.77). Patients over 50 were more likely to receive a pathological diagnosis (OR 3.3, CI 1.2, 9.3). In conclusion, clinicians should ensure that appropriate work-ups are performed regardless of presentation time or insurance status, and be vigilant in the evaluation of older patients.

Adolescent↗

Inhaled tiotropium for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Tiotropium is a new anticholinergic therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that differs from ipratropium by its functional relative selectivity for muscarinic receptor subtypes and which allows once-per-day dosing. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of tiotropium on clinical endpoints such exacerbations and hospitalisations, symptom scales and pulmonary function compared to placebo and other bronchodilators used for stable COPD. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from the Cochrane Airways Review Group Specialised Register, a compilation of systematic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL, and hand searching of 20 respiratory journals. Bibliographies from included studies and reviews were searched. The date of the last search was October 2004. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials comparing tiotropium with placebo, ipratropium bromide, or long-acting ss2-agonists for greater than, or equal to, one month's duration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data. Missing data were obtained from authors or the manufacturer of tiotropium. The data were analysed using the Cochrane Review Manager RevMan 4.2. Studies were pooled to yield weighted mean differences (WMD) or odds ratios (OR) and reported using 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN RESULTS: From 69 identified references, nine RCTs (6,584 patients) met inclusion criteria. Tiotropium reduced the odds of a COPD exacerbation (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.83) and related hospitalisations (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.82) compared to placebo or ipratropium. When applied to an annual baseline risk of 45% for exacerbations and 10% for hospitalisation, the number of patients needed to treat with tiotropium for one year were 14 (95% CI 11 to 22) to prevent one exacerbation and 30 (95% CI 22 to 61) to prevent one hospitalisation compared to placebo and ipratropium. Reductions in these endpoints compared to long-acting ss2-agonists were not statistically significant. Similar patterns were evident for quality-of-life and symptom scales. Increases in FEV1 and FVC from baseline were significantly larger with tiotropium than with placebo, ipratropium and long-acting ss2-agonists over 6 to 12 months. The decline in trough FEV1 from steady state was 30 ml (95% CI 7 to 53 ml) less with tiotropium than with placebo or ipratropium over one year; no data on decline in FEV1 from steady state were available for long-acting ss2-agonists. Dry mouth was increased by tiotropium. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Tiotropium reduced COPD exacerbations and related hospitalisations compared to placebo and ipratropium. It also improved health-related quality-of-life and symptom scores among patients with moderate and severe disease, and may have slowed decline in FEV1. Additional long-term studies are required to evaluate its effect on mortality and change in FEV1 to clarify its role in comparison to, or in combination with, long-acting ss2-agonists and to assess its effectiveness in mild and very severe COPD.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Results of 132 hepatectomies for living donor liver transplantation: report of one death.

AIMS: Liver transplant is the primary therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease. Its high success rates have lead to a broadening of the indications for liver transplantation, resulting in an increasing shortage of donors. Living donor liver transplantation has become an option to overcome waiting list mortality. We describe our experience with hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation and report a case of death. METHODS: Patients (n = 132) underwent hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation from June 2000 through June 2004. A 4-phase preoperative evaluation was performed on all patients, whose ages ranged from 13 to 54 years (mean = 29.7 +/- 8.1 years). Of the 132 patients, 76 patients (57.5%) underwent left lateral segmentectomy, 33 patients (25%) underwent left lobectomy, and 23 patients (16%) underwent right hepatectomy. In 2 other patients (1.5%), a monosegment (segment II) was obtained after left lateral segmentectomy. RESULTS: Twenty patients (15%) experienced a complication, the most common being incisional hernia, pneumonia, and biliary fistulae. On the seventh postoperative day, 1 patient developed a fatal cerebral hemorrhage while recovering from mild liver dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Although living donor liver transplantation is generally safe, serious and fatal complications may occur.

Adolescent↗

Polymorphisms in the interleukin 17F gene (IL17F) and asthma.

