Biomedical subjects

C A Farquharson

Publications and source records attributed to C A Farquharson.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Adverse cardiac effects of salt with fludrocortisone in hypertension.

The effect of salt on blood pressure (BP) is controversial. A more important question is whether salt can produce cardiac target-organ damage, irrespective of its effect on BP. We assessed the effect of salt with fludrocortisone on QT dispersion and echocardiographic left ventricular diastolic function in a prospective interventional study involving 29 hypertensive subjects with a raised aldosterone/renin ratio who were hospitalized for investigation of possible primary aldosteronism. Each subject over 4 days was given a total of 28.8 g (480 mmol) of sodium chloride and 1.5 mg of fludrocortisone with potassium supplementation. Baseline and posttreatment 12-lead ECGs and echocardiograms were obtained. There were no significant changes in body weight, pulse rate, or BP after treatment with salt and fludrocortisone. Plasma sodium was significantly increased from 141.4 (SD 2.1) to 142.6 (SD 2.4) mmol/L (P:=0.001). QT and QTc dispersion both significantly increased: +19.6 (SD 16.5) ms (95% CI, 13.4 to 25.9) (P:<0.001) and +19.8 (SD 20.9) ms (95% CI, 11.8 to 27.7) (P:<0.001), respectively. There were no significant changes in (n=15) left ventricular dimensions or systolic function, but all diastolic filling indexes, including the preload-independent index, flow propagation velocity (55.49 [SD 10.91] to 48.96 [SD 11.40] cm/s, P:=0.018) worsened, suggesting significant deterioration of left ventricular diastolic function with salt and fludrocortisone. In conclusion, a combination of salt with fludrocortisone increased QT dispersion and impaired left ventricular diastolic relaxation in hypertensive patients with high aldosterone/renin ratios. This raises the possibility that salt may have BP-independent adverse cardiac effects in susceptible hypertensive subjects.

Aldosterone↗

PubMed2000

Spironolactone increases nitric oxide bioactivity, improves endothelial vasodilator dysfunction, and suppresses vascular angiotensin I/angiotensin II conversion in patients with chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The RALES study showed that spironolactone, added to conventional therapy for chronic heart failure, dramatically reduced mortality. We tested the hypothesis that this benefit was partially due to improvement in endothelial function and/or to amplified suppression of the vascular renin-angiotensin axis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study on 10 patients with NYHA class II to III chronic heart failure on standard diuretic/ACE inhibitor therapy, comparing 50 mg/d spironolactone (1 month) versus placebo. Forearm vasculature endothelial function was assessed by bilateral forearm venous occlusion plethysmography using acetylcholine and N-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), with sodium nitroprusside as a control vasodilator. Also, vascular ACE activity was assessed by use of angiotensin (Ang) I, with Ang II as a control vasoconstrictor. Spironolactone significantly increased the forearm blood flow response to acetylcholine (percentage change in forearm blood flow [mean+/-SEM], 177+/-29% versus 95+/-20%, spironolactone versus placebo; P<0.001), with an associated increase in vasoconstriction due to L-NMMA (-35+/-6% versus -18+/-4%; P<0.05). The Ang I response was also significantly reduced with spironolactone (P<0.05), with Ang II responses unaltered. CONCLUSIONS: Spironolactone improves endothelial dysfunction, increases NO bioactivity, and inhibits vascular Ang I/Ang II conversion in patients with heart failure, providing novel mechanisms for its beneficial effect on cardiovascular mortality.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Angiotensin II receptor blockers in chronic heart failure--not as ELITE as expected!

As with many large-scale long-term outcome trials, more questions have been posed than answered regarding the potential role of angiotensin II receptor blockers as first-line agents in chronic heart failure. Given the present data, in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, ACE inhibitors must remain the treatment of choice, owing to the large body of data supporting their use in this clinical syndrome. However, ARBs seems a reasonable alternative for renin-angiotensin axis blockade in the significant number of heart failure patients who are genuinely intolerant of ACE inhibitors. The pendulum has now swung back in favour of ACE inhibition for chronic heart failure, although one can only await with great expectation the results of the ongoing trials comparing not only angiotensin II receptor blockers with ACE inhibitors but a combination of the two with regards tolerability and survival. Whether this potentially useful class of drugs will ultimately become the cornerstone of heart failure therapy in place of, or in addition to, ACE inhibitors is still in debate, but hopefully we should not have to wait too long for the definitive answers.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