Interleukin17F (IL17F) is a regulatory cytokine for T-cell-mediated immune responses. The gene coding for IL17F (IL17F) is located on chromosome 6p, a genomic region linked to asthma and asthma-related phenotypes in multiple genome scans. IL17F is expressed in lung tissue, in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from asthmatic subjects, and in activated CD4+ cells. We were thus interested in testing for association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and haplotypes in IL17F and asthma. To characterize polymorphisms in IL17F, we sequenced this gene in a group of African Americans and a group of European Americans. A total of 50 SNPs (30 not previously reported in a public database (dbSNP build 118)) and two insertions/deletions were detected in IL17F; five of these polymorphisms were genotyped in participants of the Nurses' Health Study. We then tested for association between SNPs and haplotypes in IL17F and physician-diagnosed asthma in subjects with (cases) and without (control subjects) physician-diagnosed asthma. None of the SNPs or haplotypes tested in IL17F were associated with asthma. The polymorphisms identified in this study may be used in future studies of association between IL17F and phenotypes related to immune responses.

Black or African American↗

Relation between phase of the menstrual cycle and asthma presentations in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: The phase of the menstrual cycle is thought to influence the course of asthma in women. One recent study reported a large increase in exacerbations during the perimenstrual phase, while another found a preovulatory increase. A study was undertaken to determine the relation between phase of the menstrual cycle and acute asthma in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: All women aged 18-54 years presenting with a diagnosis of acute asthma exacerbation were considered for enrollment in the study. Women who were pregnant, postmenopausal, following hysterectomy, with a >28 day menstrual cycle or incomplete reproductive history were excluded. The 792 eligible women were classified by menstrual phase based on both date of symptom onset and date of ED visit. RESULTS: When classified by date of symptom onset, 28% were preovulatory (days 5 to 11), 25% were periovulatory (days 12 to 18), 21% were postovulatory (days 19 to 25), and 27% were perimenstrual (days 26 to 4; p = 0.03). When classified by date of ED visit, 28% were preovulatory, 22% were periovulatory, 22% were postovulatory, and 27% were perimenstrual (p = 0.004). Using either approach, there were no significant differences in demographic factors or in asthma severity of women in the various menstrual phase groups. CONCLUSION: Acute asthma exacerbations do not markedly increase during the perimenstrual phase. The results support the suggestion that both preovulatory and perimenstrual phases are actual triggers of asthma exacerbation in some women, or that these two phases serve as "co-factors" that worsen other recognised triggers of acute asthma.

Acute Disease↗

Corticosteroid therapy for acute asthma.

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease, which is characterised by reversible airflow obstruction in response to a variety of stimuli. Exacerbations in response to airway irritants are part of the natural history of asthma, but often they also represent a failure in chronic treatment. Presentations to emergency departments and other acute care settings are common and frequently lead to hospitalisation and other complications. After treatment, however, most patients are discharged to the care of their primary care physician for further management. This review highlights the role of systemic and inhaled corticosteroids as mainstays of treatment in the acute and sub-acute phase of an exacerbation. These agents form the basis of most current clinical practice guidelines, yet their use is not universal. We will review the evidence for the use of these agents that arises from the Cochrane Collaboration of Systematic Reviews contained in the Cochrane Library.

Acute Disease↗

Results of 60 consecutive hepatectomies for pediatric living donor liver transplantation.

Several technical improvements have been made to increase donor pool for pediatric liver transplantation, including reduced-size grafts, split-liver, and recently living donors. The objective of the present study is to report our single-center experience with 60 hepatectomies for living donor liver transplantation in pediatric recipients between June 2000 and December 2002. Donor workup consisted of a complete history and physical examination followed by laboratory test and liver function tests. Graft size was estimated using computed tomography scan or abdominal ultrasound. Liver biopsy was performed in all donors. Arteriogram was performed to evaluate hepatic arterial anatomy. All donors survived the procedure. Only seven patients experienced complications (10.2%), most of which were short term. We conclude that liver living donation for pediatric population is a safe procedure.

Adolescent↗

Continuous versus intermittent beta-agonists in the treatment of acute asthma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute asthma treated in the emergency department are frequently treated with intermittent inhaled beta-agonists delivered by nebulisation. The use of continuous beta-agonist (CBA) via nebulisation in the emergency setting may offer additional benefits in acute asthma. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy (e.g., reductions in admission, improvement in pulmonary functions) and risks (e.g., adverse events, effects on vital signs) of continuous versus intermittent inhaled beta-agonists for the treatment of patients with acute asthma managed in the emergency department. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Airways Review Group "Asthma and WHEEZ*" Register which is a compilation of systematic searches of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL and hand searching of 20 respiratory journals. In addition, primary authors and content experts were contacted to identify eligible studies. Bibliographies from included studies, known reviews and texts were also searched. The search is considered updated to June 2003. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion. Studies were included if patients presented with acute asthma and were treated with either continuous or intermittent inhaled beta-agonists early in the ED treatment. "Continuous" nebulisation was defined as truly continuous aerosol delivery of beta-agonist medication (e.g., using a commercially available large-volume nebuliser, or a small-volume nebuliser with infusion pump) or sufficiently frequent nebulisations that medication delivery was effectively continuous (i.e., 1 nebulisation every 15 minutes or > 4 nebulisations per hour). Studies also needed to report either pulmonary function or admission results. Two reviewers independently selected potentially relevant articles and two additional reviewers independently selected articles for inclusion. Methodological quality was independently assessed by two reviewers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by two reviewers if the authors were unable to verify the validity of information. Missing data were obtained from authors or calculated from other data presented in the paper. The data were analysed using the Cochrane Review Manager (Version 4.1). Relative risks (RR), weighted mean differences (WMD) and standardized mean differences (SMD) are reported with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI); both peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV-1) data are reported. MAIN RESULTS: 165 trials were reviewed and eight were included; a total of 461 patients have been studied (229 with CBA; 232 with intermittent beta-agonists). Overall, admission to hospital was reduced with CBA compared to intermittent beta-agonists (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.5 to 0.9); patients with severe airway obstruction at presentation appeared to benefit most from this intervention (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.5 to 0.9). Patients receiving CBA demonstrated small but statistically significant improvements in pulmonary function tests when all studies were pooled. Patients receiving CBA had greater improvements in % predicted FEV-1 (SMD: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.5) and PEFR (SMD: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.5); this effect was observed by 2-3 hours. Continuous treatment was generally well tolerated, with no clinically important differences observed in pulse rate (WMD: -2.87; 95% CI: -6.0 to 0.3) or blood pressure (WMD: -1.75; 95% CI: -5.6 to 2.1) between the treatment groups. Tremor was equally common in both groups (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.5 to 1.3) and potassium concentration was unchanged (WMD: 0.02; 95% CI: -0.2 to 0.2). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence supports the use of CBA in patients with severe acute asthma who present to the emergency department to increase their pulmonary functions and reduce hospitalisation. Moreover, CBA treatment appears to be safe and well tolerated in patients who receive it.

Acute Disease↗

Body mass index and asthma among Mexican adults: the effect of using self-reported vs measured weight and height.

Several recent studies have demonstrated a positive association between obesity and asthma among women but not men. The present study examines the effect of misclassification of body mass index (BMI) in the association between obesity and asthma by gender. This cross-sectional analysis included a total sample of 961 Mexican adults. Use of measured BMI revealed that obesity (BMI >30 kg/m(2)) was a risk factor for asthma diagnosis in both men (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1-5.9) and women (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.5-3.8). In contrast, use of self-reported BMI showed that only women (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7) and not men (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.6-2.9) were at increased risk of asthma diagnosis. Use of self-reported BMI substantially underestimated the prevalence of obesity; this bias was not related to asthma per se but was mainly due to obesity. Therefore, misclassification of BMI obscured the relationship between obesity and asthma to a greater extent among men than among women since obesity prevalence in the general population was higher among men. Measurement bias merits greater attention in future research on obesity and asthma.

Adult↗

Risk of overweight among adolescents who were breastfed as infants.

CONTEXT: Overweight during adolescence predicts short- and long-term morbidity as well as obesity in adulthood. The prevalence of overweight among adolescents is high and continues to increase. Physiological and behavioral mechanisms and preliminary epidemiologic data suggest that breastfeeding could lower the risk of subsequent obesity in adolescence. OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which overweight status among adolescents is associated with the type of infant feeding (breast milk vs infant formula) and duration of breastfeeding. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: Survey of 8186 girls and 7155 boys, aged 9 to 14 years, who are participants in the Growing Up Today Study, a nationwide cohort study of diet, activity, and growth. In the fall of 1996 we mailed a questionnaire to each of the subjects, and in the spring of 1997, we mailed a supplemental questionnaire to their mothers, who are participants in the Nurses' Health Study II. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Overweight status defined as body mass index exceeding the 95th percentile for age and sex from US national data. RESULTS: In the first 6 months of life, 9553 subjects (62%) were only or mostly fed breast milk, and 4744 (31%) were only or mostly fed infant formula. A total of 7186 subjects (48%) were breastfed for at least 7 months while 4613 (31%) were breastfed for 3 months or less. At ages 9 to 14 years, 404 girls (5%) and 635 boys (9%) were overweight. Among subjects who had been only or mostly fed breast milk, compared with those only or mostly fed formula, the odds ratio (OR) for being overweight was 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.91), after adjustment for age, sex, sexual maturity, energy intake, time watching television, physical activity, mother's body mass index, and other variables reflecting social, economic, and lifestyle factors. Compared with subjects who had been breastfed for 3 months or less, those who had been breastfed for at least 7 months had an adjusted OR for being overweight of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.67-0.96). Timing of introduction of solid foods, infant formula, or cow's milk was not related to risk of being overweight. CONCLUSION: Infants who were fed breast milk more than infant formula, or who were breastfed for longer periods, had a lower risk of being overweight during older childhood and adolescence.

Adolescent↗

Methyl-xanthines for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines currently recommend the use of methyl-xanthines for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for patients who have incomplete responses to bronchodilators. However, available clinical trials are small and underpowered to evaluate the benefits and risks of methyl-xanthines in this acute setting. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefit of methyl-xanthines compared to standard care for COPD exacerbations. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from the Cochrane Airways Review Group COPD Register which is a compilation of systematic searches of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL and hand searching of 20 respiratory journals. In addition, primary authors and content experts were contacted to identify eligible studies. Bibliographies from included studies, known reviews and texts were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only RCTs were eligible for inclusion. Studies were included if patients presented with acute COPD exacerbations and were treated with either methyl-xanthines (oral or intravenous) or placebo (with or without standard care) early in the acute treatment. Studies also needed to report either pulmonary function or admission results. Two reviewers independently selected potentially relevant articles and selected articles for inclusion. Methodological quality was independently assessed by two reviewers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by two reviewers if the authors were unable to verify the validity of information. Missing data were obtained from authors or calculated from other data presented in the paper. The data were analysed using the Cochrane Review Manager 4.0.4 Studies were pooled to yield weighted mean differences (WMD) or odds ratios (OR) and reported using 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). MAIN RESULTS: From 28 identified references, 4 RCTs met inclusion criteria (172 patients). Mean change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at 2 hours was similar in methyl-xanthine and placebo groups (FEV1 WMD: -8 ml; 95% CI: -85 to 69 ml). The only study to report hospitalization rates showed a non-significant reduction with methyl-xanthines (OR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1 to 1.8) among 39 patients. Patients receiving methyl-xanthines had similar improvements in symptom scores, but reported more gastrointestinal side effects (OR: 5.3; 95% CI: 1.3 to 21.0) than patients receiving placebo. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to support the routine use of methyl-xanthines for COPD exacerbations. Methyl-xanthines do not appreciably improve FEV1 during COPD exacerbations and cause adverse effects; evidence of their effect on admissions is limited.

Aminophylline↗

Intravenous beta2-agonists for acute asthma in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled beta-agonist therapy is central to the management of acute asthma. The use of intravenous beta-agonist agents may also be beneficial in this setting. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefit of intravenous (IV) beta2-agonists for severe acute asthma treated in the emergency department. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials (RCT) were identified using the Cochrane Airways Group Register which is a compilation of systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL as well as hand searching of 20 respiratory journals. Bibliographies from included studies and known reviews were also searched. Primary authors and content experts were contacted to identify eligible studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only RCTs were considered for inclusion. Studies were included if patients presented to the emergency department with acute asthma and were treated with IV selective or nonselective beta2-agonists versus placebo, inhaled beta2-agonists, or other standard of care. Pulmonary function, vital signs, arterial gasses, adverse effects, and/or clinical success could be reported as outcome measures. Two reviewers independently selected potentially relevant articles and selected articles for inclusion. Methodological quality was independently assessed using two scoring systems and two reviewers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by two reviewers, and confirmed with corresponding authors. Missing data were obtained from authors or calculated from data present in the papers. Trials were combined using a random effects model for odds ratios (OR) or weighted mean differences (WMD) and reported with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). MAIN RESULTS: From 746 identified references, 55 potentially relevant articles were identified and 15 were included. The trials included 584 patients. Overall, selective IV beta2-agonist use conferred no advantage over the comparator regimes. For example, it was associated with a lower PEFR after 60 mins compared to inhaled beta2-agonist, although the difference was not statistically significant (-24.7 l/min; 95%CI 2.9, -52.3). There was no difference in heart rate (4.5 bpm; 95% CI -4.9, 14.0). In the well performed blinded studies there was no difference in autonomic side effects between treatments (Odds Ratio 2.2 (95%CI 0.9, 5.7). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to support the use of IV beta2-agonists in patients with severe acute asthma. These drugs should be given by inhalation. No subgroups were identified in which the IV route should be considered.

Acute Disease↗

Risk factors for lack of asthma self-management knowledge among ED patients not on inhaled steroids.

The study objective was to estimate the level of asthma knowledge and self-management skills among asthmatic patients who are not on inhaled corticosteroids and who present with acute asthma to the emergency department (ED). The design was to interview of patients by telephone at 90 to 100 days after enrollment in the Fourth Multicenter Airways Research Collaboration (MARC-4), a randomized trial comparing inhaled fluticasone versus placebo in addition to standard post-ED therapy. The setting was a multicenter trial involving 41 US urban EDs. Persons aged 12 to 54, not on inhaled steroids, who presented to the ED with acute asthma were studied. Of the 617 patients enrolled on MARC-4 405 (66%) were contacted. Mean (+/-SD) age was 30 (+/-11); 54% were women; acute asthma severity was 44% moderate and 56% severe; and 9% had prior intubation. Twenty percent (95% CI 16%-24%) responded that asthma could not be monitored and 40% (95% CI 35%-44%) scored low on a hypothetical acute asthma attack scenario. Predictors for lack of asthma knowledge and self-management skills were: less than a high school education; current smoking; lower median household income; and no history of steroid use. These data suggest that many ED patients with asthma have poor knowledge of asthma monitoring and poor self-management skills and that a "high risk" group is also identifiable. Efforts to design and implement an ED-based educational program should be tailored to better meet the needs of this high risk group.

Acute Disease↗

Differences between men and women in reporting of symptoms during an asthma exacerbation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Compared with men, women presenting to the emergency department with acute asthma are more likely to be admitted and to have a longer hospital stay. This study compares peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) with reported symptom severity between men and women with acute asthma. The null hypothesis was that men and women report similar severity symptoms for similar levels of airway obstruction. METHODS: This study combined data from 4 prospective cohort studies performed from 1996 to 1998 as part of the Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration. Using a standardized protocol, investigators at 64 EDs in 21 US states and 4 Canadian provinces provided 24-hour per day coverage for a median of 2 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 1,291 patients with moderate to severe exacerbations (initial percentage of predicted PEFR <80%), 62% were women. Women were more likely than men to report "severe" complaints in terms of symptom frequency, symptom intensity, and resulting activity limitations (all P <.05). Women with moderate exacerbations were especially likely to describe their exacerbation as causing "severe" activity limitations (sex-PEFR interaction, P =.05). CONCLUSION: Men are less likely than women to report severe asthma symptoms and activity limitations in the presence of airway obstruction. This finding supports use of objective measures of airway obstruction when managing patients with asthma so that those whose symptoms do not reflect the severity of their obstruction can be recognized and properly treated. It also reconfirms the need for increased research on differences between men and women in acute asthma.

Adult↗

Prospective multicenter study of relapse after treatment for acute asthma among children presenting to the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: Single-center studies have reported varying relapse rates after treatment of patients with acute asthma. We determined the relapse rate after emergency department (ED) treatment in a cohort of children. DESIGN: This was a prospective inception cohort study performed during 1997-1998. SETTING: The study was performed in 44 EDs including both general and pediatric centers. PATIENTS: Children (n = 1184) aged 2 to 17 years who had been admitted to EDs, with acute asthma restricted to 881 patients discharged from the ED. MAIN RESULTS: Two weeks after discharge, families were telephoned to determine relapse. Follow-up data were available for 762 (86%) of the children with a 10% incidence of relapse. On univariate analysis several factors were associated with relapse including current medications and markers of asthma severity. On multivariate analysis the factors associated with relapse were age (OR 1.4 per 5-year increase), use of second-line asthma medications (OR 3.7), exposure to cigarette smoke (OR 0.5), and ED visits within the past year (OR 1.2 per 5 ED visits). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of relapse among children is lower than that observed among adults and varies with age. Other risk factors such as frequent ED visits are likely markers of chronic asthma severity. Further research should focus on ways to decrease the relapse rate among patients at high risk.

Asthma↗